logo
Dalai Lama set to reveal succession plan, China watches

Dalai Lama set to reveal succession plan, China watches

Perth Now13 hours ago

The Dalai Lama is preparing to address a major three-day gathering of Buddhist religious figures ahead of his 90th birthday, as his followers wait for details about his succession in a move that could irk China.
Beijing views the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader who fled Tibet in 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule, as a separatist and says it will choose his successor.
The Dalai Lama has said his successor will be born outside China and urged his followers to reject anyone chosen by Beijing.
Tibetan Buddhists hold that enlightened monks are reborn to carry forward their spiritual legacy.
The 14th Dalai Lama will turn 90 on July 6 and has said he would consult senior monks and others at this time to share possible clues on where his successor, a boy or a girl, could be found following his death.
"The rest of my life I will dedicate for the benefit of others, as much as possible, as extensive as possible," the Dalai Lama told a gathering of his followers on Monday as they offered prayers for his long life.
"There will be some kind of a framework within which we can talk about the continuation of the institution of the Dalai Lamas," he said, without elaborating on the framework.
He has previously said he could possibly reincarnate in India, where he lives in exile near the northern Himalayan town of Dharamshala. He was identified as the reincarnation of his predecessor when he was two.
Dolma Tsering Teykhang, the deputy speaker of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile in Dharamshala, said it was important for the world to hear directly from the Dalai Lama on the issue because while China "tries to vilify him at every chance ... it is trying to frame rules and regulations on how to have the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama in their hand".
"China is trying to grab this institution ... for its political purpose," she said.
"We want the incarnation of the Dalai Lama to be born not only for the survival of Tibet as a distinct culture, religion and nation, but also for the well-being of the whole humanity."
Thupten Ngodup, Tibet's chief state oracle, said typically such discussions on the reincarnation do not take place when a monk is still alive but things are different now mainly because the "Chinese government is interfering".
The religious conference this week, being held for the first time since 2019, will be attended by more than 100 Tibetan Buddhist leaders and will feature a video statement from the Dalai Lama.
Hollywood star Richard Gere, a long-time follower of Tibetan Buddhism, will be among those attending, organisers have said.
The Dalai Lama will attend prayers called by the Tibetan government in exile on July 5 and participate in his birthday celebrations a day later, according to a schedule shared by the organisers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test
Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

Sydney Morning Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

In a move that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched a Federal Court lawsuit to force Chinese-linked entities to divest from a key rare earth miner. This isn't just a legal dispute; it's a test of whether Australia is willing to enforce its sovereignty in the face of economic intimidation and strategic competition. The test is one of enforcing set red lines or, in Seinfeld parlance, not just knowing how to make a reservation but knowing how to hold a reservation. That's why, if we're serious about holding onto the strategic advantages of our critical minerals sector and not just making short-term profits, this is a moment for resolve. At the heart of the matter is Northern Minerals, an Australian company developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in WA. It is an operation that could become one of the first non-Chinese sources of the critical minerals essential for advanced military systems, clean energy technologies and high-end electronics. Despite a clear directive from Chalmers last year for five Chinese-linked entities to divest their stakes in Northern Minerals, at least one, Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd, allegedly failed to comply. Now, in a move that's both unprecedented and essential, the Commonwealth is suing. Yes, we are dealing with companies but there really is no such thing as the Chinese private sector. As much as the Australian government will rightly make the case for this being about a commercial matter, this is all about the threat from the Chinese government and its objective of controlling critical minerals not just as economic leverage but as a strategic weapon. Loading It's deeply concerning that foreign investors have openly defied a directive from the Australian government. That would never be tolerated by Beijing. In China, foreign companies must abide by a highly restrictive, state-controlled investment environment or risk being expelled immediately. Yet in Australia, even after years of intensifying economic coercion and evidence of strategic interference, certain state-linked actors have come to believe that our foreign investment laws are optional or that the fear of retaliatory action by Beijing would result in Australian inaction. To the credit of the government, this lawsuit challenges that dangerous assumption head-on. Chalmers' statement was unequivocal: 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law.' What is at stake isn't just legal precedent – it's Australia's ability to protect the integrity of its critical minerals sector. These minerals – such as dysprosium, terbium and neodymium – are the foundational inputs for technologies ranging from F-35 fighter jets and hypersonic missiles to electric vehicles and offshore wind turbines.

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test
Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

The Age

time10 hours ago

  • The Age

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

In a move that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched a Federal Court lawsuit to force Chinese-linked entities to divest from a key rare earth miner. This isn't just a legal dispute; it's a test of whether Australia is willing to enforce its sovereignty in the face of economic intimidation and strategic competition. The test is one of enforcing set red lines or, in Seinfeld parlance, not just knowing how to make a reservation but knowing how to hold a reservation. That's why, if we're serious about holding onto the strategic advantages of our critical minerals sector and not just making short-term profits, this is a moment for resolve. At the heart of the matter is Northern Minerals, an Australian company developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in WA. It is an operation that could become one of the first non-Chinese sources of the critical minerals essential for advanced military systems, clean energy technologies and high-end electronics. Despite a clear directive from Chalmers last year for five Chinese-linked entities to divest their stakes in Northern Minerals, at least one, Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd, allegedly failed to comply. Now, in a move that's both unprecedented and essential, the Commonwealth is suing. Yes, we are dealing with companies but there really is no such thing as the Chinese private sector. As much as the Australian government will rightly make the case for this being about a commercial matter, this is all about the threat from the Chinese government and its objective of controlling critical minerals not just as economic leverage but as a strategic weapon. Loading It's deeply concerning that foreign investors have openly defied a directive from the Australian government. That would never be tolerated by Beijing. In China, foreign companies must abide by a highly restrictive, state-controlled investment environment or risk being expelled immediately. Yet in Australia, even after years of intensifying economic coercion and evidence of strategic interference, certain state-linked actors have come to believe that our foreign investment laws are optional or that the fear of retaliatory action by Beijing would result in Australian inaction. To the credit of the government, this lawsuit challenges that dangerous assumption head-on. Chalmers' statement was unequivocal: 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law.' What is at stake isn't just legal precedent – it's Australia's ability to protect the integrity of its critical minerals sector. These minerals – such as dysprosium, terbium and neodymium – are the foundational inputs for technologies ranging from F-35 fighter jets and hypersonic missiles to electric vehicles and offshore wind turbines.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store