logo
Taipan helicopters were 'immature and underperforming', inquiry into fatal crash hears

Taipan helicopters were 'immature and underperforming', inquiry into fatal crash hears

A former army aviation commander has told an inquiry into a fatal Taipan helicopter crash off Queensland's coast that the aircraft was "immature and underperforming".
Four airmen — Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class 2 Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs — died when the MRH-90 Taipan they were in ditched and crashed into the ocean near the Whitsundays during a night-time training exercise in July 2023.
On Wednesday, in the final week of the independent inquiry, Major General Stephen Jobson gave evidence about the fleet.
"The MRH-90 system was subject to constant reviews, groundings, air-worthiness artefacts, project slippages, loss flying hours, disruption and remediation," he said in a statement.
The Taipan wreckage is pulled from water off Queensland's coast.
(
ABC News
)
He said it was well-known among defence higher-ups that the aircraft was problematic.
A 2016 report by former Australian Defence Force chief Sir Angus Houston found the aircraft was causing capability issues and recommended the Taipan not be introduced into 6th aviation regiment — the regiment the four dead men belonged to — for special operations services.
This recommendation was not accepted, and the helicopter was introduced.
'Why was the system limping on?'
The helicopters were retired 15 months before their planned withdrawal date after the fatal crash in July 2023.
Counsel assisting, Colonel Jens Streit, asked Major General Jobson why the system wasn't retired sooner.
"Why was the system effectively limping on in a sub-optimal way, draining the resources of the command and its people?" he asked.
Major General Jobson said as the commanding officer of the 16th aviation brigade between 2016 and 2019 the brigade did everything it could to bring the helicopter into service in line with directions from defence higher-ups.
Divers during the search and rescue operation near Lindeman Island in the Whitsundays.
(
Supplied: ADF
)
The inquiry has previously heard the MRH-90 had a medium risk to defence members.
Major General Jobson described this as "an elevated risk of a catastrophic event occurring".
He said he couldn't be sure all aviators knew of this before the 2023 crash but would have expected them to be told.
He said he was uncomfortable with that level of risk.
"To be true, I was never comfortable. This is safety risk, and this is the safety and wellbeing of our personnel. I think if I was to become comfortable, I would become complacent," he said.
"Comfort was certainly not something present through really any of my commands there."
Acquisition should have been scrapped, inquiry told
Throughout the inquiry witnesses have given evidence about problems with the Taipan.
Last year, a member who oversaw the helicopters' acquisition told the inquiry the aircraft should have been retired about a decade before the fatal crash.
Lieutenant Colonel Gary Lamont said they should have been scrapped halfway through the acquisition process, and he felt the program needed to repeatedly fail "before there was the political will to retire" them.
Photo shows
A composite image of four fair-skinned men, three of whom are in military uniform.
Damning evidence, a radio shock jock, and accusations of witness intimidation have dominated hearings into a defence helicopter crash off the Queensland coast that killed four aviators.
Major General Jobson on Wednesday told the inquiry lessons had been learned from the Taipans acquisition process, and those mistakes had not been repeated for the rollout of the Blackhawk helicopter.
He said the Blackhawk helicopter was a stable and mature system, requiring much less maintenance hours, which was having a "real time" impact for maintainers on the ground.
"That difference … in workload, is what is borne out in our maintenance workforce," he said.
"And it's borne out in their families. When their soldier goes to work in an extremely demanding environment, working with a demanding, underperforming system, it's very difficult."
Major General Jobson also delivered an emotional address to the friends and families of the airmen who died, saying they had "suffered the saddest and the greatest of loss".
"We'll remember them with great honour and dignity and respect, always.
"This accident was a great tragedy. That night, we lost four good men.
"I was in command of the army aviation command. I had responsibility and accountability. I'll endeavour to do my very best today to deliver that accountability."
Hearings are expected to finish on Friday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia's 'guerilla rewilders' skirt rules and take conservation into own hands
Australia's 'guerilla rewilders' skirt rules and take conservation into own hands

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

Australia's 'guerilla rewilders' skirt rules and take conservation into own hands

John Wamsley is considered the grandfather of rewilding in Australia. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) Amid an extinction crisis, some amateur conservationists are taking matters into their own hands, releasing threatened animals on their properties. It's skirting rules and worrying scientists. But the guerilla rewilders say it's too late to wait for permission. It's the early 1980s and the grandfather of rewilding in Australia, John Wamsley, is rescuing native animals from extinction. One of those is the near-threatened brush-tailed bettong. Dr Wamsley obtained some of the small kangaroo-like marsupials and set them free on his property. According to Dr Wamsley, his sanctuary at Warrawong in the Adelaide Hills contained more than half the world's remaining population of these special bettongs at the time. Enclosed within the feral-proof fence, with no predators, they began to breed and breed and breed. Soon, there were simply too many to contain on the property. John Wamsley is considered the grandfather of rewilding in Australia. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) "I had to either let them destroy themselves or shoot 75 per cent of them," Dr Wamsley says. He decided to shoot them. "I probably shot half of the western brushtail bettongs left in the world that day. I had tears in my eyes doing it, but there was nothing I could do." This was the first chapter of Australia's rewilding story. But it was far from the last. Australia is now home to a number of unauthorised projects trying to repopulate the continent with endangered animals. It's called guerilla rewilding. And the issues that plagued Dr Wamsley continue to plague some of the attempts today. On a property two hours west of Melbourne, Roy Pails is on a similar mission to rewild his property. Over two years Mr Pails painstakingly built a feral-proof fence around 80 acres of land he owns, dubbing the area Sunset Sanctuary. He introduced native mammals such as bandicoots, bettongs and potoroos. But there's just one problem. Roy Pails created Sunset Sanctuary two hours west of Melbourne. ( ABC: Patrick Stone ) He didn't have any kind of approval to set the animals free. His animal licence says they need to be caged. "There's no rule saying you can't put them in a big cage," Mr Pails quips. "So I thought, well, I've done the right thing. I've got the animals in a big cage. They're free roaming and they're happy." But that's not how Victoria's environment department sees it. "They don't like what I've done now apparently," Mr Pails says. This is not the first time he has had a run-in with the department. In his previous life as a pet shop owner, Mr Pails pleaded guilty to a number of breaches of the terms of his wildlife licence. That included three counts of selling wildlife he didn't have a licence for and two counts of displaying protected wildlife at his shop. Now, Mr Pails has inadvertently joined an international movement of rogue rewilders who are sidestepping regulations and taking the extinction crisis into their own hands. Scientists warn that this practice, commonly referred to as guerilla or rogue rewilding, risks harming animals and does little for biodiversity. "I think that's the real danger … you create a sort of cowboy world where people can do whatever they like and you don't actually get good outcomes," says Richard Kingsford, an ecologist from UNSW, who runs one of the biggest official rewilding projects in Australia. It can result in the starvation and inbreeding of animals, but it also poses major risks for Australia's biosecurity, the professor says. As you enter Mr Pails's property, you're greeted by an enormous sign: "Welcome to Sunset Sanctuary. Wild lives matter." Mr Pails has a throng of supporters for what he's done at Sunset Sanctuary who donate money and offer support on his social media page. "We could protect so many more endangered animals if we can get rid of some of this paperwork," he says. Mr Pails says he knows of other rogue rewilders who are yet to be discovered by the department and are watching his case with trepidation. One of those individuals spoke to the ABC under the condition of anonymity, fearing repercussions from the department. "The ship for purists, 'only trained scientists can do this' … that ship has sailed. We just have to start acting rather than talking," they said. A history of guerilla rewilding Guerilla rewilding is the act of introducing native animals to an area without the permission of a regulatory body such as a state environment department. There have been examples of this overseas — there's the infamous "beaver bomber" of Belgium, lynxes being released into the Scottish Highlands, and the suspicious re-emergence of the UK's native wild boars. There's usually a libertarian or anti-red-tape element to the practice; people fed up with regulators' often risk-averse approach to restoring nature or, in this case, saving threatened and endangered species. John Wamsley is considered the grandfather of rewilding in Australia. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) One of the most famous Australian examples of this is conservationist John Wamsley's rewilding work in the 1980s. John Wamsley is considered the grandfather of rewilding in Australia. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) "I think there were about 40 government departments or something I had to get approval from, and that takes time … What I decided to do after that was just all the time was to build those sanctuaries without approval," Dr Wamsley says. John Wamsley is considered the grandfather of rewilding in Australia. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) "And that way it's a lot easier to gain forgiveness than it is to gain approval, especially if you can get the media onside." John Wamsley was a major innovator in the conservation space and a voice for threatened species when very few people seemed to care. He was a major inspiration to Mr Pails. "If he hadn't started, some of those animals wouldn't be here," Mr Pails says. And so he set about making his own sanctuary. In 2018, Mr Pails carefully studied how to construct a feral-proof fence via the internet and enlisted his family's help. By 2020, he started sourcing animals for his project. Mr Pails was able to obtain endangered Australian marsupials using a Victorian advanced wildlife licence, typically used to keep pets. While the animals were legally sourced, what Mr Pails did with them next exposes a major loophole for people looking to rewild their properties. He released the animals inside the feral-proof-fenced area, where they roam and breed freely. And while that may sound idyllic, it poses all kinds of headaches for regulators and scientists. The loophole is in question, as is the health and welfare of the animals in projects like Mr Pails's. Trading animals Rewilders trade animals such as bandicoots in what's been described as a bartering system between sanctuaries around Australia. They are sourced from conservation-minded sanctuaries that also have free-roaming endangered Australian marsupials inside feral-proofed fences. But it turns out those sanctuaries aren't always paying close attention to where their animals end up. The ABC approached some of the sanctuaries that supplied Mr Pails with animals. Potoroo Palace, based in Merimbula, claims to have not known the animals were for a personal rewilding project and said it was difficult to know a different state's licence conditions. This is despite the owner of the sanctuary, Alexandra Seddon, commenting on a Facebook post of Mr Pails, saying she was happy the animals were part of the "brilliant" project. Animals roam and breed inside feral-proof areas. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) Rewilders trade animals in a bartering system between sanctuaries. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) Softfoot Marsupial Sanctuary in South Australia, speaking more broadly, says it is typically satisfied with detailed images of a feral-proof fence and a licence number of the purchaser. It admits that mistakes have been made in the past: animals they sold were not looked after adequately and badly constructed fences allowed ferals into the sanctuaries where they were homed. "You do the best you can, and if it goes wrong you just regret it," owner Sandy Retallick said. These were legal transactions, but Mr Pails's licence required him to keep the animals caged. This is Wild Deserts, a feral-proof-fenced sanctuary in the desert of north-west New South Wales. It's home to some of Australia's most threatened desert mammals. And it's where rewilding becomes serious science. Professor Richard Kingsford is a rewilding expert. ( ABC: Bill Ormonde ) Today, Richard Kingsford is preparing to capture and release golden bandicoots. The professor has been in the rewilding space for decades and is considered an expert on the topic. Brush-tailed bettongs are a key species for the Wild Deserts project. ( ABC: Bill Ormonde ) He says it can take several years to get approval for rewilding projects — and he thinks that's appropriate. "I guess in the sort of grey area where people have sanctuaries and they're moving animals around, it just doesn't seem right that they're able to do that." Roy Pails works on the fence at Sunset Sanctuary. ( ABC: Patrick Stone ) Professor Kingsford has serious concerns about Mr Pails's sanctuary. "It sounds like it's not nearly a big enough area. Roy Pails won't be giving up on his dream of running his own rewilding project. ( ABC: Patrick Stone ) "They're all either feeding on vegetation or perhaps invertebrates, so there will be a lot of competition going on, and I'd be really worried about their long-term welfare and their survival. "I've got lots of questions about that, and they're not good questions." Professor Kingsford also has biosecurity concerns. "Are they the animals that live in that environment or have you got them from another part of Australia? Those are real challenges in terms of pest species." A group of scientists from the United Kingdom took to the journal Nature late last year, expressing their frustration at guerilla rewilders in the publication's reader correspondence. "They erode public trust in evidence-based conservation, they inflame polarised discourse around the already-sensitive issue of species reintroduction, and they undermine the leadership of public environmental agencies," they wrote. The group advocated for evidence-based, ecologically sustainable conservation. "Ultimately, deliberative collective action, although slower, will be more productive and is more likely to produce lasting conservation gains." What happens over time? It's night at Sunset Sanctuary and Mr Pails is preparing to give out food supplements to the animals in the sanctuary. He's currently experiencing drought and says he has no choice but to offer feed. Mr Pails has big concerns about overpopulation and the inbreeding of his animals. In this 80-acre space, he struggles to keep count of the animals, but believes he had hundreds at one point. These are the kinds of predicaments Professor Kingsford is concerned about. "If you get it wrong, you can do a lot of damage … It needs to be properly regulated as wildlife licensing should be." The longevity of these projects is another welfare concern. And troubles at a NSW sanctuary for the threatened parma wallaby is a stark demonstration. During the COVID-19 pandemic, businessman Peter Piggott, who famously saved the small wallaby from extinction, and his family took to the media asking for help with the translocated parma wallaby population that had been living at a reserve in Mount Wilson for half a century. According to his daughter, Heidi Piggott-Irwin, the animals had bred up to 300 individuals and the fence keeping them safe from predators had fallen into disrepair. "Dad's 88, so, it is just too much for him now," Mrs Piggott-Irwin says. Luckily the family has received help from WIRES and NSW National Parks, which are relocating some of the animals into official state government safe havens. "The breeding would not stop … It's best they go to sanctuaries that are managed by national parks," Mrs Piggott-Irwin says. Professor Kingsford says longevity is a major issue for private sanctuaries. "If you have a private sanctuary and things go pear-shaped for the animals or even personally and you can't afford to do it anymore, what happens?" 'Dragging the chain' Ash (not his real name), another rogue rewilder, says the Victorian government doesn't care about wildlife. "They're dragging the chain. "It's a department [Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action] made up of bureaucrats. That's all they are. They have no actual moral investment in what they're doing." Ash created his sanctuary in 2016 and like Mr Pails used his pet licence to obtain endangered Australian animals, releasing them inside a feral-proof fence encircling 56 hectares. Richard Kingsford says longevity is a major issue for private sanctuaries. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) It can be difficult to keep count of animal numbers in private sanctuaries. ( ABC: Che Chorley ) Ash has evaded the state environment department because the department does not conduct routine in-person checks on every licence holder. He is advocating for an entirely new licence that allows private individuals to rewild. "We can't just have cowboys doing stuff everywhere." Ash doesn't see himself or Mr Pails as one of those cowboys. "If Roy's story was taken to a public vote, everybody knows what the answer would be." Do you know more about this story? You can securely contact angelaheathcote@ Good intentions, bad consequences Mr Pails's advanced wildlife licence has been cancelled by the state environment department, placing him on a retention permit while it works out what to do about Sunset Sanctuary. "They're protecting them to extinction because you can't do nothing," he says. Roy Pails began building Sunset Sanctuary in 2018. ( ABC: Patrick Stone ) Chief conservation regulator Kate Gavens says the Victorian government did not approve Mr Pails's application due to significant concerns about animal welfare and the conservation value of the activities at the property. The regulator also says it has concerns about feeding regimes and the genetic health of the population, which makes them "unsuitable" for any breeding program. Richard Kingsford argues rewilding is a complex science that needs checks and balances. ( ABC: Bill Ormonde ) Professor Kingsford says he's got problems with any kind of rewilding project that is not scientifically rigorous. "My problem with some of this guerilla rewilding is it's just happening and people are throwing things in. No-one's actually looking at whether it was a success or failure." One of the many creatures released at the Wild Deserts sanctuary in north-west NSW. ( ABC: Bill Ormonde ) But he acknowledges the good intentions behind these acts. "It's probably a response by people wanting to do the right thing for the environment and not realising just how complicated it is. Professor Kingsford has concerns about private sanctuaries. ( ABC: Bill Ormonde ) "How do we actually get that right so that individuals can do the right thing, it doesn't cost them an arm and a leg, and they understand the long-term consequences?" Watch ABC TV's Landline at 12:30pm AEST on Sunday or stream anytime on ABC iview. Credits

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store