Hakeem Jeffries Mocks Joni Ernst's 'We're All Gonna Die' Gaffe By Pointing To GOP Cruelty As The Cause
House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) attempted to keep Sen. Joni Ernst's'we're all going to die' gaffe alive for at least one more day on Tuesday.
The Iowa Republican came under fire last week during a town hall when she addressed a constituent's concern that proposed Medicaid cuts would lead to deaths by callously responding, 'We all are going to die.'
Ernst's snarky response to a voter's concerns made for terrible optics, leading to much mockery and inspiring at least one person to run against her.
Some GOP pollsters predicted the gaffe would have consequences, and especially Ernst's bizarre follow-up video filmed in a graveyard where she told voters the tooth fairy isn't real.
On Tuesday, Jeffries took his own shot at Ernst.
'Yes, Joni, we know — the American people know — that at some point in their lives, they are going to pass away,' the House's leading Democrat said during a press briefing.
However, unlike Ernst, Jeffries offered specifics as to what might cause those deaths.
'The cause of death should not be Republican cruelty,' he said.
Jeffries then referenced Republicans' so-called Big Beautiful Bill. 'The cause of death should not be this disgusting abomination of a bill. The cause of death should not be the reckless Republican effort to rip away health care from millions of people, and rip food out of the mouths of starving children or veterans in the United States of America,' he said.
Jeffries: Yes Joni, the American people know that at some point in their lives, they are going to pass away. The cause of death should not be Republican cruelty pic.twitter.com/zcHdqoCfgW
— Acyn (@Acyn) June 3, 2025
Many people joined Jeffries in mocking Ernst.
BREAKING: Hakeem Jeffries slams Joni Ernst for belittling the American public.'Yes Joni, the American people know' everyone will die. Doesn't mean they have to die sooner. Spread this everywhere. pic.twitter.com/dysVgi7YQ3
— Aaron Parnas (@AaronParnas) June 3, 2025
pic.twitter.com/VFCVPdN21I
— VOTE 🇺🇸 🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊 (@CommittoVote) June 3, 2025
Cause of death: GOP — Grim Old Policies.
— Kumar Kesineni (@kesinenikumar) June 3, 2025
pic.twitter.com/4IysJmCREk
— Live On The Chat (@LiveOnTheChat) June 3, 2025
Cause of death in 🇺🇸: Republican cruelty@GOP@NRCC@NRSC = #GreedOverPeople Partyall to give already *OBSCENELY WEALTHY* people another obscene tax cut#GOPTaxScam 2.0 because the first #GOPTaxScam 1.0 $1.9T still didn't pay for itself and added to our already high deficit https://t.co/QU3DF41leV
— Amy Passas 🇺🇸👡🗳️🦅 (@AmyP5280) June 3, 2025
Refer to her as Death Panel Joni
— AZNLP79 (@Taxman9791) June 3, 2025
Gotta say, that's a good line. https://t.co/INx5hQKxae
— Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) June 3, 2025
GOP Senator Doubles Down On 'We All Are Going To Die' Comment In Wild Non-Apology
GOP Senator Ignores Insane Town Hall Gaffe — And Social Media Goes Off
GOP Senator Pooh-Poohs Fears On Medicaid Cuts: 'Well, We All Are Going To Die'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pharmacy benefit managers wield significant influence over patient care, costs
Multiple Republican-led states have sued to rescind a federal rule keeping the records of those who sought legal reproductive care private, while a federal judge in Texas is questioning the constitutionality of the federal HIPAA law in its entirety. (Photo by) As a physician, I have witnessed firsthand the inefficiencies in our health care system that make it harder for patients to access the care they need. One of these complexities patients now have to navigate is a growing industry of insurance middlemen known as pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), whose practices meddling in our local health system increase health care costs and block access to critical medications. PBMs work between health insurance companies and drug manufacturers to negotiate lower drug prices for the health plans they represent. Their function and influence in the health care industry have evolved significantly, and today, PBMs operate with very little oversight or transparency and their decisions are often based on what is most profitable for a health plan rather than what is best for a patient. PBMs wield significant influence over what treatments patients can access and how much they will be required to pay. These middlemen receive significant rebates and discounts from pharmaceutical manufacturers for the cost of medications and treatments after negotiations, but they don't pass those savings on to patients receiving the care, increasing what patients are required to pay out of pocket when they pick up their medication at the pharmacy counter. PBMs can also require only certain drugs be covered by a health plan, impose arbitrary rules around access to provider-prescribed medications, and PBM revenue is often directly linked to the list price of a medicine, so PBMs are incentivized to recommend treatments that would yield the most profit. The three largest PBMs – CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx – manage nearly 80% of prescription drug claims for 270 million people across the country. To make matters worse, PBMs are increasingly integrating and consolidating with other health care services, including distributors and pharmacies, making the influence PBMs hold over the health care system even larger. As these for-profit entities merge and collaborate, it's unclear if the system is actually functioning in the best interest of patients regarding quality and cost of care. PBMs have flown under the radar for far too long, but scrutiny of these middlemen and their impact on our health care system has rightfully grown in recent years, with many federal and state policymakers and regulators calling attention to the outsized role PBMs play in driving up health care costs. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) found that PBM integration with chain pharmacies and insurers has allowed them to dominate the broader health system and that PBMs have significant control over what drugs are available to patients and how much they are required to pay. The FTC even filed suit against the three of the nation's largest PBMs, citing their anticompetitive tactics as a barrier to health care access. In addition, numerous investigations found that PBMs often act in their own financial interest, including pushing patients toward drugs with higher out-of-pocket costs because it's more profitable for the PBM. Access to consistent treatments is necessary for Louisiana patients, particularly those living with chronic health conditions or hard-to-treat illnesses such as cancer. Each year, more than 25,000 Louisianans receive a new cancer diagnosis. Alleviating access and financial barriers to care is a necessary step to improving health outcomes for patients. It is overwhelmingly clear that we must take action to reform PBM practices to improve access to care for patients and stop letting middlemen meddle in our health system. There has never been a time when we can do more for patients as doctors, but at the same time, there has never been a time when we have more complexities in the health care systems impede healthcare access and affordability. This 'profit over patients' business model is putting critical care out of reach for many Louisiana patients. Time is overdue to curb harmful PBM practices.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Evers responds to Republicans' decision to back out of bipartisan budget negotiations
MADISON, Wis. (WLAX/WEUX) – Republicans in the Wisconsin State Legislature on Wednesday backed out of months' worth of bipartisan budget negotiations with Gov. Tony Evers toward reaching bipartisan compromise on the 2025-27 Biennial Budget. Despite having secured the governor's support for Republicans' half of the proposal, which included an income tax cut targeting Wisconsin's middle-class and working families and eliminating income taxes for certain retirees, Republican lawmakers are unable to reach consensus with their caucuses in order to support the governor's half of the proposal, which included meaningful increased investments in child care, K-12 schools, and the University of Wisconsin (UW) System. Republicans' decision to cease discussions comes after meetings between Gov. Evers and Republican leaders, as well as several staff-level meetings with leaders, have occurred over the span of several months and ramped up in recent weeks, including meetings every day this week. Gov. Evers Wednesday released the following statement responding to Republican leaders' decision: 'I am grateful to the legislators and legislative staff for their efforts over the past several weeks to reach a bipartisan agreement that would have delivered on key priorities for Wisconsinites. 'The concept of compromise is simple—everyone gets something they want, and no one gets everything they want. 'I told Republicans I'd support their half of the deal and their top tax priorities—even though they're very similar to bills I previously vetoed—because I believe that's how compromise is supposed to work, and I was ready to make that concession in order to get important things done for Wisconsin's kids. 'Unfortunately, Republicans couldn't agree to support the top priorities in my half of the deal, which included meaningful investments for K-12 schools, to continue Child Care Counts to help lower the cost of child care for working families, and to prevent further campus closures and layoffs at our UW System. So, today, Republicans decided not to move forward with any more bipartisan negotiations with me. 'We've spent months trying to have real, productive conversations with Republican lawmakers in hopes of finding compromise and passing a state budget that everyone could support—and that, most importantly, delivers for the people of Wisconsin. I am admittedly disappointed that Republican lawmakers aren't willing to reach consensus and common ground and have decided to move forward without bipartisan support instead. 'I will always try to do the right thing—and compromise in order to get good things done. Wisconsinites expect their elected officials to show up, act in good faith, and work together across the aisle to get things done—that's what I've been committed to doing in these bipartisan negotiations from the get-go, and that remains my commitment.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amidst Protections For The LGBTQ+ Community Being Erased, GOP Senators Want To Designate June As "Life Month"
Senators Todd Young (Ind.) and Ted Cruz (Texas) are leading Republican efforts to brand June as 'Life Month' during the already celebrated Pride Month, which honors the achievements and culture of the LGBTQ+ community. 'Every human life is worthy of protection, and it is especially incumbent upon Americans and lawmakers to protect the most vulnerable among us,' Cruz said in a statement on X, formerly Twitter. @SenTedCruz / Via According to Young's statement introducing the resolution, 'Life Month' is meant to 'recognize the dignity of human life, commends those who promote life, and encourages policymakers to continue providing resources to empower women and families to choose life.' Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral While the senators did have 11 other months they could designate as 'Life Month,' they said the resolution marks June as the anniversary of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in June 2022. Cruz and Young's pitch rings similar to Illinois Congresswoman Mary Miller's resolution, which suggested fully replacing 'Pride Month' with 'Family Month.' Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding 'By recognizing June as Family Month, we reject the lie of 'Pride' and instead honor God's timeless and perfect design,' Miller told right-wing news site The Daily Wire. Neither Cruz nor Young said they want to replace Pride Month, but their actions come at a time where the Trump administration has launched aggressive attacks against the LGBTQ+ community. Under his administration, President Donald Trump has erased or altered Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pages focused on the risks of suicide among LGBTQ children, school safety, and health disparities. He has also signed executive orders that declared it official U.S. policy that there are only two sexes, male and female, and banned people with gender dysphoria from military service. Earlier this week, Trump's Department of Education also formally declared June as 'Title IX Month.' On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, which honors the slain LGBTQ+ rights icon. This move reportedly was intentionally made during Pride Month. A total of 26 Republican senators co-sponsored the resolution, including Alabama's Tommy Tuberville and South Carolina's Lindsey Graham. 'If we are going to dedicate entire months to recognizing every group under the sun, the least we can do is dedicate June to protecting unborn babies,' Tuberville said on X. @SenTuberville / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade
