Search continues for missing woman as authorities follow up on reports of sightings near Wausau
Melissa Beson photo courtesy LDF Police Department
The authorities searching for Melissa Beson, 37, a missing member of the Lac du Flambea (LDF) Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians in Vilas County, who has been missing since March 17, say they have followed up on reports that Beson was seen around the city of Wausau as they continue searching the forest near where Beson was last seen.
On March 17, Beson was noticed walking on Village Road near Wayman Lane toward Hwy. 47 on the Lac du Flambeau Reservation.
Six days later, family members reported Beson missing on March 23.
Beson was last seen wearing red sweatpants, a black sleeveless shirt, and a gray sweatshirt. She is a Native American female, 5'7', with a medium build, brown hair, and brown eyes. She has numerous tattoos on her neck, arms, and legs.
Ground searches began on March 24 and 25, and aerial and underwater drones covered the Bear River in the vicinity where Beson was last seen.
Over 360 surveillance cameras positioned near tribal properties and monitored by full-time police employees had recorded footage reviewed without any evidence of Beson.
Subsequent ground searches were hampered by the heavy snowfall, but since most of the snow has melted, ground searches have resumed.
Lac du Flambeau Tribal Police Chief TJ Bill reports that on April 16, a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) plane provided aerial coverage, and he expects the DNR aircraft will again be available on Monday, April 21.
So far, Bill said, searchers have covered over 824 acres of forest.
'We are not saying she is out in the forest, but we need to make sure, and this is why we are doing the searches,' said Bill.
Recently police received reports that Beson was seen in the Wausau area.
Beson's mother, Winifred Ann Beson, 'Winnie,' told the Wisconsin Examiner on Tuesday, April 8, that her daughter might be with friends and she noted her daughter also likes to travel to other states, but in the past, Beson has always stayed in communication.
'Usually, she calls me if she needs money or is in trouble, but she hasn't called me,' she said.
'We have been getting numerous reports Melissa is in the Wausau area,' said Bill, 'but nothing has been substantiated. We have our officers travelling to Wausau and other areas.'
Beson's mother also said she is afraid Melissa might have been kidnapped by human traffickers. Native Americans have been targeted by human traffickers who prey on vulnerable populations where there is poverty and high drug use.
According to the Indian Law Resource Center, Native American women experience the highest rates of sexual assault of any group and are10 times more likely to experience domestic violence than white women. On some reservations, Native American women are murdered at a rate that is 10 times the national average.
The missing and murdered Indigenous women plus relatives (MMIW/R) movement has strived to raise awareness of the plight of Indigenous people in North America.
May 5 is Red Dress Day, a national day of awareness for MMIW/R.
Wisconsin has a MMIW/R Task Force that is part of the Department of Justice, but Wisconsin doesn't have a full time office as in Minnesota, which monitors MMIW/R cases, assists families, coordinates information for r law enforcement agencies and offers rewards for information.
Concerning the search for Beson, Bill said his office has one officer dedicated to the case who is also coordinating the searches with the help of the tribe's emergency management office.
'Our two detectives are spending the majority of their time on the case, working social media search warrants for cellular telephones (Verizon), Facebook, Snap Chat and Google, working with these entities on past history locations,' said Bill. 'If we're not handling current cases/calls coming into the PD, we are working this case non-stop.'
Bill said the public may be invited to help in the search for Beson, but he is concerned that volunteers stay safe in the large forest where it is easy to become disoriented and lost.
'These areas are dangerous to the novice, and we cannot afford the volunteers to work the swamp and bog areas,' he said. 'There is still some ground freeze, but areas of the swamps have thawed areas with deep mud. We got stuck at times [Thursday] in the swamps. When safe and weather conditions are good, we will ask for volunteer support.'
Anyone with any information regarding Beson's whereabouts should call the Lac du Flambeau Tribal Police Department at (715) 588-7717 or Vilas County Sheriff's Office at (715) 479-4441.
Bill wanted to acknowledge organizations that have helped with the search for Beson.
'We literally have thousands of hours into this investigation, which involves so many entities, not just ourselves,' said Bill.
Organizations that have helped include:
LDF Emergency Management, LDF Tribal Roads, LDF Tribal Wardens, LDF Natural Resources, LDF Victim Services, LDF Economic Support, LDF Prosecutor, Newbold Fire Search and Rescue, LDF Fire and EMS, Arbor Vitae Fire and EMS, Vilas County Sheriff's Office and Dispatch, Vilas County Sheriff's Office Jail, Vilas County IT Department, LDF IT Department, Manitowoc County Sheriff's Office, DNR, Wisconsin Emergency Management, Wausau Police Department, Mountain Bay Metro Police, Taylor County Sheriff's Office, Medford Police Department, Forest County Sheriff's Office, Crandon Police Department, Kenosha County Sheriff's Office, Atkins County Sheriff's Office – Minnesota, Milwaukee High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) agency, Vilas County Emergency Management, State of Wisconsin Department of Criminal Investigation, State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections Probation and Parole, Lake of the Torches Casino surveillance, Missing Murdered, Indigenous, plus Relatives (MMIW/R) Wisconsin Task Force, and Native American Drug and Gang Initiative (NADGI) Task Force.
The tribal police department also received free software from Intrepid Networks, a company whose platform allows police to monitor searchers via cell phone using GPS coordinates.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man gets appeal denied for Super Bowl Sunday murder
MESA COUNTY, Colo. (KREX) – A man, who was sentenced for murder following a dispute on Super Bowl Sunday in 2020, had his appeal denied by the Colorado Court of Appeals. Christopher Rizo was convicted to life in prison without parole for killing Thomas Huddleston outside Roosters Tavern on Feb. 2, 2020. He was also convicted for shooting Thomas' brother, Bill Huddleston. The incident started when Rizo sat next to the brothers, talking about the game. Rizo became furious after a joke made by another trucker – which the brothers laughed at. Rizo told the men they weren't 'from around here' and should be careful, according to court documents. Although a bartender tried to defuse the situation, the man continued, eventually calling her a 'f***ing b****' after he was asked to leave. When Thomas and Bill left Roosters following the game, Rizo pulled up to them and pointed a gun at Bill. Rizo ordered him to empty his pockets, before taking his phone. At the same time, Thomas returned to his truck to get his gun. Rizo yelled at Thomas to get out of the vehicle before Bill swung at him. Rizo shot Bill twice in the leg who then dropped to the knees. Bill heard a series of gunshots and saw Thomas fall to the ground, according to court documents. Rizo picked up Thomas' gun and fled the area. Thomas was declared dead at the scene; he was shot 12 times. A tourniquet was placed on Bill's leg, and he was sent to the hospital. Rizo contested his sentencing saying he was acting in self-defense, and he was not given due process, a fair trial or an impartial jury. In the appeal, Rizo, who did not testify in the original trial, argued the court failed to instruct the jury regarding self-defense or multiple assailants and it should not have admitted his behavior in the bar before the shooting as evidence. Because of this it led to cumulative error, Rizo contended The appeals court didn't find any such issues. It said the jury was instructed to use the model self-defense instruction. Rizo's conduct is also admissible evidence because it happened 'contemporaneously' with the shooting, court documents read. 'Specifically, Rizo's conduct provided relevant evidence of his motive for reappearing at the bar more than two hours after he was kicked out and of his mental state as he approached Thomas and Bill,' according to court documents. The appeals court also said it did not find any errors in the trial meaning no cumulative error occurred. Rizo also contended his life sentence without parole was unconstitutional as it's a cruel and unusual punishment. But the appeals court said it was not persuaded by his argument. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's pardons have shortchanged fraud victims of millions of dollars in restitution, lawyers say
In April, fresh off a presidential pardon that sprung him from prison, convicted fraudster Jason Galanis embarked on a new and audacious legal fight: an attempt to recover money that he had already paid back his victims. As part of his 2017 sentence, a federal judge ordered Galanis to pay more than $80 million in restitution for his various fraudulent schemes. But when President Donald Trump commuted Galanis' 189-month prison sentence in March as part of a flurry of pardons, Galanis' pardon warrant stipulated that "no further fines [and] restitution" should be collected. Days later, Galanis asked a federal judge to order the government to return some $2 million he had already paid, arguing that because the government had not yet released those funds to his victims, Galanis was entitled to them. MORE: Trump grants clemency to 2 of Hunter Biden's ex-associates "Put very simply, the funds were taken for a particular purpose," attorneys for Galanis wrote last month in a letter to the judge. "It is indisputable that that purpose no longer exists and thus ... the funds must be returned." U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, the judge overseeing Galanis' case, ruled Wednesday that he cannot recoup the $2 million. But some legal experts say Galanis' bid to retrieve those restitution funds reflects a broader symptom of what they say is Trump's unprecedented use of executive pardon powers. "Typically, the Department of Justice does not recommend a pardon in cases in which the candidate owes a significant amount of restitution ... so these pardons that wipe out large financial obligations are very unusual in their effect," former U.S. pardon attorney Liz Oyer, who is not involved in the case, told ABC News. By Oyer's count, the recipients of Trump's second-term clemency cumulatively owed more than $1 billion in restitution -- money intended for the victims of fraudulent schemes. Instead, according to Oyer, "victims are just out all of the money that they expected to be repaid as part of restitution, due to the pardons." "The victims are the losers," Oyer said. "Those are people who have a legal entitlement under federal law to be repaid their losses ... and the president is overriding that legal requirement ... to the great detriment of people who, in some cases, have lost their life savings." Those victims include a Native American tribe, an Arizona teachers' pension fund, and even a Republican governor. In Galanis' case, prosecutors wrote that the victims of his scheme include "pension funds held for the benefit of, among others, transit workers, longshoremen, housing authority workers, and city employees." The majority of the victims are shareholders in companies like Nikola, whose disgraced founder and chief executive, Trevor Milton, was sentenced to four years in prison for lying about the viability of his electric vehicle technology. Prosecutors had asked a federal judge to order Milton to pay more than $600 million in restitution, which they said was "the approximate amount of damages to investors in this case." Milton was pardoned before a judge had a chance to approve that figure, but experts said judges typically hew closely to prosecutors' calculations. Asked in a local news interview in March whether he would repay the victims of his fraudulent scheme, Milton said he "wouldn't pay them back," but offered an alternative: "I've got a few big ventures I'm working on right now, I'd definitely be open to helping those people in the future." MORE: Trump's flurry of pardons include some to campaign contributors "I'm not heartless," he added. "As a matter of fact, I feel for these people probably more than most." Pardon recipients who owed outstanding restitution at the time they were pardoned include Carlos Watson, the founder and CEO of Ozy Media who pleaded guilty to fraud charges and owed nearly $37 million in restitution, and Ross Ulbricht, the Silk Road founder serving life in prison for an online drug scheme, who was ordered to pay almost $184 million in restitution. Other pardon recipients include Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality television celebrities sentenced to more than seven years in prison for tax evasion and bank fraud, whose attorney suggested to TMZ that they may seek to recoup some of the $17 million in restitution that they'd already begun to pay. Former Las Vegas councilwoman Michele Fiore, who spent some $70,000 in donations to a slain police officer fund on personal expenses, including cosmetic surgery, was also pardoned. Trump issued Fiore's pardon before her sentencing, but experts say restitution generally aligns with the cost of the purported fraud scheme. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a fellow Republican, testified at trial that he had donated to Fiore's fund and was a victim of her fraud. Another victim, Harry Mohney, a strip club owner who donated $2,000 to the fund, said he was "distressed" to learn that Fiore would not have to pay restitution. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons "It certainly pisses me off to a great extent," Mohney told ABC News. "It's unfair that she never has to repay the people she got the money from under false pretenses, but there's nothing I can do about that." In a statement to ABC News, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said that Trump is "using his pardon power to offer people second chances at life." "The Founding Fathers gave the President the pardon power to provide mercy where the President alone deems it necessary," Fields said. Legal experts ABC News spoke with said it's unclear to what extent victims could seek to claim the restitution they're still owed following Trump's pardons. One option would be to file a civil lawsuit to reclaim damages, but that can be a lengthy and expensive proposition. "Restitution makes it so easy -- you don't have to pay a lawyer, you don't have to go to court," said Mark Osler, an expert on clemency at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. "You can see why that would be a victim's first choice for how to be made whole." Experts who spoke with ABC News struggled to cite past examples of fraudsters who were granted clemency prior to fulfilling their restitution obligations. Oyer said Trump's commutation of restitution payments is without precedent. MORE: Trump issues sweeping pardons and commutations for Jan. 6 rioters "This is not normal," Oyer said. The Justice Department, on its website, cautions fraud victims seeking restitution that "the chance of full recovery is very low," and that "while defendants may make partial payments toward the full restitution owed, it is rare that defendants are able to fully pay the entire restitution amount owed." Nevertheless, experts say that regardless of whether victims ever completely recoup their lost money, restitution obligations remain an important mechanism in the criminal justice system. "One of the purposes of restitution, even if it's never fully repaid, is to ensure that the perpetrator of the crime cannot enrich themselves first, while they still owe money to victims," Oyer explained. "And that's exactly what [Trump's] pardons facilitate happening." Trump's pardons have shortchanged fraud victims of millions of dollars in restitution, lawyers say originally appeared on
3 hours ago
Trump's pardons have shortchanged fraud victims of millions of dollars in restitution, lawyers say
In April, fresh off a presidential pardon that sprung him from prison, convicted fraudster Jason Galanis embarked on a new and audacious legal fight: an attempt to recover money that he had already paid back his victims. As part of his 2017 sentence, a federal judge ordered Galanis to pay more than $80 million in restitution for his various fraudulent schemes. But when President Donald Trump commuted Galanis' 189-month prison sentence in March as part of a flurry of pardons, Galanis' pardon warrant stipulated that "no further fines [and] restitution" should be collected. Days later, Galanis asked a federal judge to order the government to return some $2 million he had already paid, arguing that because the government had not yet released those funds to his victims, Galanis was entitled to them. "Put very simply, the funds were taken for a particular purpose," attorneys for Galanis wrote last month in a letter to the judge. "It is indisputable that that purpose no longer exists and thus ... the funds must be returned." U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, the judge overseeing Galanis' case, ruled Wednesday that he cannot recoup the $2 million. But some legal experts say Galanis' bid to retrieve those restitution funds reflects a broader symptom of what they say is Trump's unprecedented use of executive pardon powers. "Typically, the Department of Justice does not recommend a pardon in cases in which the candidate owes a significant amount of restitution ... so these pardons that wipe out large financial obligations are very unusual in their effect," former U.S. pardon attorney Liz Oyer, who is not involved in the case, told ABC News. By Oyer's count, the recipients of Trump's second-term clemency cumulatively owed more than $1 billion in restitution -- money intended for the victims of fraudulent schemes. Instead, according to Oyer, "victims are just out all of the money that they expected to be repaid as part of restitution, due to the pardons." "The victims are the losers," Oyer said. "Those are people who have a legal entitlement under federal law to be repaid their losses ... and the president is overriding that legal requirement ... to the great detriment of people who, in some cases, have lost their life savings." Those victims include a Native American tribe, an Arizona teachers' pension fund, and even a Republican governor. In Galanis' case, prosecutors wrote that the victims of his scheme include "pension funds held for the benefit of, among others, transit workers, longshoremen, housing authority workers, and city employees." The majority of the victims are shareholders in companies like Nikola, whose disgraced founder and chief executive, Trevor Milton, was sentenced to four years in prison for lying about the viability of his electric vehicle technology. Prosecutors had asked a federal judge to order Milton to pay more than $600 million in restitution, which they said was "the approximate amount of damages to investors in this case." Milton was pardoned before a judge had a chance to approve that figure, but experts said judges typically hew closely to prosecutors' calculations. Asked in a local news interview in March whether he would repay the victims of his fraudulent scheme, Milton said he "wouldn't pay them back," but offered an alternative: "I've got a few big ventures I'm working on right now, I'd definitely be open to helping those people in the future." "I'm not heartless," he added. "As a matter of fact, I feel for these people probably more than most." Pardon recipients who owed outstanding restitution at the time they were pardoned include Carlos Watson, the founder and CEO of Ozy Media who pleaded guilty to fraud charges and owed nearly $37 million in restitution, and Ross Ulbricht, the Silk Road founder serving life in prison for an online drug scheme, who was ordered to pay almost $184 million in restitution. Other pardon recipients include Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality television celebrities sentenced to more than seven years in prison for tax evasion and bank fraud, whose attorney suggested to TMZ that they may seek to recoup some of the $17 million in restitution that they'd already begun to pay. Former Las Vegas councilwoman Michele Fiore, who spent some $70,000 in donations to a slain police officer fund on personal expenses, including cosmetic surgery, was also pardoned. Trump issued Fiore's pardon before her sentencing, but experts say restitution generally aligns with the cost of the purported fraud scheme. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a fellow Republican, testified at trial that he had donated to Fiore's fund and was a victim of her fraud. Another victim, Harry Mohney, a strip club owner who donated $2,000 to the fund, said he was "distressed" to learn that Fiore would not have to pay restitution. "It certainly pisses me off to a great extent," Mohney told ABC News. "It's unfair that she never has to repay the people she got the money from under false pretenses, but there's nothing I can do about that." In a statement to ABC News, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said that Trump is "using his pardon power to offer people second chances at life." "The Founding Fathers gave the President the pardon power to provide mercy where the President alone deems it necessary," Fields said. Legal experts ABC News spoke with said it's unclear to what extent victims could seek to claim the restitution they're still owed following Trump's pardons. One option would be to file a civil lawsuit to reclaim damages, but that can be a lengthy and expensive proposition. "Restitution makes it so easy -- you don't have to pay a lawyer, you don't have to go to court," said Mark Osler, an expert on clemency at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. "You can see why that would be a victim's first choice for how to be made whole." Experts who spoke with ABC News struggled to cite past examples of fraudsters who were granted clemency prior to fulfilling their restitution obligations. Oyer said Trump's commutation of restitution payments is without precedent. "This is not normal," Oyer said. The Justice Department, on its website, cautions fraud victims seeking restitution that "the chance of full recovery is very low," and that "while defendants may make partial payments toward the full restitution owed, it is rare that defendants are able to fully pay the entire restitution amount owed." Nevertheless, experts say that regardless of whether victims ever completely recoup their lost money, restitution obligations remain an important mechanism in the criminal justice system. "One of the purposes of restitution, even if it's never fully repaid, is to ensure that the perpetrator of the crime cannot enrich themselves first, while they still owe money to victims," Oyer explained. "And that's exactly what [Trump's] pardons facilitate happening."
