logo
Starmer dismissing calls for inquiry into evil grooming gangs was ‘extraordinary failure of leadership', rages Badenoch

Starmer dismissing calls for inquiry into evil grooming gangs was ‘extraordinary failure of leadership', rages Badenoch

The Sun10 hours ago

GROOMING gang victims were failed by cops and public officials more bothered about not being considered racist.
A devastating report yesterday laid bare how the State was in 'denial' over the rape and abuse of white girls.
6
6
6
Dame Louise Casey found perpetrators got away with it because of fears about inflaming community tensions.
Ministers have ordered an inquiry into the widespread cover-up of the crimes, which disproportionately invol­ved Asian men, many of Pakistani heritage.
The findings have forced the PM to bow to pressure for a national inquiry and pledge a package of measures to combat predators.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper yesterday apologised to victims for the 'failure of our country's institutions through decades to prevent that harm and keep you safe'.
But Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused Sir Keir Starmer of 'an extraordinary failure of leadership' after originally dismissing calls for a full inquiry.
Across almost 200 pages, Baroness Louise Casey's report details how officials let down vulnerable victims on a devastating scale.
It highlights authorities' failure to collect - and even deliberately twist - data on the perpetrators' ethnicity.
The independent Whitehall troubleshooter says her rapid three-month audit into the scandal reveals that 'questions about ethnicity have been dodged for years'.
It uncovered many examples of the topic being avoided 'for fear of appearing racist'.
Baroness Casey says there have 'been enough convictions across the country of groups of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds to have warranted closer examination'.
'Cowardly PM gaslit survivors'
By Kemi Badenoch
LABOUR tried to gaslight the country and the survivors of rape gangs yesterday.
The party that said those of us calling for a national inquiry were 'dog-whistling' has U-turned.
Yet they now tell us this was what they wanted all along.
This Labour government needed a report to tell them to do something obvious to the rest of us.
It's shameful it took six months of pressure from the Conservatives.
This has been an extraordinary failure of leadership from the PM.
He was more worried about the views of his leftie lawyer mates than the brave survivors.
For decades they have called for their abusers, and those who covered it up, to face justice.
No one can be beyond scrutiny.
And it must be swift.
The PM's cowardice made them wait longer than necessary.
They must not wait another decade for justice.
But she added: 'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation. In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it.
'The system claims there is an overwhelming problem with White perpetrators when that can't be proved.'
A whole chapter is devoted to a culture of 'denial' by institutions - such as the police and councils - to confront the prevalence of Asian gangs.
She says: 'Blindness, ignorance, prejudice, defensiveness and even good but misdirected intentions, all play a part in a collective failure to properly deter and prosecute offenders or to protect children from harm.'
6
6
While two-thirds of perpetrators have no ethnicity recorded, police data in the few areas where it is collected show a 'disproportionate number of men from Asian ­ethnic backgrounds'.
Ms Cooper branded the findings 'deeply disturbing'.
She said she will accept a recommendation for all authorities to track ethnicity data.
Ministers will also take on the others, including mandatory rape charges for anyone having penetrative sex with an under-16.
The report also calls for an end to the harmful 'adultification' of teenage girls, especially those in care, who are too often judged as complicit rather than recognised as vulnerable children.
Baroness Casey said if we got this right years ago 'then I doubt we'd be in this place now'.
Child sexual exploitation should be treated with the same seriousness as major organised crime, she says.
Loopholes in taxi licensing will be closed as inconsistent local regulations have been exploited by some drivers, often placing kids at greater risk of sexual exploitation.
Grooming gang crackdown unveiled
BARONESS Casey's report sets out a series of recommendations, which the government has accepted in full
1. Strengthen the law: Tighten the law so that any adult who has sex with a child under the age of 16 is automatically charged with rape, removing current legal grey areas that allow abusers to avoid proper punishment.
2. Address Historical Failings: Through a national inquiry pursue justice for past cases and hold accountable those who failed to act.
3. Enhance Intelligence Gathering: Improve the collection and analysis of information to combat exploitation more effectively.
4. Improve Inter-Agency Collaboration: Foster stronger cooperation and information-sharing among agencies.
5. Mandatory Reporting: Require all services to share information when a child is at risk.
6. Introduce Unique Child Identifiers: Implement a system to ensure children are consistently and accurately identified across services.
7. Modernise Police Systems: Upgrade technology to enable seamless communication and prevent missed opportunities.
8. Treat Grooming Gangs as Serious Organised Crime: Employ the same robust strategies used to combat other forms of organised criminal activity.
9. Investigate Declining Reports: The Department for Education must examine why reports of child abuse are decreasing and take corrective action.
10. Understand the Underlying Drivers: Conduct in-depth research into the factors underpinning grooming gangs, including cultural and online influences.
11. Regulate the Taxi Industry: Prevent exploitation by restricting the use of 'out-of-area' taxi drivers.
12. Commit Government Resources: Ministers must allocate funding and ensure measurable progress is achieved.
Victims will be offered trauma counselling immediately and without legal delay, with their recovery treated as a priority.
Ms Cooper told MPs: 'This will mark the biggest programme of work ever pursued to root out the scourge of grooming gangs and child sexual exploitation. Those vile perpetrators who have grown used to the authorities looking the other way must have no place to hide.'
She also vowed to kick out asylum seekers who are found to have committed child sexual exploitation.
The Home Secretary will further strengthen the law so that any migrant convicted of sexual offences are denied refugee status.
The package will come alongside the national inquiry, expected to take around three years.
The National Crime Agency is also to reopen more than 800 closed grooming-gang cases.
Speaking from the G7 summit in Canada, Sir Keir said it will go 'wherever it needs to go' to uncover the truth.
After initially slapping down calls for a probe, he said he changed his mind 'on the basis' of Baroness Casey's findings.
The PM said: 'I've looked at her report, I've considered that material. I think she's right, and that's why it'll be a national inquiry. It'll be a statutory inquiry.'
6
But he was savaged by Ms Badenoch in a fiery Commons debate.
She blasted: 'The Prime Minister's handling of this scandal is an extraordinary failure of leadership.
'His judgment has once again been found wanting.
'Since he became Prime Minister, he and the Home Secretary dismissed calls for an inquiry because they did not want to cause a stir.
'They accused those of us demanding justice for the victims of this scandal as, and I quote, 'jumping on a far-right bandwagon', a claim the Prime Minister's official spokesman restated this weekend.
'Shameful.'
Baroness Casey yesterday admitted she initially opposed an inquiry but changed her mind after realising that no local council except Oldham was willing to take part.
She warned that children across Britain are still being sexually abused in gangs but officials cannot say how many.
She found there is 'no recent study' and 'incomplete data' across police, councils and the justice system.
In 2023, cops logged 700 group-based exploitation crimes but the report said the true figure is much higher.
Some 500,000 kids are likely to be sexually abused each year, yet most cases are never reported or recognised, it added.
Whitehall officials attempted to cover up the scandal in 2011, ex-No10 adviser Dominic Cummings claimed.
He said they tried to help Rotherham Council block The Times from exposing it.
By Harry Cole, Editor-at-Large
WELCOME aboard the 'far-right bandwagon' then, Prime Minister.
It's been six months since Sir Keir Starmer airily dismissed those calling for a moment of reckoning over the wave of Asian rape gangs systematically attacking white British girls under the noses of officials and cops.
Six months since the PM whipped his Labour MPs to vote down an inquiry into the biggest scandal and cover-up in modern British history, yet mysteriously missed the toxic Commons vote himself.
And six months since our technocratic lawyer leader outsourced the problem to someone else, instead of gripping the issue from the centre.
Now Dame Louise Casey, the go-to woman to write long reports on issues ministers find too sticky, has reached the blindingly obvious conclusion that this blot on our national history deserves more than just mournful words and brushing under the carpet.
As one weeping survivor, Elizabeth, told GB News: 'We're not far-right — we were just children who were abused.'
We will find out what exactly Casey has unearthed later today when her report is published — but even on the facts as known already, the case for an inquiry is already overwhelming.
Hundreds of men of Pakistani origin, often working in cabs or takeaways, luring and drugging young girls with drink and drugs and subjecting them to the most horrific ­sexual abuse.
A generation of victims then failed by simpleton social ­services across ­dozens of mostly Labour-run local authorities.
Officials more worried about so-called community cohesion than rape, police forces suspiciously close to so-called ­community leaders, turning a blind eye or even returning young women into the hands of the evil perpetrators.
Girls branded slags and prostitutes rather than child-abuse victims — all in the name of multicultural harmony and cultural enrichment.
If you weren't already angry about this before Elon Musk took the issue stratospheric last Christmas, then you were not paying attention.
The court transcripts alone, such as one case in Dewsbury where a victim was told, 'we're here to f*** all the white girls and f*** the Government', should have been enough to trigger a wider review.
But the Labour Government again and again appeared to close the doors and windows to the much-needed disinfection of sunlight — in what could well be a brand-destroying inquiry into years of failure by the party across swathes of northern Britain.
To his credit, Sir Keir had a strong track record in ­beginning to crack this scandal as Director of Public Prosecution, banging up the first batch of abusers.
Which makes the lawyer leader's obfuscation earlier this year even more baffling — and even more personally damaging.
Rightly or wrongly, it looked like a political leader — who in a past life knew the horrors and evil that was wrought across northern cities and towns — now in charge of a party at the centre of the ­scandal and doing his utmost to avoid ­scrutiny.
A regularly repeated tale from those who have worked closely with Starmer in both Opposition and government is that the lawyer leader often refuses to take advice from those who genuinely mean him well and want him to do the right thing. Instead, the ­barrister locks himself away from aides, reads his brief and makes his own decisions, thinking he knows best.
It's said to be a trait the PM sticks to, despite the fact he has been shown time and again to suffer from a political tin ear, preferring the comfort of reviews and legalese over instinct and leadership.
And then the inevitable U-turns come when it turns out the lawyer did not know best, after all.
The case for an inquiry was as obvious in ­January as it is now, but the PM was clearly unwilling to be seen to be bounced into it by Musk, Reform or the Tories.
He could have shown a ­genuine moment of strong leadership and got on the front foot, but yet again could not see the chance.
So, the rug has now been pulled from under him by the very 'audit' he clearly hoped would make this thorny issue go away.
And frankly, the PM has only himself to blame for looking like he's been dragged into this kicking and screaming — once again facing massive questions over his judgment, nous or even emotional intelligence.
Plenty in Government saw an inquiry as not just the right thing to do, but a political no-brainer, given their hand would be forced eventually.
But it's not too late for the PM to do the right thing now, as he sets up the probe.
No wishy-washy old human-rights lawyer mate from his past will do at the helm.
Instead, we need a proper judge with a track record of not ­caving in to politically ­correct trends.
No Labour council, official or local organiser spared from testimony.
No police force off-limits for a hauling over the coals.
And Covid Inquiry -style ­powers to have council emails, phone records and court papers turned over and ­published in full, however politically toxic for Labour.
This inquiry needs to be no-holds-barred and it must be televised.
The victims — and this ­country — deserve the whole truth about these horrors, ­however long it takes and ­however hard that is for the PM and his party.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The lucrative reason Prince Harry and Meghan wrecked any chance of a compromise with the Royal Family during 'Megxit', royal author claims
The lucrative reason Prince Harry and Meghan wrecked any chance of a compromise with the Royal Family during 'Megxit', royal author claims

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The lucrative reason Prince Harry and Meghan wrecked any chance of a compromise with the Royal Family during 'Megxit', royal author claims

Prince Harry and Meghan allegedly wrecked any chance of a compromise with the Royal Family during 'Megxit' because they wanted the 'freedom to make money and dip their toes into politics', a royal author has claimed. When Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals in 2020, hopes were high within the Firm that a compromise could be found. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex claimed their decision to 'step back as senior members' was to become more financially independent and to enjoy privacy from the prying eyes of the media. At the time it seemed plausible that these wishes could be fulfilled alongside an agreement to represent the Crown at a select number of events every year. However, according to royal author Valentine Low, any prospect of a soft 'Megxit' was scuppered by the Sussexes over finances. Writing in his tell-all book Courtiers, Low claims that Meghan's desire to 'earn money for herself' led the couple to abandon their duties entirely. Low revealed that during discussions about how to reach a happy middle ground - which could please the whole family - multiple scenarios were explored. These ranged from Harry and Meghan 'having a month a year to do their own thing' to 'spending most of their time privately but doing a select number of royal activities'. There was apparently a 'positive atmosphere' in the room, with each party believing a deal was close. The one caveat for the Sussexes continuing royal duties - however small or minor - was that they must stick to the 'normal rules about royal behaviour'. Crucially, that would mean Harry and Meghan could not 'act or take decisions in order to gain financially'. Low writes: 'Some suspected that in the end she wanted to make money. And the only way she was going to do that was by leaving her royal life behind and going back to America.' On top of this, the couple wanted the 'freedom to dip their toes into American politics', which would represent a major breach of royal protocol for a family with a long history of being staunchly apolitical. 'There was no way for the two sides to reach an agreement on that point. 'Crucially, it was the Queen who took the view that unless they were prepared to abide by the restrictions that applied to working members of the Royal Family, they could not be allowed to carry out official duties.' Indeed, since 'Megxit' the couple have 'dipped their toes' into US politics. During the 2020 US presidential race, the couple endorsed Joe Biden in all but name in a video address urging voters to 'reject hate speech', while Meghan labelled it the 'most important election of our lifetime'. The duke said at the time: 'This election I am not able to vote in the US. But many of you may not know that I haven't been able to vote in the UK my entire life. As we approach this November, it's vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity.' While Harry and Meghan did not name their favoured candidate, many viewers thought it 'obvious' they were backing Joe Biden over Donald Trump. As such, the Sussexes were accused of 'violating' the terms of their 'Megxit' deal. In September 2020, Trump said that he was 'no fan' of the duchess after the couple released their video. In the aftermath, Republicans and other critics called on the Royal Family to strip the couple of their titles, calling their interference 'inappropriate'. In last year's election, the couple stayed publicly neutral and instead urged Americans to go out and vote. The statement read: 'Voting is not just a right; it's a fundamental way to influence the fate of our communities. 'At The Archewell Foundation, we recognize that civic engagement, no matter one's political party, is at the heart of a more just and equitable world. 'By participating in initiatives like this, we aim to amplify the message that every voice matters.' Free from the shackles of royal protocol, Meghan appears more ambitious than ever. The former Suits actress reportedly hopes to become a billionaire by launching a career in media and as a entrepreneur. In March 2024, she soft-launched American Riviera Orchard before changing the company's name to As Ever. Announcing the venture, Meghan said: 'This new chapter is an extension of what has always been my love language, beautifully weaving together everything I cherish - food, gardening, entertaining, thoughtful living, and finding joy in the everyday.' The food products sold by the brand include an assortment of teas, edible flower sprinkles and a £20 jar of honey. Speaking on an episode of her podcast, Confessions Of A Female Founder, Meghan revealed she has decided to 'just pause' restocking her As Ever brand after previously selling out of products in less than an hour. Meghan has invested in a number of companies including the vegan coffee brand Clevr Blends and haircare line Highbrow Hippie. She has also invested in asset manager Ethic, which focuses on sustainable investments. Harry and Meghan signed a lucrative £18million deal with Spotify in 2020. However despite appearing to be a joint venture, the only show they produced was hosted by Meghan. In the series, titled Archetypes, Meghan interviewed various celebrities from Serena Williams to Paris Hilton. The deal was 'mutually ended' in June 2023 with sources claiming the music streaming giant did not see enough content to warrant the full payout. Earlier this year, the duchess launched her Confessions Of A Female Founder podcast, which saw her chat with female business owners from an array of successful companies. In a slight career change, Meghan also penned a children's book in 2021 titled The Bench. It follows the relationship of a father and son through the eyes of the mother and received mixed reviews from critics. In their television projects, Harry and Meghan have kept a much more united front, but even so, the couple appear to be working separately more often. Although an official figure was never announced, Harry and Meghan's deal with Netflix was allegedly worth around £80million, and the couple produced multiple shows. In 2022, the first Netflix series about the Sussexes was released aptly named Harry and Meghan. While it holds the record for the biggest debut for a Netflix documentary it received mixed reviews. The pair were also executive producers on the Polo sports documentary series which followed athletes at the US Open Polo Championship. In 2023, Meghan did not join Harry as an executive producer on the Heart Of Invictus series, although the duke and duchess did appear together in the show. Meghan's first major solo television project was her lifestyle programme called With Love, Meghan, which saw her team up with a number of famous guests to cook and create homeware products. Harry was almost entirely absent from the series, aside from a very brief cameo in the last episode. A source from the show has since reported that neither Harry nor their children will appear in the next season. Although The Mail On Sunday revealed in May that Harry is planning to launch his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months, he remains focused on his charity work. Harry is still involved heavily with the Invictus Games and the foundation which supports the tournament as well as the HALO Trust - a charity working to remove landmines which Princess Diana supported. The duke has also launched other projects in recent years, including an eco-travel campaign through his non-profit Travalyst, aimed at encouraging sustainable travel. And in November 2023, he became the global ambassador for Scotty's Little Soldiers - a charity that cares for children whose parents died while serving in the Armed Forces. Earlier this year, Harry had his most high profile fallout with a charity to date when he and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho resigned from their roles as patrons of Sentebale.

Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled
Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled

Reuters

time22 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled

LONDON, June 17 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump is hoping to secure American dominance in semiconductors over China. The president wants to bring production of chips back to the U.S., while courting allies. But success will take years and much more capital, while looming tariffs and unclear export rules add cost and confusion. When it comes to stimulating a key industry, the U.S. strategy is falling short. For an example of how to approach state-backed industrial planning, look to China. The People's Republic has already become a powerhouse in making solar panels and batteries for electric vehicles. A decade ago, President Xi Jinping launched his 'Made in China 2025' plan with the intention of reducing the country's reliance on foreign semiconductors from 85% to around 30%. The urgency was clear: chips had overtaken oil as China's largest import. Nearly a decade later, China has not met its goal, but local capacity is ramping up. Of the 51 wafer fabrication plants currently under construction worldwide, 23 are in China, according to an industry expert. It's a direct result of government funding: state-led investment in chips has probably exceeded $150 billion since 2014, according to, opens new tab the Economist Intelligence Unit. Little wonder that the U.S. is worrying about its dominance of advanced chips and artificial intelligence. While Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei says, opens new tab the Chinese tech giant's chips are still one generation behind U.S. rivals, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab CEO Jensen Huang has said Huawei's latest processors are approaching parity with the $3.5 trillion company's cutting-edge H200 graphics processors. These are central to training advanced AI models. Chinese players like DeepSeek are also showing signs of catching up. For the Trump administration, maintaining the U.S. lead starts with safeguarding demand for American products. That means ensuring key international customers in Europe and the Middle East don't drift toward Chinese suppliers. It's one reason Trump scrapped his predecessor Joe Biden's 'diffusion rule', which set country-specific quotas for advanced chips. The rule risked restricting previously friendly nations' access to semiconductors, pushing them into Huawei's arms. On the supply side, Trump wants to bring manufacturing back onshore. As most advanced chips are still made in Taiwan, any diversification of supply chains makes sense. The $52.7 billion Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act -- which includes, opens new tab $39 billion in subsidies for domestic chip manufacturing -- is a start, but progress is slow. The bill only releases funds as projects meet staged milestones. Trump has criticised the act, while also using it to force private companies to crank up investment stateside. Taiwanese giant TSMC ( opens new tab, for instance, committed to spending over $100 billion in the U.S. as it finalised state funding of $6.6 billion. GlobalFoundries (GFS.O), opens new tab this month pledged, opens new tab $16 billion alongside a $1.5 billion subsidy. Tariffs are another of Trump's favoured tools. He has asked the Commerce Department to investigate chip supply chains under Section 232, citing national security. But applying levies to semiconductors is fraught. For a start, the U.S. imports relatively few chips, but lots of products which contain them. Semiconductors worth less than $40 billion arrived in the country in 2024, while the U.S. imported electronic goods worth $486 billion, according to the International Trade Centre. Trying to impose tariffs on components inside devices like laptops and iPhones would be tricky. There's no easy way to tell where the chip was made once it's been packaged. Even if the Trump administration can successfully tilt the playing field towards domestic manufacturing, however, resilience still comes at a price. Proposed subsidies would make the cost of building semiconductor fabrication plants in the United States as competitive as in Asia, according to an industry analyst. But running those plants in a high-wage economy is another challenge: McKinsey & Company estimates operating costs are 35% higher in the U.S. than in Taiwan. Buyers of U.S.-made chips for cars or medical machines would have to absorb that premium or pass it on to customers. It also implies that semiconductor firms will need ongoing support in the form of tax breaks or operational subsidies as they shift supply chains. However, Trump has made hostile noises about the costs of the CHIPS Act. One key incentive, a 25% investment tax credit for every dollar chipmakers spend on capital expenditures, is set to expire unless renewed. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has hinted at possibly withholding further subsidies unless paired with broader tax legislation. The administration's stance on immigration, especially from China, is another impediment. Nvidia's Huang reckons around half of global AI researchers are Chinese. Meanwhile, nearly a third of chip companies' design engineers are in mainland China – the same proportion as in the United States, according to BCG data. The administration's policy on export controls also remains in flux. Though it has rolled back the 'diffusion rule', nothing has replaced it. Crafting bespoke export agreements with every partner like the United Arab Emirates will be time-consuming. Other potential measures, such as banning shipments of chip-making equipment made by the likes of ASML ( opens new tab to China, would require cooperation from key allies in Japan and the Netherlands. It would also require U.S. equipment makers like $114 billion Lam Research (LRCX.O), opens new tab to sacrifice revenue which could be as much as 30% of the total top line. Trump's chaotic and go-it-alone instincts on tariffs risk undermining the partnerships he will need to isolate China. China's chip campaign still falls short in several areas, including scale and efficiency. But Beijing's strategic clarity, persistence, and willingness to absorb long-term costs signal its serious intent. By contrast, Trump's U.S. chip revival is at best half-assembled. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

Woman ‘repeatedly punched in head before being pushed out of speeding van' as cops launch urgent hunt for driver
Woman ‘repeatedly punched in head before being pushed out of speeding van' as cops launch urgent hunt for driver

The Sun

time28 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Woman ‘repeatedly punched in head before being pushed out of speeding van' as cops launch urgent hunt for driver

A WOMAN was repeatedly punched in the head and pushed out of a moving car by a man, police said. Cops said is only by chance she was not seriously hurt or even killed. 1 The victim was a passenger in a small grey van with a man driving when the ordeal unfolded. Witnesses may have seen it moving "erratically and at high speeds". The woman was left with serious cuts, burns and grazes to her head, face and body. A passing motorist stopped to help her after she was shoved out of the van. The man drove off from the scene following the shocking assault, which happened between 9pm and 9.45pm on Saturday in Tunbridge Wells, Kent. Police said the woman and driver knew each other. Cops are asking drivers to check dashcams and locals to check their CCTV to help with the investigation. Detective Constable Tom Bale of Kent Police, who is investigating the assault, said: 'The victim was pushed from the vehicle at speed and it is only by chance she didn't suffer more serious or even fatal injuries. 'The suspect was driving a small grey van which may also have the appearance of a car. It approached Pembury Road from the direction of the High Street and Grove Hill Road and may have been seen moving erratically and at high speeds. 'The suspect currently remains at large and we are urging anyone who may have information and who has not yet spoken to the police to contact us straight away. 'We are also asking drivers to check for important footage they may have on dash cams, along with residents living on the route the vehicle took to check doorbell or CCTV cameras.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store