logo
Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

Newsweeka day ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has said Floridians have a right to hit protesters with their car if they need to "flee for your safety."
Ron DeSantis speaks during a news conference in Miami, Tuesday, May 9, 2023.
Ron DeSantis speaks during a news conference in Miami, Tuesday, May 9, 2023.
Rebecca Blackwell, File/AP Photo
DeSantis was speaking on The Rubin Report on Wednesday, when he said: "We also have a policy that if you're driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle, and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety.
"And so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that's their fault for impinging on you. You don't have to just sit there and be a sitting duck and let the mob grab you out of your car and drag you through the streets."
Gov. Ron DeSantis says that Floridians are ALLOWED to drive over protesters in the street, if they feel like their life is in danger..
LOVE this! 👏👏 pic.twitter.com/xUDVMfM5g4 — American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) June 12, 2025
Civil rights activist Heather Heyer was killed after James Alex Fields Jr., drove his car into counter protesters at the Unite the Right Rally in 2017. Fields argued self-defense but was found guilty of first degree murder.
DeSantis' comments come ahead of the 'No Kings' protests which are planned for June 14. Protest organizers have said the demonstrations are non-violent, and are providing de-escalation training to people taking part.
This is a developing story and will be updated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Gets Ready To Go on a Date—Then Discovers Neighbor's Revenge
Man Gets Ready To Go on a Date—Then Discovers Neighbor's Revenge

Newsweek

time30 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Man Gets Ready To Go on a Date—Then Discovers Neighbor's Revenge

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A home resident's tale of sweet revenge against an inconsiderate neighbor has gone viral on Reddit, drawing hundreds of reactions from readers who have dealt with their own difficult neighbors. The post, titled "My neighbor blocked my driveway one too many times, so I had his car towed during his Tinder date," was shared by u/VryCuteAjaBharDuChut in the r/revengestories subreddit. The post has garnered more than 32,000 upvotes and over 1,200 comments since it was uploaded about a month ago. "For context: my neighbor is the type of guy who thinks rules are for other people. An arrogant 6 feet something hunk, in his mid 20s," the poster wrote. "He constantly parks in front of my driveway, fully blocking it, despite multiple warnings, notes, and in-person 'hey man, seriously, stop' conversations. His excuse? 'I'm just here for a bit.' A bit apparently means an eternity … 3-5 hours every d*** time." After repeated run-ins, the situation reached a boiling point. "Last week, I come home and surprise. He's there again. Blocking my driveway with his crusty silver sedan. I see him through his window getting ready, cologne and everything. He's going out. I decide, tonight's the night," the poster said. Rather than leaving another note or having yet another conversation, the frustrated resident took decisive action. "So I do what I should've done weeks ago. I call a tow truck. No warnings or notes. Got it towed straight up." Stock image: A man stands outside a car with his arms stretched forwards, while another pokes his head out the driver's window of a vehicle. Stock image: A man stands outside a car with his arms stretched forwards, while another pokes his head out the driver's window of a vehicle. Getty While the story has been widely applauded online, experts caution against escalating neighbor disputes. In a recent survey conducted by Talker Research on behalf of Newsweek, 1,000 U.S. adults were asked about their most intense or unusual conflicts with neighbors. The results highlighted a range of issues, from noise complaints and lawn battles to property damage, boundary disputes, and unwanted intrusions. Gregg Ward, executive director at The Center for Respectful Leadership, told Newsweek that retaliating against neighbors can backfire. "If your neighbor doesn't behave in ways you want them to, the last thing you should do is get into a tit-for-tat battle with them," Ward said. "This happens all too often, and it never ends well. In short, don't respond to disrespect with more disrespect—it will just make everything worse." 'Most Hollywood Revenge Story Ever' About 45 minutes after the Reddit user called the tow-truck service, as the poster sat on the porch enjoying a beer, a young woman arrived, clearly dressed for a date. She knocked on the neighbor's door, and, when he came out smiling, he quickly realized his car was missing. "She's confused. He's flipping out. He starts looking around like someone robbed him," the poster wrote. At that point, the resident informed them both: "I casually say, 'If you're looking for your car, it got towed. You were blocking my driveway. Again.'" The woman's reaction sealed the moment. "He tries to argue but the girl just says, 'Wait, you parked in front of his driveway?' He tries to explain, but she just says, 'Wow. That's trash,' and walks off," according to the post. The Reddit user said the neighbor has since changed his behavior. "I haven't seen him block my driveway since, and he never called another girl home after that. His confidence took a major hit," the poster added. Reddit users overwhelmingly supported the original poster's actions, with many praising the patience shown before finally calling the tow truck. U/_Roxxs_ said, "That's hilarious," and u/dj_is_here said it was the "Most Hollywood revenge story ever." TORONTOTOLANGLEY simply wrote, "You're my hero," while u/Intrepid_Lack7340 posted: "He blocked you, you blocked him. Fair is fair." Schtweetz commented: "You did a favor to the date too. She didn't have to find out what he's like later in the game." Newsweek has contacted the original poster for comment via the Reddit messaging system. Do you have a home-related video or story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.

If Clarence Thomas Resigns Under Trump, Here's Who Might Replace Him
If Clarence Thomas Resigns Under Trump, Here's Who Might Replace Him

Newsweek

time41 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

If Clarence Thomas Resigns Under Trump, Here's Who Might Replace Him

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. There is speculation within the legal community over whether Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will retire during Donald Trump's presidency, given he is currently 76 years old. Justice Samuel Alito is 75 years old, sparking similar speculation about his future as well. According to Supreme Court scholar Adam Feldman, there are six judges in the U.S. who are likely to be considered by President Trump if either justice resigns. Feldman told Newsweek that the possibility of either judge retiring is "unlikely but possible." "Neither are terribly old by Supreme Court standards, both are in their mid-70s, but Thomas will be 80 around the end of Trump's term. Neither have major health issues, at least those that have been made public. If they have confidence that the next president will be a Republican then they have incentive to stay," said Feldman. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, left, and Clarence Thomas look on during the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, January, 20, 2025. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, left, and Clarence Thomas look on during the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, January, 20, 2025. Chip Somodevilla/Pool Photo via AP Why It Matters President Trump has already picked three out of the nine justices on the Supreme Court. If he had the opportunity to pick two more justices, his presidency and worldview could have a lasting impact on the future of US law long beyond the next three and a half years. However, Justice Barrett has not always ruled in the Trump administration's favor recently, showing that appointing a judge does not guarantee their support from the bench. What To Know Supreme Court seats are lifetime and supposedly apolitical appointments, but justices occasionally retire during the term of a president who aligns with them politically in order to ensure their legacy is retained by the court. For example, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg declined to retire during the Obama administration before passing away under Trump, meaning her seat is now occupied by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who is significantly more conservative in her interpretation of the law than Ginsburg. "Ginsburg's light on the risk of waiting too long to step down. Since both Thomas and Alito have a lot of sway on the direction of the Court's outcomes, I don't foresee either stepping down unless there is another reason, [for example] health or fear that a Democrat will win the next election, that motivates them," Feldman told Newsweek. According to Feldman, the six judges who are likely to be tapped for consideration are judges Patrick J. Bumatay, Aileen M. Cannon, James C. Ho, Andrew S. Oldham, Neomi J. Rao and Amul R. Thapar. Trump has said in the past that he wants to appoint "more justices like the ones I already picked," so Feldman, creator of the Empirical SCOTUS blog, analyzed decisions and written statements made by the prospective judges and compared them to Trump's picks: Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. He also compared their decisions to those made by Thomas and Alito, examining the language and citations used in their work to determine how it would appeal to the president. According to Feldman's research, Judge Andrew Oldman, who currently is in a Trump-appointed role for the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, is the most similar to Trump's picks, whereas Judge James Ho is the most similar to Alito and Thomas. Despite ruling in the President's favor several times, including blocking lawmakers from reading the Jack Smith report into Trump's handling of classified documents, and currently being the presiding judge in the case surrounding the second assassination attempt on the president in 2024, Cannon appears to be the furthest away from the Trump appointees and Alito and Thomas. She is one of the most frequent users of "hot-button" words in her writing, including "tyranny," "culture," "elite," and "freedom." These are terms Feldman has singled out as appealing to Trump. However, she does not possess the same qualities as other potential candidates, such as clerking for a Supreme Court judge. Feldman told Newsweek: "My best guess is that Trump would appoint her to a federal appellate court first and nominate another judge (Ho for instance) if there is a SCOTUS vacancy soon although the Cannon likelihood goes up if there is a vacancy towards the end of Trump's term." According to Feldman's metrics, the most likely pick to replace Thomas is Ho, and the most likely pick to replace Alito is Oldham. U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts attend inauguration ceremonies in the... U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts attend inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. More Chip Somodevilla/Getty images picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images What People Are Saying Attorney Bradley P. Moss told Newsweek in a previous article: "I see absolutely no reason to believe Clarence Thomas will step away from the bench until either he physically is unable to continue with his work, or he is assured that a handpicked successor will be confirmed without incident." Adam Feldman told Newsweek: "With the recent news that Trump is unhappy with Barrett in particular I think he is likely to pick someone who has a more pronounced judicial track record (Barrett's was minimal) that conveys a more conservative bent. That is why my sense is that Judge Ho is the most likely nominee if there is a vacancy. He is about as much a surefire bet to fit the Alito/Thomas paradigm and he clerked for Thomas which adds to his pedigree." Adam Feldman wrote in his Legalytics Substack: "My sense still is that Judge Ho is the obvious pick if Justice Thomas is the next justice to step down and Judge Oldham likely gets the nod if Justice Alito is the first to leave SCOTUS as recent history has shown that presidents may look first to a justice's former clerk to as a replacement if possible." What Happens Next Neither Alito nor Thomas have said they are thinking about retiring. Early in his career, Thomas threatened to quit over his salary. However, that has now been raised. Were either justice to pass away or retire, the president will pick a replacement justice who will be voted on by the Senate.

US Issues Advice To Americans As Israel-Iran Tensions Rise
US Issues Advice To Americans As Israel-Iran Tensions Rise

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

US Issues Advice To Americans As Israel-Iran Tensions Rise

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Department of State is urging all Americans to exercise extreme caution in light of the ongoing Israel-Iran tensions. American citizens in Israel are strongly advised to limit internal travel and to maintain a high level of situational awareness. Iran remains under a longstanding "Level 4: Do Not Travel" advisory due to risks of terrorism, kidnapping, wrongful detention, and civil unrest. In light of current escalations, U.S. government employees across the region, including in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq, may be authorized to depart or evacuate depending on evolving security threats. All travelers should expect sudden disruptions, heightened security presence, and rapidly changing conditions. Americans abroad are encouraged to enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrolment Program (STEP) to receive real-time updates from the nearest U.S. Embassy. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, the State Department said: "Due to high tensions in the Middle East, the security environment remains complex and can change quickly. We remind U.S. citizens in Israel and the broader region of the continued need for caution and encourage them to monitor the news for breaking developments." File photo: The State Department seal is seen on the briefing room lectern at the State Department in Washington. File photo: The State Department seal is seen on the briefing room lectern at the State Department in Washington. Mandel Ngan/Pool via AP This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store