logo
The shared history of California & Mexico, why anti-ICE protestors were waving Mexican flags

The shared history of California & Mexico, why anti-ICE protestors were waving Mexican flags

Indian Express5 hours ago

Amid the Trump administration's sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration, which critics say specifically targets Hispanics, cities across the United States have witnessed massive anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests this month.
These protests began on June 6 in Los Angeles after military-style ICE raids resulted in the detention of 44 people, mostly of Mexican heritage. California, especially the city of Los Angeles, has been the epicentre of these protests.
This is in no small part due to almost 40% of Californians being Hispanic, and more than 30% tracing their ancestry to Mexico, with whom the state shares a border as well as deep historic, cultural, and economic ties. Here's a brief history.
The Spanish colonisation of the New World began in the late 15th century and continued till the end of the 19th century. At its peak, Spanish territory in the Americas touched Alaska in the north and extended to Tierra del Fuego in the southern tip of South America.
The southern tip of the Baja peninsula (today the Mexican states of Baja California and Baja California Sur) was spotted by Conquistadors in the 16th century. They erroneously likened their 'discovery' to the mythical island of Californias mentioned in the Spanish novel Las Sergas de Esplandián (The Adventures of Esplandián) written in 1510 by Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo.
Upon venturing inward, the conquistadors realised that the region was not an island as previously imagined. The peninsular region came to be called Baja California, while the territories to its north, which today make up the American state of California, were called Alta California.
Another two centuries would pass before the Spanish colonial project, driven by the edict 'gold, God and glory', would claim the Californias for the empire. There are a few different reasons for this.
* One, Spaniards were kept busy elsewhere. The Viceroyalty of New Spain was formally established in 1535 with its capital in Mexico City, and would swell to include territories ranging from the Philippines to the Caribbean and northern parts of South America.
* Two, the discovery of gold and silver deposits in Mexico, central America and South America, as well as the lack of (known) deposits in California, discouraged conquistadors from making the difficult, often deadly journey.
Spanish interest in the region picked up when Russia looked to settle in the Californias in the mid-18th century. While Jesuit missionaries had been proselytising in the region for decades at that point, King Charles of Spain formally ordered the colonisation of California in 1761.
Junípero Serra, regarded today as the patron saint of California, would go on to establish 21 missions which 'developed' the region. The Californian economy would be defined by agriculture and livestock-rearing.
But colonisation was also devastating for Native Americans, who had been inhabiting the region for many millennia. 'Mission Indians' were forcefully converted to Catholicism and forced to work as farm labour. Demographer Sherburne F Cook estimates that the population of indigenous Californians fell from 310,000 in 1769 to only 25,000 in 1910. (The Population of the California Indians 1769-1970, Sherburne F. Cook, 1976)
The Spanish empire saw a steep decline in the 19th century. As Napoleon Bonaparte pummelled Spain in Europe, the Bourbon monarchy struggled to suppress revolutionary tendencies across its colonies.
Growing resentment over Spanish rule, stemming from rampant economic exploitation and social inequalities, set the stage for the Mexican War of Independence in 1810. Mexico would formally secede from Spain in 1821. But the new republic was far from politically stable, and witnessed 40 different governments before 1848.
The undivided Californias province had been split into two — Alta California and Baja California — in 1804. While the new Mexican republic retained this division, the territories immediately witnessed a host of changes.
For one, all restrictions on trade with foreigners were eased, allowing the Californian settlers or 'Californios', to trade in commodities, finished goods and luxuries. Trade with Anglo-Americans helped initiate the economic detachment of Alta California from central Mexico, as ships transported Californian hides and tallow in exchange for English and American manufactured goods. The Mexican government struggled to assert control over these territories, which grew closer to the US economically.
Foreigners in the Californian territories were also given land-holding rights after converting to Catholicism, spurring immigration by hordes of US citizens between the 1820s and the 1840s. As American interest in the Californias surged, the US and Mexico signed the Treaty of Limits in 1828, recognising the borders between the two nations according to the 1819 Adams-Onis Treaty between Spain and the US (in which the Spanish Crown ceded Florida to the US).
This treaty was further amended in 1836 when the Republic of Texas became independent from Mexico.
The concept of 'Manifest Destiny', a belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable, drove the United States' westward expansion in the 19th century. And it was this belief, along with ever-growing Anglo-Saxon connections to erstwhile Spanish territories in the American West, that set the stage for the Mexican-American War of 1846-48.
In 1845, Texas became the 28th state of the US, prompting Mexico to sever all ties with Washington. But US President James K Polk wanted more territory, including Alta California and present-day New Mexico. When his offer to purchase these territories was rebuffed, he moved US troops into Texas and Mexican territory, and claimed all land between Nueces and the Rio Grande rivers in January 1846.
Mexico retaliated in April, causing 16 casualties among the American troops, triggering a wave of nationalism in the US, and a declaration of war by the Congress. The 16-month-long war saw the US military leverage strategy, brutality and luck, eventually capturing Mexico City. When the war ended in 1848, the US acquired present-day California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming from Mexico for only $15 million.
That said, even before the war had completely ended, the discovery of gold in 1848 at Sutter's Mill in Sierra Nevada, California, had set off what was known as the California Gold Rush. More than 300,000 people moved to California over the next four years, hoping to, quite literally, strike gold. California was officially given statehood by the US in 1850.
Seeing the Mexican flag waved during anti-ICE protests was an affront for many, a rejection of the United States and American identity. But ask the protestors and they will tell you a different story.
'It's about refusing to be erased,' Mexican journalist Enrique Acevedo wrote for The Washington Post. '…Mexican identity isn't foreign [in Los Angeles]. It's foundational. This was Mexico once and remains part of the memory, culture, street names, food and families who never crossed a border because the border crossed them. In that context, the Mexican flag isn't necessarily a symbol of separation or rejection. Sometimes, it's a claim: We are both. We are Mexican and American, not divided but layered…,' he wrote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to lunch with Pakistan army chief Munir, PM Modi rejects invitation, Pakistan is worried but good news for India due to...
Trump to lunch with Pakistan army chief Munir, PM Modi rejects invitation, Pakistan is worried but good news for India due to...

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

Trump to lunch with Pakistan army chief Munir, PM Modi rejects invitation, Pakistan is worried but good news for India due to...

(File) Trump-Munir meeting: In a major development that could impact the India-US relations, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir will meet US President Donald Trump for lunch at the White House on Wednesday, where Islamabad claims talks will held on the Kashmir issue and Pakistan's conflict with India, along with other pressing matters, including the raging Israel-Iran war. Munir's US trip as Trump admin readies to attack Iran Munir's meeting with Trump comes at a time when the US is mulling to get involved in Israel-Iran war, and send fighter jets and American troops to aid Israel in taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, especially the hardened Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is built deep underground and cannot be damaged by conventional bunker buster bombs. In a public address in Washington DC, Asim Munir had declared Pakistan's 'clear and strong' support for Iran in its war with Israel while also backing US efforts to de-escalate the situation. While US readies to attack Iran, Asim Munir as well as the Pakistan's civilian government led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has announced strong support for Tehran in its war against the Jewish state, a situation that presents a major conundrum for Islamabad to balance its ties with Washington. Its is believed that US could use Pakistani airbases to launch attacks against Iran if it decides to get involved in the Israel-Iran war, and Trump's meeting with Munir could be meant to sway the Pakistani army chief to change Islamabad's stance on Tehran. Experts say that if America jumps into the war against Iran, then Pakistan's airbase can be used and that is why Trump is giving so much importance to Munir. The Pakistanis themselves are not able to digest the fact that the US President is meeting an Army Chief. Pakistani journalist and analyst Waqas wrote on X, 'It is surprising that Trump is going to have lunch with the Army Chief of Pakistan. That too when his counterpart is the PM of Pakistan. Meeting a low-level government official is out of protocol but it shows that Trump needs General Munir. Trump is going to talk about Pakistan's support in the war with Iran.' Geopolitical have pointed out the significance of Asim Munir being invited to a meeting with the US President at the White House, as it not the norm to host foreign Army chief in the Oval Office. 'Senior US officials often engage with Pakistani Army Chiefs, but rarely is one hosted at the White House by the US President. One of many reasons why Munir's scheduled meeting with Trump is so significant, especially as his administration considers its options regarding the war in Iran,' South Asia analyst Michael Kugelman wrote on X. Kugelman noted that the Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't only be seen through the lens of the Israel-Iran war as the there's been US-Pakistan engagement on critical minerals, crypto, and Counter Terrorism. 'Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these. And Munir is empowered to talk about it all. Also, Kashmir,' he added. According to Derek J. Grossman, National Security and Indo-Pacific analyst, it was time for India to 'speak up'. 'India, time to speak up! Trump this week is scheduled to meet at the White House with Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir, who New Delhi believes is the terrorist mastermind behind attacks on Indians.' Good news for India? While Asim Munir being hosted at the White House is certainly a setback for India's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan on the global stage, experts note that there may be silver lining for New Delhi as Iran would likely move closer to India if the Pakistan army chief is coerced into changing Islamabad's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. 'Trump will meet Asim Munir. There is no doubt he (Trump) will seek cooperation from Pakistan against Iran, which includes providing Pakistani airbases to the US Army. This is a tempting offer for the Pakistani army, but Tehran could move closer to India if Islamabad allows US to attack it from its soil,' West Asia affairs expert Kabir Taneja wrote on X. PM Modi declined Trump invite Notably, it has also come to the fore that Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday rejected an offer to visit the US after attending the G7 summit in Canada. According to details, Trump, in a 35-minute telephone conversation with Modi, had requested the Indian Prime Minister to visit the US after departing from Canada, presumably to arrange a meeting with Pakistan's de-facto ruler, Asim Munir and the Indian PM, with the US President acting as mediator. However, PM Modi turned down the offer, reinforcing India's stance of not accepting any third-party mediation to resolve its issues with Pakistan 'Earlier today, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit, which took place in Canada. During the conversation, which lasted over half an hour, PM Modi briefed the US President about India's Operation Sindoor and firmly conveyed the message that India has never accepted and will never accept mediation on the issues with Pakistan,' Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri informed..

'I may do it, I may not; No one knows what I'll do': Trump on striking Iran
'I may do it, I may not; No one knows what I'll do': Trump on striking Iran

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

'I may do it, I may not; No one knows what I'll do': Trump on striking Iran

Donald Trump said his patience with Iran had run out, as Israeli airstrikes intensified in Tehran. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei rejected Trump's call for unconditional surrender Prateek Shukla New Delhi US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his patience with Iran had run out. His statement came amid intensified Israeli airstrikes around Tehran. Speaking to reporters outside the White House, Trump said Iran had made contact, but added, 'it's very late to be talking.' He refused to confirm whether the US would support Israel's bombing campaign against the Islamic Republic. 'There's a big difference between now and a week ago,' Trump said. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Asked if he is moving closer to striking Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump said, 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Iran's Supreme Leader rejects US demands In response, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected Trump's calls for unconditional surrender in a televised address — his first since Friday. 'The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,' Khamenei said. 'Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender.' Israel continues strikes; civilians flee Tehran As the conflict escalated, Israeli airstrikes intensified, prompting residents to flee Tehran in large numbers. Highways out of the city were jammed with people trying to escape the bombing. 'As we promised – we will continue to strike at symbols of governance and hit the Ayatollah regime wherever it may be,' said Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz. According to Israel's military, 50 fighter jets struck 20 targets in Tehran, including facilities involved in missile production. The Israeli military also urged civilians to evacuate parts of the city for their own safety. Trump's tone has shifted in recent days — from hinting at a diplomatic solution to suggesting military involvement. In a series of social media posts on Tuesday, he speculated about targeting Khamenei and demanded Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!'

US Supreme Court upholds Tennessee law banning youth transgender care
US Supreme Court upholds Tennessee law banning youth transgender care

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

US Supreme Court upholds Tennessee law banning youth transgender care

The US Supreme Court backed a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors on Wednesday in a setback for transgender rights that could bolster efforts by states to defend other measures targeting transgender people. The court, in a 6-3 ruling powered by its conservative justices, decided that the ban does not violate the US Constitution's 14th Amendment promise of equal protection. They upheld a lower court's decision upholding Tennessee's law barring medical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormones for people under age 18 experiencing gender dysphoria. The Supreme Court's three liberal justices dissented. "Tennessee concluded that there is an ongoing debate among medical experts regarding the risks and benefits associated with administering puberty blockers and hormones to treat gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder and gender incongruence. (The law's) ban on such treatments responds directly to that uncertainty," conservative Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed dismay that the court largely deferred to the state legislature's policy choices in upholding the ban. "By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims. In sadness, I dissent," Sotomayor wrote, joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Gender dysphoria is the clinical diagnosis for significant distress that can result from an incongruence between a person's gender identity and the sex assigned at birth. The Justice Department under Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration had challenged the law. The dispute over transgender rights and Tennessee's ban - one of two dozen such policies enacted by conservative state lawmakers around the country - required the Supreme Court to confront a major flashpoint in the US culture wars. Since returning to office in January, Republican President Donald Trump has taken a hardline stance against transgender rights. Trump's administration told the Supreme Court in February that Tennessee's ban was not unlawful, reversing the position taken by the government under Biden. The Trump administration, however, suggested that the court press forward and decide the case despite the shift. Tennessee's law, passed in 2023, aims to encourage minors to "appreciate their sex" by prohibiting healthcare workers from prescribing puberty blockers and hormones to help them live as "a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex." Providers can be sued and face fines and professional discipline under the law for any violations. The law allows these medications to be used for any other purpose, including to address congenital defects, early-onset puberty or other conditions. Several plaintiffs - three transgender minors and their parents, as well as a doctor who provides the type of care at issue - sued to challenge the Tennessee law's legality. They were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and LGBT rights group Lambda Legal. Biden's Justice Department subsequently intervened in the lawsuit, opposing Tennessee's law. The challengers argued that the law discriminates against these adolescents based on sex and transgender status, violating the 14th Amendment. Tennessee has said it is banning "risky, unproven gender-transition interventions," pointing to "scientific uncertainty," tightened restrictions in some European countries and "firsthand accounts of regret and harm" from people who discontinue or reverse treatments. Medical associations, noting that gender dysphoria is associated with higher rates of suicide, have said gender-affirming care can be life-saving, and that long-term studies show its effectiveness. A federal judge blocked the law as likely violating the 14th Amendment but the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed the judge's preliminary injunction. TRANSGENDER RIGHTS The Supreme Court on May 6 permitted Trump's administration to implement his ban on transgender people in the military, allowing the armed forces to discharge the thousands of current transgender troops and reject new recruits while legal challenges play out. Trump since returning to office has taken actions targeting "gender ideology" and declaring that the US government will recognize two sexes: male and female. Trump issued executive orders curtailing gender-affirming medical treatments for youth under 19 and excluding transgender girls and women from female sports, while rescinding orders by Biden combating discrimination against gay and transgender people. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority. In a previous major case involving transgender rights, it ruled in 2020 that a landmark federal law forbidding workplace discrimination protects gay and transgender employees. During arguments in the Tennessee case in December, some of the conservative justices cited an ongoing debate among experts and policy makers over the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with the treatments at issue, suggesting that those decisions should be left to legislatures instead of courts. A broader set of state restrictions have been enacted in recent years targeting transgender people, from bathroom use to sports participation, some limited to minors but others extending to adults.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store