
‘Unacceptable': outcry over police attacks on journalists covering LA protests
Several journalists covering the protests in Los Angeles against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown have reported being attacked by law enforcement over the last several days, prompting condemnation and a call on authorities to do 'more to ensure press freedom is respected'.
Some were struck by rubber bullets and fired at with pepper balls while one crew was briefly detained while broadcasting live.
CNN's Jason Carroll and his crew were briefly detained by police on Monday while covering the LA protests live on air. A video of the encounter shows Los Angeles police officers telling Carroll and his colleagues that they have to leave the area, before asking them to put their hands behind their backs and escorting them away.
'I asked, 'Am I being arrested?'' Carroll told CNN after the incident, to which he said the officer told him: ''No … you're being detained.'
In the video, the officer says that if they return to the area they would be arrested.
Carroll later said he tried to explain to the officer who he was, identifying himself as press, and that they 'did not put me in zip-ties, but they did grab both of my hands as I was escorted over to the side'.
'You take a lot of risks as press, this is low on that sort of scale of risks, but it is something that I wasn't expecting, simply because we've been out here all day, [and] I've covered any number of protests,' Carroll said.
A CNN spokesperson confirmed to USA Today that the crew was briefly detained while 'capturing the events that were unfolding as police attempted to clear an area during the protests and police and military response in the city'.
'We are pleased the situation resolved quickly once the reporting team presented law enforcement with their CNN credentials. CNN will continue to report out the news unfolding in Los Angeles,' the spokesperson added.
On Sunday, Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi from Nine News was shot in the leg by a rubber bullet while reporting live from the protests.
In a statement, Nine News said Tomasi was 'struck by a rubber bullet' and said that she and her camera operator 'are safe and will continue their essential work covering these events'.
'This incident serves as a stark reminder of the inherent dangers journalists can face while reporting from the frontlines of protests, underscoring the importance of their role in providing vital information,' the network added.
'Less-than-lethal' or 'less lethal' munitions – such as rubber, plastic, or sponge bullets, and pepper balls – are sometimes deployed in the US during protests to disperse crowds. Despite the term, these munitions have caused serious injury and death in the past.
Amid the Los Angeles protests, CNN has documented the deployment of flash-bangs, tear gas, pepper balls, rubber bullets and bean-bag rounds.
Investigative reporter Sergio Olmos from CalMatters told the Washington Post he was hit on Sunday by what he believes was a 40mm sponge grenade.
Olmos, who said he has covered hundreds of protests, described the use of less-lethal rounds on Sunday as the 'most' he's seen 'used in a single day protest'.
The Los Angeles police department did not immediately respond to requests for comment from the Guardian. But in a news release, the police department said the 'LAPD professional standards bureau will be investigating allegations of excessive force and other issues related to LAPD actions during the protests'.
As of Tuesday evening, in addition to Ice and the LAPD, various law enforcement agencies including the sheriff's department, the Department of Homeland Security and California Highway Patrol are all currently operating across LA amid the demonstrations.
The British photographer Nick Stern, who is based in LA, told the Guardian he was wounded on Saturday by what appeared to be a less-lethal projectile fired at him while covering the protest, and said that the injury required surgery.
Stern was taken to the hospital, and as of Sunday, was awaiting surgery. He said the doctor who looked at his X-rays said his wound indicated he had been struck by a non-lethal round.
A New York Times reporter was also hit by a non-lethal round in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, the newspaper said. The reporter was assessed at a hospital but not seriously injured.
On Sunday, a freelance photographer for the New York Post was hit in the head by a less-lethal round while covering the protests on California's 101 freeway. The photographer, who says he was wearing his press pass, said a California Highway Patrol officer fired at him from about 100 yards away.
A photo published by the Post shows a large bruise on his forehead. The newspaper said that he was treated for whiplash and neck pain.
The California Highway Patrol did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
On Monday, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) condemned the incidents.
'We are greatly concerned by the reports of law enforcement officers' shooting non-lethal rounds at reporters covering protests in Los Angeles' said Katherine Jacobsen, the CPJ US, Canada, and Caribbean program coordinator.
'Any attempt to discourage or silence media coverage by intimidating or injuring journalists should not be tolerated. It is incumbent upon authorities to respect the media's role of documenting issues of public interest.'
Reporters Without Borders, another press freedom group, said that at least 27 'separate incidents of violence against journalists have been recorded at the protests since 6 June', including '24 by law enforcement and three by individuals'.
Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters Without Borders US, called the incidents 'unacceptable' and called on authorities in LA to do 'more to ensure press freedom is respected during these protests'.
'These protests are a matter of huge public interest and the public has a right to know exactly what's going on,' Weimers said. 'The only way that can happen is if journalists are allowed to do their jobs freely.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
China strikes cautious tone after Trump claims trade deal is 'done'
China will "always honour its commitments" when it comes to negotiating trade disagreements with the US, according to a spokesperson for the Chinese government. But when pushed by Sky News, he refrained from confirming what those commitments are. The reluctance is at odds with President Trump, who declared on his Truth Social account that "our deal with China is done", while also claiming that China has agreed to supply rare earth metals to the US"upfront", and to a 55% tariff rate on its goods. The comments follow high-stakes talks between delegations from the two countries in London aimed at stabilising the relationship amid an escalating trade and supply chain war. China's refusal to confirm these details has raised speculation that, contrary to what the US side is claiming, there may still be significant disagreements and some details yet to be worked out. The continued silence comes after two days of negotiations between delegations from the US and China in the UK. While both sides confirmed that they had agreed a "framework" to implement the "consensus" reached at previous talks in Geneva last month, as well as during a phone call between President Xi and President Trump on 5 June, the delegations were supposed to be taking the agreement to their respective leaders for sign-off. When asked by Sky News if any of the details in Trump's Truth Social post reflected what China understood to be in the deal, Lin Jian, China's foreign ministry spokesperson said "the two sides achieved new progress in addressing the concerns on economic and trade issues". "We always honour our commitments. Since we've reached common understandings, the two sides need to follow them." 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 When pushed by Sky News on whether China agrees with Trump's Truth Social assessment that the US-China relationship is "excellent", Lin declined to agree, saying simply: "Our position on relations with the United States has been consistent and clear". Such lukewarm language is not uncommon in China but there will likely be significant displeasure at the way Trump is unilaterally publishing details that may not yet have been officially signed off. It is in stark contrast to China's communication landscape which is highly scripted and controlled, and if it was designed to force China into an agreement it could well backfire. Indeed, if everything in Trump's Truth Social post is true it would represent quite a coup for the US, and that feels a little unlikely given the valuable bargaining chips China has, particularly over rare earth metals. 0:54 This will likely have been a crunch point in negotiations. China has the vast majority of the world's rare earth metals which are vital in the production of everything from cars to weaponry, and recent export controls imposed in response to Trump's tariffs have brought some production lines to the brink of standstill. In response, the Trump administration imposed extra export controls on high-tech chips, chip development technology and parts needed to make jet engines, as well as moving to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals. President Trump indicated in his Truth Social post that the measures to revoke visas will be rowed back. When pushed by Sky News, Lin refrained from commenting on whether Trump's communications on this matter have undermined the relationship more broadly, but the stakes remain enormously high, with the unfolding supply chain war set to do significant damage to the economies of both nations.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Washington Spanish teacher fired by high school for saying n-word while reading To Kill A Mockingbird to class
A Spanish teacher has been fired after reading a passage from To Kill A Mockingbird to his class that included the n-word. Matthew Mastronardi, who worked at West Valley High School in Spokane, Washington, had overheard students discussing the classic Harper Lee novel in his classroom when he was asked to read a passage aloud, which included the n-word. His students, according to Mastronardi, said they skipped over the controversial slur within the text as per another teacher's instructions. 'I was astonished and expressed disagreement, saying, "That's silly; it undermines the book's historical context and disrespects the author's intent to use accurate language,"' the teacher wrote on X. To Kill A Mockingbird tells the story of a white lawyer defending a black man accused of raping a white woman in 1930s Alabama and deals heavily with racist abuse suffered by blacks in the south. After Mastronardi slated the students for censoring themselves, one spoke up to ask the teacher he would read every word, including the n-word. Mastronardi said he would. 'A male student immediately handed me the book and said, "Okay do it,"' he continued. 'I knew the situation was serious with 30 students watching...I saw it as a teachable moment about context and literary honesty in reading.' Mastronardi read the book out loud to his class, specifically a passage that included the n-word, but he had 'no idea' that he was being recorded by a student. While it remains unclear if the recording was reported to school officials or if it received any complaints, Mastronardi was pulled in to discuss the matter with Principal Ryan Mulvey. The Spanish teacher said in the meeting that he 'acted in good faith with the desire to serve students.' 'Furthermore, I believe what I read was not to stir trouble but to deliver value. My conscience is clean and as stated in policy, this is a free exchange of ideas, which is what I was trying to perpetuate,' Mastronardi said. 'Teaching kids they can interact with a text honestly and intimidation should not be used to prevent that. I was asked to read it and so I did.' Then, on April 28, he was given a letter with a verbal warning. Mulvey wrote that Mastronardi had engaged in 'unprofessional communication' with his students. He determined that Mastronardi had 'failed to communicate in a civil manner, failed to maintain an atmosphere conducive to learning by consistently maintaining professional boundaries, and did not maintain the highest professional standards.' The verbal warning declared that the teacher had violated the Districts Civility and Professional Staff Student Boundaries policy and ordered him to refrain from using the language again. On May 6, Mastronardi was called for a meeting with the Human Resources Director Sabre Dahl and Principal Mulvey during which he was informed he could 'either voluntarily resign or face the non-renewal' of his contract. Mastronardi, however, argued his case and wrote to rebuke the warning. 'This rebuttal is necessary because the actions taken against me are wholly unjustified... It is not uncivil, nor unprofessional to read a passage from a school approved novel,' he wrote. 'Words should not be skipped over simply because they make us uncomfortable, especially when the usage is essential to describe and understand the historical context.' Then, come May 8, Mastronardi was served with a non-renewal notice by Superintendent Kyle Rydell which claimed the teacher exercised 'poor judgement' and that the school had concerns for his 'ability to serve as a positive role model.' Mastronardi wrote on X that he requested evidence for the claims listed, 'but none was provided.' As the battle for his job continued, the Spanish teacher met with the superintendent to 'urge reconsideration.' 'During the meeting, they repeatedly stated the decision wasn't solely due to the TKAM incident,' he wrote. 'When I asked, "What other reasons contributed to my termination?" they provided no specifics.' Mastronardi further claimed there had been 'no parent complaints, no documented disciplinary actions, and I've passed every teaching evaluation.' 'The superintendent admitted relying on "hearsay" for part of his decision. Two union representatives, taking notes, attested to this.' Yet, it was still recommended his contract not be renewed. 'My students are very upset,' Mastronardi wrote. One freshman student even took it upon himself to create a petition in support of the teacher. 'He's a really good teacher,' the student, Payton Johnson, told Frontlines. 'He was just reading out of the book. He wasn't saying it to anyone or, like, in a rude manner.' The petition calls for the school to reinstate Mastronardi and said the 'beloved educator' is 'unjustly facing termination over a misunderstanding.' 'This decision strikes at the heart of educational integrity and the role educators play in exposing students to important historical contexts that foster critical thinking,' the petition said. 'We urge the administrative body of West Valley High School and the wider Spokane education authorities to reconsider this course of action. 'Not only is this decision detrimental to a well-regarded teacher's career, but it also diminishes the richness of the educational experience provided to students by limiting exposure to important, albeit challenging, literature.' The petition garnered a total of 654 signatures come Thursday morning. A GiveSendGo was created by the Spanish teacher to help his family through the transition period, with a large portion intended to be donated to support educational efforts toward free speech. Mastronardi, a husband and father of 'three beautiful children,' is set to plead his case at a board meeting on June 25. 'This is my final appeal to save my job,' he wrote.


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court rules for girl with epilepsy in opinion that could affect education access lawsuits
The Supreme Court sided with a teenage girl with a rare form of epilepsy on Thursday in a unanimous ruling that could make it easier for families like hers to go to court over access to education. The girl's family says that her Minnesota school district didn't do enough to make sure she has the accommodations she needs to learn, including failing to provide adequate instruction in the evening when her seizures are less frequent. But lower courts ruled against the family's discrimination claims in court, despite finding the school had fallen short. That's because courts in that part of the country require plaintiffs in lawsuits against schools to show officials used 'bad faith or gross misjudgment,' a higher legal standard than most disability discrimination claims. The family appealed to the Supreme Court. The district, Osseo Area Schools, said that lowering the legal standard could expose the country's understaffed public schools to more lawsuits if their efforts fall short, even if officials are working in good faith. The district also argued that all claims over accommodations for people with disabilities should be held to the same higher standard — a potentially major switch that would have been a 'five-alarm fire' for the disability rights community, the girl's lawyers said. ___