logo
City Hall: Planning board shares concerns over Goffstown project; Lesniak loves a parade

City Hall: Planning board shares concerns over Goffstown project; Lesniak loves a parade

Yahoo01-03-2025

Feb. 28—Members of Manchester's planning board have joined the growing chorus of Queen City officials concerned over a proposed development in Goffstown.
As previously reported, the Dubay Group Inc. and Allard Revocable Trust are seeking a variance from the Goffstown zoning board to subdivide a property for the purposes of building 34 lots for single-family homes within the Industrial Zone, which is not permitted per Section 3.11 of the Goffstown Zoning Ordinance.
Manchester officials and residents are keeping an eye on the project because the property is located off Riverview Park Road, on the border between the city and Goffstown.
Access to the proposed subdivision would be off of Phillip Street and Joseph Street Extension — streets located in the Queen City — creating a cut-through in what has historically been a very quiet Manchester neighborhood off Goffstown Road near Mount Calvary Cemetery.
A quick discussion on the proposal was held earlier this month at Goffstown Town Hall, with zoning board members there voting to determine that the project has regional impact — meaning the development proposal has potential impacts beyond Goffstown's boundaries.
As RSA 36:54-58 explains, a determination of regional impact affords the abutting communities and the regional planning commission the status of abutter. It is also an opportunity to broaden the scope of review and in doing so, gain additional input and technical support in the review of large, complex development proposals and evaluate potential effects on inter-municipal agreements.
Members of Manchester's planning board discussed the project at their last meeting, in preparation for notifying their neighbors to the northwest of their concerns via email or letter.
"My concern is that in order to get to the subdivision, you have to go through a very small street in Manchester," said planning board alternate Brian Beaupre. "And how are they going to handle plowing? Police, fire, garbage pickup?"
"I share your questions and concern because, like, they would be paying property taxes to Goffstown for services from Goffstown, presumably," Planning Board chairman Bryce Kaw-uh said.
Former city assessor and current planning board member Bob Gagne said it appeared to him the parcel in question has frontage in Goffstown, off Riverview Park Road.
"Why aren't they just accessing the subdivision off that street instead of through Manchester?" Gagne asked. "My understanding is the topography just doesn't let them get to the upper level of the site from the Goffstown side," Manchester Deputy Planning Director Nicola Strong said.
"I do agree though, Bob, if they could connect that way, that would have been preferable," Kaw-uh said. "The way it is now, all the impact is on Manchester."
Gagne said the lots being proposed appear to be "small."
"It's gonna have to be public water and sewer," Gagne said. "Where's that coming from? They're going to hook up to Manchester there as well. I mean, say, 'OK, you can do that, but we get all the taxes from these lots.'"
Board members agreed to send correspondence to Goffstown officials saying they aren't particularly concerned on residential use versus industrial use for the site — it's the connection to Manchester streets and the use of Manchester facilities and services, that is of potential concern.
Manchester aldermen held a very brief discussion Feb. 18 on the possibility of putting a gate or gates on Phillip and Joseph streets, preventing access from Manchester through those neighborhoods.
The Goffstown Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on the application Tuesday, March 4, at 7 p.m. in the Mildred Stark Room (Room 106) in Goffstown Town Hall, 16 Main Street.
Marshal, marshal, marshal!Erik Lesniak, business liaison for the city's Economic Development Office, has been named Grand Marshal of the 2025 Manchester St. Patrick's Parade.
Described by parade organizers as a "dedicated community leader, coach, mentor, and advocate for the Queen City," Lesniak — a native of Holyoke, Mass., with "deep Irish roots" — arrived in Manchester in the early 2000s when the New Haven Ravens were sold and relocated to New Hampshire, becoming the New Hampshire Fisher Cats.
Lesniak served in several leadership positions in the organization, including director of group sales, executive director of sales, and vice president of business development. In 2022, he took on his current role with the Economic Development Office.
Lesniak has given his time coaching with Manchester Little League (10 years and counting), St. Francis of Assisi basketball (four years), St. Joseph Jr. High basketball (current), Manchester South Jr. Soccer (eight years), and indoor soccer.
He's also volunteered with many civic and community organizations including the Lions Club, Kiwanis Club, Caregivers, Manchester Community College Department of Business Studies Advisory Board, Pastoral Counseling Services, Queen City Rotary Club, Manchester Downtown Committee, and the Leadership Greater Manchester Steering Committee.
"Erik's generosity and kindness can be seen in every corner of the community," the Manchester Saint Patrick's Parade Committee said in a statement. "Whether he's securing Christmas trees, food, clothes and decorations every year for families in need during the holidays, organizing community fundraisers, or serving meals at New Horizons/Families in Transition over the years, Erik is always ready to lend a helping hand"
Lesniak lives in Manchester with his wife, Kristen, and son, Jayden.
As always, the Queen City's holiday parades march to the beat of their own drum.
As is tradition, the parade will not be held on the actual day that others celebrate St. Patrick's Day, March 17. The 2025 Manchester St. Patrick's Parade will take place almost two weeks later, on Sunday, March 30.
.
Contact City Hall reporter Paul Feely at pfeely@unionleader.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proposed self-storage facility on College Highway to restart permitting process at next Planning Board meeting
Proposed self-storage facility on College Highway to restart permitting process at next Planning Board meeting

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Proposed self-storage facility on College Highway to restart permitting process at next Planning Board meeting

SOUTHWICK — When the Planning Board meets again, it will hold a public hearing to restart the permitting process for a proposed self-storage facility on College Highway after the developers withdrew its first request once it became clear it had little chance of being approved. The new application for the permit, sought by Southampton-based developers Jim and Ellen Boyle, offers the board a proposal that is a significant departure from its first site plan, which asked for permission to build a nearly 60,000-square-foot, two-story facility between O'Reilly's Auto Parts and Pioneer Valley Trading Co. The new facility proposed has two stories and each is 17,708 square feet for a total square footage of 35,416, according to the architectural drawings submitted by the Berkshire Design Group. On the first floor are 201 storage spaces and 113 on the second floor that range in size from 5 feet by 5 feet to 10 feet by 20 feet, according to the drawings. The portion of the building facing College Highway, which will be painted reddish to resemble a tobacco barn, will have nine doors for the 10- by 20-foot storage spaces. There will be an entrance into the facility with glass doors. The two-story facility uses an 'over/under concept' that would be fully sprinklered, meet all applicable building codes, and will have video surveillance cameras installed that cover every square inch of the facility operating 24 hours a day, according to the building's designers. It will also be built into a gentle slope at the rear of the property and have 10 parking spaces, five in front and five in back, with one designated as handicapped accessible. The facility's front will be a little over 300 feet from College Highway. The Boyles had wrestled with the Planning Board for months during its first request for a permit trying to meet the board's expectations. It came to a head in February 2024, which was when board members and the Fire Department made it clear they weren't satisfied with the proposal. The general complaint from the Planning Board for the first permit request was that the proposed facility would be too big for the 3.17-acre parcel the Boyles own on College Highway. Before that meeting, public hearings for the project had been open since May 2023. After the February meeting, the Boyles had informal discussions with former Town Planner Jon Goddard and other board members and floated the idea of renting out some of the spaces for contractors where they could conduct business. Because that would have changed the use of the building, the Boyles were told they would need to seek a new special permit and start over. Before they formally proposed changing the use, they withdrew the application in February. Goddard said this week that the new plans didn't include renting space to contractors. Also included in the request is the construction of a small office building with a square footage of 437, that would be located at the entrance to the facility. Between the office building and the facility is a wetlands area that will be crossed by the entrance road. The road will be built over the wetlands and a pipe installed behind it to allow water to move back and forth along it. Goddard said the developers will have the responsibility to adhere to state regulations for wetlands replacement. The public hearing will be held at 7:10 p.m., Tuesday, June 24. Read the original article on MassLive.

Bunnell commissioners to consider request for approval of massive new development Monday
Bunnell commissioners to consider request for approval of massive new development Monday

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Bunnell commissioners to consider request for approval of massive new development Monday

The Bunnell City Commission will meet Monday, June 9, at 7 p.m. to consider approval of a massive new 2,800-acre development known as the Reserve at Haw Creek. The project developer is asking for permission from the five-member commission to build between 6,000 and 8,000 homes, which would increase the population of Bunnell many times over. The 2020 census put Bunnell's population at 3,276 residents. The proposal has drawn controversy due to its sheer size. Commissioners will consider two items. The first is whether to approve rezoning the project acreage to a "Planned Unit Development District." City staff has recommended approval, though the planning and zoning board wants the total number of homes to be reduced to 5,500. The second item is a request from the developers to approve the development itself. City staff have declared the development agreement is "consistent with the City's 2035 Comprehensive Plan." Both agenda items will be read for the first time at Monday's meeting. The development is described as a mixed-use community including residential, commercial, light industrial, emergency support services, parks and recreation, and conservation. Housing types will range from affordable to market rate, and include single-family homes, townhomes, garden homes, and condominiums. A village center is proposed that will provide "a mixture of neighborhood and community services, retail and commercial spaces, parks and trails, public services, and amenities," according to the proposed plan. The applicant for the zoning change is Northeast Florida Developers LLC of Jacksonville. The property owner is JM Properties X LLC, of Palm Coast. The property is located between State Road 11, State Highway 100 West, County Road 302, and County Road 65. The development has drawn some pushback from neighbors, including Cheryl Trujillo, who lives on County Road 302, and spoke up at a public hearing on Jan. 7. While she said she is not against development, this proposal is "too much, too fast." "This isn't just somebody going to build a couple of roofs," Trujillo said. "You want to have Palm Coast in my backyard, and that's what it amounts to." "Where are you going to put all these people?" she continued. High on many residents' list of concerns is traffic. A traffic study has been completed, but was not included in the advance materials for the article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Bunnell City Commission discussing Reserve at Haw Creek Monday night

Decision deferred on high-rise student tower blocks by Deptford Creek
Decision deferred on high-rise student tower blocks by Deptford Creek

Yahoo

time30-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Decision deferred on high-rise student tower blocks by Deptford Creek

A decision on whether two high-rise blocks of student accommodation by Deptford Creek will be built has been deferred after councillors voted for a site visit. Greenwich Council's Planning Board discussed the contentious plans—which garnered 294 letters of support and 251 objections—for nearly two-and-a-half hours on Tuesday evening (May 27). Luxury student accommodation business YourTRIBE and development and investment company Redington Capital first applied for planning permission to demolish three low-rise residential buildings in Greenwich Quay and replace them with 20-storey and 15-storey student tower blocks in December 2023. These plans were reduced earlier this month, bringing the 20 storeys down to 17 and shrinking the number of beds from 700 to 598. This reduction in part was because Maritime Greenwich had objected to the plans due to the height of the development and its potential visual effect on the nearby UNESCO World Heritage Site. Maritime Greenwich withdrew its objection after the height of the tallest tower was reduced. Cllr Majella Anning, speaking on behalf of Greenwich Creekside ward where the development site is located, stated that the student provision in Creekside would increase to around 20 per cent of the ward's total population if the proposal was approved. She said: 'I am in favour of the provision of student housing in my ward. What I object to is the scale of what is being proposed and the lack of a mixed housing offer, in particular social housing for local Greenwich residents.' Cllr Anning also likened the development to a 'cash cow' and claimed that developers would pay a lower community infrastructure levy in Greenwich when compared to other London boroughs. She also called the height of the buildings 'completely inappropriate' and described them as looking 'ugly'. She added: 'Student-only tower blocks do not offer any relief to the 28,000 people on our Greenwich Council [social housing] waiting list. These are blocks of temporary accommodation, by their very definition.' Cllr Anning's fellow Creekside ward Cllr Calum O'Byrne Mulligan also spoke in opposition to the proposal. He said: 'I urge the committee to reject this application as the scale and mass of the buildings not in a tall building area go against existing council policy. 'I fear that this development risks the intangible strategic asset that we have in the world heritage site and jeopardises protected views, going against our local plan.' Scott Fitzgerald of the Millennium Quay Residents Association (a residential development nearby the proposal site) said: 'The public consultations held by YOURTribe have repeatedly failed to address reasonable concerns.' The concerns he focused on were those of access to the site via Clarence Road which measures 3.5 metres wide, and fears that the site does not have adequate space if an evacuation was needed. He said: 'This development is about short-term economic gain, not long-term community diversity… It prioritises financial return over inclusive, sustainable living and would turn Greenwich Quay into a de facto student dormitory, not a diverse residential neighbourhood.' Another Greenwich resident opposed to the plans, Charlotte Kiddie, said: 'Who benefits from this proposal? Not those on the social housing register, not local residents, not London which risks losing one of only four UNESCO sites, not Greenwich Council, unable to generate council tax, nor even the students who are being overcharged. The only party that benefits in this is the property developer.' Phoebe Juggins, senior planning manager at YOURTribe, spoke in support of the application. She said: 'We expect that through delivering 590 purpose-built student accommodation units, we will free up the equivalent of 236 homes in Greenwich, and will importantly mean that students are living in a well-managed and supportive environment. 'We want this scheme to not only invest in the education of the next generation, but to the local area, delivering £7.3 million annually to the local economy, 43 full-time jobs plus over 500 construction jobs.' Ms Juggins also responded to queries brought up by councillors and objectors, assuring that all the necessary hoops had been jumped through to ensure the development has a robust fire safety and evacuation strategy. Planning committee member Cllr David Gardner asked what students would actually be able to afford this accommodation, calculating that other rent prices offered by YOURTribe in London exceed the maximum student loan for living costs. YOURTribe director Nick Lawrence responded: 'I think it's a misnomer that all students are poor. We are having high demand for our accommodation, and in conjunction with the universities we set the rent.' Cllr David Gardner proposed a site visit because he thought the committee needed to look at 'the impact on the neighbouring development Millennium Quay'. This was seconded by Cllr Olu Babatola, who thought a site visit would help him assess the fire safety concerns raised at the meeting. The committee voted for this site visit proposal, and a final decision on whether planning permission will be granted has been deferred until after a visit has been made.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store