logo
Asia rises, MIT holds Top spot as QS reveals 2026 World University Rankings

Asia rises, MIT holds Top spot as QS reveals 2026 World University Rankings

Associated Press7 hours ago

US and China gain ground, Italy and Saudi Arabia debut in top 100
#QSWUR
LONDON, June 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Global higher education experts QS Quacquarelli Symonds have released the 22nd edition of the QS World University Rankings.
MIT retains the global #1 position for the 14th consecutive year. Imperial College London holds second place, while Stanford University surges to third.
Top 10 Universities (2026 / 2025)
1 / 1 MIT – US
2 / 2 Imperial College London – UK
3 / 6 Stanford University – US
4 / 3 University of Oxford – UK
5 / 4 Harvard University – US
6 / 5 University of Cambridge – UK
7 / 7 ETH Zurich – Switzerland
8 / 8 National University of Singapore – Singapore
9 / 9 UCL – UK
10 / 10 California Institute of Technology – US
This edition features 1,500+ institutions across 106 locations. The US leads with 192 ranked universities, followed by the UK (90) and Mainland China (72). India (54) and Germany (48) round out the top five.
Ben Sowter, QS Senior Vice President, said:
'We are witnessing a rebalancing of global academic influence. The Ranking highlights a shifting center of gravity in higher education—towards Asia, which now claims the highest number of ranked universities worldwide. While traditional powerhouses maintain strong positions, the data shows clear momentum in regions investing heavily in research capacity, internationalization, and long-term strategy. The QS World University Rankings illuminate not only institutional excellence, but also the evolving contours of global knowledge production. These shifts underscore an increasingly multipolar academic world—more competitive, more connected, and more ambitious than ever.'
Highlights Asia now leads with 565 ranked universities—more than Europe (487), the Americas (358), Africa (47), and Oceania (44). It also adds the most newcomers: 84, compared to 10 in the Americas, 9 in Europe, 8 in Africa, and 1 in Oceania.
US: Records more institutions improving than declining for the first time in seven years. Stanford rises due to Sustainability and International Faculty metrics. University of Chicago re-enters the top 20.
UK: Matches US with four top-10 entries. Remains a leader in International Student Ratio.
Canada: McGill overtakes Toronto as national leader (27th). Canada excels in Sustainability.
Australia: Two top-20 entries. University of Sydney drops to 25th; 71% of institutions fall.
China: 45% of institutions rise. Tsinghua climbs to 17th; Fudan jumps nine places to 30th.
India: IIT Delhi becomes top-ranked nationally (123rd), overtaking IIT Bombay.
Italy & Saudi Arabia: Enter the top 100 for the first time—Politecnico di Milano (98th), KFUPM (67th).
Africa: South Africa holds top four spots; Cape Town climbs 21 places to 150th.
Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2714473/QSWUR_Logo.jpg
View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/asia-rises-mit-holds-top-spot-as-qs-reveals-2026-world-university-rankings-302485769.html
SOURCE QS Quacquarelli Symonds

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Buss family agrees to sell majority stake of Los Angeles Lakers in reported record $10B deal
Buss family agrees to sell majority stake of Los Angeles Lakers in reported record $10B deal

CNN

time14 minutes ago

  • CNN

Buss family agrees to sell majority stake of Los Angeles Lakers in reported record $10B deal

The Buss family has agreed to sell majority ownership of the Los Angeles Lakers, one of the most storied franchises in all of sports, to Los Angeles Dodgers owner Mark Walter, a source familiar with the agreement told CNN. The valuation of the agreement is approximately $10 billion, representing the most lucrative deal for a professional sports team, according to the Associated Press. ESPN's Shams Charania was first to report the agreed sale. CNN has reached out to the Lakers and Dodgers for comment. Aside from being the chairman and controlling owner of the Dodgers, Walter is the CEO and founder of the holding company TWG Global. The diversified business also holds stakes in the WNBA's Los Angeles Sparks, the Premier League's Chelsea FC and the newly formed Cadillac Formula One team, which is scheduled to make its debut on the grid in 2026, among other sports franchises. On Wednesday, TWG said Walter is entering into an agreement to acquire additional interests in the Lakers. He has owned a minority stake in the franchise since 2021. Basketball Hall of Famer Jerry Buss bought the Lakers in 1979 and oversaw the franchise winning 10 NBA titles. After his death in 2013, his daughter Jeanie Buss took over the role as governor of one of the most successful franchises in sports. Los Angeles added another Larry O'Brien trophy to the collection in 2020, led by LeBron James, the team's 17th NBA championship. Last season, the Lakers finished in third place in the Western Conference with a 50-32 record before being eliminated by the Minnesota Timberwolves in the first round of the NBA playoffs. James still remained one of the better players in the league in his 22nd season, averaging 24.4 points, 7.8 rebounds and 8.2 assists. But the team shocked the world by executing one of the most stunning blockbuster trades in NBA history. Los Angeles acquired NBA superstar Luka Doncic, as well as Maxi Kleber, Markieff Morris from the Dallas Mavericks for Anthony Davis, Max Christie and the Lakers' 2029 first-round draft pick. The NBA's all-time leading scorer reportedly signed a two-year, $104 million maximum contract to return to the Lakers ahead of 2024-2025 season and has a player option to return next season. Team president of basketball operations and general manager Rob Pelinka had previously said James will be keeping an eye on how the roster improves in the offseason. Buss reportedly will continue in her role with the franchise after the sale.

Working While Receiving Social Security: Understanding the Rules
Working While Receiving Social Security: Understanding the Rules

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Working While Receiving Social Security: Understanding the Rules

You can work and collect Social Security in many cases, but there are some rules. The Social Security earnings test dictates how your benefits could be withheld. If you've already reached full retirement age, the earnings test doesn't apply. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › Can you work and collect Social Security benefits at the same time? The short answer is yes, but it depends on your personal situation. In some cases, workers who receive retirement benefits, or other types of Social Security benefits, can see some or all of their monthly benefits temporarily go away. That's where the Social Security earnings test comes in. In a nutshell, depending on your age and how much earned income you have, some or all of your Social Security benefits can be withheld. Does the earnings test apply to you? And if it does, what can you expect to happen to your Social Security benefits? Here's a quick rundown of what all working seniors need to know. For the purposes of the Social Security earnings test, beneficiaries who have applied for retirement benefits fit into three categories. Each category has different rules and limitations when it comes to the potential withholding of benefits. So the first step in figuring out how the earnings test could affect you is to determine which category you fall into, expressed as such: You will reach your full Social Security retirement age after. You will reach (or have reached) your full Social Security retirement age during. You reached full retirement age before. If you're in the third category, it's an easy answer: The Social Security earnings test does not apply to you. You can work and earn as much money as possible, and it won't affect your Social Security payments whatsoever. If you're in one of the first two categories, the general idea is that some or all of your Social Security benefits can be withheld if your income exceeds a certain threshold. Here's what I mean. If you will reach your full retirement age after 2025, the earnings test is the most restrictive. You can earn up to $23,400 for the year, or $1,950 per month, with no impact to your benefits. Beyond that, $1 of your Social Security benefits can be withheld for every $2 in earnings. For example, if you earn $30,000 in 2025 and won't reach full retirement age during the year, you will have exceeded the earnings test threshold by $6,600. That means $3,300 would be withheld from your Social Security checks. Finally, if you reach your full retirement age during 2025, the earnings test limit is much higher at $62,160, or $5,180 per month, and only months before your birth month are considered. In other words, if your birthday was April 12, only earnings from January through March are subject to the earnings test. Furthermore, for earnings above the threshold, $1 is withheld for every $3 in excess earnings. First, I want to point out that I deliberately used the word "withheld" when discussing the earnings test limits. If you exceed the earnings test limits and get a lower Social Security benefit as a result, the withheld benefits are not necessarily lost. Once you reach full retirement age, your monthly Social Security payment will be adjusted upward to reflect any withheld money. Second, there's no perfect answer to the question of whether you should claim Social Security while you're still working if the earnings test is likely to affect you. Depending on your financial situation, it could certainly make sense to claim benefits even if some of the money is likely to be withheld. But on the other hand, if you're working and don't necessarily need the extra money, it could make more financial sense to wait. The bottom line is that the Social Security earnings test is a big factor in determining whether older adults who are still working should claim benefits before full retirement age. But it isn't the only factor. It's important to consider your financial situation, family situation, health, and more to decide the best move for you. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Working While Receiving Social Security: Understanding the Rules was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Big Tech's AI Takeover? Amazon, Google, and Microsoft Push for 10-Year Regulatory Freeze
Big Tech's AI Takeover? Amazon, Google, and Microsoft Push for 10-Year Regulatory Freeze

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Big Tech's AI Takeover? Amazon, Google, and Microsoft Push for 10-Year Regulatory Freeze

Big Tech is making a big betand investors are watching. Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), Meta (NASDAQ:META), and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) are pushing for a 10-year nationwide ban that would block U.S. states from regulating artificial intelligence. The proposal, already tucked into the House version of Trump's budget bill, is being sold as a way to avoid a messy patchwork of state-level rules that could slow innovation and leave the U.S. trailing China. Their message: keep regulation federal, uniform, and minimalfor now. The lobbying effort is backed by INCOMPAS, a trade group representing tech heavyweights, which launched the AI Competition Center this year to drive home that point. Chip Pickering, INCOMPAS CEO, said the move is about safeguarding America's lead in AI. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with AMZN. But not everyone's buying that narrative. Criticsincluding academics, policy analysts, and even some in Silicon Valleyargue this could be less about innovation and more about locking in dominance. MIT's Max Tegmark called it a power grab, while voices from the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator warned that defanging state oversight now could make AI's societal risks harder to manage later. Even within the GOP, there's friction. Some Republicans like Thom Tillis see the merit in avoiding 50 conflicting rulebooks. Others, like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Josh Hawley, say tying states' hands for a decadewhen no one knows where AI is headedcould backfire hard. The Senate is now weighing how to fit this moratorium into a budget reconciliation bill, which bypasses the need for Democratic votes. Senator Ted Cruz has floated a workaround: cut broadband funding to states that refuse to comply. But the clock is ticking, and the political ground is far from firm. For investors, the outcome could reshape how U.S. AI leaders operateand whether they face a smooth runway or a patchwork of speed bumps. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store