Transfers rule March Madness. See how your team's roster compares.
The Post analyzed the careers of 10,000 college basketball players to see how transfers are increasingly shaping the sport.
If you've ignored college basketball since last March … well, you might be a little confused this week.
That men's player who seemed perfect for his team — the jersey colors made sense, the coach and him seemed like real buddies? He plays for a bigger program now. And that women's player you took to? She also transferred, no matter how many times she called your alma mater her dream school.
This is college basketball in 2025. Player movement is rampant. Players staying put can feel like a surprise. No program is spared from the chaos of The Portal.
To understand the phenomenon and its impact, look no further than the men's and women's NCAA tournament fields. On the men's side, 53 percent of all rotation players previously logged minutes at another Division I school, according to a Washington Post analysis. Roughly one-third of these key contributors — the top eight players in total minutes on each roster — played for another D-I program just last season.
On the women's side, nearly 40 percent of key players previously played for another D-I team — a big jump from before 2021, when the NCAA stopped requiring athletes to sit out a year after transferring. This increase has plateaued somewhat in the past three years, whereas the number of transfers in men's hoops continues to rise. That's mostly because there's more name, image and likeness (NIL) money being thrown around for male players. Still, transfers have also had a major influence on the women's game.
Look up your favorite 2025 tournament team
Men
Auburn
Auburn men's team
Prev. D-I schools
0
1
2
3
Johni Broome
Miles Kelly
Denver Jones
Chad Baker-Mazara
Chaney Johnson
Tahaad Pettiford
Dylan Cardwell
Chris Moore
6,789 minutes
in previous seasons at other D-I schools
6,933 minutes
in previous seasons at this school
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 5 10 15K
The Post collected the rosters of every men's and women's NCAA tournament team since 2010, then analyzed the careers of roughly 10,000 players using statistics logged on the website Sports Reference. The Post found that key contributors for 2025 tournament teams previously played for another D-I school more than three times as often as their peers a decade ago, when just 15 percent of men's tournament rotation players and 9 percent of women's had recorded minutes at a different D-I program.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Auburn, the No. 1 overall seed in the men's field, has four players in its top eight who've logged minutes at another D-I school. And that doesn't include another key contributor who began his career at a D-II program. (Sports Reference only maintains statistics for D-I teams, so transfers from lower levels, including junior colleges, are not included in The Post's analysis.)
The trend extends up and down the men's bracket. Alabama, a No. 2 seed, has five transfers in its top eight. Bryant, a No. 15 seed, has seven. Not only are there more players in this year's tournament field who have transferred than have spent their entire careers at a single school, some are on their third or even fourth D-I team.
In 2025, transfers rule the men's game
Prev. D-I schools
0
1
2
3
Sort by
Number of transfers
Most minutes
Fewer minutes
Memphis
5 seed
Kentucky
3
McNeese
12
Grand Canyon
13
Louisville
8
Texas
11
High Point
13
Bryant
15
Norfolk State
16
Texas Tech
3
Vanderbilt
10
Oklahoma
9
St. John's
2
Mississippi
6
Utah State
10
Xavier
11
Iowa State
3
Michigan
5
Missouri
6
VCU
11
Show more
In the women's tournament, some of the biggest stars — such as Paige Bueckers at Connecticut and Flau'jae Johnson at LSU — have only played for one team. But D-I transfers contribute at nearly every school. Only five of the 68 tournament teams don't have one in their rotations.
Most women's tournament teams have multiple transfers
Prev. D-I schools
0
1
2
3
Sort by
Number of transfers
Most minutes
Fewer minutes
TCU
2 seed
Arkansas State
15
Grand Canyon
13
Maryland
4
Mississippi
5
Oregon
10
Oklahoma State
7
Alabama
5
Florida Gulf Coast
14
West Virginia
6
Michigan State
7
San Diego State
14
North Carolina
3
Tennessee
5
Illinois
8
Baylor
4
Mississippi State
9
LSU
3
Kansas State
5
California
8
Show more
For three straight years — Duke in 2015, Villanova in 2016 and North Carolina in 2017 — men's teams won national titles without a single transfer among their key players. The women's champions around that time had similar roster constructions, with development at a single school far more common than it is today. By contrast, many of this year's top contenders are powered by transfers, especially on the men's side.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
The reasons for the transfer boom amount to a perfect storm. In the summer of 2021, the NCAA permitted athletes to profit off their NIL, which quickly led to boosters paying de facto salaries to football and men's basketball players. The NCAA eased transfer restrictions that year, too, allowing athletes to switch schools once without sitting for a year. Then last April, even those rules were eliminated, meaning players could transfer wherever, whenever, without the consequence of stalling their athletic careers.
Not every transfer decision is about money, especially on a women's side that attracts far less interest from boosters. Players transfer for more minutes. They transfer because their coaches leave and they want to follow them or start fresh somewhere else. They transfer to escape a bad fit. They transfer, in some cases, simply because they can, because they need a reset and that itch is easier to scratch than ever.
But money is a major factor in many cases. For players who won't play professionally, transferring — or the threat of transferring — is often the best way to cash in on their talents. And for players who will play professionally, there will always be coaches trying to poach them.
The number of transfers on tournament teams has skyrocketed Men's teams
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Women's teams
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Not all transfers are new to their teams. Some joined their programs years ago. But when you include freshmen, about half of rotation players in the men's field hadn't logged any minutes at their school before this season.
Of course, there are exceptions, including Purdue (a No. 4 seed) and Marquette (a No. 7 seed). Neither team has a single player in its eight-man rotation who has transferred at any point in his college career.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
And then there are the most extreme cases of the Portal Effect. At St. John's, six of Rick Pitino's top eight players in minutes are transfers. He recently said on the Pardon My Take podcast that he is not recruiting any high school players for next season, feeling he can't win big with them in the transfer era. At Kentucky, the entire rotation joined the team this past offseason, after coach John Calipari left for Arkansas. Together, the Wildcats' top eight players entered this season with plenty of experience: close to 18,000 combined minutes. It was just all at other D-I schools.
Kentucky 2025 men's team
Prev. D-I schools
0
1
2
3
Otega Oweh
Koby Brea
Andrew Carr
Amari Williams
Jaxson Robinson
Lamont Butler
Brandon Garrison
Ansley Almonor
17,726 minutes
in previous seasons at other D-I schools
0 minutes
in previous seasons at this school
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 5 10 15K
While constant player movement potentially has hurt the popularity of men's basketball, having at least some roster continuity has helped the women's game grow. Entering the season, the eight-man rotations of men's tournament teams had, on average, roughly 4,400 combined minutes on the court at their current schools. A decade ago, that number was 6,800. On the women's side, the decrease has been less stark — from 7,600 then to 6,400 now.
Together, the Kentucky Wildcats' top eight players entered this season with plenty of experience: close to 18,000 combined minutes. It was just all at other D-I schools. (Steve Roberts/Imagn Images)
The connection between familiarity and fandom is easy to see. Take Iowa's women's Final Four team from a year ago: Yes, the hype was mostly due to Caitlin Clark. The rotation, though, entered the season with 13,000 combined minutes at the school; no men's rotation in the past three NCAA tournaments has had that much combined experience at a program. Unlike with many men's rosters, fans had watched the whole Iowa team grow over time.
In this year's tournament, most of the top women's teams have just one or two rotation players who previously played elsewhere, including title contenders South Carolina and Connecticut (one each). UCLA, however, has four, including standout center Lauren Betts, who began her career at Stanford.
South Carolina 2025 women's team
Prev. D-I schools
0
1
2
3
Te-Hina Paopao
Raven Johnson
Bree Hall
Joyce Edwards
Chloe Kitts
Tessa Johnson
MiLaysia Fulwiley
Sania Feagin
2,431 minutes
in previous seasons at other D-I schools
7,578 minutes
in previous seasons at this school
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 5 10 15K
Coaches and programs spend a ton of time fundraising, both to retain players and win the bidding war for transfers. That process, the endless loop of pleading and negotiating, contributed to why Tony Bennett, Mike Krzyzewski and other prominent coaches have retired in recent years, saying they couldn't juggle these demands with the already grueling job of running a program.
As soon as this summer, schools could be permitted to pay athletes directly for the first time. In anticipation of that rule change, schools are already trying to slow the roster churn by inking athletes to multiyear contracts, according to multiple agents and coaches who have negotiated deals for the next academic year. It's just unclear if any effort to roll back player movement will be successful.
For now, though, no matter the seeds, no matter the matchup, transfers will have a massive influence on March Madness. And with the transfer portal opening again next week, the lucky schools will spend the month juggling game prep with roster management, their seasons and future success all on the line.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Hagens Berman Responds to Appeals to NCAA College Athlete Name, Image and Likeness Settlement
OAKLAND, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Following the federal court's final approval to a historic $20 billion plus settlement with the NCAA allowing payments and benefits to college athletes for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL), Hagens Berman responded to the first appeal. 'If these lawyers believe that a Title IX case will succeed, they should bring it and not hijack payments to college athletes that could be lifechanging.' To address questions from NCAA athletes about the impact of the appeal, Hagens Berman issued the following statement: 'Attorneys John Clune and Ashlyn Hare of Hutchinson Black and Cook LLC and Rebecca Peterson-Fisher of Katz Banks Kumin LLP have filed a notice of their intent to appeal the historic NCAA settlement approved June 6, 2025, by Judge Claudia Wilken. 'This appeal will block payments to hundreds of thousands of athletes, delaying payments by a minimum of several months to potentially a year or more. These attorneys are pursuing an appeal based on a Title IX issue that Judge Wilken already disposed of correctly, quickly and multiple times. 'Judge Wilken noted that these attorneys cited 'no authority that Title IX applies to damages awards distributions or that damages distributions made by a claims administrator are subject to Title IX.'' 'This is an antitrust case about competition, it is not a Title IX case, and now hundreds of thousands of athletes will have to wait to recover for past wrongs that were addressed in this lawsuit in order for these attorneys to take on this unrelated issue,' added Hagens Berman co-founder and managing partner, Steve Berman, who serves as court-appointed co-lead counsel. 'If these lawyers believe that a Title IX case will succeed, they should bring it and not hijack payments to college athletes that could be lifechanging.' Straight from the Bench In Judge Wilken's June 6, 2025, opinion on the order granting final approval to the settlement, the court clearly states that it overrules objections, noting, 'There is nothing in the SA [settlement agreement] that would prevent or prohibit schools from distributing benefits and compensation pursuant to the Injunctive Relief Settlement in a manner that complies with Title IX.' Berman added, 'Judge Wilken had made that same ruling earlier in the case, theoretically allowing objectors ample time to find authority to back up their objection, and they failed. It's a shame given this utter failure they will be holding up payments to athletes. I say shame on them.' Hagens Berman represents a class of nearly 400,000 college athletes in the lawsuit in which the total value under the new revenue-sharing model is expected to exceed $20 billion over the next 10 years. The settlement resolves three pending antitrust lawsuits, House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v. NCAA. Class members in the three affected cases may find out more about the claim process by visiting the settlement website at . Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm's determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of 'Most Feared Plaintiff's Firm,' MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law
Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement that the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion,' Hare said. 'Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports.' Advertisement The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. Advertisement 'This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes,' Hare said. 'Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case.' The appeal was filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, and was first reported by Front Office Sports. It would be heard by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'No guarantees' that Oakmont rough will cough up every golf ball it swallows
'No guarantees' that Oakmont rough will cough up every golf ball it swallows OAKMONT, Pa. – The U.S. Open is synonymous with tall, thick rough. Especially at Oakmont, where the juicy mix of Kentucky bluegrass, rye and poa annua will be kept around 5 inches and change, continually manicured so that it stays upright and keeps swallowing golf balls. It feels worse. Advertisement 'Try 9 inches,' said one competitor, only half jokingly. Jackson Koivun, the standout Auburn junior who ascended to No. 1 in the World Amateur Golf Ranking on Wednesday, has already lost a ball to the rough, on the 10th hole Monday. He's not the only one – Bryson DeChambeau and Preston Summerhays, in the same group, had drives disappear right of the 14th fairway – and if players haven't, it's almost a guarantee that they and their caddies have spent multiple minutes these past few days looking for errant shots. 'This is the worst rough that I've seen,' said Koivun's caddie, Chris Williams, a former world No. 1 amateur in his own right and now the Tigers' assistant. The rough is thriving, in part, because of a record May for rainfall in Allegheny County. Slightly bigger fairways following a recent renovation by Gil Hanse have also emboldened the USGA to be more aggressive with the setup, which includes the elimination of the graduated rough that competitors saw the last time this championship came to Oakmont, nine years ago. When you spot mowers – several dozens of them, in sync – running about the property, there isn't much cutting being done but rather what can better be described as fluffing. Advertisement 'We just felt we needed the rough that we have,' said John Bodenhamer, the USGA's chief championships officer. 'We think it's appropriate for the driving corridors, and we're looking forward to seeing how it unfolds.' Of course, with this tenacious of rough comes greater responsibility to the spotters. Perhaps the most unsung of heroes this week will be the four to six skilled sets of eyes on each hole. That's in addition to the dozen or so marshals per hole. 'This is like watching ketchup come out of a Heinz bottle, the anticipation,' said one marshal as he awaited tee shots on the par-4 17th hole during Wednesday's practice round. Added another, as she arrived for her shift: "I'm ready. I've got my sunglasses." Advertisement They'll be reinforced, too, as the dedicated spotters, not deployed for the practice days and 330 in total, will punch in beginning Thursday morning with the sole task of locating balls and flagging them. 'I'm glad we have spotters up there,' said Rory McIlroy, who also played Oakmont two Mondays ago in an outing, when there was absolutely no help looking for balls that missed the short grass. '… You hit a ball off the fairway and you were looking for a good couple of minutes just to find it.' Added Ben An: '18-handicappers will not finish a round without volunteers.' Try 13-handicappers, too. One such player who played Oakmont last month said he lost four balls in a hole and a half. Advertisement "And then I just walked in," said the man, who is working as a spotter on the 18th hole Friday and Saturday. One final-hole spotter for Sunday was already praying that they wouldn't factor in the outcome: "Imagine if the leader misses one right and we can't find it..." PGA: U.S. Open - Practice Round Tiger Woods might have 16 major titles if not for his lost drive on his first hole of the 2003 Open Championship at Royal St. George's. Woods and an army of marshals spent 5 minutes looking for his Nike '1' golf ball that day but to no avail. Woods had to return to the tee and would eventually finish two shots behind winner Ben Curtis. Advertisement Bodenhamer seemed confident the USGA's platoon of pupils would ensure that every ball is found this week. 'We have plenty of spotters,' Bodenhamer said, 'but no guarantees we won't lose a golf ball or two. But we're going to do everything we possibly can not to do so. But we feel good about that.' Now, finding balls and playing them are different stories. Most balls nestled deep in the rough will require hacking out with a lob wedge, with some of those shots requiring players to take their swings while barely being able to see the ball. Sometimes guys will get lucky, but it won't be often. Oakmont's famous SWAT games usually produce a breakeven best-ball score of 69 to 70. It's been at least seven shots higher in recent months as the club has prepared for this U.S. Open. Advertisement 'I don't think people understand how thick the rough is,' Collin Morikawa said. 'It's not wispy like the club is going to go through. … You have to be steep to get to the ball in the rough, and when you're steep, it delofts the face, so you're just hitting it deeper into the earth. It's very, very hard.' Added McIlroy: 'The person with the most patience and the best attitude this week is the one that's going to win.' Being the luckiest won't hurt, either.
