Canada police bust trucks carrying $47M in cocaine; $1.6M in stolen electronics recovered in US
Canadian investigators recently arrested nine men for using trucks to smuggle cocaine from the U.S. into Canada; while police in Arizona recovered a truckload carrying $1.6 million worth of stolen cargo; and freight theft cases in Illinois and Kentucky surged in April.
Canadian authorities said Tuesday they have arrested nine men following the seizure of $47.9 million worth of bricked cocaine, the largest drug bust in Peel Regional Police history.
The arrests follow a year-long international investigation into a transnational organized crime network smuggling drugs using tractor-trailers from the U.S. into the Toronto area, according to a news release.
'Thanks to the leadership of Peel Regional Police, and the support of national and international law enforcement agencies … a transnational criminal network is no longer operating or flooding our communities with illicit drugs from the United States,' Peel Regional Police Chief Nishan Duraiappah said in a statement. 'Organized crime continues to exploit borders and pose serious threats to public safety.'Peel, located about 24 miles from Toronto, is considered the heart of the trucking industry in the area. It is in Ontario, a province in east-central Canada that borders the U.S.
Peel investigators began looking into a cocaine smuggling operation in June 2024 that was using commercial vehicles to carry the drugs from the U.S. into Canada.
Over the course of a six month investigation, Peel authorities linked multiple individuals, trucking companies, and storage sites to the transnational smuggling operation.
The nine men arrested in connection to the case are from the Ontario area. They face 35 criminal charges related to drug trafficking and firearms offences. Two loaded semi-automatic handguns were also recovered, police said.Police said the accused men were held for a bail hearing at the Ontario Court of Justice in Brampton, Canada.
Supply chain risk management firm Overhaul recently worked with law enforcement to recover a full truckload of stolen electronics after the tractor-trailer carrying the load was taken from the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport.
The theft occurred when the shipment was fraudulently uplifted from the airport, Overhaul said in a news release.
Instead of being delivered to its intended destination in Childress, Texas, the cargo was transported through New Mexico and eventually into Arizona.
The tractor-trailer was located in Flagstaff, Arizona, where state troopers successfully initiated a traffic stop. During the stop, authorities discovered three individuals in the tractor, two of whom were identified as drivers. All three subjects were arrested at the scene.
Further investigation revealed that two of the subjects were in the country illegally, Overhaul said.
The trailer and its cargo, valued at $1.6 million, were recovered intact and returned to its owner.
New data from GearTrack's Cargo Security Index and Verisk's CargoNet shows California, Texas, and Illinois accounted for 68% of cargo theft incidents in April, according to a news release.Cargo theft cases in Illinois during April were up 81% month-over-month, while cases in Kentucky skyrocketed 200% month-over-month.
Cargo theft cases in Florida declined by 44% in April compared to March.
Electronics, vehicles, and apparel were the top targets of cargo thieves – including a stolen shipment of bitcoin mining computers valued at $2.7 million discovered at the Los Angeles International Airport.
'Recent tariffs on imported vehicles and auto components may also be contributing to a rise in vehicle related thefts,' according to the Cargo Security Index.
The post Canada police bust trucks carrying $47M in cocaine; $1.6M in stolen electronics recovered in US appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lone Air India Survivor in Seat 11A Speaks Out, Reports Say
News reports from India say a man named Viswashkumar Ramesh was the lone survivor of the Air India crash, and he's already speaking out, describing how quickly the tragedy unfolded. India TV News attributed the information to Police Commissioner GS Malik on June 12, reporting that the "lone survivor was found out of 242 passengers and crew on board the Air India flight that crashed near Ahmedabad airport." According to India TV News, Malik made the comment to ANI, saying "that police found one survivor in seat 11A" and that he was undergoing treatment in a hospital. Throughout history, a handful of people have been the lone survivors in major plane crashes, with one flight attendant surviving a 33,000-feet BBC also reported that police officials had told Indian media that Ramesh survived the crash. According to BBC, the survivor is a British national whose full name is sometimes spelled as Vishwash Kumar Ramesh. Indian media outlets quoted the miracle passenger as telling reporters, according to BBC: "Thirty seconds after take-off, there was a loud noise and then the plane crashed. It all happened so quickly." 'Cannot say anything about the number of deaths yet. The death toll may increase as the flight crashed in a residential area," the police official said, according to India TV News. Photos of the man with injuries to his face circulated on social media. Malik told reporters that the miracle passenger's "seat number was 11 A in the flight," according to India TV News, which shared a photo of Ramesh's plane ticket. That site reported that Ramesh was "returning to London after Gujarat visit" and told News 18, "There were bodies all around me, there were pieces of the plane all around me. Someone took hold of me and put me in an ambulance." The lone survivor suffered 'impact injuries' on his chest, eyes and feet, the site reported, adding that he was traveling with his brother Ajay Kumar Ramesh, 45. Within 30 seconds after takeoff, the issues started, he told Indian media, according to India TV News. Video emerged of Ramesh walking around. Reuters is also reporting that one man survived. Authorities believe there might be survivors of the crash, which killed at least 200 people, including five students eating lunch at a medical college cafeteria on the ground, according to The New York Times. The Air India plane, which carried 242 people, crashed shortly after takeoff on June 12, according to The Times. The plane was headed to London. A series of horrific videos have emerged showing the moment the plane crashed as well as the wreckage on the ground. The plane crashed in Ahmedabad. According to BBC, the doomed plane carried "169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian on the Gatwick Airport-bound flight." The cause is not yet Air India Survivor in Seat 11A Speaks Out, Reports Say first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 12, 2025
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Detective wasn't interested in the truth, had ‘fundamental misunderstanding' of consent laws, Crown tells judge at Hockey Canada trial
LONDON, Ont.—The police detective who first investigated allegations of sexual assault by members of the 2018 Canadian world junior championship team didn't understand the legal definition of consent and didn't have 'a genuine interest' in the truth, the Crown argued at the players' trial . Det. Steve Newton, who at the time was with the London police's sexual assault and child abuse section, declined to lay charges in February 2019 following an eight-month investigation, which included interviewing the complainant several times and most of the hockey players now on trial, as well as reviewing surveillance and other video evidence. London police documents make clear the high-profile sex assault investigation was reopened in 2022 due to 'a resurgence in media attention' — with London police documents make clear the high-profile sex assault investigation was reopened in 2022 due to 'a resurgence in media attention' — with As the Star first reported last month , Newton had doubts about the complainant's assertion that she was too drunk to consent, and wondered in his report where she had been an 'active participant' when engaging sexually with players in a room at the Delta Armouries hotel in the early hours of June 19, 2018. He reviewed the evidence with his superior before deciding not to lay charges. The force reopened their probe with a different detective in charge, Lyndsey Ryan, amid intense public pressure in 2022 after TSN reported that Hockey Canada had quickly settled, for an undisclosed sum, the complainant's $3.5-million sexual lawsuit filed against the organization and eight unnamed John Doe players. Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube, and Cal Foote were then charged with sexual assault in 2024. In written arguments filed as part of closing submissions happening all week at the judge-alone trial , Crown attorneys Meaghan Cunningham and Heather Donkers argue that Newton had a 'fundamental misunderstanding' of the legal definition of consent, and that the 'shortcomings' of his investigation help explain why the complainant testified she felt there were details about the night she wasn't comfortable sharing with Newton. The now-retired police officer testified at trial that because the complainant was 'participating in the acts that were occurring in the room without resisting, or you know, saying she didn't want to do it,' he concluded that she had been an 'active participant' with a 'certain level of consent' on her part. The Crown and defence have completed their evidence at the Hockey Canada sex assault trial. Here's what you need to know to catch up. The Crown and defence have completed their evidence at the Hockey Canada sex assault trial. Here's what you need to know to catch up. 'This answer reflects an incorrect understanding of what consent actually means in law, and this erroneous conclusion undoubtedly impacted how Det. Newton moved forward from there,' the prosecutors write. The arguments come in a set of filings the Crown has given to Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia as part of the prosecution's closing submissions, which continue Thursday. Written filings are more common in judge-alone trials. Carroccia is set to deliver her judgment in the case on July 24. The central issue is whether the complainant consented to the sexual activity in the room, with the Crown arguing this week that the players failed to take any reasonable steps to confirm the woman was consenting to each sexual act, and that the woman never made an 'affirmative, voluntary choice.' The complainant had met McLeod at Jack's Bar and returned to his room where they had consensual sex, only for multiple men to come in afterward, some prompted by a group chat text from McLeod about a '3 way.' A screenshot of a group chat involving members of Canada's 2018 world junior championship team. The Crown has alleged that McLeod had intercourse with the complainant a second time in the hotel room's bathroom; that Formenton separately had intercourse with the complainant in the bathroom; that McLeod, Hart and Dubé obtained oral sex from the woman; that Dubé slapped her naked buttocks, and that Foote did the splits over her head while she was on a bedsheet on the ground and his genitals 'grazed' her face — all without her consent. Part of Newton's reasoning that the complainant wasn't too drunk to consent was due to viewing surveillance footage from the Delta hotel lobby, where the complainant is seen walking up and down stairs unaided in heels. He testified that while he also obtained surveillance footage from Jack's, he never viewed it. The prosecutors argue the Jack's footage 'could have (and did) provided evidence' of how much alcohol the complainant drank that night, and 'other indicators of her level of intoxication,' though they don't specify. And although Newton obtained the complainant's clothing from the night in question, he never sent them off for forensic testing, and eventually returned them to her. Finally, Newton 'made only a passive effort' to interview the players who were in room 209 at the Delta, the Crown says. His report indicates that in the summer of 2018, he asked lawyer Danielle Robitaille — who was leading an independent probe into the matter for Hockey Canada — to pass along his message that he was interested in speaking with any players who were willing to talk. (Of the five accused men, the complainant had only been able to identify McLeod and Formenton, who were roommates at the Delta that night.) The players were 'compelled' to sit for an interview with Hockey Canada. But they weren't told the investigator knew police wanted access to her The players were 'compelled' to sit for an interview with Hockey Canada. But they weren't told the investigator knew police wanted access to her He interviewed all of the men on trial except for Hart, although at the time Foote was only treated as a witness to the sexual activity in the room. Newton told them upfront he had no grounds at that point to lay criminal charges. The men who admitted to sexual contact with the woman maintained it was consensual, and that she had been demanding to have sex with players — a version of events the Crown has asked the judge to reject as having been cooked up by the men after the fact. 'Det. Newton did not ask very many questions of the interviewees. Notably, he failed to ask them about whether there was any slapping or if anyone had done the splits on (the complainant), which were things she had reported in her initial police interview. The detective also did not ask any of the interviewees to consider turning over text messages that they referred to,' Cunningham and Donkers state. For example, Formenton told Newton that he had received a text from McLeod about a three-way, but he no longer had it as he had a new phone. But Newton didn't go back to McLeod to ask for that text. In his own interview with Newton, McLeod claimed he didn't know why men kept showing up to the room, and expressly denied that it was in response to messages from him. 'The interviews leave the clear impression that Det. Newton had made up his mind that there would never be grounds for charges (based on his erroneous or incomplete understanding of consent) and that he was conducting these interviews to say that he did, rather than with a genuine interest at getting at the truth,' the Crown argues. London police approached the case from a different angle in 2022: that the complainant only went along with the sexual activity because she was intimidated to be in a room full of men she didn't know, and that they should have known she wasn't actually consenting. One of the few new pieces of evidence was the players' group chat from 2018, which included McLeod's three-way text to his teammates in the early hours of June 19. The chat also included messages sent back and forth between players on June 26, 2018, that the Crown has argued is evidence of the men trying to unite on a false version of events. And because the police now believed they had grounds to lay charges, they obtained a warrant to get Robitaille's file from the Hockey Canada investigation, which included interviews with McLeod, Formenton, and Dube given under penalty of a lifetime ban from Hockey Canada activities if they refused to cooperate. Robitaille didn't tell them the police planned to get a warrant for her files. The men had refused to speak to police in 2022 to maintain their right to silence, but their interviews with Robitaille ended up in the hands of the police anyway. A different judge tossed those statements during pre-trial hearings last year, concluding that the 'unfair and prejudicial' way they were obtained harmed the men's right to a fair trial. Det. Ryan, who led the reopened police probe in 2022, testified as the last witness at trial that the complainant was 'quite upset' when she told her that her allegations were being once again investigated. 'I felt pretty bad because it felt like — I got the sense that I was opening up some wounds that she was trying to close,' Ryan said. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal in long-running Facebook privacy case
OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to review a ruling that concluded Facebook broke federal privacy law by failing to adequately inform users of risks to their data when using the popular social media platform. Last September, the Federal Court of Appeal found Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, did not obtain the meaningful consent required by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act between 2013 and 2015. The decision overturned a 2023 Federal Court ruling. The Court of Appeal said Facebook invited millions of apps onto its platform and did not adequately supervise them. It found that the Federal Court's failure to engage with the relevant evidence on this point was an error of law. Privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne called the Court of Appeal decision an acknowledgment that international firms whose business models rely on users' data must respect Canadian privacy law. Facebook applied for a hearing at the Supreme Court, arguing the Court of Appeal took the wrong approach to consent and security safeguards under the privacy law. It said in a written application that, rather than evaluating Facebook's multi-layered efforts to obtain meaningful consent, the Court of Appeal focused myopically on the platform's privacy policy alone. The Supreme Court, following its usual practice, gave no reasons Thursday for agreeing to hear the case. A 2019 investigation report from then-federal privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien and his British Columbia counterpart cited major shortcomings in Facebook's procedures and called for stronger laws to protect Canadians. The probe followed reports that Facebook let an outside organization use a digital app to access users' personal information, which was then passed to others. The app, at one point known as "This is Your Digital Life," encouraged users to complete a personality quiz but collected information about the people who installed the app and data about their Facebook friends. Recipients of the information included the British consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, which was involved in U.S. political campaigns and targeted messaging. About 300,000 Facebook users worldwide added the app, leading to the potential disclosure of the personal information of approximately 87 million others, including more than 600,000 Canadians, the commissioners' report said. The commissioners concluded that Facebook violated PIPEDA by failing to obtain valid and meaningful consent from installing users and their friends, and that it had "inadequate safeguards" to protect user information. Facebook disputed the investigation's findings. The company has said it tried to work with the privacy commissioner's office and take measures that would go above and beyond what other companies do. In early 2020, Therrien asked the Federal Court to declare Facebook had violated the law. A judge ruled the commissioner failed to establish that Facebook breached the law on meaningful consent. He also agreed with Facebook's argument that once a user authorizes it to disclose information to an app, the social media company's safeguarding duties under PIPEDA come to an end. In its decision, the Court of Appeal noted Facebook's contention that users read privacy policies presented to them when they sign up to social networking websites — something the judges called "a dubious assumption" given such documents can run to thousands of words. "Terms that are on their face superficially clear do not necessarily translate into meaningful consent," Justice Donald Rennie wrote for a three-member panel. "Apparent clarity can be lost or obscured in the length and miasma of the document and the complexity of its terms." In this case, Rennie said, a central question was whether a reasonable person "would have understood that in downloading a personality quiz (or any app), they were consenting to the risk that the app would scrape their data and the data of their friends, to be used in a manner contrary to Facebook's own internal rules (i.e. sold to a corporation to develop metrics to target advertising in advance of the 2016 U.S. election)." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
