Court case between Reliance Communications, Ericsson returns after 6 years
Nearly six years since Sweden's Ericsson won ₹ 550 crore dues from Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom) following a Supreme Court order, the bankrupt telco's demand to return the money is coming up in court. On Thursday, the Mumbai bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will hear RCom resolution professional's petition that the Swedish company is an operational creditor, and paying it first while financial creditors wait would be a case of preferential treatment.
Once among India's leading telecom operators, RCom could not survive a brutal tariff war that began in 2016, and filed for bankruptcy in 2019. Ericsson won its dues after a court battle the same year, but the story did not end there—the RP had sought refund of the money in the same year, which Ericsson rejected.
In a court petition this week, RCom's resolution professional Anish Nanavaty of Deloitte said, "...payment to the respondent amounts to a "preference" as the said payment has the effect of putting the respondent in a beneficial position vis-a-vis the other creditors of the corporate debtor in the event of distribution being made under liquidation of the corporate debtor. The respondent here refers to Ericsson while the corporate debtor is RCom.
Ericsson is in no mood to give in.
"The demand for refund is an abuse of process of law inasmuch as the settlement and undertaking was in an order passed by the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India," Anil Kher, senior advocate representing Ericsson told Mint. Article 142 allows the apex court to pass any order to ensure justice.
In 2019, Ericsson had asked NCLT to dismiss the petition "with exemplary costs", calling it wholly misconceived. The company had also called the petition "motivated at the instance of the members of the Committee of Creditors who are also the Financial Creditors.' Nanavaty's petition this week is a rejoinder to this.
Nanavaty did not respond to emailed queries.
In 2013, RCom and its subsidiaries Reliance Telecom and Reliance Infratel picked Ericsson to maintain their networks. The entry of Reliance Jio three years later sparked a tariff war, forcing most of the weaker players to fold up. In 2017, Ericsson took the telco and its subsidiaries to the insolvency court as dues rose to ₹ 1,500 crore. The case went from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), with the latter asking the telco to pay up by 15 December 2018. When the deadline was crossed, Ericsson filed a contempt petition against Anil Ambani, then chairman of RCom in the Supreme Court The two units were made parties to the case.
RCom was already sinking under debt of ₹ 46,000 crore, and besieged by local and foreign lenders including State Bank of India and China Development Bank. Its operational creditors included the telecom department, tower companies and equipment vendors. In early 2019, it filed for bankruptcy, and Deloitte was appointed RP.
In 2019, RCom paid ₹ 458.77 crore to the Swedish telecom equipment maker (about ₹ 118 crore was deposited earlier), clearing the outstanding dues. At that time, the former chairman, in a statement, thanked his elder brother and his wife—Mukesh and Nita Ambani—for their "timely support".
However, RCom's efforts to sell land, towers and spectrum to Reliance Jio and Brookfield fell through.
In the same year, a new battlefront opened up, when Deloitte moved NCLAT demanding a refund from Ericsson, calling it a preferential payment. The appellate court directed the parties to head to NCLT's Mumbai bench. This matter has been resurrected and is expected to be heard on Thursday.
In 2020, RCom's committee of creditors had selected UVARCL as the preferred bidder for RCom and Reliance Telecom, while Jio was selected for Reliance Infratel's assets. However, the matter is also stuck in legal hurdles.
First Published: 30 Apr 2025, 10:19 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Illinois toy firm takes Trump tariffs to SC in long shot bid for quick win
An Illinois toy company challenged President Donald Trump's tariffs in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday in a long shot bid to press the justices to quickly decide whether they are legal. Learning Resources Inc filed an appeal asking the Supreme Court to take up the case soon rather than let it continue to play out in lower courts. The company argues the Republican president illegally imposed tariffs under an emergency powers law rather than getting approval from Congress. While the company won an early victory in a lower court, the order is on hold as an appeals court considers a similar ruling putting a broader block on Trump's tariffs. The appeals court has allowed Trump to continue collecting tariffs under the emergency powers law ahead of arguments set for late July. The company argued in court documents the case can't wait that long, in light of the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims. The Supreme Court is typically reluctant to take up cases before appeals courts have decided them, lowering the odds that the justices will agree to hear it as quickly as the company is asking. Still, Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said tariffs and uncertainty are taking a major toll now. He's looking ahead to the back-to-school and holiday seasons, when the company usually makes most of its sales for the year. All the people that are raising their prices are doing it with a sense of dread, Woldenberg told The Associated Press. But, we do not have a choice. We absolutely do not have a choice. The company's attorneys suggested the court could hear arguments in late summer or early fall. The Trump administration has defended the tariffs by arguing that the emergency powers law gives the president the authority to regulate imports during national emergencies and that the country's longtime trade deficit qualifies as a national emergency. Trump has framed tariffs as a tool to lure factories back to America, raise money for the Treasury Department and strike more favourable trade agreements with other countries. Woldenberg said he's putting enormous resources into shifting his company's supply base but the process is time-consuming and uncertain. I think that our case raises uniquely important questions that this administration won't accept unless the Supreme Court rules on them, he said. Based in Vernon Hills, Illinois, the family-owned company's products include the Pretend & Play Calculator Cash Register for USD 43.99 and Botley the Coding Robot for USD 57.99.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Economic Offences Affect Nation's Financial Health and Must Be Treated Sternly: HC
Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of Bombay high court recently refused bail to an accused in a Rs145 crore scam involving alleged financial fraud against farmers. The court observed that economic offences pose a serious threat to society and must be handled with a firm approach. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It described such crimes as a 'class apart', citing their long-lasting damage to the country's financial health and public morality. Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, while quoting Supreme Court rulings, stated, "The consistent view is that socio-economic offences have deep-rooted conspiracies affecting the moral fibre of the society and causing irreparable harm which needs to be dealt with sternly." She noted that offences involving public funds cannot be treated on par with ordinary crimes due to their systemic impact. The accused, Ramanrao Bolla, approached the court for bail on the basis of his cooperation during the investigation and his clean criminal record. However, the court declined relief, stating that the magnitude of the fraud and its effect on the rural population demanded a cautious approach. Strongly opposing the bail, additional public prosecutor Neeraj Jawde contended that Bolla conspired with others to fraudulently obtain agricultural loans in the names of multiple farmers. "The petitioner is one of the conspirators and owns warehouses and hatched a conspiracy to dupe farmers, got opened their bank accounts, obtained loans, and amount of loans, which is public money, is siphoned by the applicant. Total amount siphoned by him comes to Rs145 crores. Forensic Audit Report was collected and involvement of the applicant revealed," Jawde told the court. Bolla, who has been in custody since October 28, 2023, faces charges under the Indian Penal Code, Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Joshi-Phalke also highlighted the human cost of the alleged fraud. "From the evidence, it is apparent that by hatching conspiracy by the petitioner and other co-accused, poor farmers were deceived and some of them committed suicide and some of them are under mental stress," Justice Joshi-Phalke noted. The court relied on past Supreme Court precedents to underline that bail in cases of economic offences should not be granted routinely due to the gravity and far-reaching consequences of such crimes.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Toy company challenges Trump tariffs at US Supreme Court; claims misuse of emergency powers; seeks urgent ruling
This is a representative AI image An Illinois-based toy maker, Learning Resources Inc., has taken its tariff battle to the US Supreme Court, urging the justices to swiftly rule on the legality of former President Donald Trump's trade tariffs. In legal documents, the company emphasised the urgency, citing "the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims." The company contends that Trump overstepped his authority by using an emergency powers law to impose tariffs without congressional approval. It filed the appeal in a bid to bypass ongoing proceedings in lower courts. Despite securing an initial lower court victory, the ruling remains suspended whilst an appeals court evaluates a similar decision that more broadly challenges Trump's tariffs. Currently, Trump maintains authority to collect tariffs under emergency powers legislation, with arguments scheduled for late July. The Supreme Court traditionally avoids cases before appeals courts reach decisions, reducing the likelihood of granting the expedited hearing requested by the company. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 지금 시작하세요 [자세히 보기] 임플란트 더 알아보기 Undo Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg highlighted the current impact of tariffs and uncertainty, particularly concerning the approaching back-to-school and holiday periods, which typically generate their highest annual sales. "All the people that are raising their prices are doing it with a sense of dread," Woldenberg told The Associated Press. But, "we do not have a choice. We absolutely do not have a choice," he added. The company's legal representatives proposed scheduling arguments for late summer or early autumn. The Trump administration's defence maintains that emergency powers legislation authorises presidential control over imports during national emergencies, considering the persistent trade deficit as such an emergency. Trump presents tariffs as mechanisms to encourage domestic manufacturing, generate Treasury revenue, and negotiate more advantageous international trade agreements. Woldenberg described investing substantial resources into diversifying his company's supply chain, whilst acknowledging the process as lengthy and unpredictable. "I think that our case raises uniquely important questions that this administration won't accept unless the Supreme Court rules on them," he said. The family-owned enterprise, located in Vernon Hills, Illinois, produces items including the Pretend & Play Calculator Cash Register for $43.99 and Botley the Coding Robot for $57.99.
