Large majority of Gisborne residents want local control of water services
Former Gisborne Mayor Meng Foon (top left) was in favour of keeping the region's water services in council hands in his verbal submission to the Local Water Done Well Hearings. Ngai Tamanuhiri Chair Pauline Hill (bottom left) and Maraetaha Incorporated Trustee Beth Tupara-Tekene and chairwoman Bella Hawkins.
Photo:
LDR/Paul Rickard/Zita Campbell
An overwhelming 90 percent of Gisborne submitters are in favour of keeping the region's water services in council hands, with ring-fenced funding and targeted rates.
The favoured model could result in households connected to water services facing an average rate increase of $100 per year, while unconnected properties may have an equivalent decrease, according to council estimates.
During a meeting on Wednesday, Gisborne District councillors voted to approve the modified in-house delivery model for its future water services delivery plan.
Councils must submit their water plans to the Government by September 2025 under the Local Water Done Well reforms.
Previous Mayor Meng Foon was among those who submitted, writing in his submission, "water is a public good" and it should stay in public hands to prevent exploitation.
"CCO and private businesses are there for profit, as they are responsible for making a profit," Foon said.
Former Gisborne Mayor Meng Foon verbally submitted to the Local Water Done Well Hearings at the Gisborne District Council chambers on Wednesday morning.
Photo:
Gisborne Herald/Paul Rickard
Consultation ran from 1 April to 1 May this year, with 204 submissions received.
Just one in 10 submitters supported establishing a council-controlled organisation (CCO), governed independently of the council, with water services funded through user charges and external financing.
Under the CCO model, stormwater charges would remain with the council because of its connection with other services like roads and parks.
This option would involve higher set-up costs and debt in the short term, but would have more borrowing capacity for upgrades.
At the hearings, Foon spoke on his submission, supporting the council's recommended option to retain water services under council control.
"Your mana in ensuring that you control and have direction of our waters is utmost.
"Even though it's a CCO, your private organisation cannot borrow money as cheaply as the council."
However, Maraetaha Incorporated, a Māori land entity of Ngāi Tāmanuhiri shareholders, wanted the CCO option to enable an independent governance structure that could accommodate "formal Māori representation and co-governance".
Trustee Beth Tupara-Katene said the Maraetaha lands were taken under the Public Works Act to develop the region's water infrastructure, including three supply dams.
"These sites now form a critical part of the city's municipal water supply, yet our shareholders and whānau have long been excluded from the decision-making, governance and benefit streams associated with that infrastructure," Tupara-Katene told the hearings.
She said the Waitangi Tribunal and Supreme Court have affirmed that Māori hold customary rights to water, which are protected under Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Local Water Done Well intends to make services more efficient, locally accountable and future-proofed.
"From our perspective, this can only be achieved if the model is built on the right foundations, recognising Treaty obligations, Māori property rights and our deep and enduring connection to our water," Tupara-Katene said.
Submitters opting to maintain council control emphasised the value of local control (60 mentions), trust in council governance (44) and concern over affordability (62), according to the council's meeting report.
"[The CCO option] was commonly associated with increased bureaucracy, reduced community voice, and a risk of future privatisation."
"Our preferred option avoids the high setup and transition costs associated with CCO, resulting in the lowest short-term impact on rates," the document reads.
The council could also choose to shift approaches later on if they choose to, by exploring shared service arrangements with other councils or a transition to a CCO.
Tupara-Katene said if the in-house model is selected, iwi must be formal partners in decision-making alongside the council.
"One of the highest levels of participation in co-governance is the wastewater committee ... and that has come through a consent condition," she said as an example.
There needs to be a formal decision-making group that can make those decisions alongside the council, she said.
Ngāi Tāmanuhiri chairwoman Pauline Hill (left), and Maraetaha Incorporated trustee Beth Tupara-Tekene and chairwoman Bella Hawkins.
Photo:
LDR/Zita Campbell
During deliberations, councillor Aubrey Ria said if an independent committee was set up to include mana whenua, it should reflect the Mangapoike dam, the Maraetaha community, Ngāi Tāmanuhiri Iwi and Waipaoa mana whenua, as water is drawn from the Waipaoa river.
She also noted it could be like the Tairāwhiti Resource Management Plan committee, which had two technical specialists who gave "really sound technical advice".
"A make-up of another community board within the council to help guide, shape and mould the governance in that space, I think, would be really beneficial," Ria said.
The council signalled all water service costs will transition to a fully ring-fenced funding structure, from July 1, 2027, as required under the Local Water Done Well legislation.
Borrowing under the in-house model still provides "stable financial headroom" within the council's Local Government Funding Agency cap of 280 percent of operating revenue, according to the report.
Under the ring-fenced housing structure, "households connected to water services are expected to see an average rate increase of $100 per year, while unconnected properties may see an equivalent decrease."
The council will need to decide on introducing water metering, which had a "mixed" reception during submissions, according to the council report.
If approved, the new water service model will take effect on 1 July, 2027.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
22 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Stuff twins up with Trade Me, NZME top table change
The same day Stuff twinned up with Trade Me, its big rival NZME overhauled its board and ushered in a self-described 'agitator' from overseas. But both are banking on profitable property platforms at the heart their businesses. A good thing for media that need money - or a plague on both their houses? Also - the backlash against the backlash against dangerous games.
RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: Who calls the shots after change at the top?
The New Zealand Herald reports the news that its rival has gone into business with Trade Me. Photo: New Zealand Herald "NZME's D-Day is finally here" said a headline in the New Zealand Herald last Tuesday, before shareholders of its owner NZME settled a bitter battle over its governance. But in the end, there was no fighting on the beaches. The existing board and the activist shareholders who wanted to clear it out compromised late last month and endorsed an agreed slate of nominees. That included the Canadian billionaire who sparked the whole saga, James Grenon. He has lived here for 12 years but had such a low profile only two photos of him appeared in the many media stories about his bid for control. Grenon had not been heard in public here until last Tuesday's meeting, at which he told shareholders he was virtually "a ghost on Google". He has only been an NZME shareholder since February when he bought between 9 and 10 percent of the shares. He currently owns a 13 percent stake. Soon after he told the board he wanted to be the chair - and to act like "an owner-operator" and "delve into the operational details so as to be able to challenge management." This raised eyebrows, given he helped to set up alternative news sites critical of the Herald and other local news media. In mid-March, the main journalists' trade union E tū called on Grenon to guarantee he would not interfere in NZME editorial decisions. The Post reporting in NZME's chair speaking out against a bid to oust the current board of the company. Photo: Stuff / The Post NZME's board - on the defensive at that time - said it was also concerned that Grenon's takeover bid was an effort for "control over a newsroom, rather than anything else". More media eyebrows were raised when the Free Speech Union confirmed it encouraged billionaire Jim Grenon's investment in the NZME as part of a campaign to "retake our institutions - one board at a time." But Grenon insisted his main focus was NZME's financial performance and how it had been represented by the previous board. His belief that NZME's profitable property platform OneRoof could be a source of greater reward evidently resonated with other shareholders too. In the end, after some awkward questions to James Grenon on Tuesday, shareholders gave a green light to the governance plan. Grenon is now on the board led by former radio entrepreneur and government minister Steven Joyce. So peace in our time at NZME - at least, for now. But earlier in the day, shots were fired by NZME's main rival in news publishing. Stuff Group chief executive Sinead Boucher and TradeMe chief executive Anders Skoe. Photo: Supplied / TradeMe Hours before NZME's meeting, Stuff announced TradeMe would take a 50 percent stake in Stuff Digital, the online wing of the company that does not include the newspaper mastheads like The Press, The Post and their websites. It is an alliance observers expected after Stuff's sole owner Sinead Boucher split the company in two last year - and then divided her single share into one million in February. What's in this for Trade Me is pretty clear - more eyeballs for stuff that's for sale on its own online marketplace, especially houses. But what will it do for Stuff and its users? And what is the catch for Stuff? "We've been doing quite nicely on our own ... [but] it allows us to expand and do more and to keep growing," Sinead Boucher told Mediawatch. The money that changed hands in the deal - and the terms - were confidential, but "there is a capital injection there that we will use to do all sorts of things," Boucher said. "We're going to start with rebranding the Stuff Property section and to Trade Me Property and some added features in that. Trade Me has all the data and expertise and insights. We'll be following not too long after that with motoring. Let's see what comes after that." The 50-50 split of Stuff Digital will be run by a board of two members of the Stuff Group, and two from Trade Me including chief executive Anders Skoe. "I will be the chair and I have the casting vote on that board," Boucher said. But Trade Me is much bigger than Stuff. What if they want more bang for the undisclosed bucks they're now investing? "Those scenarios have come up and just been discussed in all we've gone through the last few months to make sure that both sides are perfectly comfortable." Would Trade Me allow Stuff to sell part of its stake to another party? Or seek or accept investment from another? "You're touching on what would be the confidential terms of the deal, so I can't really comment on that in any detail," Boucher said. During the NZME boardroom battle, it also emerged that NZME had approached Stuff about acquiring its mastheads. When asked at the shareholders' meeting on Tuesday, NZME chief executive Michael Boggs said he was still interested in acquiring Stuff's mastheads. "He has my number, but I've got my own things going on at the moment. I'm not intending to do anything with that business at this stage," Boucher said. What NZME's new leaders decide to do will also move the media industry - and public life. It owns the Herald and other weekly, daily and community papers, and the Herald's news website and app have a huge national audience and more than 150,000 subscribers. NZME also has half the country's radio networks, including the country's top-rating talk radio station Newstalk ZB. On top of all that - and maybe worth more on its own - is NZME's OneRoof, which posted a 50 percent leap in revenue last year. The outgoing board was already looking at splitting it off with separate governance and management, or even selling it. Property content platforms can be goldmines for media companies. Stuff's former Australian owner Fairfax Media created Domain to cater for the A$7 billion a year real estate market. It's just been sold for A$2.8b to US property firm Costar by current owner Nine Entertainment - the same company that offloaded Stuff to Boucher for one symbolic dollar five years ago. NZME will be anxious about Stuff's Trade Me property joint venture eating OneRoof's lunch. "We are now dealing with an integrated media enemy," one of the shareholders said at the NZME meeting last Tuesday. For years, Stuff has looked for ways to bring in money - broadband, electricity and even noodle night markets. When Warner Brothers Discovery closed Newshub last year, Stuff struck a multi-million dollar deal to produce ThreeNews. Is property content now the future for funding news? "It reflects the position it holds in people's lives and how important all things about property - buying, selling, saving, mortgage rates - all of those things perform well on our site," Boucher said. "With Trade Me being number one in that area I think we will end up producing a more useful, more relevant product for our audiences." "Before bringing someone in or selling part of part of the business ... you have to be on the same page around the sanctity of editorial independence," Boucher said. "The business continues to run operationally independently, and Trade Me is very happily in support of our editorial independence. They will have absolutely no say on the content that goes on the site." "I fielded one call from someone who wanted to buy one of our local papers. They wanted to change the mayor of the town. Some wanted to buy a whole media company for the power of influence on the public agenda." Concerns that the new board at NZME will seek to change editorial practice have been a sticking point ever since Grenon raised them in his initial bid to be chair. Grenon's final written notes for shareholders to ponder included the claim that AI could be deployed to track political bias in NZ Herald journalism. "Things were drifting downhill from my perspective ... particularly in the editorial front," Grenon said Tuesday's meeting. "I thought, well, maybe I can sort of jump-start something here. And I'm very, very delighted with the way it seems to have worked out." Another shareholder (also coincidentally from Canada) urged Grenon to "inject more balance" on climate change to NZME journalism. "Ultimately, there's very few businesses that you really can try to look over the shoulders of your staff as they're performing the business. I don't know that writing is a heck of a lot different than that," Grenon replied. "But you can have general guidelines, and you can also score after the fact and see how you're doing at meeting these guidelines. If they aren't meeting the guidelines, you can sort of nudge them in the right directions." "Maybe I would like to see more clear score-keeping than has been going on, although perhaps my eyes will be opened when I get on the inside," he added. An editorial advisory board will be established by the new regime. One of the members will be lawyer Philip Crump, who previously blogged and broke the odd story under the pseudonym Thomas Cranmer - an archbishop of Canterbury executed for heresy. It is not Crump's first gig at NZME. In mid-2023, he was appointed as editor of ZB Plus, billed as "a go-to platform for news and commentary" for paying subscribers. ZB Plus was off the ZB site months later - but his is the only media company experience among James Grenon's candidates. "Having worked in the same newsroom as Philip Crump, we do not believe he has the experience, ability, or mana to take on what would be an influential role," E tū's union representative Isaac Davison - also a senior Herald reporter - said in a letter to Grenon in mid-April. Philip Crump has claimed journalists should welcome many of their new ideas for NZME, such as restoring the NZ Herald's editor to NZME's executive leadership team. On his Substack, he published Six Challenges Undermining Media Trust "Addressing these issues requires not just critique but actionable reform," he wrote, but he has declined to be interviewed for Mediawatch about this until later this month. Former Herald editor Gavin Ellis reckoned the new chair Steven Joyce would be aware of the danger of editorial overreach. "The board has an important role, but the board also shouldn't be making individual decisions about individual items ... in the general course of events anyway," Steven Joyce said on Tuesday. "(Editorial advisory boards) are quite common internationally. It's an opportunity to debate and support the development of editorial policy. In every business, we can get very, very busy day to day - and journalism is one of those businesses - so it's that opportunity to test that thinking independently." "I can assure you that the board's view will be ... to try and enhance and strengthen the editorial offering of NZME - and not do anything else." Media Minister Paul Goldsmith appointed Philip Crump to the NZ On Air board recently. This week the minister told Newsroom he would take advice managing the conflict of interest arising from oversight of public funding for journalism. When Newsroom asked the minister if Crump could recuse himself from funding decisions he replied: "Anything related directly to journalism would be an obvious place to start." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
What 'running out' supply means for households still using gas
Gas supplies for households probably won't run out. Photo: 123RF Reports that New Zealand's natural gas reserves might be dwindling faster than expected may be unwelcome news to households using it to cook and heat. The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment said previous forecasts showed annual gas production falling below 100 petajoules (PJ) by 2029, but revised forecasts indicated that level would be reached by next year . Paul Fuge, general manager at Consumer NZ's Powerswitch, said residential gas use was only about 4 percent of the country's total gas consumption, so gas supplies for households probably would not run out, but he said they would likely become more expensive over time. "This is especially true, if we see a death spiral effect," he said. "As more households disconnect from gas, the cost of maintaining the gas infrastructure is spread across fewer users, pushing prices up further and encouraging even more to leave. "Lower-income households and renters may be left behind on the gas network, facing rising costs, while wealthier households can afford to transit." Consumer's advice was, when household gas appliances reached the end of their life, it made sense to replace them with an electric alternative. Fuge said 46 percent of households used gas of some type and he expected an average increase in gas prices of 10 percent this year. "Retailers cite rising wholesale and network costs as the main drivers of price increases. A significant factor is higher gas network charges - the cost of transporting gas to homes - which typically account for about a third of a household's bill. Starting in 2024, the Commerce Commission approved an annual average increase of 3.8 percent in gas pipeline charges over four years, adding about $48 per year for a typical household. Fuge said Nova and Megatel were the only providers offering gas as a standalone product. Others required people to sign up to a gas-and-electricity package. "As a result, gas customers may find their choices are limited, and they cannot access lower-cost or more innovative electricity plans and suppliers." GasNZ chief executive Jeffrey Clarke said there would be enough gas for household and commercial users for many years. "To put a 100PJ supply into perspective, about 290,000 homes are connected to natural gas in the North Island and they use just 7.3PJ annually." Clarke said there was an estimated 9.5PJ of untapped potential for producing biogas from organic waste in the North Island and 9.1PJ in the South Island. "With sufficient investment to expedite the development of the renewable gas market in New Zealand, there's every expectation that all residential natural gas consumption could be replaced by renewable biogas over this timeframe." Countries like Denmark have replaced about 40 percent of natural gas supply with renewable gas produced from organic waste, with plans to make this 100 percent by 2030, he said. "In total, it's estimated up to 23.5PJ of biogas could be produced annually across New Zealand - enough to supply a good amount for commercial needs as well." He said LPG was also in plentiful supply. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
