Moelis names next CEO
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter.
Ken Moelis, the CEO and co-founder of investment bank Moelis & Company who has been at the helm since 2007, will step down from his role and become executive chairman effective Oct. 1, the company announced Monday.
Navid Mahmoodzadegan, co-founder and co-president, will become the CEO and join the board.
Jeff Raich, co-founder and co-president, will become the New York-based firm's executive vice chairman and continue to head key businesses, the company said.
The recent executive changes are part of the company's long-term leadership transition planning, Moelis noted in a statement.
'I have never felt better about our Firm and the opportunities ahead,' he said Monday. 'Navid is a founder of our Firm and has been a trusted partner to me for 30 years. As Co-President, he has been involved in every major decision we have made and has been a key driver of our Firm's most impactful strategic growth initiatives.'
Mahmoodzadegan, who has co-led the firm's investment banking business, has the full support of the Moelis board to drive growth and invest in next generation talent, the outgoing CEO noted. Raich's leadership will be 'critical' in the firm's next chapter, Moelis said.
'Navid, Jeff, and I share a long-term vision and deep commitment to fostering a collaborative and entrepreneurial environment that prioritizes exceptional client service and innovation,' Moelis added.
The company was founded in 2007 when Moelis, a former president of UBS' investment bank, poached Mahmoodzadegan and Raich from his former employer to help build the new firm. The investment bank went public in 2014.
Moelis, who is also the chairman of the company, was offered a $25 million retention bonus in February 'to maintain continuity and stability in the Company's leadership in the coming years.' The limited partnership award will vest fully if the executive stays with the company until February 2029.
Moelis expects handing the baton to be the 'smoothest transition ever in the history of Wall Street,' he told The Wall Street Journal.
The incoming CEO, a 30-year banking veteran, was the global head of media investment banking at UBS prior to joining Moelis. He was also an investment banker at Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette and an attorney at Irell & Manella, according to Mahmoodzadegan's LinkedIn profile.
'As we move forward, we will continue to put clients first – that has always been the key to the Firm's long-term success and achieving outstanding results for our shareholders. We have never been better positioned to capitalize on the significant growth opportunities ahead,' Mahmoodzadegan said in a prepared statement Monday.
Raich, a merger and acquisitions expert, was the joint global head of M&A at UBS and head of West Coast M&A at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette before co-founding Moelis with his two former colleagues, according to Raich's LinkedIn profile.
Mahmoodzadegan and Raich were named co-presidents of the company in September 2015.
Moelis grabbed attention last year when Jonathan Kaye, a banker at the firm, was filmed punching a woman in the face amid a Pride celebration in Brooklyn in June. Kaye, a managing director who led Moelis' business services franchise, was put on leave after the 10-second video went viral and left the firm soon after.
In February, Kaye pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor charges, including assault.
The next month, Kaye joined investment firm Rothschild & Co. as the global co-head of business services of its North America unit to help the firm expand its North America global advisory business.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
Dozens of states have filed a joint lawsuit against the bankrupt DNA-testing company 23andMe to block the company's sale of its customers' genetic data without explicit consent. The suit, filed this week in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri, comes months after 23andMe began a court-supervised sale process of its assets. The South San Francisco-based venture was once valued at $6 billion and has collected DNA samples from more than 15 million customers. The company's bankruptcy has raised questions over privacy standards for genetic data, which experts say is uniquely sensitive, immutable and irreplaceable if stolen. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia filed the lawsuit, arguing that 23andMe customers have an inherent right to their own genetic information. Read more: 'People should be worried': 23andMe bankruptcy could expose customers' genetic data 'This isn't just data — it's your DNA," said Oregon Atty. Gen. Dan Rayfield in a statement. "It's personal, permanent, and deeply private. People did not submit their personal data to 23andMe thinking their genetic blueprint would later be sold off to the highest bidder." 23andMe announced in May that it would be sold to New York-based drug maker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, which had agreed to comply with 23andMe's existing privacy policy. However, a competing offer from nonprofit TTAM Research Institute led the bankruptcy judge to reopen the auction last week. TTAM is run by 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who has made several failed attempts to take the company private. In a statement, a 23andMe spokesperson said the lawsuit's claims "are without merit" and that the sale of genetic data does not violate privacy regulations. 'Customers will continue to have the same rights and protections in the hands of the winning bidder," the spokesperson said. Read more: Congressmen sound alarm over data privacy following 23andMe bankruptcy 23andMe customers have the right to delete their genetic information from the company's database at any time, as outlined in the Genetic Information Privacy Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act. During a testimony in Washington earlier this week, 23andMe interim Chief Executive Joseph Selsavage said that 1.9 million customers have requested their data be deleted since the company's bankruptcy filing in March. Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that 23andMe's privacy policy was subject to change and not adequate to protect customers' data. In an interview in March, she stressed the sensitivity of genetic data. 'I would be very concerned if I had given a swab to 23andMe," she said. "There is little we can do to control what happens to it." Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Fast Company
32 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Boring is expensive
BY Boring is expensive. The first time I saw those words was the summer of 2023. Our head of strategy in New York had them on a slide during a meeting, and it stopped me cold. Since then, it's become something of a mantra around here, not because it was a new idea, but because it captured something I've felt in my bones since the beginning of our agency. It put a price tag on the thing we've been fighting all along: sameness. I've always believed that distinctive work wins. It wins creatively, emotionally, and commercially. That the best advertising doesn't blend in with the category. It stands out from it. Sometimes it even does the exact opposite of what the rest of the category is doing. And now, more than ever, that matters. The age of sameness We're living in an age of sameness. Average is everywhere. The gravitational pull to fit in is strong. And I'm not just talking about advertising. Fitting in, after all, is a good thing for us humans. We want to belong. We want to blend in with the group. We want our kids to be accepted at school. We even want our dogs to fit in with their furry friends at the dog park. But if you're a brand, fitting in is the fast track to irrelevance. When everything looks and feels the same, what are people supposed to base their choice on? Usually, it's price. The cost of boring At our company, we talk a lot about 'fighting sameness.' Because while comfort might feel like safer bet (especially in turbulent times), safe can be forgettable. And it can be costly. That's what research from Binet & Field, System1, and the IPA has shown us: Emotional ads that drive fame are 29% more likely to deliver major profit growth Roughly 50% of ads are 'neutral,' meaning they make people feel nothing Dull ads require 7.3 more share of voice points —or around £9.8M more in spend—just to compete with a strong emotional campaign That's the cost of boring. And we've seen the upside of doing the opposite when brands are brave enough to stand out, the results follow. Like when Extra Gum launched their now-famous comeback ad in 2021, set to Celine Dion's 'It's All Coming Back to Me Now.' While most brands were preaching caution and isolation, Extra leaned into humor, joy, and pent-up human connection. Sales spiked. Brand metrics jumped. It won the Global Grand Effie, the top recognition for advertising effectiveness. Make people feel something We've seen it firsthand in our own work, too. At the height of inflation, we launched The Fixed-Rate Pizza for Pizza Pizza, a tongue-in-cheek campaign that treated pizza like a financial asset. People could 'lock in' their price for a full year, complete with 'pre-approvals.' It cut through the noise and immediately drove increases to store, web traffic, and sales growth. With Harry's, our brand platform ' Man, that feels good ' challenged the overpromising masculinity tropes of the grooming category. And it's paying off. Honesty has always been part of the brand's DNA and leaning back into it has drove lifts in awareness, consideration, and perceived quality across the board. When the work dares to be different and it makes people feel something, it works better. Full stop. So yes, 'boring is expensive' might be a clever turn of phrase. But to all of us in the marketing community, it's more than that. It's a reminder. A challenge. And maybe even a little warning. So if you're in a position to shape the work, as a marketer, as a CEO, as a CFO, this is your moment. Push for the bold The next time you brief your agency, ask for something you haven't seen before. Something that makes you feel something. Resist the comfort of category conventions. Don't reach for the familiar. Reach for the stuff that scares you a little. The stuff that gets talked about, remembered, and passed around. Fight for the work that doesn't blend in. Back your creative teams when they bring you bold, emotional, human ideas. No, actually push them further. Challenge them to surprise you. Because safe might get approved, but it rarely moves the needle. So push for bold. Ask for different. Fight sameness.
Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Q&A: What's Happening With Inflation Data?
A supermarket in New York. Government workers research how much items cost in stores as part of the monthly inflation survey. (Zuma Press)
