Judge dismisses Baldoni's US$400mil defamation lawsuit against Lively
Justin Baldoni's US$400 million defamation lawsuit against actress Blake Lively has been dismissed by a US district judge. (Invision/AP pic)
NEW YORK : A US judge on Monday dismissed actor Justin Baldoni's US$400 million defamation lawsuit against actress Blake Lively, who had accused Baldoni of sexually harassing her while filming the 2024 movie 'It Ends with Us.'
US District Judge Lewis Liman in Manhattan said Lively's claims to a California state agency about Baldoni's alleged harassment during the filming were privileged, and shielded from the defamation claim by Baldoni and his Wayfarer Studios.
In a 132-page decision, Liman also dismissed Baldoni's related US$250 million lawsuit against the New York Times NYT.N for its Dec 21, 2024 article about the dispute, ''We Can Bury Anyone': Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine.'
The judge said Baldoni can try to file a much narrower lawsuit against Lively focused on contractual issues.
Lawyers for Baldoni did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively,' her lawyers Michael Gottlieb and Esra Hudson said in a joint statement. 'As we have said from day one, this US$400 million lawsuit was a sham.'
Baldoni's lawsuit was in response to Lively's own lawsuit over his alleged harassment. She still seeks unspecified triple and punitive damages, and a March 2026 trial remains scheduled before Liman.
A Times spokesman, Charlie Stadtlander, said in a statement: 'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognised that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism.'
Lively alleges vengeance
The feud began publicly in December when Lively filed a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) about Baldoni, followed by her lawsuit.
In response, Baldoni's countersuit accused Lively, her husband and actor Ryan Reynolds, Lively's publicist Leslie Sloane, the Times and others of trying to smear him.
Baldoni said Lively tried to effectively hijack 'It Ends with Us,' which he directed and whose themes included domestic violence, and then blame him when her 'disastrous' promotional approach prompted an online backlash against her.
Lively had called Baldoni's lawsuit a 'vengeful' attempt to weaponise the federal courts, and pursue a 'sinister campaign to bury and destroy' her for speaking out.
The Times, meanwhile, said it shouldn't be punished merely for newsgathering, and said a statement in the article that Baldoni led a 'smear campaign' in retaliation for Lively's complaints was protected opinion.
Judge finds defamation claim implausible
In his decision, Liman said Baldoni alleged at most that Lively communicated the privileged CRD complaint to the Times, while her husband and publicist made what they thought were true statements about Baldoni's sexual harassment.
'The Wayfarer Parties' conclusory allegations that the Lively, Reynolds, and Sloane engaged in a conspiracy to defame the Wayfarer Parties by disseminating knowingly false statements cannot substitute for factual allegations supporting a plausible inference that this occurred,' the judge wrote.
Liman also said that even if the Wayfarer parties laid the groundwork for a negative publicity campaign but never put it into operation, the Times would not have known.
'Freedoms of expression require breathing space, and a publisher must be permitted to publish the story that it believes in good faith to be before it,' Liman wrote.
'It Ends with Us' garnered mixed reviews, but grossed more than US$351 million worldwide, according to Box Office Mojo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
15 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘I wasn't even in my own body': Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's ex faces defence grilling in sex trial
NEW YORK, June 10 — Sean Combs's defence lawyers on Tuesday will question a woman who dated the music mogul up until his arrest, and who has testified in agonising detail that he pressured her into drug-fuelled sex with escorts. After three days on the stand the woman speaking under the pseudonym Jane will face intense scrutiny from defence lawyers who have insisted that what prosecutors deem sex trafficking was in fact consensual. Jane told jurors how the final year of her relationship with the artist known as 'Diddy' exploded into violence in June 2024. At the time Combs was already under investigation by federal authorities; his homes had been raided, and the now-infamous security footage of him assaulting his ex-girlfriend Casandra Ventura in a hotel was public. Throughout her testimony Jane, who began seeing Combs in early 2021, detailed how she had longed for a more traditional romantic relationship with him. But she said 90 per cent of their time together resulted in sometimes days-long sex parties that saw Combs direct her to have sex with male escorts while he watched, even as she told him the encounters made her feel 'sleazy' and 'disgusted.' The June 2024 date at home was meant to be a chill night in, she said, but she and Combs got into a fight over his relationship with another woman. The argument escalated when Jane said she pushed Combs's head onto a marble countertop and began hurling candles. 'I was angry with him,' Jane said. 'It was a built-up mix of everything... I just kept saying that I hated him.' Combs was livid: Jane told jurors he kicked down doors and ultimately put her in a chokehold. She managed to run out of the house barefoot but upon returning hours later he was still there. He kicked and punched her until she had a black eye and 'golf-ball' sized welts, she said. Combs instructed her to ice the injuries and 'put an outfit on.' Jane told jurors that she put on the requisite heels and lingerie for a so-called 'hotel night' with Combs and a man he had invited. Through tears Jane said Combs gave her ecstasy and demanded she have sex with the man, and when she protested he said 'you're not going to ruin my f**king night.' When she said again she didn't want to participate, he stood closely to her face as he asked in a 'forceful' tone: 'Then is this coercion?' Jane ultimately complied, and gave the escort oral sex: 'I just felt like I wasn't even in my own body,' she said. Jane told jurors Combs paid for her rent at the time and still does. He also continues to fund her legal costs. 'Sexual trauma' When Ventura — who last month testified of physical and psychological abuse in similarily excruciating detail — filed her 2023 civil lawsuit that opened the door for a federal investigation, Jane said she 'almost fainted.' 'There was a whole other woman feeling the same thing,' Jane said. 'I feel like I'm reading my own sexual trauma. It makes me sick how three solid pages, word for word, is exactly my experiences and my anguish,' she messaged Combs, in text records read in court. After weeks of back-and-forth, Jane said Combs called her a 'con artist,' and threatened to show sexually explicit videos to the father of her child. She had previously testified at length that she felt 'obligated' to participate in hotel nights for 'fear of losing the roof over my head' that Combs was bankrolling. Jane said that following their physical fight in the summer of 2024, they saw each other twice more before his arrest last September. The 55-year-old faces life in prison if convicted of racketeering and sex trafficking. Jane's story was not in the original indictment against Combs, but she was added after receiving a subpoena requiring she testify in November 2024 before a grand jury. She began speaking to prosecutors in January of this year. Jane testified that she told Combs's defence team about the brawl last summer before she told prosecutors. She said she felt 'obligated' to meet the defence team 'due to my relationship.' Jane has not filed any civil suit against Combs, and said in court Monday she has no plans to. 'I just pray for his continued healing,' she told jurors, 'and I pray for peace for him.' The Manhattan federal trial is expected to last several more weeks. — AFP
Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Rapper Kendrick Lamar leads 2025 BET Awards wins as ‘Not Like Us' takes video of the year
LOS ANGELES, June 10 — Kendrick Lamar was the top winner on Monday at the BET Awards, an awards ceremony honouring Black actors, singers and sports stars. The 30 For 30 rapper won the best male hip hop artist award, best album of the year as well as the video of the year award for Not Like Us. Lamar and filmmaker Dave Free also took home the video director of the year award at the event, which was held at the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles and broadcast on the BET cable channel. Lil Wayne performs at the 25th annual BET (Black Entertainment Television) Awards, in Los Angeles, June 9, 2025. — Reuters pic 'BET has always made sure they're representing the culture right and always put me in the midst of the cycle of what we represent,' Lamar said on stage when accepting his award. Host comedian Kevin Hart opened the ceremony by recognising the BET Awards' 25th anniversary and all of the 'history that has been made' on the stage. The ceremony traversed the evolution of Black music, starting with a performance by R&B artist Ashanti that featured a compilation of songs, including her 2002 song Foolish. Mariah Carey performs at the 25th annual BET (Black Entertainment Television) Awards. — Reuters pic Additional performances included other 2000s songs Ballin' by Mustard, 1 Thing by Amerie and Like You by Bow Wow. Hart led with jokes while also highlighting the BET Ultimate Icon Award winners of the night, including Kirk Franklin, Mariah Carey, Jamie Foxx and Snoop Dogg. The special award was given to those that have paid homage to music, entertainment, advocacy and community impact. Snoop Dogg reacts after accepting the Ultimate Icon award from Dr Dre at the 25th annual BET (Black Entertainment Television) Awards. — Reuters pic Presented by Stevie Wonder, Foxx accepted his award and reflected on his recovery journey after having a stroke in 2023. 'I gotta be honest, when I saw the in memoriam, I was like, 'Man, that could have been me',' he said. Another honour included the best female hip hop artist award for rising rapper Doechii. 'Trump is using military forces to stop protest,' Doechii said in her acceptance speech, addressing the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, where the National Guard and US Marines are being deployed. 'I want y'all to consider what kind of government it appears to be, when every time we exercise our democratic rights to protest, the military is deployed against us,' she added. — Reuters
Malay Mail
18 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Weinstein retrial jury sees ‘good progress' after tense standoff threatens mistrial
NEW YORK, June 10 — Jurors reported getting closer to a verdict Monday in the sex crimes retrial of disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, despite tensions raising the risk of a deadlocked jury and a mistrial. 'We're making good progress,' Judge Curtis Farber read in a final note from jurors wrapping up the third day of closed-door deliberations in the New York courtroom. Farber had previously read aloud two notes sent to him by the 12-member jury. In the first note, a juror expressed a desire to talk to Farber 'about the situation that isn't very good.' In the second, jurors wrote they 'request the entire definition of reasonable doubt and rules of the jury especially to avoid a hung jury.' A hung jury occurs when a judge acknowledges that jurors have been unable to reach a unanimous decision after several days of deliberations. In that case, a mistrial would be declared and a new trial may be held. On Monday morning, Weinstein, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, looked on impassively from his wheelchair, as the judge, prosecutors and his lawyers engaged in tense discussions. The jury must decide whether Weinstein — accused by dozens of women of being a sexual predator — is guilty of sexual assaults in 2006 on Miriam Haley and former model Kaja Sokola, and of rape in 2013 of then-aspiring actress Jessica Mann. Weinstein is on trial again after a New York state appeals court threw out his 2020 convictions, citing irregularities in the original proceedings. The former movie industry titan's 23-year prison sentence for the initial conviction was thrown out, but he remains imprisoned for separate offenses. 'Playground stuff' On Friday, one juror came forward to report tensions between his fellow panelists, alleging 'people are being shunned. It's playground stuff.' He asked to resign as a juror, but Farber denied his request. Responding to the situation, Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala called for a mistrial, but the judge refused his request. At midday Monday, another juror sought to deliver a message of reassurance that matters had calmed down. 'Things are going well, the tone is very different today, we are finding headways,' she told the judge, who appeared to breathe a sigh of relief. During the trial, the three alleged victims testified for several days, recounting how the powerful movie producer had forced them into sexual relations after luring them to his apartment or a hotel room in New York. On Wednesday, prosecutor Nicole Blumberg summarized the evidence of the three alleged victims by saying simply: 'He raped three women, they all said no.' The Hollywood figure had 'all the power' and 'all the control' over the alleged victims, which is why jurors should find him guilty, she said. 'The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him, now it is the time to let him know that the rules apply to him.' Weinstein did not take the stand but conceded in an interview with FOX5 television on Friday that he had acted 'immorally.' He insisted he did nothing criminal, however. Weinstein's defence team has suggested the women accused him to score a payday from a legal settlement or criminal damages. — AFP
