Pimicikamak Cree Nation struggles with evacuations as people return out of frustration
One day after Pimicikamak Cree Nation Chief David Monias said 767 people in the northern Manitoba community needed to evacuate, there are now close to 1,000 waiting to leave.
That's part of the frustration Monias says he's facing with exits being blocked by wildfires, airlifts unavailable and long waits for ferries.
"Some have somehow made it back," he said of evacuees who left on Wednesday and headed south toward Norway House Cree Nation, after Monias ordered a mandatory evacuation.
Hundreds of vehicles and buses took people to the ferry for the crossing to that community, but the bottleneck meant some waited up to nine hours without food or water, Monias said. It appears many got fed up with waiting and returned to Pimicikamak.
Some residents were flown out earlier this week from the airport in Pimicikamak, about 530 kilometres north of Winnipeg on the shores of Cross Lake, but high winds and dry conditions worsened the situation this week. Flights were grounded.
The remaining 6,500 residents were told to head to Norway House, even though that community was only expecting 1,000 evacuees.
Since Thursday, the Canadian Armed Forces has been flying four Hercules aircraft into Norway House to pick up Pimicikamak evacuees and get them to Brandon or Winnipeg. The plane then heads back to Norway House for another load.
Monias said each round trip takes about three hours, so it's a slow process.
Just over 3,000 Pimicikamak residents were still on the list to be evacuated from Norway House as of Friday morning.
The thick smoke in Pimicikamak cleared out by late afternoon Thursday, as the wind changed direction and the sky cleared, Monias said.
"We were so happy. [It was] easier to breathe, easier on the throat."
But the airport has remained quiet. Monias was making calls Friday to see if any privately run airlines could help out, but he wasn't sure how long that window of clear skies would remain open.
"[The fire] is continuing to move towards our direction despite the wind blowing against it. The wind is slowing it down," he said.
"But the wind changes frequently, and then it'll be coming towards our way again probably at the end of the day or evening. So that means more smoke and more fire coming again. It's very concerning."
He was also on the phone with federal government officials, requesting water bombers to clear some of the flames from the highways.
"It would give us the chance to see if we can get people out that way," he said.
By Friday afternoon, an RCMP official told CBC News the highway has been temporarily reopened and evacuations were taking place that way. The spokesperson did not know how many were able to leave.
More evacuations ordered
Meanwhile, mandatory evacuations were also ordered Friday for Schist Lake and Big Island Lake, while the campground at nearby Bakers Narrows Provincial Park was evacuated and shut down Thursday night.
All three locations are just southeast of Flin Flon, a city of 5,000 near the Saskatchewan border in northwestern Manitoba that faces a dire situation due to an approaching wildfire.
Cranberry Portage, about 35 kilometres southeast of Flin Flon, is also under a voluntary evacuation because it's running out of gas and supplies. The community is along Highway 10, which has been closed due to fires. The closest gas supply is in Grand Rapids, roughly a 350-kilometre drive away.
On the east side of the province, the community of Bissett has also been ordered to evacuate due to the out-of-control Nopiming/Bird River fire, which is about 125,000 hectares in size, according to the province.
Everyone was told to be out Friday morning.
As of Thursday, the most recent update from the province, there were 22 active wildfires in Manitoba. There have been a total of 103 already this season, far above the province's 20-year annual average of 80 at this time of year.
More than 17,000 people are being evacuated from northern, western and eastern regions of Manitoba, and a provincewide state of emergency has been declared.
The communities being cleared out include Lynn Lake, Pukatawagan Cree Nation (also known as Mathias Colomb First Nation), Marcel Colomb First Nation and Sherridon.
Norway House and Chemawawin Cree Nation (Easterville) are under evacuation notices, with people ordered to be ready to leave.
The Manitoba FireView map includes locations, sizes and other information about the wildfires.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
22 minutes ago
- CBC
Experts warn of Bill C-2 as "anti-refugee" and "anti-immigrant" giving Canada "unchecked powers" like the U.S.
Mbonisi Zikhali came to Canada in 2009 from Zimbabwe to pursue a master's in journalism at Carleton University. Post-graduation, the international student found himself homeless in Windsor and applied for refugee status – a privilege soon unavailable if Bill C-2 becomes the law. "The bill is unnecessary and not sympathetic at all to people's well-being," Zikhali said. Many experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada agree. They are calling on the Liberal government's sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, "anti-immigrant and anti-refugee" hoping the legislation is not voted on to become law. Zikhali said he came on scholarship and in 2012 found himself in Windsor picking tomatoes at a greenhouse. Soon enough, he was living on the streets, and lost his passport which also had his study permit in it. Applying for refugee status, Zikhali said, was his saving grace and worries this bill will deprive vulnerable people of a safe haven. What is Bill C-2? The legislation proposes changes to a number of laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Specifically it allows officials to cancel, suspend or change immigration documents immediately, pause the acceptance of new applications and cancel applications already in process if deemed in the public interest. Critics say new border legislation aligns Canada's immigration system with the U.S. 20 hours ago Duration 2:43 Asylum claims would also have to be made within a year of entering the country, including for international students and temporary residents. For example, an Afghan international student came to study here in July 2020 .The Taliban takes over in August 2021 and things become scary back home. That student could have applied for asylum. But with this bill, the one-year time period would have lapsed and they would be ineligible. Zikhali said had the bill been around when he was applying for asylum, it would have been "devastating" as he would have been denied. The immigration changes would also require irregular border crossers, people who enter Canada between official ports of entry, to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. "Very U.S.-like" bill: refugee help centre Windsor's Matthew House gives refugees a place to live and helps them with resettlement. Mike Morency, their executive director, worries this bill will put more vulnerable people at greater harm. "It continues to align our immigration system with that of the United States," Morency said. "Refugee claimants are not the problem. The one year-ban is a major concern for us. The other major concern for us is the ability of the government to declare an emergency and suspend applications. That one to me feels very US-like." Morency said he understands the government's will to try to cut back on international students and migrant workers making a refugee claim as a way to stay in Canada, but worries for people who have a legitimate need for protection being unfairly targeted. "It also feels very much like a workaround to our commitment to the Geneva Convention. If the government wants to step out of the Geneva Convention, then then we need to do it with integrity and we need to approach the UN and say we're going to withdraw," he said. Syed Hussan, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network, agrees saying the bill violates Canada's "most basic legal obligations" and is "immoral". Hussan asserts the bill infringes upon Canada's legal commitments and ethical standards by granting the government excessive authority to cancel permits. "Every refugee gets to have the right to have their case heard. That's now being taken away," he said. "Collectively it's a bill that gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status… This is an anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bill. It's illegal." Without any ability for people to appeal or have their case individually heard, Hussan said, the bill allows the government to "make people undocumented or just throw people out of the country in the hundreds of thousands". The changes also allow the federal immigration department to share information more widely with different agencies within Canada. Hussan said anyone who was not a citizen or later became a citizen will have their data impacted by the bill. Hassan said this is similar to the US immigration policies. "This is Carney's first test and he's failed it. He's no different from Donald Trump." Sharry Aiken, professor of law at Queen's University, also finds the bill troubling. "Very disappointing. It's a betrayal of many Canadians that supported this government in the most recent election," she said, noting these issues weren't part of the Liberal election campaign. The omnibus bill, she said, is quite complicated with 16 different parts and neither serves to reform the asylum system nor address Canadians' privacy rights. Typically, omnibus bills don't get the degree of parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, she said, which is concerning. Aiken said the one year-bar for asylum claimants represents "a major rollback of rights". "No longer are these claimants eligible for a hearing before the Refugee Protection Division," she said. The division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) hears and decides claims for refugee protection in Canada. Aikens said this "arbitrary" bill will also very quickly develop a backlog. "The bill proposes a legislative fix for a problem that doesn't require new law. It requires operational intervention," she said. "This one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and what has been the subject of extensive international criticism… This bill does a disservice to refugees and betrays the Canadian public's trust in the Liberal government for ensuring a fair refugee determination system consistent with international standards." She urges the MPs to separate out the provisions having the issues desegregated. 'Will make the process more cumbersome': immigration lawyer Toronto-based immigration lawyer, Mario Bellissimo, said with the bill creating "arbitrary distinctions" of 14 days and one year after June 2020, "an individualized assessment" approach is being taken away. While the number of refugee claimants have recently dipped, Bellissimo said the bill signals that Canada wants to potentially limit immigration. "It wants to send messages to individuals who want to traverse the system over many years without legitimate claims that this is not a destination of choice for you," he said. Bellissimo agrees that targeting individuals who impact the immigration system in a negative way is important but the bill will end up targeting individuals in genuine need of assistance.
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Alarming privacy threats are buried in the Liberal border bill
Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa's faculty of law. A border security bill tabled by the Liberal government this week will have wide reach far beyond the 49th parallel. Buried in the massive bill are provisions to allow law enforcement to access information about internet subscribers without a warrant. While there may be a case for new police powers in the digital era, these should be presented in their own bill and be debated on their own merits. The pressure from Canadian law enforcement for access to internet subscriber data dates back to 1999, when government officials began crafting proposals that included legal powers to access surveillance and subscriber information. What followed were a series of lawful access bills that sparked opposition, both from the public and in the courts. For example, in 2012, then-public safety minister Vic Toews infamously said to Francis Scarpaleggia, now the Speaker of the House but then a critic of an internet surveillance bill, that he could 'stand with us or with the child pornographers.' The comment did not help his case, and the overwhelming negative publicity pressured the government to quickly backtrack by placing the lawful access bill on hold. Border security bill would give law enforcement access to internet subscriber information without a warrant Liberal government's Throne Speech passes as Carney survives first major test of confidence The lawful access campaign was effectively derailed for a decade by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2014, when it ruled that there was a reasonable expectation of privacy in internet subscriber information. It doubled down on that ruling last year, expanding the privacy safeguards by adding that IP addresses were similarly protected. The Strong Borders Act seeks to circumvent these decisions by creating a new 'information demand' power for law enforcement that does not require court oversight. The new power targets information about a subscriber, such as whether they use a particular internet service and if the provider has data about their usage. The provider may also be required to disclose where and when the service was used, as well as information about any other services the subscriber used to communicate. This is akin to law enforcement approaching a bank to demand if a particular person is a client and whether there is information about their account transactions, and which branches were used, but stopping short of asking for the actual account information. There are obvious privacy implications here that are certain to result in a legal challenge, should the bill pass in its current form. In most cases, obtaining further subscriber information will still require a warrant. The government is turning these into global production orders as it seeks to loop in foreign providers as well. This means that potential warrant targets extend well beyond Canadian internet and telecom providers to also include international platforms. Ottawa to overhaul financial-crime laws in new border security bill The standards for obtaining these production orders should give pause. This bill makes it easier to pass the threshold when compared with previous proposals, since law enforcement only needs to suspect that an offence has been or will be committed. Moreover, these orders can be applied to any Act of Parliament, granting law enforcement exceptional powers to pursue internet subscriber information for everything from Criminal Code violations to camping in national parks without the necessary permit. The bill introduces a new term – 'electronic service provider' – that is presumably designed to extend beyond telecom and internet providers by scoping in internet platforms such as Google and Meta. Those international services are now key players in electronic communications (think Gmail or WhatsApp), though some may be beyond this form of regulation, such as Signal. All electronic service providers are subject to obligations to 'provide all reasonable assistance, in any prescribed time and manner, to permit the assessment or testing of any device, equipment or other thing that may enable an authorized person to access information.' Moreover, all are required to keep such requests secret. Electronic service providers that the government views as 'core providers' are subject to additional regulations that effectively grant law enforcement direct access to their systems for the purposes of communications retrieval and interception. This is a revival of old proposals in which law enforcement sought access to the systems of Canada's major telecom and internet providers. These provisions will sound technical to most Canadians, and are seemingly designed to escape notice at the end of a 140-page bill purportedly about a safer border. But Bill C-2 is far from just a border bill. The government and law enforcement are running back a decades-old warrantless access playbook that should be roundly rejected as it trades a border crisis for a privacy one.
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Chatham school receives $20,000 literacy grant
A Chatham school has been awarded a $20,000 literacy grant, on behalf of the Indigo Love of Reading Foundation. King George VI Public School was one of 30 chosen across Canada. $20,000 will be given over three years, allowing the school to enhance its library collection and inspire a love of reading for the students. 'We are absolutely thrilled and incredibly grateful to receive this $20,000 Indigo Love of Reading Grant,' said Principal Danielle Maryschak. 'This generous funding will be a game-changer for our school library, allowing us to acquire a diverse collection of new books and resources that will undoubtedly ignite a passion for reading in our students. We believe that a strong library is the heart of a thriving school, and this grant will empower us to provide our students with the tools and inspiration they need to become lifelong learners and readers.' The Indigo Love of Reading Foundation has committed more than $36 million to more than 3,600 schools since 2004.
