Real estate gets USD 26.7 bn equity investment in 2022-24; Mumbai attracts USD 6.7 bn: CII-CBRE
'Total real estate equity investments during CY (calendar year) 2022-24 stood at USD 26.7 billion in India. Mumbai topped the real estate equity investments with the highest inflows of USD 6.9 billion, accounting for a 26 per cent share,' the consultant said.
On Tuesday, real estate consultant CBRE and Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) released a joint report which provides a view of real estate landscape and prevailing financing strategies, including those pertaining to equity and debt investments and AIFs, among other strategic insights.
Mumbai, Apr 22 (PTI) The Indian real estate sector attracted USD 26.7 billion equity investments during the last three calendar years, with Mumbai city getting more than one-fourth of total inflows, according to a CII-CBRE report.
Together, Mumbai, Delhi-NCR, and Bengaluru attracted around USD 16.5 billion, accounting for a cumulative 62 per cent share during this period.
'This sustained dominance of gateway cities was driven by a high concentration of investment-grade projects, robust urban infrastructure, a skilled talent pool, strong demand across asset classes, and a steadily formalising real estate ecosystem,' the report 'Bricks & Billions – Mapping the Financing Landscape of Real Estate' said.
Land/developments sites attracted the largest share of equity investments, accounting for a 44 per cent share of total inflows between CY 2022-24, followed by built-up office assets, which had a 32 per cent share.
Between CY 2022 and 2024, tier-II cities accounted for nearly 10 per cent of total real estate equity investments, amounting to about USD 3 billion.
Anshuman Magazine, Chairman & CEO – India, South-East Asia, Middle East & Africa, CBRE, said, 'India's real estate sector is entering a new phase of growth, powered by robust capital inflows and a significant pool of dry powder ready for deployment.' The strong investor sentiment, especially in built-up office assets and residential developments, is underpinned by sound fundamentals and steady end-user demand, he added.
Rishi Kumar Bagla, Chairman, CII Western Region and Chairman & Managing Director, BG Electricals and Electronics, said, 'India's real estate sector is rapidly institutionalising, creating a more transparent, risk-mitigated environment that aligns with global investor expectations.' 'As the sector becomes more structured and regulated, we expect deeper participation from global funds, especially those focused on sustainability and resilience,' he added. PTI MJH MJH ANU ANU
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Chennai-based Lalithaa Jewellery Mart files DRHP for Rs 1,700 crore IPO to fuel southern expansion
Lalithaa Jewellery Mart, a Chennai-headquartered jewellery retailer offering gold, silver, and diamond jewellery designed for southern Indian markets, has filed its Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to raise Rs 1,700 crore through an initial public offering (IPO). ADVERTISEMENT The proposed Rs 1,700 crore IPO comprises a fresh issue of up to Rs 1,200 crore and an offer-for-sale (OFS) of Rs 500 crore by promoter M. Kiran Kumar Jain. The company also plans a reservation for eligible employees with a bidding discount and may undertake a pre-IPO placement of up to 20% of the fresh issue size, which would proportionally reduce the fresh issue. Proceeds from the fresh issue will be primarily deployed towards capital expenditure for setting up new stores in India, amounting to Rs 1,014.50 crore, with the balance allocated for general corporate purposes, the company said in its filing. The issue will follow the book-building process, allocating no more than 50% of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), and reserving at least 15% and 35% for non-institutional investors and retail individual investors, respectively. The company proposes to list its shares on the National Stock Exchange of India and BSE Ltd. Founded in 1985, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart opened its first store in Chennai's T. Nagar, a hub for silk and jewellery retail. The company operates 56 stores across southern India's Tier I, II, and III cities, including 22 in Andhra Pradesh, 20 in Tamil Nadu, seven in Karnataka, six in Telangana, and one in Puducherry, spanning a total operational area of 6,09,408 sq. ft. As of December 31, 2024, 47 of these stores each cover more than 5,000 sq. ft. According to a CRISIL report cited in the DRHP, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart recorded the highest operating revenue per store among key organised jewellery players in India between fiscal years 2022 and 2024. It is also ranked the second fastest growing regional jewellery player based on operating revenue growth during the same period, posting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 43.62%. ADVERTISEMENT The company's jewellery schemes, 'Dhana Vandhanam' and 'Free-yo-Flexi,' have attracted repeat customers, with 420,261 active enrolments as of December 31, 2024. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart runs two manufacturing units in Tamil Nadu, one at Thirumudivakkam, Chennai, and another at Maraimalai, Kanchipuram, the latter through its wholly owned subsidiary Asita Manufacturing Private Limited. From December 2024, operations commenced at the Thirumudivakkam facility. The company employs a total of 563 Karigars across both manufacturing units. ADVERTISEMENT The company also operates one of India's largest jewellery stores in Vijayawada, with a carpet area of 1,00,000 sq. ft., alongside large-format stores in Somajiguda (98,210 sq. ft.) and Vishakhapatnam (65,000 sq. ft.), making them among the largest jewellery retail outlets in the country, according to Lalithaa Jewellery Mart reported a 26.07% increase in restated consolidated revenue from Rs 13,316.80 crore in fiscal 2023 to Rs 16,788.05 crore in fiscal 2024, driven by the rise in store count from 47 to 53, higher gold rates, and increased gold sales. For the nine months ended December 31, 2024, the company posted revenue of Rs 12,594.67 crore and profit after tax of Rs 262.33 crore. ADVERTISEMENT The Indian gems and jewellery retail industry was valued at Rs 6.49 trillion in fiscal 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13–14% to reach Rs 12–12.2 trillion by fiscal 2029. South India remains the largest jewellery-consuming region, accounting for 38–43% of the country's overall jewellery Rathi Advisors and Equirus Capital are the book-running lead managers for the issue, while MUFG Intime India serves as registrar. ADVERTISEMENT Also read | IPO calendar: 4 new issues, 1 listing lined up in a busy mid-June week (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘No time for life': Andhra Pradesh's new 10-hour work rule slammed by employees
The Andhra Pradesh government has decided to raise the maximum working hours from nine to 10 per day in a move that has led to outrage and backlash on social media. This decision from the TDP-led NDA government in Andhra Pradesh will allow private companies and factories to increase their maximum working hours to 10 per day, up one hour from the earlier nine. The decision to increase working hours from 9 to 10 has drawn criticism (Representational image) {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} As per a PTI report, the Information and Public Relations (I&PR) Minister K Parthasarathy said that it has been decided to amend labour laws to make them 'favourable' to workers and investors. {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} However, workers on social media struggled to see how increased working hours would be 'favourable' for them. The move has also drawn the ire of trade unions, Criticism of 10 hours per day policy {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} On social media, users said that increased work hours would benefit only business owners at the cost of employees. Many were of the opinion that private companies would implement 10 hours as mandatory policy, further affecting work-life balance. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} On social media, users said that increased work hours would benefit only business owners at the cost of employees. Many were of the opinion that private companies would implement 10 hours as mandatory policy, further affecting work-life balance. {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} 'Good for financial growth. What about mental health? 10 hrs work, 2 hrs travelling, 8 hrs sleep, you have to do everything in left 4 hours,' wrote X user Ankit. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} 'Good for financial growth. What about mental health? 10 hrs work, 2 hrs travelling, 8 hrs sleep, you have to do everything in left 4 hours,' wrote X user Ankit. {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} 'So the Andhra Pradesh govt thinks longer hours = better productivity? No, it means exploitation. More hours, same pay, worse lives. Workers deserve dignity, not burnout,' X user Supriya opined. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} 'So the Andhra Pradesh govt thinks longer hours = better productivity? No, it means exploitation. More hours, same pay, worse lives. Workers deserve dignity, not burnout,' X user Supriya opined. {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} Several people said the move will lead to overworked employees who have no time to spend with family. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} Several people said the move will lead to overworked employees who have no time to spend with family. {{/usCountry}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} '9 hours of working itself was a lot and they still increased it. Overworking your employees has tickled down effects, people will have no time to spend with their families. AP fertility rate is already falling rapidly & you're disincentivizing people from having/raising kids,' an X user said. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} Others noted how maximum working hours in parts of India are already more than the global average of 8 hours per day. 'The Government is hand in glove with the corrupt corporations that want to exploit cheap labour,' a user said. Dozens of people wondered whether increased working hours would come with an accompanying pay raise. What the AP government says "Because of this (amendments to labour laws), investors in factories will (come to our state). These labour rules will be favourable for labourers and they will come to invest more. Globalisation is happening in every state. These amendments were brought to implement global rules," said Minister K Parthasarathy. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} Further, the minister observed that the cabinet has also relaxed night shift rules to enable more women to work in the night shifts. According to the I&PR Minister, women were not allowed to work in the night shifts earlier but now they can work with safeguards such as consent, transport facility, security and surveillance. Opposition slams move Meanwhile, K Ramakrishna, State Secretary of CPI, opposed the NDA alliance government's stand on labour laws amendments. He alleged that the Central and state governments are working against the interests of workers. "For the past 11 years, the Modi government has repeatedly taken measures that infringe upon workers' rights in India," Ramakrishan told PTI on Saturday. SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How did things get from bad to worse between Donald Trump and Elon Musk? A step-by-step guide
A no-holds-barred and very public blow-up between the world's richest man and the president of the United States has had social media agog in recent days, with each making serious accusations against the other. And while tech billionaire Elon Musk appears to have cooled the spat somewhat – deleting some of his more incendiary social media posts about Donald Trump – the president still appears to be in no mood to make up, warning Musk of 'very serious consequences' if he backs Democrats at the mid-term elections in 2026. Tensions erupted over Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB). The OBBB proposes extensive tax cuts which could add roughly USD 3 trillion (AUD 4.62 trillion) to the US national debt. After stepping down from his role as advisor to Trump, Musk criticised the OBBB as 'disgusting abomination' that would 'burden America [sic] citizens with crushing unsustainable debt'. Trump returned fire, suggesting 'Elon was 'wearing thin', I asked him to leave […] and he just went CRAZY!'. In a dramatic escalation, Musk responded by calling for Trump's impeachment. Musk also tweeted allegations that Trump was implicated in the Epstein files related to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He has since deleted those tweets. Why has the much-hyped 'bromance' between Musk and Trump suddenly ended? And what was the basis of their alliance in the first place? Like many billionaires, Musk had previously been hesitant to get involved in frontline politics. He says he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020, but claimed in 2021 'I would prefer to stay out of politics'. In early 2024, Musk was still claiming to be politically non-aligned, suggesting he would not donate to either presidential campaign. This apparent neutrality ended following the attempted assassination of Trump at a July 2024 campaign rally, with Musk immediately endorsing Trump. In reality, Musk's conversion to the MAGA movement long predated the assassination attempt. Musk's hyperactive Twitter/X account shows a steady radicalisation. Across 2020-2024, Musk engaged with accounts sharing MAGA and far-right conspiracy theories. These include the antisemitic Great Replacement Theory, and the related South African white genocide conspiracy. Musk's posts also show the obsession with opposing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies characteristic of the MAGA movement. After endorsing Trump, Musk spent USD 288 million (AUD 444 million) supporting Trump's election and appeared at campaign events around the country. Musk's support for Trump was both ideological and pragmatic. From tax cuts to immigration restrictions to opposing DEI, there were clearly many ideological commonalities between Musk and Trump. There were also clear practical benefits for both men. Trump gained the financial backing of the world's wealthiest man. Musk gained not only unparalleled access to the US president, but also a role leading the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Early reporting on the second Trump presidency noted the omnipresence of Musk, who at one point moved into Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort to be close to the president. However, observers were sceptical about the potential effectiveness of DOGE, and Musk's claim it would save the government USD 2 trillion (AUD 3.02 trillion). In the early months of the Trump administration, Musk cut government programmes and employees at a remarkable rate. The USAID programme was particularly hard hit, as were the Department of Education and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As the spending cuts picked up pace, Musk began to attract more controversy. Critics questioned the apparent power wielded by the unelected billionaire. Musk's ties to the far right were also in the spotlight after he appeared to perform two 'Roman salutes', which many observers believed to be a Nazi salute. Musk's apparent rampage through government did not last long. As Trump's executive appointees assumed control of their departments, Musk and DOGE experienced increasing resistance. After a series of fractious cabinet meetings, Trump reportedly reduced the power of DOGE in March. Political attention was also clearly affecting Musk's businesses. The negative publicity has significantly damaged the Tesla brand, leading to declining sales around the world and repeated falls in Telsa's share price. On May 1, Musk announced he would be leaving DOGE, claiming the department had saved the government USD 180 billion (AUD 277 billion) in spending. This number is likely an exaggeration, but still falls well short of his original target. Musk has learned a harsh lesson in politics – that the complexities of government resist simple reform and cannot be easily rolled back in the way a CEO might slim down a company. For Trump, his manoeuvring of Musk appears to be another smart political move. As the public face of DOGE, Musk bore the negative rap for early government cuts and chaos. Having used his money and reputation, Trump dispensed with Musk as he has with so many advisers and appointees before. Musk departed his role in a muted White House ceremony, where Trump thanked him for his service and presented him with a ceremonial 'golden key' to the White House. However, behind the public show of civility, tension was brewing over Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill. Trump and Musk had originally claimed the USD 2 trillion (AUD 3.02 trillion) in DOGE savings could be used to fund a substantial tax cut. With the efficiency savings not eventuating, Musk worried the OBBB would significantly increase US public debt. Unable to convince Trump or other Republican legislators, Musk took to X, launching a 'Kill the Bill' campaign that ultimately led to his incendiary showdown with Trump. For his part, Trump has belittled Musk, suggesting Musk only opposed the OBBB because it cut subsidies for electric vehicles. Though the subsidy cuts will affect Tesla, Musk has previously supported eliminating subsidies. Musk's anger at the OBBB is more likely driven by the realisation he has been played by Trump. Trump has used and discarded many other powerful figures in his chaotic political career. Musk has more power than most, and might be able to strike back at Trump. Yet, with his public reputation and brands already tarnished, Musk would be ill-advised to pick further fights with Trump and his adoring MAGA movement. Accordingly, Musk has indicated over the weekend he is open to a détente. Tesla investors will no doubt be relieved if Musk makes good on his pledge to step back from politics and return to his businesses. More concerning are the prospects for democracy. With wealth and power continuing to concentrate in a handful of billionaires, voters appear reduced to the role of viewers forced to watch the reality TV drama unfold. Though Trump appears to have won this round of billionaire battle royale, whatever happens next, democracy is the real loser.
