
U.S. aid cuts leave food for millions moldering in storage
By Jessica Donati, Emma Farge, Ammu Kannampilly and Jonathan Landay
Food rations that could supply 3.5 million people for a month are moldering in warehouses around the world because of U.S. aid cuts and risk becoming unusable, according to five people familiar with the situation.
The food stocks have been stuck inside four U.S. government warehouses since the Trump administration's decision in January to cut global aid programs, according to three people who previously worked at the U.S. Agency for International Development and two sources from other aid organizations.
Some stocks that are due to expire as early as July are likely to be destroyed, either by incineration, using them as animal feed or disposing of them in other ways, two of the sources said.
The warehouses, which are run by USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (BHA), contain between 60,000 to 66,000 tons of food, sourced from American farmers and manufacturers, the five people said.
An undated inventory list for the warehouses - which are located in Djibouti, South Africa, Dubai and Houston - stated that they contained more than 66,000 tons of commodities, including high-energy biscuits, vegetable oil and fortified grains.
Those supplies are valued at over $98 million, according to the document reviewed by Reuters, which was shared by an aid official and verified by a U.S. government source as up to date.
That food could feed over a million people for three months, or the entire population of Gaza for a month and a half, according to a Reuters analysis using figures from the World Food Program, the world's largest humanitarian agency.
The U.N. body says that one tonne of food - typically including cereals, pulses and oil - can meet the daily need of approximately 1,660 people.
The dismantling of USAID and cuts to humanitarian aid spending by President Donald Trump come as global hunger levels are rising due to conflict and climate change, which are driving more people toward famine, undoing decades of progress.
According to the World Food Program, 343 million people are facing acute levels of food insecurity worldwide. Of those, 1.9 million people are gripped by catastrophic hunger and on the brink of famine. Most of them are in Gaza and Sudan, but also in pockets of South Sudan, Haiti and Mali.
A spokesperson for the State Department, which oversees USAID, said in response to detailed questions about the food stocks that it was working to ensure the uninterrupted continuation of aid programs and their transfer by July as part of the USAID decommissioning process.
"USAID is continuously consulting with partners on where to best distribute commodities at USAID prepositioning warehouses for use in emergency programs ahead of their expiration dates," the spokesperson said.
SOME FOOD LIKELY TO BE DESTROYED
Although the Trump administration has issued waivers for some humanitarian programs - including in Gaza and Sudan - the cancellation of contracts and freezing of funds needed to pay suppliers, shippers and contractors has left food stocks stuck in the four warehouses, the sources said.
A proposal to hand the stocks to aid organizations that can distribute them is on hold, according to the U.S. source and two former USAID sources briefed on the proposal. The plan is awaiting approval from the State Department's Office of Foreign Assistance, the two former USAID sources said.
The office is headed by Jeremy Lewin, a 28-year-old former operative of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, who is now overseeing the decommissioning of USAID.
The Office of Foreign Assistance, DOGE and Lewin himself did not respond to requests for comment.
Nearly 500 tons of high-energy biscuits stored at a USAID warehouse in Dubai are due to expire in July, according to a former USAID official and an aid official familiar with the inventories. The biscuits could feed at least 27,000 acutely malnourished children for a month, according to Reuters calculations.
The biscuits are now likely to be destroyed or turned into animal feed, the former USAID official said, adding that in a typical year only around 20 tonnes of food might be disposed of in this way because of damage in transit or storage.
Some of those stocks were previously intended for Gaza and famine-stricken Sudan, the former official said.
The State Department spokesperson did not directly respond to questions on how much of the food aid in storage was close to expiry and whether this would be destroyed.
USAID plans to fire almost all of its staff in two rounds on July 1 and Sept 2, as it prepares to shut down, according to a notification submitted to Congress in March. The two former USAID sources said many of the critical staff needed to manage the warehouses or move the supplies will depart in July.
CHILDREN DYING
The United States is the world's largest humanitarian aid donor, amounting to at least 38% of all contributions recorded by the United Nations. It disbursed $61 billion in foreign assistance last year, just over half of it via USAID, according to government data.
U.S. food aid includes ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) such as high-energy biscuits and Plumpy'Nut, a peanut-based paste.
Navyn Salem, the founder of Edesia, a U.S.-based manufacturer of Plumpy'Nut, said termination of transportation contracts by USAID had created a massive backlog that had forced the firm to hire an additional warehouse to store its own production.
The resulting stockpile of 5,000 tons, worth $13 million, could feed more than 484,000 children, she said.
Salem said that email exchanges with Lewin have left her "hopeful" that a way will be found soon to get her product to the desperate children who need it.
The U.N. children's agency UNICEF warned in late March that RUTF stocks were running short in 17 countries due to funding cuts, potentially forcing 2.4 million children suffering from severe acute malnutrition to go without these crucial supplies for the rest of the year.
The four USAID warehouses contain the majority of the agency's pre-positioned food stockpiles. In normal times, these could be rapidly deployed to places like Sudan, where 25 million people - half the country's population - face acute hunger.
Jeanette Bailey, director of nutrition at the International Rescue Committee, which receives much of its funding from the U.S., said it was scaling back its programs following the cuts.
She said the impact of global shortages of therapeutic foods due to the disruption to U.S. aid flows is difficult to measure, particularly in places where aid programs no longer operate.
"What we do know, though, is that if a child's in an inpatient stabilization centre and they're no longer able to access treatment, more than 60% of those children are at risk of dying very quickly," she said.
Action Against Hunger, a non-profit that relied on the United States for over 30% of its global budget, said last month the U.S. cuts had already led to the deaths of at least six children at its programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo, after it was forced to suspend admissions.
CUTS CAUSING CHAOS
The Bureau for Humanitarian Affairs, which coordinates the U.S. government's aid efforts overseas, was plunged into chaos by the Trump administration's cutbacks, the five sources said.
The bureau's staff were among thousands of USAID employees put on administrative leave pending their terminations. While some staff were brought back to work until their severance dates, aid administration has not recovered.
Three sources told Reuters that the contract to maintain USAID warehouses in the South African port city of Durban had been cancelled, raising questions about future aid distribution. Reuters was unable to confirm that independently.
Two former USAID officials said that the Djibouti and Dubai facilities would be handed over to a team at the State Department which has yet to be formed. The State Department did not comment.
A spokesperson for the WFP, which relies heavily on U.S. funding, declined to comment on the stranded food stocks.
Asked if it was engaged in discussions to release them, the spokesperson said: "We greatly appreciate the support from all our donors, including the U.S., and we will continue to work with partners to advocate for the needs of the most vulnerable in urgent need of life-saving assistance".
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
G7 leaders arrive in Canada for summit that starts Monday
The leaders from the Group of Seven members have arrived in western Canada for their summit that starts on Monday. US tariffs, the situation in the Middle East and Russia's invasion of Ukraine will likely be on the agenda. The leaders are expected to discuss the global economic outlook on the first day. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who will attend, spoke to reporters on Sunday ahead of the meeting in Kananaskis. In an apparent reference to the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, she said: "Let us keep trade between us fair, predictable and open. All of us need to avoid protectionist measures. This is an important message that the G7 can send to the markets and to the world." Von der Leyen also expressed concern about the conflict between Israel and Iran, adding that "it will be a topic at G7 without any question." She reiterated the European Union's view that "Iran can never have a nuclear weapon." "A diplomatic solution remains the best way in the long run to address concerns about Iran's nuclear program." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is scheduled to join the G7 leaders on the second day of the summit. White House officials announced that Trump and Zelenskyy will hold one-on-one talks on the sidelines.


Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: A plea to stop Washington sticking its nose in U.S. Steel
Nippon Steel Corp.'s move to acquire U.S. Steel finally got the seal of approval from the U.S. government after it intervened and set conditions. We give high marks to the partnership agreed to by private-sector companies of Japan and the United States. The U.S. government needs to respect Nippon Steel's autonomous management and not meddle in it. Prior to winning the presidential election last November, Donald Trump vowed to block the acquisition. But he has since toned down his attitude and said he would allow 'investment' by Nippon Steel. Still, he expressed qualms about the Japanese company's goal of making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Nippon Steel made its intentions known about 18 months ago. The plan to make U.S. Steel a subsidiary was approved with the signing of a presidential order just before the deadline that revised one signed by Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, to stop the acquisition. U.S. Steel is a noted corporation that at one time boasted the world's largest share of crude steel production. But it has fallen on hard times. Even if the U.S. government was trying to protect this symbol of U.S. industrialization from being controlled by foreign capital, the argument that an acquisition by a company from Japan, a U.S. ally, would create a risk in U.S. national security and in an important supply chain lacked logic. It was a mistake to try to push through protectionist policy. It is only right that the U.S. government did an about-face and allowed U.S. Steel to become a wholly owned subsidiary. As a condition for having its acquisition approved, Nippon Steel agreed to sign a national security agreement with the U.S. government. The U.S. side will have some influence over company management through the issuance of 'golden shares' to the U.S. government that grant it veto power over important management decisions. In addition to the 2 trillion yen ($13.8 billion) for the acquisition, Nippon Steel will also invest about 1.6 trillion yen on production facilities by 2028. The agreement appears to include wording on the composition of the U.S. Steel corporate board as well as production capacity in the United States. But using that agreement to flex its muscle will limit Nippon Steel's management freedom and perhaps thwart the rebuilding of U.S. Steel on the path to sustained growth. Concerns about the investment environment in the United States could lead other Japanese companies to take a more cautious stance about investing there. The interests of both Japan and the United States will not be served by such a development. Prior to approving the acquisition, Trump doubled the tariff rate on steel and aluminum to 50 percent. Trump seems to be trying to take credit for increased investment in the United States through his high tariff policy. But the acquisition plan was well under way before the increased tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Trying to claim that Nippon Steel's investment was the result of the tariff policy is a wishful boast. Trump also suddenly indicated that the 25-percent additional tariff on imported autos would be raised. That was a high-handed move that could deal a crippling blow to the Japanese economy. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump will soon meet for talks on the tariffs. Tokyo should not simply compromise just because the acquisition was approved but continue to seek a retraction of all the tariff measures. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 15


Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Trump administration offers some details of how it would control U.S. Steel, but union raises concerns
President Donald Trump arrives to speak at U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plan on May 30, in West Mifflin, Pa. By JOSH BOAK and MARC LEVY President Donald Trump would have unique influence over the operations of U.S. Steel under the terms of what the White House calls an 'investment' being made by Japan-based Nippon Steel in the iconic American steelmaker. Administration officials over the past few days provided additional insight into the 'golden share' arrangement that the federal government made as a condition for supporting the deal. The Pittsburgh-based steel maker and Nippon Steel plan $11 billion in new investments by 2028 after indicating that they plan to move forward with the deal under the terms of a national security agreement that has the White House's approval. The White House has described the deal as a 'partnership' and an 'investment' by Nippon Steel in U.S. Steel, although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary in a nearly $15 billion offer it originally made in late 2023. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on social media on Saturday how the 'golden share' to be held by the president would operate, revealing that the White House is willing to insert itself aggressively into a private company's affairs even as it has simultaneously pledged to strip away government regulations so businesses can expand. Under the government's terms, it would be impossible without Trump's consent to relocate U.S. Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, change the name of the company, 'transfer production or jobs outside the United States,' shutter factories, or reincorporate the business overseas, among other powers held by the president. Lutnick also said it would require presidential approval to reduce or delay $14 billion in planned investments. 'The Golden Share held by the United States in U.S. Steel has powerful terms that directly benefit and protect America, Pennsylvania, the great steelworkers of U.S. Steel, and U.S. manufacturers that will have massively expanded access to domestically produced steel,' Lutnick posted on X. That $14 billion figure is higher than what the companies disclosed on Friday when Trump created a pathway for the investment with an executive order based on the terms of the national security agreement being accepted. Lawmakers from Pennsylvania say the higher figure includes the cost of an electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that Nippon Steel wants to build in the U.S., bringing the value of the deal to at least $28 billion. The president has the authority to name one of the corporate board's independent three directors and veto power over the other two choices, according to a person familiar with the terms of the agreement who insisted on anonymity to discuss them. The details of the board structure were first reported by The New York Times. Details of the agreement emerged as Trump was traveling to Alberta in Canada for the Group of Seven summit. Still, the full terms remain somewhat unclear. The companies have not made public the full terms of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel or the national security agreement with the federal government. On Sunday, the United Steelworkers, the labor union representing U.S. Steel employees, posted a letter raising questions about the deal forged by Trump, who during his run for the presidency had pledged to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel. The union said it was 'disappointed' that Trump 'has reversed course' and raised basic questions about the ownership structure of U.S. Steel. 'Neither the government nor the companies have publicly identified what all the terms of the proposed transaction are,' the letter said. 'Our labor agreement expires next year, on September 1, 2026, and the USW and its members are prepared to engage the new owners" of U.S. Steel "to obtain a fair contract.' If Trump has as much control of U.S. Steel as he has claimed, that could put him in the delicate position of negotiating the salary and benefits of unionized steelworkers going into midterm elections. As president, Joe Biden used his authority to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel on his way out of the White House after a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. After he was elected, Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement and ordered another review by the committee. That's when the idea of the 'golden share' emerged as a way to resolve national security concerns and protect American interests in domestic steel production. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel made a series of commitments. It gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest in U.S. Steel, promised to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.