Court rules Ace Magashule's assistant cannot be tried in asbestos case as her extradition is unlawful
Moroadi Cholota's extradition from the USA was declared unlawful in the Bloemfontein High Court. She no longer faces any charges and can go back to the USA.
Image: File
The Bloemfontein High Court ruled that former Free State premier Ace Magashule's personal assistant, Moroadi Cholota, cannot be tried in the R255 million asbestos case, as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful.
Judge Philip Loubser on Tuesday found Cholota's extradition was unlawful due to the lack of a lawful extradition request by the South African executive. 'This court does not have the power to try you. You are free to leave,' the judge told Cholota.
Cholota was one of the 18 accused in the high-profile trial where the accused are facing a host of charges relating to alleged fraud, corruption, and money laundering. All of the accused had pleaded not guilty and vehemently denied any involvement in the allegations against them.
A trial-within-a-trial was held to establish whether Cholota's extradition was lawful after she had contested it by way of a special plea.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The request for the extradition from the United States to South Africa was made by the Director of Public Prosecutions in the Free State.
The judge stated that this request was not lawfully executed and thus it is not valid. Cholota was studying in the United States at the time of her extradition.
The NPA, meanwhile, said it is studying the judgment.
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
NPA Hit with Massive Legal Bill After Botched Banxso Case
Taxpayers left to foot nearly R500,000 after prosecutors' failed funds grab backfires in court. Image: IOL / Ron AI The National Prosecuting Authority has been ordered to pay a costs order approaching half a million rand after their attempt to freeze Banxso's funds collapsed on appeal, leaving South African taxpayers to shoulder the financial burden of what legal experts describe as a fundamentally flawed strategy. The costly legal defeat began when the NPA secured what appeared to be a straightforward victory through an ex parte application. This legal procedure allows only one party to present their case to the court without the opposing side being present or having an opportunity to respond. "Ex parte applications are supposed to be reserved for genuine emergencies where there's a real risk of assets disappearing overnight," explained a senior legal practitioner. "The fact that this preservation order was successfully overturned on appeal suggests the original application may not have met the stringent requirements for such urgent relief." Banxso successfully challenged the preservation order through a Reconsideration Application, resulting in the court not only overturning the original ruling but imposing substantial legal costs on the NPA. Liquidation Proceedings Present Far Greater Risk The NPA's financial setback, whilst significant, represents only a fraction of the potential costs exposure facing applicants in the ongoing liquidation proceedings. The main liquidation case, which has been progressing through the courts since October 2024, involves substantially more complex legal issues and protracted hearings. Judge Le Grange heard the liquidation application in early May, but judgment remains pending. Legal sources suggest the extended timeline and complexity of liquidation proceedings could result in costs orders exponentially higher than the NPA's bill. "When you're dealing with liquidation applications of this magnitude, costs can spiral very quickly," said a liquidation expert with extensive experience in commercial insolvencies. "The NPA matter was relatively straightforward compared to what we're seeing in liquidation proceedings. If that resulted in costs approaching R500,000, we could be looking at exposure running into tens of millions for the main case." The expert noted that liquidation proceedings typically involve multiple postponements, extensive documentation, and lengthy court hearings—all factors that contribute to escalating legal costs. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Strategic Legal Positioning Banxso has requested that the court grant a de bonis propriis order against Mostert and Bosman Attorneys. This legal mechanism would make the attorneys personally liable for costs rather than their clients bearing the financial burden. "A de bonis propriis order is a serious remedy that courts don't grant lightly," the legal source explained. "It essentially means the lawyers would pay costs out of their own pockets. Courts typically only make such orders where there's evidence of improper conduct or where attorneys are seen to be the real driving force behind litigation." Banxso has consistently maintained that the applicants are being used by their legal representatives, who allegedly stand to benefit financially from liquidation proceedings regardless of the outcome for creditors. This argument gained judicial attention when Judge Le Grange questioned why the applicants would reject Banxso's offer of security for their claims in favour of pursuing liquidation proceedings that would yield only 15 to 50 cents on the rand in the best-case scenario. Section 381 Implications During proceedings, Advocate Rudi van Rooyen, representing the applicants, referenced the possibility of a section 381 application. This provision would allow provisional liquidators to apply for extended powers equivalent to those of finally appointed liquidators, including authority to institute commissions of enquiry and appoint expensive legal teams. "Section 381 applications can dramatically increase costs because they essentially give liquidators carte blanche to investigate and litigate using the company's own funds," the liquidation expert noted. "It's a powerful tool, but it can also be expensive for all concerned." Judge Le Grange observed that such an application would effectively allow Banxso's money to be used to fund litigation against the company itself, reinforcing Banxso's argument that liquidation primarily benefits attorneys and liquidators rather than creditors. Financial Consequences Mount The NPA's substantial costs order will be paid from government coffers, adding to taxpayers' financial burden. The failed preservation strategy has resulted in the state bearing the cost of unsuccessful litigation whilst achieving none of its intended objectives. Meanwhile, the applicants in the liquidation matter face potential personal liability for costs that could exceed the NPA's financial exposure by significant margins. Industry observers note that liquidation proceedings involving Mostert and Bosman have previously resulted in substantial legal fees being deducted from creditor payouts. "The pattern we've seen in previous matters suggests that legal costs can consume a significant portion of available funds," the liquidation expert observed. "Creditors often end up receiving much less than anticipated because of the fees involved in the liquidation process." Financial disclosures from the Mirror Trading International liquidation revealed that Mostert and Bosman had levied legal costs exceeding R24 million by September 2023, with creditors still awaiting dividend payments and a second Liquidation and Distribution account remaining unpublished. Pending Judgment The contrast between the NPA's failed strategy and Banxso's defensive approach has become increasingly apparent. Whilst the state prosecution authority faces a substantial costs order for unsuccessful litigation, Banxso continues defending its position and seeking to protect client interests through the judicial process. As the legal community awaits Judge Le Grange's judgement, the NPA's costly defeat stands as a stark reminder of the financial consequences when aggressive legal strategies backfire in the commercial courts.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Jacinta Zinhle MaNgobese Zuma's campaign against illegal immigration gains support
March and March campaign supporters Scelo Mlaba, Gcina Dube, Mxolisi Nxumalo and Msizi Ngidi after their picket outside the Pietermaritzburg Magitrate's Court on Thursday. Image: Bongani Hans FORMER radio personality Jacinta Zinhle MaNgobese Zuma's newly established March and March Until We Win campaign against illegal immigrants is gaining traction around the country while being allegedly shunned by the government. On social media, ordinary South Africans have expressed their support for MaNgobese Zuma's campaign. However, she expressed concern about the government departments' lack of support. MaNgobese Zuma, who also enjoys support from ActionSA, said the national police and KwaZulu-Natal Premier Thami Ntuli, were the only ones not hostile and who were willing to hear her concerns. 'Otherwise, all the other departments are very, very hostile when we try to work with them. 'We write letters without getting responses, we try to facilitate engagements, we don't get feedback from them, and we tried reaching out to the president,' she said. She spoke to this reporter telephonically on Thursday after a group of her supporters picketed outside the Pietermaritzburg Magistrate Court where a suspect, who was believed to be from Malawi, had appeared for allegedly raping a 10-year-old girl from Copesville. Although she welcomed Ntuli's campaign against illegal immigrants, she stated that this was not sufficient. 'My point is that you cannot do something once off and keep quiet for three months because the situation is dire and requires serious intervention,' she said. She wanted President Cyril Ramaphosa to declare a state of emergency against illegal foreigners and deploy the army to assist the police in flushing them out of the country. 'The police cannot do this by themselves, as they are already overwhelmed. 'Our courts and the national defence force need to play their parts,' she said. She called on the South African citizens to assist by stopping to rent out spaces in their homes to the illegal immigrants to open spaza shops. MaNgobese Zuma described the issue of illegal immigrants as the country's crisis that has depleted already scarce resources earmarked for the local citizens. She said there was no way that the government could misinterpret the March and March campaign as xenophobic because it was supported by legal foreigners who understood the situation. She said the crisis was clear because people were losing their jobs as companies were opting to employ illegal foreigners. 'We state all those things in our communication with the departments, and if they keep ignoring us, things are going to get worse. 'Look at the health department, people complain about overcrowded clinics and hospitals, leading to the lack of access to healthcare, and that leads to more tension on the ground. 'We recently saw a report from ActionSA stating that 70% of the files at the Department of Health in Johannesburg belonged to foreigners, and that speaks to the situation that is not healthy,' she said. Responding to ActionSA MP Dr Kgosietsile Letlape's parliamentary questions last year, Public Service and Administration Minister Inkosi Mzamo Buthelezi said out of 12 million employees of government departments nationally and various provinces, more than 6,000 were foreign nationals. MaNgobese Zuma said she started the March and March campaign on March 24 this year after realising the future of young South Africans was bleak. 'I was inspired by looking at the future of this country and seeing the pain from thinking of my poor children of South Africa, where they can no longer be able to go outside and play because there is kidnapping, human trafficking, and drugs. 'The youth of South Africa don't have jobs,' said MaNgobese Zuma. She alleged that illegal immigrants were contributing to the high crime rate. 'They are armed to the teeth with all kinds of ammunition and guns, and there is even a spaza shop mafia run by Pakistanis and Somalians, and when South Africans try to open a shop, it becomes a crisis. 'How is that even possible that a country cannot allow its citizens to open spaza shops?' she said. According to the Home Affairs website, the department deported close to 47,000 illegal immigrants in the 2024/2025 financial year alone. In a statement issued on April 2, Home Affairs Minister Dr Leon Schreiber described the country's deportation rate, which he linked to improved working relationships between his department, the Border Management Authority and police, as having improved than the previous years. 'The fact that Home Affairs now performs more than double the number of deportations conducted in a country like France, which has the highest rate of deportations in the European Union, sends a clear message to offenders that the days of impunity are over. This improved performance, coupled with our digital transformation reforms that will automate entry and exit to prevent people from entering the country illegally through our ports of entry, is contributing to enhanced national security and trade facilitation,' said Schreiber. [email protected]
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Government condemns Riverlea shootout linked to illegal mining
A tragic shootout between illegal miners and the South African Police Service (SAPS) in Riverlea, Johannesburg, has left a 59-year-old man dead, prompting national condemnation and calls for stronger community collaboration in tackling criminal activity. Police reportedly exchanged gunfire with three suspects at the Zamimpilo informal settlement when the man was caught in the crossfire and killed. His body was discovered in the early hours of Wednesday morning. The South African government has extended condolences to the victim's family and pledged its support for ongoing investigations. 'This incident demonstrates the severe threat that illegal mining poses, not only to law enforcement, but to the safety and well-being of communities,' said Acting Government spokesperson Nomonde Mnukwa. Mnukwa called on community members to avoid taking the law into their own hands and instead work with police to address criminality. 'Community members are called to cooperate with authorities and report criminal activities taking place in their areas,' she said. Illegal mining, often associated with heavily armed syndicates, has plagued several parts of Johannesburg, including Riverlea. The violence accompanying these operations has frequently drawn attention from authorities and residents, with infrastructure damage and community safety being constant concerns. Residents in Riverlea have previously complained about the dangers posed by illegal miners, known locally as zama zamas, who operate in abandoned mines and informal settlements with minimal regard for public safety. Furthermore, law enforcement continues to intensify efforts to disrupt illegal mining networks in Johannesburg and beyond. The government has praised these efforts and reaffirmed its stance on maintaining order. 'Government commends the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to clamp down on illegal mining operations, which continue to pose serious threats to public safety and infrastructure,' Mnukwa added. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
