
Whistleblower says senior DOJ official expressed willingness to ignore court orders
A former Department of Justice (DOJ) employee alleges in a whistleblower complaint that Principal Assistant Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove made repeated attempts to willingly disobey or ignore court orders.
Bove, who is now a judicial nominee for the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, was accused in the complaint of using a 'lack of candor, deliberate delay and disinformation' to violate injunctions against the Trump administration. The complaint, which was sent from the Government Accountability Project to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and the DOJ's inspector general, was first reported by the New York Times,
Former government attorney Erez Reuveni alleges in the complaint that DOJ leaders in March and April planned to 'resist court orders' that would slow Trump administration efforts to deport people in the country illegally.
In a meeting on March 14 about deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members under the Alien and Enemies Act, Bove, the complaint says, said 'stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what.' In the face of legal challenges, he proposed the department tell the courts 'f— you,' and 'ignore' court orders blocking the Trump administration's attempted removal of these individuals.
In the complaint, Reuveni cited three separate occasions where the DOJ attempted to undermine the rule of law by presenting legal arguments with 'no basis' while 'misrepresenting' facts presented before the court.
Reuveni, the complaint says, tried to keep the DOJ's actions in compliance of the law 'and was thwarted, threatened, fired, and publicly disparaged for both doing his job and telling the truth to the court.'
He was suspended and ultimately terminated from a 15-year stint at the DOJ in April after, in a hearing in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, agreeing that the Maryland man was removed from the U.S. due to an 'administrative error' by the federal government.
Bove, in his time at DOJ, ordered the dismissal of federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D-N.Y.) in his corruption case. Before Trump's election,he served as Trump's defense attorney when the leader was charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records.
Trump administration officials responded to the allegation by saying Reuveni is a 'disgruntled employee' who issued false allegations about Bove to offset his Wednesday Senate confirmation hearing.
'Note that not a single individual except the disgruntled former employee agrees with the statements cavalierly printed by this purported news outlet,' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in a Tuesday post on X.
'I was at the meeting described in the article and at no time did anyone suggest a court order should not be followed,' he added.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, shared heightened concerns about Bove's nomination to serve as a federal judge amid reporting on the complaint.
'These serious allegations, from a career Justice Department lawyer who defended the first Trump Administration's immigration policies, not only speak to Mr. Bove's failure to fulfill his ethical obligations as a lawyer, but demonstrate that his activities are part of a broader pattern by President Trump and his allies to undermine the Justice Department's commitment to the rule of law,' Durbin said in a statement.
'I want to thank Mr. Reuveni for exercising his right to speak up and bring accountability to Mr. Bove. And I implore my Senate Republican colleagues: do not turn a blind eye to the dire consequences of confirming Mr. Bove to a lifetime position as a circuit court judge.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Alvin Bragg, Manhattan prosecutor who took on Trump, wins Democratic primary in bid for second term
NEW YORK (AP) — Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the prosecutor who oversaw the historic hush-money case against President Donald Trump, won Tuesday's Democratic primary as he seeks reelection. Bragg defeated Patrick Timmins — a litigator, law professor and former Bronx assistant district attorney — to advance to November's general election. About 70% of registered Manhattan voters are Democrats. The first-term incumbent will face Republican Maud Maron, who was a public defender for decades and previously ran for Congress and NYC's City Council as a Democrat. Bragg has long been one of the nation's most prominent prosecutors, spotlighted in TV's 'Law & Order' and other shows. The DA directs about 600 attorneys in one of the biggest local prosecutors' offices in the U.S. He raised the office's profile still further by bringing the hush-money case. His predecessor, fellow Democrat Cyrus R. Vance Jr., spent years investigating various Trump dealings but didn't procure an indictment . Bragg decided to focus on how and why porn actor Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000 to clam up about her claims of a 2006 sexual encounter with the married Trump. The payment was made, through the then-candidate's personal attorney, weeks before the 2016 presidential election. Trump's company records logged the money as a legal expense. Trump denied any wrongdoing and any sexual involvement with Daniels. But a jury last year found him guilty of 33 felony counts of falsifying business records, the first-ever felony conviction of a former — and now again — U.S. commander in chief. Trump is appealing the verdict. The Republican president has long derided the case as a political 'witch hunt,' and he has kept lambasting Bragg by social media as recently as March. Bragg, 51, was a civil rights lawyer, federal prosecutor and top deputy to New York's attorney general before becoming DA. Raised in Harlem and educated at Harvard, he's the first Black person to hold the post. His tenure had a rocky start. Days after taking office in 2022, he issued a memo telling staffers not to prosecute some types of cases, nor seek bail or prison time in some others. After criticism from the police commissioner and others, Bragg apologized for creating 'confusion' and said his office wasn't easing up on serious cases. The matter continued to animate his critics. Trump repeatedly branded Bragg 'soft on crime,' and Timmins said on his campaign site homepage that the memo 'has brought about increased crime and a perception of chaos in the subway and on our streets.' Timmins — who has raised about $154,000 to Bragg's $2.2 million since January 2022 — also pledged to do more to staunch subway crime, keep cases from getting dismissed for failure to meet legal deadlines, and prioritize hate crimes, among other things. Bragg's campaign emphasized his efforts to fight gun violence, help sexual assault survivors, prosecute hate crimes and go after bad landlords and exploitative bosses, among other priorities. His office, meanwhile, has been enmeshed in a string of high-profile cases in recent months. The office is using a post-9/11 terrorism law to prosecute UnitedHealthcare CEO killing suspect Luigi Mangione , lost a homicide trial against Marine veteran and Republican cause célèbre Daniel Penny in a case that stirred debate about subway safety and self-defense, and retried former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein on sex crimes charges. Mangione, Penny and Weinstein all pleaded not guilty. Bragg unexpectedly inherited the Vance-era Weinstein case after an appeals court ordered a new trial. In a jumbled outcome, jurors this month convicted Weinstein on one top charge, acquitted him of another and didn't reach a verdict on a third, lower-level charge — which Bragg aims to bring to trial a third time. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin officials slam leaked bomb damage assessment indicating Iran could restart nuclear program within months: ‘Completely preposterous'
Trump administration officials on Tuesday slammed a leaked preliminary intelligence assessment of the damage done to Iran's nuclear facilities by weekend US airstrikes that the president has touted as a massive success. The classified Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) bomb damage assessment — deemed a 'low confidence' estimation of the effectiveness of Saturday's strikes on the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz sites — reportedly determined that Iran could bring its nuclear program back online as quickly as within one to two months, according to Fox News. On the high end, estimates indicate that Iran could restart uranium enrichment within a year, according to those who viewed the DIA report. 3 Trump administration officials do not believe the DIA's bomb damage assessment is accurate. via REUTERS CNN, which first reported on the leaked classified document, noted that assessments are ongoing and could change, but the DIA believes Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed by the 'bunker buster' bombs dropped on the nuclear facilities. The White House strongly disagrees with the DIA's preliminary assessment. 'This alleged 'assessment' is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X. 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' she added. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' Leavitt argued. The assessment was reportedly based on satellite images and electronic communications that have been intercepted since the strikes. The report focuses on the damage done to the Fordow, a facility buried underneath mountains south of Tehran, which was hit by 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrators. The DIA reportedly assessed that the entrances to the facility caved in as a result of the strike, and that some infrastructure was destroyed, but that the Iranians could still dig out, repair or rebuild the site. 3 The DIA report suggested the Fordow facility caved in but could be dug out by the Iranians. AP 3 Trump on Tuesday claimed Iran will never restart its nuclear program. Getty Images Special Envoy Steve Witkoff charged that any suggestion the US did not achieve its military objectives in Iran is 'completely preposterous.' 'I've read all the damage assessment reports from not just our government, but from other governments, and I'm not going to get into anything that's top secret, but let me tell you for sure what happened here,' Witkoff said during an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham. Witkoff was adamant that the conversion facility at Isfahan — needed to begin the process of uranium enrichment — was 'the only facility in Iran that can do this' and 'was completely destroyed' in Saturday's aerial assault. 'It's above ground. It was hit with a 30,000-pound bunker buster, and it could not survive that hit — so they have no conversion opportunity, and that means they cannot weaponize, even if they've enriched to 90%,' the Trump administration official said on 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'Then there are two other nuclear reactors in Natanz, one above ground and one below ground,' Witkoff continued. 'The below-ground one we know we eviscerated, and the above-ground one, which had been hit by the Israelis and had been substantially damaged, we put another bomb on top of it, just to make sure that it was eviscerated. And we know for a fact it was. 'Fordow is the last enrichment reactor that was operating there, and we put 12 bunker buster bombs on Fordow. There's no doubt that it breached the canopy. There's no doubt that it was well within reach of the depth that these bunker buster bombs go to, and there's no doubt that it was obliterated.' Witkoff slammed the leaking of the DIA assessment as 'outrageous' and 'treasonous,' and called for investigation to find the person responsible for it in order to hold them accountable. The White House did not respond to The Post's request for comment.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Tucker Carlson Be Darned!': CNN Data Chief Flags How GOP Feels On Trump's Iran Strikes
CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten argued Tuesday that it's 'so important to note' it's still President Donald Trump's Republican Party as he pointed to polling showing that the majority of the GOP is on board with the president's strikes on Iran. 'Tucker Carlson be darned!' said Enten, in a reference to the ex-Fox News host who has been notably opposed to America's involvement in Israel's war on Iran. Enten dismissed claims that MAGA world 'wouldn't necessarily' like the strikes by noting that 76% of Republicans backed the president's military action whereas 18% of the party disapproved of it, per an average of recent polls from CNN/SSRS and Reuters/Ipsos. MAGA world, which was mostly in step with Trump's decision to strike Iran, has shown cracks in its coalition in recent days. Prominent right-wing figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) notably disagreed with Trump's decision but later praised a ceasefire agreement he brokered between Israel and Iran, thanking the president for pursuing 'PEACE.' Steve Bannon commended the strikes but declined to back a possible U.S. push for a regime change in Iran. Earlier in the CNN segment, Enten noted that Americans' overall net approval rating (percent approval minus percent disapproval) of the strikes in both the CNN and Reuters polls sat at -12 points and -9 points, respectively. The figures, he said, 'surprised' him as airstrikes typically 'rank fairly highly' among Americans. He turned to an average of CBS News and Fox News polls from 2014 showing Americans' net approval rating of U.S. strikes against ISIS was +58 points. CNN's John Berman noted that the most recent polling on strikes against Iran could change depending on whether the ceasefire — which Israel and Iran both initially broke — continues to hold or not. H/T: Mediaite Trump's Bombing Probably Set Iran's Nuclear Program Back By Mere Months, Report Says Tucker Carlson Boldly Claims The Murdoch Family Asked Him To Run Against Trump Matt Gaetz Caught Texting His Mom About How He's 'Guiding' Trump