logo
America's wokest DA probed by Trump for offering plea deals on the basis of race

America's wokest DA probed by Trump for offering plea deals on the basis of race

Daily Mail​05-05-2025

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty is facing a federal civil rights investigation over her new plea deal policy, which explicitly directs prosecutors to factor in race when considering offers for criminal defendants.
Less than a week after Moriarty's office implemented the changes, the Department of Justice announced it was launching an inquiry into whether the policy violates the Constitution.
The investigation is being led by Trump-era appointees who argue the guidelines may unlawfully treat people differently based on race.
Moriarty - who has been dubbed the country's most woke DA - is a progressive former public defender who campaigned on racial equity and criminal justice reform.
Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon made the announcement Saturday.
'This letter is to inform you that the Department of Justice is opening an investigation to determine whether the Hennepin County Attorney's Office (HCAO) is engaged in a pattern or practice of depriving persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States,' she wrote.
The memo at the center of the firestorm — titled Negotiations Policy for Cases Involving Adult Defendants — was quietly distributed inside the HCAO and first obtained by local NBC affiliate KARE 11.
It lays out a series of new priorities for prosecutors, including guidance to consider a defendant's age, immigration status, employment, housing, and access to student financial aid.
But the most contentious provision is the one that directly addresses race.
'While racial identity and age are not appropriate grounds for departures [from the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines], proposed resolutions should consider the person charged as a whole person, including their racial identity and age,' the policy states.
'While these factors should not be controlling, they should be part of the overall analysis.
'Racial disparities harm our community, lead to distrust, and have a negative impact on community safety.
'Prosecutors should be identifying and addressing racial disparities at decision points, as appropriate.'
Moriarty, who took office in 2023 after winning a highly polarized election, has positioned herself as a reformer eager to disrupt traditional prosecutorial practices — including how plea deals are offered.
She previously made headlines for declining to charge certain juvenile suspects in high-profile cases, sparking outrage from police unions and some community members.
Supporters say Moriarty's approach is long overdue in a system plagued by racial inequities.
But critics argue the new plea policy goes too far, replacing equal justice with identity-based leniency that could violate civil rights protections.
'Lady Justice is blindfolded for a reason,' Dhillon wrote on X. 'Under the leadership of @AGPamBondi and her team, @TheJusticeDept lawyers will investigate and take action wherever necessary to identify government practices that may run afoul of our civil rights norms.'
The probe marks a sharp clash between federal civil rights enforcement under conservative leadership and local progressive prosecutors who argue that colorblind policies perpetuate racial injustice.
It also signals the DOJ's willingness to take on local jurisdictions where reforms are seen as ideologically extreme.
Moriarty has not personally commented on the investigation. However, her office issued a brief statement.
'We are aware of the letter from the Department of Justice posted to social media but have not received it,' HCAO spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping told KARE 11 News.
'Our office will cooperate with any resulting investigation and we're fully confident our policy complies with the law.'
The case is likely to become a flashpoint in the ongoing national debate over race, justice, and the future of progressive prosecution.
In April, Moriarty was accused of flouting her own rules to ensure a Minnesota state worker walked free after keying six Teslas.
Her office revealed that they dropped charges against 33-year-old Dylan Bryan Adams after he reportedly admitted to causing around $21,000 in damage s during four separate incidents.
Adams will instead be entered into an adult diversion program for first-time, low-level offenders, which could even allow him to keep his job as a is a program consultant at the state's Department of Human Services.
Even the liberal-leaning Minnesota Star Tribune has slammed Moriarty's decision in an op-ed where they note her own office's policy, which says that diversion is only meant for property crimes of less than $5,000.
Bryan - whose ultimate boss is Minnesota's Democrat Governor Tim Walz - caused more than four times that amount of damage but won't even have a conviction to his name.
'Moriarty either ignored it or bent it to fit a narrative,' columnist Brandi Bennet wrote.
'Either way, the public is left wondering: What exactly are the rules in Hennepin County, and who are they written to protect?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court asked to pause order reinstating Education Department staff
US Supreme Court asked to pause order reinstating Education Department staff

South Wales Guardian

time7 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

US Supreme Court asked to pause order reinstating Education Department staff

The Justice Department's emergency appeal to the high court on Friday said US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston exceeded his authority last month when he issued a preliminary injunction reversing the lay-offs of nearly 1,400 people and putting the broader plan on hold. Mr Joun's order has blocked one of Mr Trump's biggest campaign promises and effectively stalled the effort to wind down the department. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed. The judge wrote that the lay-offs 'will likely cripple the department'. But Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote on Friday that Mr Joun was substituting his policy preferences for those of the Trump administration. The lay-offs help put in place the 'policy of streamlining the department and eliminating discretionary functions that, in the administration's view, are better left to the states', Mr Sauer wrote. He also pointed out that the Supreme Court in April voted 5-4 to block Mr Joun's earlier order seeking to keep in place Education Department teacher-training grants. The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Mr Trump's plan amounted to an illegal closure of the Education Department. One suit was filed by the Somerville and Easthampton school districts in Massachusetts along with the American Federation of Teachers and other education groups. The other suit was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general. The suits argued that the lay-offs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required by Congress, including duties to support special education, distribute financial aid and enforce civil rights laws. Mr Trump has made it a priority to shut down the Education Department, though he has acknowledged that only Congress has the authority to do that. In the meantime, Mr Trump issued a March order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to wind it down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law'. Mr Trump later said the department's functions will be parcelled to other agencies, suggesting federal student loans should be managed by the Small Business Administration and programmes involving students with disabilities would be absorbed by the Department of Health and Human Services. Those changes have not yet happened. The president argues that the Education Department has been overtaken by liberals and has failed to spur improvements to the nation's lagging academic scores. He has promised to 'return education to the states'. Opponents note that K-12 education is already mostly overseen by states and cities. Democrats have blasted the Trump administration's Education Department budget, which seeks a 15% budget cut including a 4.5 billion dollar cut in K-12 funding as part of the agency's downsizing.

Report: Trump may sell his brand-new Tesla
Report: Trump may sell his brand-new Tesla

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Report: Trump may sell his brand-new Tesla

President Donald Trump may sell or give away the red Telsa he purchased from Elon Musk, according to a new report. Trump bought the Tesla - paying cash - in March after he let Musk park several of his vehicle on the South Lawn in a show of support. The move comes after he and Musk's bro-mance ended, loudly and spectacularly, on the social media on Thursday. It was both painful and fascinating to watch. Musk dropped the bombshell after bombshell tweet: that the Jeffrey Epstein files haven't been released because Trump was in them; he endorsed Trump's impeachment; and he declared the president's tariffs will bring about a recession. Trump is 'not interested' in speaking with him. In March, the president turned the South Lawn of the White House into a Tesla showroom with five different models - including the infamous cybertruck - on display on the driveway. The model Trump bought, which he said his staff at the White House would use, has a starting price of $76,880. Aides have taken selfies of themselves in the Tesla as it sat in its parking space outside the West Wing. It's unclear if any one has actually driven it. Trump held the event to support Musk's electronic car company. Tesla showrooms and vehicles became targets of the public's rage as they expressed their unhappiness with Musk and his government cutting work through the Department of Government Efficiency.

John Fetterman slams fellow Democrats for sudden love for Elon Musk after ditching Teslas
John Fetterman slams fellow Democrats for sudden love for Elon Musk after ditching Teslas

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

John Fetterman slams fellow Democrats for sudden love for Elon Musk after ditching Teslas

Sen. John Fetterman ripped his Democratic colleagues for immediately embracing Elon Musk amid the billionaire's raucous online feud with President Donald Trump. The Tesla owner has for days been posting an avalanche of negative critiques of the president and his landmark legislative package, the Big Beautiful Bill Act. The multi-trillion dollar bill includes tax cuts, border wall funding and a national debt limit increase. Musk, having just left work at the White House a week ago, has since turned on the president for the legislation, primarily sounding off on how the bill will allow the national debt to soar by trillions. The mercurial business leader also raked Trump over the coals by launching personal attacks against the Republican's character, saying the president is an Epstein-linked pedophile who never would have won the election without Musk's millions in donations. As the the world's richest man lambasted the world's most powerful man publicly on X, some Democrats began hatching plans to turn the two against each other. Though when liberal lawmakers began making overtures to Musk due to his explosive targeting of Trump over a GOP-backed budget bill, Fetterman rebuked his colleagues. 'The Dems, we've been dumping all over Musk and vandalizing Teslas or whatever, and now, suddenly, we might be more back into him,' the 55-year-old senator said. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., told Politico that Democrats should be in a dialogue with the Tesla owner amid his rift with the president Fetterman warned his colleagues against ingratiating Musk back into the Democratic party, however. 'It wasn't that long ago that Tesla was like the virtue-signaling kind of accessory for Dems,' he said. 'I would never want to vandalize Teslas, and the 'big, beautiful bill' is wrong for America. So, from my perspective, I've just tried to be consistent through that.' Known for bucking his party in displaying a fervent allegiance to Israel and meeting personally with Trump, the Pennsylvania Democrat's warning against Musk stands in contrast to his typically contrarian policy posture. Meanwhile, California Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna - who represents parts of Silicon Valley and has known Musk for decades - is of the mind that his party would benefit from brining the billionaire back into the party's fold. Democrats should be 'in a dialogue' with the billionaire, Khanna told Politico this week. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day. When we refused to meet with [Robert Kennedy Jr.], Trump embraced him & won,' Khanna posted on X. 'We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' the Democrat's post continued. New York Democrat Ritchie Torres also has said that his party should reassess its relationship with the Tesla owner. 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the legislation,' he told Politico. Former Obama staffer and popular liberal podcast host Jon Favreau reposted one of Musk's posts calling for the Big Beautiful Bill Act to be 'killed.' 'Couldn't agree with Elon more: kill the bill,' he posted. The sudden embrace comes despite Democratic attacks against the business mogul for his work at DOGE. Many lawmakers, including Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., went as far as to sell their Tesla cars. 'When I bought this thing, I didn't think it was going to become a political issue,' Kelly said in a viral video about selling his Tesla, noting how he does not want to drive a car built by an 'a*****.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store