Online Safety Crisis Solved: Filmmaker And Advocate Proposes Game-Changing New Law
Press Release – Case Basket Communications
Under his proposed legislation, routers and phones would automatically filter harmful content for those under 18, while adults remain free to browse as usual.
Another recognisable voice has just joined the legislative conversation about kids' online safety this week. Kiwi filmmaker and online safety expert Rob Cope has revealed that he wrote his own long-considered bill over the summer holidays. While he fully supports efforts to protect minors from the ills of social media, he proposes a more impactful and long-lasting place to start solving this problem.
'I definitely support MP Catherine Wedd's proposed bill to ban social media for children under 16 and I'm really encouraged to see the Prime Minister setting aside resources for this area of work,' says the co-founder of Our Kids Online who has spoken before tens of thousands of parents and teachers over the last seven years.
'But before we tackle social media – a complex beast with boundaries that are hard to define – we need to start at the very first rung on the ladder, which is providing access to safe internet for children and youth under 18 in Aotearoa.'
Cope agrees that social media is 'a massive concern' but dealing with this as if it's the whole solution would be like building a house before the foundations are laid. The basic protections our children need are found in filtering harmful and explicit content for all minors – on phones, at home, and in public, he says. This is exactly what is proposed in Cope's The New Zealand Child Internet Safety Act: Protecting Minors from Harmful Online Content.
'You could see this as the foundation, and then social media protections built on top of this. Ideally, New Zealand would filter the internet for minors as I've proposed and, then afterwards, look at how to protect our tamariki from social media.
'For 30 years, the internet has remained unfiltered for most of our kids and, naturally, we've asked ourselves and countless others why the majority of parents haven't already seriously considered filtering. I think it's a natural subconscious belief that 'If it was really that bad, the government would've done something by now.' But they haven't – not for 30 years. It's long overdue, and our kids are paying the price,' says Cope.
Under his proposed legislation, routers and phones would automatically filter harmful content for those under 18, while adults remain free to browse as usual.
To those who would argue that filtering legislation is too hard or too expensive to implement, the dad of four responds with a challenge: 'How can we afford not to? We're pouring millions into mental health support for our youth every year and we now know that a growing proportion of that distress is down to an unfiltered online world. If we can stop the harm before it happens, we'll not only protect our children – we'll ease the pressure on families, schools, and already overwhelmed mental health services.'
Cope stresses that this mess is not a technology issue – the tools already exist in various forms; it is a legislative issue.
'Let's not fail our tamariki because of a lack of creativity or effort. We're a nation of pioneers — Kiwis are known for their hard work and innovation. Let's roll up our sleeves, collaborate, innovate, and do what it takes to keep our kids safe online.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Responds To Legislation To Restrict Farm-To-Forest Conversions
Press Release – ACT New Zealand The Government is moving to address legitimate concerns in rural communities. Forestry is swallowing up productive farmland because the current system is rigged against those who feed the world. Responding to the introduction of legislation to restrict farm-to-forest conversions, ACT Rural Communities spokesperson Mark Cameron says: 'The Government is moving to address legitimate concerns in rural communities. Forestry is swallowing up productive farmland because the current system is rigged against those who feed the world,' says Mr Cameron. 'Red tape and distorted incentives make it more profitable to plant pine trees than to run a farm. 'There is more the Government could do to address the root of the problem. It could start by letting Kiwis offset their emissions overseas. There's no reason we should be covering our own productive land in carbon farms when planting is cheaper and more efficient in other parts of the world. 'It's also time for a wider conversation about whether New Zealand's Paris climate commitments are worth the cost. 'Right now, our only options to meet these targets are blanketing the countryside in trees, or driving up costs on fuel, electricity and everyday goods. Neither of those is acceptable. We need to ask whether the pain is worth it. 'Kiwi farmers are the best in the world at what they do – the freer they are to compete and grow, the better. ACT will keep backing farmers and rural communities.
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
Climate Activists Dressed As Lawyers Would Sacrifice Farmers To The Climate Gods
Press Release – ACT New Zealand ACT is committed to climate policies that are practical, not performative. We will back Kiwi innovation, not regulation for its own sake. Well support farmers, not sue them. We know that when farmers do well, all New Zealanders are better off. Responding to legal action from Lawyers for Climate Action NZ, ACT Rural Communities spokesperson Mark Cameron says: 'This is a courtroom stunt by climate activists dressed as lawyers. They would sacrifice our rural lifeblood at the altar of climate ideology. 'The clear goal of this challenge is to place more restrictions on Kiwi farmers. It's the same tired approach we saw from Labour and the Greens. 'Shutting farms down or burying them in regulation won't save the climate. It will just shift food production offshore, cost us jobs, and make food more expensive. 'New Zealand farmers are the most emissions-efficient food producers on the planet. We need to back them, which is what ACT is doing in government. 'This government is right to back off from costly, unworkable policies that punish rural New Zealand. The idea that New Zealand – responsible for just 0.17% of global emissions – should wreck its economy to impress international activists is absurd. 'ACT is committed to climate policies that are practical, not performative. We will back Kiwi innovation, not regulation for its own sake. We'll support farmers, not sue them. We know that when farmers do well, all New Zealanders are better off.'
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Climate Activists Dressed As Lawyers Would Sacrifice Farmers To The Climate Gods
Responding to legal action from Lawyers for Climate Action NZ, ACT Rural Communities spokesperson Mark Cameron says: "This is a courtroom stunt by climate activists dressed as lawyers. They would sacrifice our rural lifeblood at the altar of climate ideology. "The clear goal of this challenge is to place more restrictions on Kiwi farmers. It's the same tired approach we saw from Labour and the Greens. "Shutting farms down or burying them in regulation won't save the climate. It will just shift food production offshore, cost us jobs, and make food more expensive. "New Zealand farmers are the most emissions-efficient food producers on the planet. We need to back them, which is what ACT is doing in government. "This government is right to back off from costly, unworkable policies that punish rural New Zealand. The idea that New Zealand – responsible for just 0.17% of global emissions – should wreck its economy to impress international activists is absurd. "ACT is committed to climate policies that are practical, not performative. We will back Kiwi innovation, not regulation for its own sake. We'll support farmers, not sue them. We know that when farmers do well, all New Zealanders are better off."
