Slovakias Fico excoriates judge over central banker bribery conviction
May 30 (Reuters) - Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico lambasted a judge who fined central bank Governor Petr Kazimir for corruption on Thursday, saying the judge might be politically motivated and should be probed for criminal behaviour.
Specialised Criminal Court judge Milan Cisarik imposed a 200,000 euro ($227,680) fine on Kazimir for bribing a tax authority chief when he was finance minister in Fico's previous government, before he took on the central bank job and a seat on the European Central Bank's policymaking council in 2019.
Kazimir denied any wrongdoing.
"The judge's decision raises the question whether it should have served political aims of the opposition to damage the ruling parties, because even a law faculty student must see fatal nonsense in the verdict," Fico said late Thursday.
"I cannot shake off the feeling that it is justified to look at potential suspicion that the judge committed multiple criminal acts and at what the ruling was supposed to serve."
The court declined to comment.
Fico regularly accused prosecutors and judges of improperly targeting him and his allies when he was in opposition in 2020-2023.
The ruling is not final, as Kazimir flagged he would appeal to a higher court, and so it does not force him to stand down from the central bank.
His term ends on June 1, but he will stay on until a replacement is appointed. There has been no political agreement for a process involving the government, parliament and president.
Nationalist European leaders like Fico and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban have often attacked the judiciary and clashed with the European Union over the rule of law.
In February, thousands of Hungarian judges, court staff and supporters marched to the ministry of justice to demand judicial independence, freedom of expression and better pay.
($1 = 0.8823 euros) (Reporting by Jan Lopatka in Prague. Editing by Mark Potter)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Hungarians silently protest bill 'muzzling' NGOs, media
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (AP) BUDAPEST: Thousands marched in silence, many with their mouths taped shut, in central Budapest Sunday to protest a planned law that would allow the government to sanction "foreign-funded" NGOs and media. Critics consider the bill "on transparency in public life" as the latest attempt by nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban to muzzle dissenting voices since returning to power in 2010. The legislation would empower the government to blacklist organisations that "threaten the sovereignty of Hungary by using foreign funding to influence public life". The government argues these measures are necessary to defend against "foreign interference". "I believe it is important to have an independent press, and not to judge a publication based on where it gets its money from," one of the protesters, 49-year-old Zsolt Solyom, a retired soldier, told AFP. "What I see is that the government wants to silence any media outlet that does not speak or write according to its liking," he added. An AFP photographer estimated that a few thousand people marched through Liberty Bridge in central Budapest in complete silence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo "Donation today, evidence of crime tomorrow?" read one of the banners. The crowd later erupted in boos and chants denouncing the ruling party as an organiser read the names of all 115 lawmakers co-sponsoring the bill. According to the draft law blacklisted organisation, would need permission to receive foreign funding. They would also be barred from receiving donations through Hungary's annual one-percent income tax contribution scheme, an important source of revenue for non-profits. The proposed legislation has been condemned by the opposition, which has accused the government of copying Russia's authoritarian evolution. Last week, lead representatives of over 80 media outlets from 22 countries -- including Britain's The Guardian and France's Liberation -- urged their governments and the European Union to do everything in their power to prevent its enactment. The European Commission has called on Hungary to withdraw the draft, vowing to take the "necessary action" if it is adopted. Lawmakers are scheduled to vote on the legislation in mid-June. It is expected to pass, as Orban's tightly disciplined governing coalition has a supermajority in parliament.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Trump's diplomatic ambitions hit a wall across the globe
Every U.S. president believes they can reshape world affairs—and Donald Trump has always projected an even stronger sense of personal power than most of his recent predecessors. Yet as the 47th president's first four months unfold, he is finding that many of the world's major leaders are simply not intimidated. In his first term, Trump showed he could push American corporations, universities, and courts to fall in line with his agenda. But when it comes to entrenched foreign leaders, his traditional tactics of bluster and threats have backfired. Russian President Vladimir Putin, for example, has openly defied Trump's calls to end Russia's war in Ukraine. Instead of cowering, Russian media portray Trump as a loudmouth who always backs down when pressed for real consequences. Trump's hopes of forcing China to capitulate after their bruising trade war have also fallen flat. Beijing's leadership, confident in their own system, refused to yield. U.S. officials now confess frustration that China has not honored the trade concessions it once agreed to—illustrating that an authoritarian government need not bend to threats of tariffs. Europe, too, has resisted Trump's pressure tactics. When he revived tariffs on European goods, Brussels threatened retaliatory measures. Eventually, the U.S. relented. Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong even coined the mocking acronym 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out) to describe the president's pattern of making big threats and then retreating. Trump likely expected Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to fall in line as he did during Trump's first term, when the American president granted nearly every demand Israel made. But today's distorted dynamics in the Middle East have frustrated Trump's effort to mediate Gaza's conflict. Netanyahu's grip on power relies on a protracted Gaza war, making any premature ceasefire politically dangerous for him. Likewise, Trump's aspirations to negotiate a new Iranian nuclear deal clash with Israel's plans to strike Iran's nuclear facilities while the regime is still weakened—and unwilling to negotiate. Many of these world leaders pursue their own long-term interests on schedules that do not align with America's more transactional approach. Strongmen like Putin, Xi Jinping, and even Netanyahu have little incentive to yield to personal pleas that promise no obvious payoff. Trump's public humiliations of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office—and of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa before that—have only made those leaders wary of granting him leverage. A détente with the world's strongmen simply cannot hinge on the lure of a future White House photo op. During Trump's campaign, he repeatedly touted his 'very good relationship' with Putin and Xi as if it would magically resolve seemingly intractable conflicts. Yet his experience echoes that of his predecessors. President George W. Bush once believed he could 'see into Putin's soul' and use personal chemistry to alter Russia's course. That effort collapsed in 2014 when Putin annexed Crimea. President Barack Obama, meanwhile, dismissed Russia as a 'regional power,' only to watch Moscow reassert itself on the world stage. Both men discovered that authoritarian leaders do not bend to flattery or moral high ground. And even President Joe Biden's claim that 'America is back' after Trump's first term has dwindled into nostalgia for a post–World War II international order. Four years into his administration, Biden's bid for a second term has faltered, leaving many allies uncertain whether U.S. influence will endure. Now Trump has returned, eager to reclaim America's dominance, but his 'America First' populism risks eroding the very alliances and institutions that made the United States so powerful. In his first months back in office, Trump has threatened tariffs, teased territorial expansion into Canada and Greenland, and slashed global aid budgets. Yet so far, China, Russia, Israel, and even Canada appear unmoved—calculating that defying Trump carries little political cost. His ferocious rhetoric may win headlines, but it has done little to bend world leaders to his will. Instead, Trump's brash approach is undermining U.S. soft power—its ability to persuade by example rather than coercion—and revealing the limits of presidential omnipotence on the global stage.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Russia and Ukraine step up the war on eve of peace talks
Amidst escalating conflict, Ukraine and Russia are set to engage in peace talks in Istanbul, following a major prisoner exchange. However, the lead-up to negotiations has been marked by intensified warfare, including drone battles, attacks on Russian territory, and advancements by Russian forces in Ukraine. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads On the eve of peace talks, Ukraine and Russia sharply ramped up the war with one of the biggest drone battles of their conflict, a Russian highway bridge blown up over a passenger train and an ambitious attack on nuclear-capable bombers deep in days of uncertainty over whether or not Ukraine would even attend, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Defence Minister Rustem Umerov would sit down with Russian officials at the second round of direct peace talks in Istanbul on talks, proposed by President Vladimir Putin, have so far yielded the biggest prisoner exchange of the war - but no sense of any consensus on how to halt the talk of peace, though, there was much least seven people were killed and 69 injured when a highway bridge in Russia's Bryansk region, neighbouring Ukraine, was blown up over a passenger train heading to Moscow with 388 people on board. No one has yet claimed attacked Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers at a military base deep in Siberia on Sunday, the first such attack so far from the front lines more than 4,300 km (2,670 miles) away. A Ukrainian intelligence official said 40 Russian warplanes were launched 472 drones at Ukraine overnight, Ukraine's air force said, the highest nightly total of the war so far. Russia had also launched seven missiles, the air force said it had advanced deeper into the Sumy region of Ukraine, and open source pro-Ukrainian maps showed Russia took 450 square km of Ukrainian land in May, its fastest monthly advance in at least six months.U.S. President Donald Trump has demanded Russia and Ukraine make peace and he has threatened to walk away if they do not - potentially pushing responsibility for supporting Ukraine onto the shoulders of European powers - which have far less cash and much smaller stocks of weapons than the United to Trump envoy Keith Kellogg, the two sides will in Turkey present their respective documents outlining their ideas for peace terms, though it is clear that after three years of intense war, Moscow and Kyiv remain far ordered tens of thousands of troops to invade Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops. The United States says over 1.2 million people have been killed and injured in the war since has called Putin "crazy" and berated Zelenskiy in public in the Oval Office, but the U.S. president has also said that he thinks peace is achievable and that if Putin delays then he could impose tough sanctions on June last year, Putin set out his opening terms for an immediate end to the war: Ukraine must drop its NATO ambitions and withdraw all of its troops from the entirety of the territory of four Ukrainian regions claimed and mostly controlled by negotiators in Istanbul will present to the Russian side a proposed roadmap for reaching a lasting peace settlement, according to a copy of the document seen by to the document, there will be no restrictions on Ukraine's military strength after a peace deal is struck, no international recognition of Russian sovereignty over parts of Ukraine taken by Moscow's forces, and reparations for document also stated that the current location of the front line will be the starting point for negotiations about currently controls a little under one fifth of Ukraine, or about 113,100 square km, about the same size as the U.S. state of Ohio.
