UK renationalises first train operator under Labour reforms
Representative Image (AI-generated)
A private train operator servicing parts of southern England, including London, on Sunday became the first to be returned to public ownership under a government plan to renationalise Britain's much-maligned railways.
All UK rail operators are due to be renationalised within the next two years in a key policy launched by Prime Minister Keir Starmer following his Labour party's return to government last July after 14 years in opposition.
"South Western Railway is now under public ownership. And this is just the start," Starmer said on X, naming the service kickstarting his government's plan.
He vowed the renationalisation "will put passengers first", with "better services, with simpler ticketing, on more comfortable trains".
Train passengers in Britain suffer from frequent cancellations, in addition to high ticket prices and regular confusion over which services they can be used on.
The privatisation of rail operations took place in the mid-1990s under the Conservative prime minister of the time, John Major, but the rail network remained public, run by Network Rail.
Four of the 14 operators in England are already run by the state owing to poor performance in recent years, but this was originally meant to be a temporary fix before a return to the private sector.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Labour triumphed over the Conservative party in elections last year, with its manifesto including promises to fix the country's ailing transport services.
Legislation was approved in November to bring rail operators into public ownership when the private companies' contracts expire -- or sooner in the event of poor management -- and be managed by "Great British Railways".
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said in a statement that will end "30 years of fragmentation", but warned that "change isn't going to happen overnight".
Public good:
"We've always been clear that public ownership isn't a silver bullet, but we are really firing this starting gun in that race for a truly 21st-century railway, and that does mean refocusing away from private profit and towards the public good," she added.
In an example of how passengers might not immediately notice much difference, South Western's first service under public ownership on Sunday was set to include a rail replacement bus because of engineering work.
Government figures show that the equivalent of 4 per cent of train services in Britain were cancelled in the year to April 26.
The rate was 3 per cent for South Western.
Rail unions -- which have staged a stream of strikes in recent years over pay and conditions due to a cost-of-living crisis -- welcomed the state takeover.
"We're delighted that Britain's railways are being brought back where they belong -- into the public sector," said Mick Whelan, general secretary of union Aslef.
"Everyone in the rail industry knows that privatisation... didn't, and doesn't, work," he added.
Two operators serving towns and cities in southeastern and eastern England are next to be brought back into public ownership by late 2025.
All the current contracts are set to expire by 2027.
UK media reported that the renationalisation of South Western means a third of journeys are now on publicly owned services.
The government has said renationalisation will save up to £150 million ($200 million) per year because it will no longer have to pay compensation fees to rail operators.
The main rail operators in Scotland and Wales, where transport policy is handled by the devolved administrations in Edinburgh and Cardiff, are also state-owned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Czech Leader Calls on Trump to Give Europe More Time to Rearm
Czech President Petr Pavel called on the US to give Europe more time and realistic goals to take care of the continent's security and contain an increasingly aggressive Russia. European nations can't secure a lasting peace in Ukraine without American help and President Donald Trump is right to demand that they significantly ramp up defense spending, said Pavel, a former top-ranking NATO general. But it would take years to replace some protections now provided by Washington, he told Bloomberg Television in an interview in his office in Prague. 'The US will try to exert pressure on Europeans to do it faster,' said Pavel, who will represent the Czech Republic at a June 24-25 NATO summit in The Hague. 'Let's create enough pressure on Europeans, but let's not push them over the cliff.' Pavel's plea comes two weeks before the leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are expected to agree to spend at least 5% of GDP on defense — a win for Trump, who has long pushed for Europe to invest more in its security. The goal for The Hague summit and beyond is to 'keep the Americans engaged' in the region, according to the Czech head of state. He expressed optimism that allies would agree on higher military investments and the US would uphold NATO's Article 5, the collective defense clause that commits members to protect each other. 'I believe that it is achievable that we will stay united,' the Czech president said. 'European allies would welcome a much stronger expression that Russia is, and will be at least in the short term, our biggest security challenge.' Pavel, 63, said the summit declaration will be 'extremely short' and likely refrain from earlier pledges of financial and military support for Ukraine, as well as the prospect of the country joining the alliance. Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing a preliminary draft, that the one-page declaration focuses solely on defense spending. It's a sharp departure from last year's statement that ran more than 5,000 words and included a pledge of long-term security assistance for Ukraine. Pavel said he was disappointed by the reluctance of Trump to show more strength and to clearly designate Russia as the aggressor and Ukraine as the victim. The Czech president added that Europe needed the US to step up pressure on the Kremlin through economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation and military deterrence. 'We clearly see that Donald Trump leaves the door open for future relations, mostly economic relations, with Russia,' said Pavel. 'I have some suspicion that he doesn't fully grasp what Russia and Russians are about.' Russia has stepped up drone and missile strikes that earlier this week hit civilian targets in Kyiv and the Black Sea city of Odesa. While Russia and Ukraine have agreed on major prisoner swaps, peace talks have stalled. Trump has so far held off from imposing new sanctions to force the Kremlin to agree to a ceasefire. Pavel has been among the staunchest supporters of Ukraine, urging allies to step up weapons supplies and giving Kyiv a pathway to European Union and NATO membership. The Czech Republic has also been coordinating international donations of heavy ammunition, and has backed a plan for NATO members to increase defense and security-related spending to 5% of GDP. But after more than three years of war, allies are increasingly realizing Ukraine is unlikely to meet all its military goals, according to Pavel, who became Czech president in 2023 after serving as chairman of the NATO Military Committee. 'Part of the territory will be for some time, temporarily, occupied by Russia, and that there will be necessary concessions to be made by Ukraine,' he said. 'We should all collectively strive for the best possible result.' Sill, Pavel said, the West must keep arming Ukraine to prevent Russia from declaring victory and feeling rewarded for its aggression. 'I believe NATO is and will be a cornerstone of European security,' said Pavel. 'We have to coordinate very closely with the US because it is also in their interest not to let Russia prevail in this conflict.' With assistance from Chad Thomas. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump , but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Piyush Goyal says addressing non-tariff barriers key to India-EU trade pact
Finding solutions to address non-tariff barriers would be important for the proposed free trade agreement (FTA) between India and the European Union (EU) and both sides are actively working on resolving these issues, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday. He said the two sides are "pretty" close to finalising the talks for the proposed free trade pact. "Significant progress has been made. More than half the chapters are ready. In terms of content, I would say we are almost 90 per cent ready for market access. The important issues to be addressed are non-tariff barriers and how we will make it smoother, easier, and better to do business between the EU and India," Goyal told reporters here. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo He added that both India and the EU are in active discussions to find solutions to make business smooth for companies of both sides. Also Read: US trade pact set for early finish: Piyush Goyal Live Events "Unless countries recognise that over regulation and barriers to trade will be met with reciprocal action, everybody suffers. We are committed to deregulation, to finding solutions to the high cost of regulation, the non-tariff barriers that these regulations cause and the impediments to free trade. I am quite hopeful that we will find very robust solutions to this problem," the minister said. He is here on an official visit to meet his Swedish counterpart and companies for promoting trade and investments between the two countries. Sweden is a member of the 27-nation EU bloc. Key Indian exports that routinely face high barriers in the EU include -- chillies, tea, Basmati rice, milk, poultry, bovine meat, fish, chemicals products. Most non-tariff measures (NTMs) are domestic rules created by countries with an aim to protect human, animal or plant health and environment. NTM may be technical measures such as regulations, standards, testing, certification, pre-shipment inspection or non-technical measures like quotas, import licensing, subsidies, government procurement restrictions. Also Read: Challenging times for global trade; India will certainly cross USD 825 bn exports this fiscal: Piyush Goyal When NTMs become arbitrary, beyond scientific justification, they create hurdles for trade and are called NTBs (non-tariff barriers). India's exports are far below potential as they face NTBs in regions, including the EU, the US, China, Japan, and Korea. According to think tank GTRI, the EU has set MRL (minimum residual limit) for tricyclazole, a fungicide in rice, to 0.01 mg per kg as against the ten times higher limit earlier. Similarly, the EU has set MRL for aflatoxins B1 level in chilies and other spices at 5 to 10 ppb (parts per billion). The minister said negotiations on services and rules or origin have started. To give an impetus to the ongoing talks for the FTA, EU Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic is expected to visit New Delhi on June 28-29. On the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Goyal said this measure is "not good" as it is also a kind of a non-tariff barrier. This carbon tax, if imposed, will do injustice to Indian industry, he said, adding that if the EU will take any such step, India will have to respond to that. FTA talks are happening in a good environment and it will not be good to impose carbon tax on Indian goods, he added. "Our talks are going on the issue to find ways to deal with this," the minister said, adding that some good solutions will come out on this. On February 28, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed to seal a much-awaited free trade deal by this year amid rising concerns over US President Donald Trump 's policy on tariffs. In June 2022, India and the 27-nation EU bloc resumed the negotiations after a gap of over eight years. It stalled in 2013 due to differences over the level of opening up of the markets. India's bilateral trade in goods with the EU was USD 136.4 billion in 2024-25 (exports USD 75.75 billion, imports USD 60.65 billion), making it the largest trading partner of India for goods. The EU market accounts for about 17 per cent of India's total exports, while the EU's exports to India make up 9 per cent of its total exports. EU's investments in India are valued at over USD 117 billion with around 6,000 European companies present in India. India's investments in the EU are valued at around USD 40 billion.
