logo
RFK Jr wants to ban government scientists from publishing in top journals and instead create a MAGA-backed publication

RFK Jr wants to ban government scientists from publishing in top journals and instead create a MAGA-backed publication

Yahoo4 days ago

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr wants to ban top government scientists from publishing in 'corrupt' medical journals and force them to present research in MAGA-backed publications instead.
During an appearance on the Ultimate Human podcast, Kennedy Jr said: 'We're probably going to stop publishing in the Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and those other journals because they're all corrupt.' He claimed the journals are under the control of pharmaceutical companies, according to The Washington Post.
The world-renowned journals publish peer-reviewed research and analyze medical findings across the globe. Some of the journals receive millions of visits to their site annually.
More than 1 million people read the New England Journal of Medicine in print each week.
In past remarks, Kennedy has accused government agencies, including the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, of being 'sock puppets' for pharmaceutical giants.
The new government journals would immediately receive credibility because they'd be funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), said Kennedy. This is despite NIH funding falling more than $3 billion between President Donald Trump's inauguration and March, when compared to the same time last year.
'It is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist,' he said on the podcast episode, which aired shortly after he bypassed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and announced the department would stop recommending the coronavirus vaccine for healthy pregnant women and children.
Last week, the White House released a 'MAHA report,' challenging vaccines. Several sections of the report offered misleading representations of findings in scientific papers, the newspaper reported.
The scientific community is becoming increasingly concerned that research efforts are not progressing due to the Trump administration's actions.
Since Trump's inauguration, Kennedy's agency has dismissed 20,000 federal workers, impacting almost every department division.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock futures inch lower to kick off start of the new trading month: Live updates
Stock futures inch lower to kick off start of the new trading month: Live updates

CNBC

time34 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Stock futures inch lower to kick off start of the new trading month: Live updates

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) at the opening bell on May 30, 2025, in New York City. Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images Stock futures fell on Sunday as Wall Street looks to the start of a new month of trading following a strong performance in May. S&P 500 futures traded down 0.2%, while Nasdaq-100 futures dropped about 0.3%. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average also declined 70 points, or 0.2%. On Friday, the S&P 500 closed out the month of May with a more than 6% gain, its best monthly performance since November 2023. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite surged more than 9% for the month and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about 4%. That said, Morgan Stanley's Chris Toomey is skeptical about whether May's market momentum will continue. "We're probably still range-bound," the managing director told CNBC's "Closing Bell" on Friday. "The concern we've got is that while I think we've taken [out] the worst-case scenario with regards to the 'liberation day' [tariffs], we're in a situation where I think the market's right now probably pricing in the best-case scenario." He added: "Everyone's talking about the fact that there's probably going to be 10% tariffs across the board, 30% for China. I think that's kind of baked in." President Donald Trump's tariffs have been in legal limbo following two key court rulings last week. The U.S. Court of International Trade struck down much of the president's steep levies Wednesday, ordering his administration to stop collecting them. A day later, however, a federal appeals court granted the administration's request to temporarily pause that ruling, effectively reinstating the duties. Trump's top economic advisors have remained optimistic in the tariffs even with the recent legal challenge, as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Fox News over the weekend that the tariffs are "not going away." Additionally, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told ABC News that he's "very confident that the judges will uphold this law." Hassett also suggested that Trump and China's President Xi Jinping could discuss trade as early as this week, though he said no date for the talks has been set. His comments come as trade tensions between the U.S. and China ramped up last week, with Trump writing in a Truth Social post Friday that China has "TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US." Meanwhile, investors will be eyeing a slew of reports due this week that could provide insight into how tariffs have affected the U.S. economy, including the key May nonfarm payrolls reading on Friday. Stock futures traded lower Sunday evening. S&P 500 futures were down about 0.3% shortly after 6 p.m. ET, along with Nasdaq-100 futures. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 95 points, or 0.2%. — Sean Conlon

List of ‘sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website
List of ‘sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website

Hamilton Spectator

time35 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

List of ‘sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website

WASHINGTON (AP) — A list of more than 500 ' sanctuary jurisdictions' no longer appears on the Department of Homeland Security's website after receiving criticism for including localities that have actively supported the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The department last week published the list of the jurisdictions. It said each one would receive formal notification the government deemed them uncooperative with federal immigration enforcement and whether they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published Thursday on the department's website but on Sunday there was a 'Page Not Found' error message in its place. The list was part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that there had been anger from some officials about the list. However, she didn't address why it was removed. 'Some of the cities have pushed back,' Noem said. 'They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' The list, which was riddled with misspellings, received pushback from officials in communities spanning from urban to rural and blue to red who said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California, the city of Huntington Beach made the list even though it had filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration sanctuary law and passed a resolution this year declaring the community a 'non-sanctuary city.' Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his community must have been a clerical error. Davel voted for Trump as did 67% of Shawano County. Davel thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump was not informed about Ukraine attack which destroyed huge fleet of Russian planes, reports claims
Trump was not informed about Ukraine attack which destroyed huge fleet of Russian planes, reports claims

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump was not informed about Ukraine attack which destroyed huge fleet of Russian planes, reports claims

Donald Trump was not given a heads-up about Ukraine's unprecedented drone strikes that took out a huge fleet of Russian planes on Sunday, according to reports. Ukraine's 'large-scale' drone attack launched deep into Russian territory wiped out 40 military bombers and targeted five bases, Ukrainian security sources told CBS News. The attack took over a year and a half to plan and was personally supervised by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the sources added. Ukrainian officials did not give the Trump administration advance notice of the attack, both Ukrainian and U.S. officials told Axios. The attack comes as Zelensky announced he would send a delegation headed by Minister of Defense Rustem Umerov to conduct ceasefire talks with Russia in Istanbul on Monday. A Ukrainian official told Axios the operation was conducted by the country's security service, with officers launching drones from trucks covertly parked near Russian air bases. Some of the trucks were parked in Siberia, thousands of miles away from Ukraine, according to the report. About 40 Russian military planes, including strategic bombers, were reportedly struck in the attack. During the first months of his second term, Trump has pushed for the now three-year-old war between Russia and Ukraine to come to an end. Trump, who has long been an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, recently vented his frustrations about the Russian leader online, writing on his Truth Social platform that Putin was 'absolutely CRAZY' and 'needlessly killing a lot of people' in Ukraine. Ukraine's unprecedented drone attack on Russia comes as seven people were killed and 69 more injured after bridges collapsed in separate incidents across Russia. Russia's Railways initially blamed the collapse in the Bryansk region, which borders Ukraine, on 'illegal interference in the operation of transport', in a likely reference to Ukrainian saboteurs, but the Telegram post was later removed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store