Trump is brushing off Musk's megabill attacks — for now
President Donald Trump is frustrated with Elon Musk for slamming the administration's chief legislative priority, but isn't taking it personally — a distinction that's helped keep a lid on the White House's response so far.
Yet as Musk's attacks stretch into their second day, administration officials are wondering how long the peace will hold, according to two White House aides and two outside advisers to the president granted anonymity to discuss internal thinking.
'In Trumpworld, we know that the sign things are going south fast is the president getting personal, even if it's just a half-sentence on Truth,' said one of the advisers. 'He's the one who decides.'
Musk's ambush of the GOP's megabill via social media represents perhaps the stiffest test yet of a Trump-Musk relationship that has survived far longer than many in the president's orbit anticipated, even if it now appears to be ending the way most of them predicted.
The Tesla CEO called the centerpiece of Trump's agenda a 'disgusting abomination' just days after a buddy-buddy press conference in the Oval Office during which Trump presented him with a golden key.
And while it has irritated Trump aides who are trying to maintain fragile support for the legislation in the Senate, Musk's targeting of the bill and not the president himself has helped keep things relatively civil, according to the two administration officials and one of the advisers.
Trump has kept silent on the matter despite Musk's continued broadsides on X. Within the West Wing, his aides dismissed Musk's complaints about the bill's size and deficit spending, arguing instead that Musk is upset primarily because it eliminates tax credits that stood to benefit his electric car company Tesla.
The episode did renew quiet discussions over how to counter the sudden offensive from a former ally whose prominence, social media platform and deep pockets have made him massively influential within the Republican Party.
Senior White House aide Stephen Miller, who worked closely with Musk in the administration, has taken the lead in defending the merits of the bill on X, seeking to remind critics in one post that the bill was designed by "President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People."
Yet Trump has remained circumspect, according to aides and others who have spoken to him, avoiding a high-profile fight even as he ramps up involvement in efforts to change the bill in the Senate. If Trump were to confront Musk, it would most likely happen via Truth Social, said one of the White House officials.
'Elon running his mouth publicly about the bill is not helping the president at all,' the outside adviser said. "But those two fellows have talked a lot, Trump and Elon, and I think they know each other pretty well."
The White House has publicly downplayed the rift, emphasizing that Musk is now a private citizen and that he still agrees with Trump on a host of other issues.
"The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. "It doesn't change the president's opinion."
Musk's broadsides came ahead of a White House meeting on Wednesday between Trump and Senate Republicans, as lawmakers try to enact the megabill within a matter of weeks.
Hill GOP leaders have largely brushed off Musk's intervention, calling the billionaire's critiques misguided and downplaying the impact he might have in moving votes.
Within Trump's orbit, the timing of the criticism has bothered officials more than the substance — giving fodder to hesitant senators like Ron Johnson and Josh Hawley, according to one of the White House officials. But aides and allies largely dismissed the suggestion that Musk might derail the Senate effort, with some saying that after pouring millions of dollars into unsuccessfully influencing the Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier this year, it's become clear his money doesn't swing votes.
Other Republicans, though, have quietly urged the party's leadership to take more seriously the threat that Musk could fund primary challenges, said the second adviser. Even if the megabill makes it through the Senate, they say, a revised version will need to go back to the House, where Musk's influence and money could become a more immediate problem.
Already, frontline and conservative Republicans are fretting about the potential consequences of getting crosswise with Musk and his near-unlimited financial resources. Should Musk escalate his rhetoric and issue a more explicit primary threat, it could force Republicans into the unenviable position of choosing between the president and his former aide — and raise the stakes for Trump's own decision over how to respond.
'They're stuck between Trump and Musk,' the second adviser said of rank-and-file members. 'I would characterize the level of alarm as reasonably high.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A different kind of D-Day, laden with anxiety among old allies
Advertisement 'The enemy underestimated the strength of the Allied war cause,' he said from a podium before a modest international crowd and about two dozen American World War II veterans, most around 100 years old, watching from wheelchairs nearby. 'Without the sacrifices of American, French, British and other Allied powers, we would not have a free world ," he said. To many, the speech came as a relief. But still, there was an elephant on the perfectly kept cemetery lawn. D-Day is typically a time to commemorate sacrifice and unity among Allied countries fighting for freedom and liberty against the authoritarianism and tyranny of Nazi Germany. Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Ukraine's resistance has become a central part of the ceremonies as a strong echo from the past. Last year, President Biden vowed that America would not 'walk away' from the fight, defending a Ukraine that had been 'invaded by a tyrant bent on domination.' Advertisement 'Were we to do that, it means we'd be forgetting what happened here on these hallowed beaches,' he said. 'Make no mistake: We will not bow down. We will not forget.' However, the Trump administration has a very different view of its allies and the Russian invasion. President Trump has said the European Union was created to 'screw the United States' and is threatening it with 50 percent tariffs. He has blamed Ukraine for a war that Russia started. On Thursday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, during a visit to the Oval Office, reminded Trump of the anniversary of D-Day and pressed him to use American power to force Russia's retreat. Trump responded by comparing the war to two fighting children in a hockey game, when the referee lets them 'go for a little while before you pull them apart.' Hegseth has similarly shown little interest in supporting Ukraine against its Russian invader. On his last trip to Europe, he announced that a return to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders was 'an unrealistic objective' and ruled out NATO membership for Kyiv. Almost immediately after being sworn into the job, Hegseth dumped America's leadership of the Contact Group — a collection of more than 50 nations to coordinate shipments of military and humanitarian aid to Kyiv. He didn't show up to the group's latest meeting this week. Then, there were his comments on a Signal chat group, created before the American military attack on Houthi militia in Yemen and inadvertently shared with a journalist from The Atlantic. It all cast a shadow on the annual D-Day ceremony — making an event meant to celebrate friendship and shared values feel, as Denis Peschanski, a French historian, put it, 'less comfortable.' Advertisement 'There was no contradiction between the democratic values upheld by the Biden administration and the historical sacrifice of these Americans, as well as these British, these Canadians, well, all those who landed, and the French who were fighting in the Resistance also for the success of this landing,' said Peschanski, who was in charge of the 80th anniversary's scientific advisory board. It was 'obvious' that this year's commemoration would feel awkward without those shared values, he said. The celebration of what Hegseth called the 'greatest amphibious assault in the history of mankind' was more muted than last year. But that had nothing to do with American foreign policy — 81 isn't considered as auspicious as 80, and off-round number years rarely draw huge crowds or heads of state. Still, American and Canadian flags fluttered from hedges, World War II enthusiasts screeched along the narrow roads in vintage jeeps, and ceremonies were planned throughout the 50-mile ribbon of beaches and cliffs. No mention of American aggression was made by French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu, either. Instead, he thanked the veterans, saying they embodied the 'unique friendship between our two countries.' To some, Hegseth's criticism of Europe was not entirely off-point, if only because its spine has yet to stiffen sufficiently. 'The problem is, he is right. The EU is pathetic,' said Gérard Araud, former French ambassador to Washington, referring to Hegseth's text. 'In face of US hostility from JD Vance and Trump himself and then Hegseth, there is no appetite for retaliation or responding. They are totally terrified at the prospect of the US dumping Ukraine.' Advertisement Though European countries are committed to continuing to materially and financially help Ukraine maintain its opposition, most believe American support — particularly in intelligence — is essential. So, Araud said of Hegseth, 'everything will be done by the French to seduce him, to try and convince him we are serious on defense and we are working with the Americans and basically, please stay.'
Fast Company
32 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Fear of Trump's tariffs sparked a rush on used cars—now prices are easing
Used car prices ticked down slightly last month in spite of uncertainty around tariffs, but buying a new old whip still costs more than it used to. In April, the average cost for a used vehicle shot up as consumers raced to lock in purchases ahead of potential price hikes driven by Trump's ongoing trade wars. The Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index from Cox Automotive, which tracks used car sales in the U.S., showed a 1.4% drop in prices last month, but prices are still up 4% compared to the same time last year. In April, used car prices saw their biggest spike since October 2023. 'While the market continues to digest the impact of tariffs, we could see a bit higher levels of wholesale depreciation over the summer,' Cox Automotive Senior Director of Economic and Industry Insights Jeremy Robb said in the report, while noting that low inventory could act as a counterbalance, driving prices back up. Compared to a year ago, luxury cars saw the biggest price increase at 6.5%, with SUVs close behind with a 5.2% year-over-year increase. Electric vehicle prices were up 3.1% compared to the same time last May. Used car prices in the U.S. have been a telling indicator of market forces in recent years. In the pandemic's early days, supply chain issues constricted the availability of new cars, driving more buyers to the used market. That demand sent used car prices up, and they mostly stayed that way. In March, President Trump announced a 25% tariff on imported cars and car parts, sowing fresh inflation concerns and sending supply chains into chaos again. Trump later eased tariffs for vehicles assembled in the U.S. using foreign parts – a reprieve intended to give U.S. automakers a break while they scramble to determine the feasibility of building domestic supply chains to replace parts sourcing abroad.
Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Score: Tesla, Cleveland-Cliffs, Dollar General and More Stocks That Defined the Week
The Score is a weekly review of the biggest stock moves and the news that drove them. U.S. steelmakers rallied on President Trump's recent move to double steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%.
