
El Salvador's Leader Went All In on Trump. One Democrat Still Wants to Work With Him.
In the current political moment, Democrats for El Salvador are about as common as coal miners for green energy. But there's at least one: Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, a Blue Dog Democrat and ally to the Central American country's strongman leader and MAGA darling, Nayib Bukele.
In recent months, Democrats have been harshly critical of Bukele, who has become one of Donald Trump's most eager partners overseas, particularly on his immigration agenda. Bukele agreed earlier this year to hold over 240 Venezuelan migrants deported from the United States by the Trump administration in indefinite detention, and he has also refused to release Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran who the Trump administration conceded was mistakenly deported to the country. Bukele's bad blood with Democrats has only gotten worse with his avid support for Trump and willingness to troll congressional Democrats on Twitter.
But there's at least one Democrat still on Bukele's side. Gonzalez is, along with former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), the founding co-chair of the El Salvador Caucus, which they formed last year. Gonzalez is also the lone congressional Democrat to have met with Bukele on a visit to El Salvador as well as been granted a tour of CECOT in mid-May, the infamous Salvadoran prison to which the Venezuelan migrants and Abrego Garcia were sent. (Abrego Garcia has since been moved.) Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and other delegations of House Democrats who went to the country in recent months were unable to gain access to CECOT or meet with Bukele on their trip.
Gonzalez's support of Bukele can be seen as consistent with his other centrist border and immigration stances. Gonzalez represents a 90 percent Hispanic border district that Trump won in 2024 and has been vocal about the need for immigration enforcement. He has hailed what he sees as the transformative effects of Bukele's crackdown on rampant gang violence in El Salvador and has described the country as a model for Latin America.
'I think it's undeniable what he's done has been spectacular, in terms of bringing security to over 98 percent of the population that lived in turmoil for over a generation,' the Texas Democrat told POLITICO Magazine in an interview. 'He clean[ed] up the most dangerous country in the world and turn[ed] it into the safest in the hemisphere.' The murder rate in the Central American country has dropped drastically in the past decade, particularly since Bukele's first election, though critics say the price has been a severe crackdown on civil liberties.
After his trip to El Salvador in mid-May, Gonzalez said in a press release that 'El Salvador is crucial in helping the United States curb the flow of irregular migration and is an important ally in the western hemisphere.' Since Bukele took office, migration to the United States from El Salvador has declined significantly.
All of this makes for a very unusual dynamic on Capitol Hill for Gonzalez.
Out of 14 members, Gonzalez is one of only two Democrats in the El Salvador Caucus; the other is Rep. Lou Correa (D-Calif.). The organization is unapologetically pro-Bukele. In a floor speech announcing its formation, Gaetz said, 'The purpose of this caucus will be to vindicate the choices that President Bukele has made that, indeed, strengthen the U.S.-El Salvador relationship.'
Gonzalez doesn't see a reason why his colleagues can't be a part of that relationship, too. 'I think Democrats … shouldn't shy from building a diplomatic relationship with the country of El Salvador,' Gonzalez said. 'I think we have a lot in common. And I don't think Bukele comes from an extreme right-wing history. I think he's kind of been a middle-of-the-road survivor.' He also said he's in the process of setting up meetings between the Salvadoran ambassador and Democrats to start improving relations.
The lawmaker has also been making the same case to Bukele. 'I told [Bukele] it would be very shortsighted to think that the only people he should have a relationship with are Republicans,' Gonzalez said.
Gaetz's support is less unique among Republicans. Bukele has become one of the most beloved foreign leaders on the MAGA right, joining a pantheon that includes figures such as Argentina's President Javier Milei and Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Starting with his early embrace of bitcoin and crypto currency, followed by his crackdown on rampant gang violence in El Salvador (not to mention his ardent posting on X, the social media app formerly known as Twitter), Bukele has become a star attraction at CPAC and was given the warmest possible reception when he visited Trump at the White House this year. (Even if Trump did take shots at El Salvador in his 2024 convention speech and on the campaign trail at times.) As one Republican strategist, granted anonymity to speak frankly, marveled, 'it was interesting to see the entire Cabinet in a meeting with the president of a country of six million who is not a player in a major region.'
At the same time, human rights organizations have become increasingly critical of Bukele. Roughly 2 percent of the population is in prison as a result of a crackdown on gangs, which also included a 'state of exception' that Bukele declared in 2022 that allowed him to broadly suspend civil liberties in the country and is still in effect today. Activists in the country have been arrested and journalists have fled the country, but Bukele has remained remarkably popular. He won re-election in 2024 with nearly 85 percent of the vote.
In our interview, Gonzalez continued to praise the transformation of El Salvador but shared concerns over some of the Salvadoran government's actions and the steps it had taken to cooperate with the Trump administration's deportation efforts. 'I personally, as a lawyer, believe that the Salvadorans could be exposing themselves to legal liability in foreign jurisdictions for a long time to come if they get in the business of incarcerating foreigners,' he said.
Gonzalez relayed that he had told Bukele, 'In 20 years, President Trump will be long gone and and the legal liability from actions that you take today can follow you for a very long time, as we've seen with Pinochet, as we've seen with Fujimori, as we've seen with Duterte,' referring to foreign leaders who have faced criminal charges for human-rights violations after leaving power. Gonzalez thought this message was 'very effective.'
'One thing that I think would be a deal-breaker not only for me, but for millions of Americans, would be the idea of incarcerating Americans,' Gonzalez continued. 'And I know that that was talked about by President Trump and suggested to him, and [Bukele] assured us that that would not happen and that he would not be accepting Americans for incarceration.'
In reference to Abrego Garcia in particular, Gonzalez said that he believed that if the U.S. government asked for his return, 'they would get [him].'
Gonzalez said that the Venezuelans held at CECOT were held in 'very different conditions' than Salvadoran inmates, which Gonzalez said he observed himself. 'There's a lot less people per unit. They're fed three times a day. They're given much more freedoms' than Salvadorans in the prison, he said. In addition, Gonzalez also said that Venezuelan migrants who are not alleged to be part of any criminal organization are not at the prison and instead are 'living in a separate migrant detention center, similar to what we've had here for a long time.'
This information, if true, is more than what others have been able to obtain about the migrants' circumstances in El Salvador. Family members of Venezuelans detained in El Salvador have little if any information about their loved ones' whereabouts since their deportations and the access that Gonzalez received to CECOT has not been given to international human rights groups, let alone other members of Congress.
Gonzalez chastised both Bukele as well as his Democratic colleagues for letting things get out of hand with a war of words on social media. 'Just as much as I get after my Democratic colleagues for making a spectacle out of the political conditions, I don't believe that the Salvadoran government should disrespect the United States senators and members of Congress who visit El Salvador,' he said.
However, Gonzalez thought there should still be a partnership. 'I think Bukele is a good person, and I really do think he means well and wants to do the best he can for his country, and I think we should work with him.'
Like Gonzalez, Gaetz also told me that he thought Bukele would respond to some courting. 'I think Bukele's desire is to have a strong relationship with the United States no matter who's in power,' he said. The former Florida congressman noted that the Central American leader frequently expresses his dismay that 'Kamala Harris never once called him' when she was assigned to handle migration from Central America during the Biden administration.
Gaetz thought that Bukele had not yet 'burned the bridges and burned the boats with the Democratic Party.'
Democrats, though, begged to differ.
Already Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, have introduced legislation that could potentially lead to an end to all security assistance from the United States to El Salvador in response to the deportations.
One prominent Democratic consultant granted anonymity to discuss the politics of this frankly noted that there wasn't any real political upside for engagement with Bukele.
'There are about a dozen ways to signal you are taking the immigration crisis seriously before cozying up to dictators,' this person said.
It's a breach between congressional Democrats and Bukele that is probably more than can be fixed by a simple charm offensive like the one being proposed by Gonzalez. As Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) put it, 'There's always a path back from authoritarianism, but it requires structural changes, and not just personal change of heart on behalf of a malign dictator becoming a benevolent dictator.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Faces New Lawsuit Over Migrants Sent to Salvadoran Prison
The Trump administration is facing a new legal challenge to its arrangement with El Salvador to send migrants — and potentially US citizens — to a mega-prison infamous for its dangerous and unsanitary conditions. The case, filed in federal court in Washington, is the first to directly target the State Department's agreement to pay millions of dollars to house people arrested in the United States in El Salvador's prison system, including the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, known as CECOT.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now
Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," he said. "I don't know if we will anymore." "Such ingratitude," Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans, wrote on X. President Donald Trump is finally responding to Elon Musk's criticism of his "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said in the Oval Office on Thursday. "I don't know if we will anymore." Trump told reporters that Musk's criticism of the bill likely stemmed primarily from the phase-out of the electric vehicle tax credit, which would likely impact his company, Tesla. "You know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate… which was a lot of money for electric vehicles," Trump said. "And they're having a hard time, the electric vehicles." "Elon knew this from the beginning," Trump added. Musk fired back minutes later, saying that while he thought the EV phase-out was unfair, he was more concerned about the "MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." He later wrote on X that without him, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would have gained control of the House, and Republicans would've had a smaller majority in the Senate. "Such ingratitude," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans last year. In the Oval Office, Trump also said that Musk was lashing out because he "missed" being in the White House. "I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office," Trump said. "I'll tell you, he's not the first. People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it." The tech titan first unleashed on the "Big Beautiful Bill," which is set to serve as the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, on Tuesday. He's kept up his criticism ever since. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." Musk main criticism has been of the bill's projected impact on the federal deficit. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that in its current form, the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years, while the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said that number would be $2.5 trillion. Musk previously said that the bill undermined the work of DOGE, which has sought to cut billions of dollars in federal spending. Republicans on Capitol Hill have largely brushed off Musk's criticism. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Wednesday that Musk is "flat wrong" about the bill, while Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that the tech titan is "entitled to that opinion," but "we're going to proceed full speed ahead." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump's Controversial Pardons Make Some Republicans Squirm
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump's pardons of white-collar criminals whosupport his presidency and donate to his campaigns stoked plenty of outrage from Democrats and former law enforcement officials last week. Now, even some Republicans are signaling their discomfort with his decisions to grant clemency ― and the way he's going about it. 'I think that when the president pardons someone, they need to carefully explain why injustice was done,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told HuffPost. 'And I think pardons should be rare, and President Trump likes pardons much more than I do.'In recent weeks, Trump has pardoned a former Virginia sheriff who was convicted of trying to sell deputy badges, a Las Vegas politician who stole money intended for a memorial dedicated to a fallen police officer, a tax cheat whose mother raised millions of dollars for Republican political campaigns, and a pair of reality television stars who were convicted of bank fraud and tax evasion. The pardons appear to have been politically motivated, a reward for MAGA die-hards who stood with Trump and his movement. 'No MAGA left behind,' Ed Martin, the president's controversial new pardon attorney, wrote in a social media post last month. Trump also shocked many Republicans when he pardoned hundreds of Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol rioters who were convicted of assaulting or interfering with police officers, roughly 1,000 nonviolent offenders and around 200 people accused of assaulting police. A number of those pardoned have since been rearrested for other alleged crimes. 'On its face, you got to be pretty careful,' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), another Senate Judiciary Committee member, said of Trump's latest pardons. 'I haven't looked at the current ones, but I think I'm pretty well staked out on about two or three hundred of Jan. 6 people who never should have been pardoned.' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said the 'best approach' for issuing pardons is to follow a process and make decisions on clemency requests after a recommendation from a parole board or the Department of Justice. The president's pardon power under the U.S. Constitution is broad and completely unchecked. Presidents aren't bound to go through a certain process ― though some follow DOJ guidelines more than others ― and they're free to pardon whomever, no matter the crime. Some of President Joe Biden's pardons also drew outrage ― including for his son Hunter Biden. 'The only way you're going to fix it or change it would be, I think, through a constitutional amendment, and that would take a long time to do,' Rounds said. 'I think just the American people being aware of it is an important part of this discussion. I don't know that you're going to fix it as much as bring attention to it.' Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed a question about Trump's pardons by pointing to controversial pardons issued by President Bill Clinton in the 1990s. 'There's no sense of making any comments about the president's pardons because it's totally his own decision ― any president in the United States,' Grassley said. 'And nobody asked me about the 2,500 pardons that [Bill] Clinton gave, and so I'm not going to make any comments on pardons that Trump makes.' Trump, meanwhile, seems far more interested in probing his predecessor's pardons. On Wednesday, the president directed his administration to investigate Biden's actions as president, accusing his aides of concealing his 'cognitive decline' and casting doubts on the legitimacy of his use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. The order followed weeks of inquiries by Republican lawmakers into Biden's mental and physical health as president following the release of a new book chronicling the former president's 'decline, its cover-up and his disastrous choice to run again.' Biden, however, denied the accusations from Trump in a statement Wednesday: 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.'