SA blocks sale of disability home Abbeyfield House after protest
Disability residents will stay in their home after the South Australian government withdrew plans to sell it.
Abbeyfield House, in Edwardstown in Adelaide's south, has been home to eight adults with intellectual disabilities — including Jacob Milbank, a beloved figure at the Adelaide Crows — for more than 15 years.
The home is owned by Marion City council, which sought consultation from the public about the proposed sale.
The council looked at selling the home to a disability-focused housing provider and sought to protect existing residents from being evicted.
Speaking live on FIVEAA radio this morning, SA Premier Peter Malinauskas said the state government will intervene to stop the sale, ensuring residents can stay.
'I'm very pleased to report to Jake and the other residents at Abbeyfield that we are going to intervene here and stop this sale from going ahead,' he told 5AA.
'We want to provide long-term certainty to those residents so they know they can continue to call their place home — which is what matters to anybody, let alone if you're diagnosed with an intellectual disability.'
5AA also spoke to Jacob Milbank, who has lived at Abbeyfield for 12 years and works three days a week as chief motivational officer with the Adelaide Crows.
'This is our house. I do cooking here, we do parties here — this is where I live,' he told 5AA.
'I'm just saying no way, no way Marion Council is selling. It's not fair for others. I've had anxiety attacks, I'm sick of it.'
On Tuesday, Upper house independent MLC Frank Pangello blamed the council's ambivalence towards the residents.
'It's council bureaucracy and indifference that is going to cause enormous stress and homelessness,' he told 7NEWS.
The campaign was launched on Change.org by Jan McConchie, whose son, Eddie, lives at Abbeyfield.
On Tuesday, Jan and the families of other residents delivered the petition to Pangallo on the steps of South Australian Parliament.
'This win means everything to our families,' McConchie said.
'We've seen our children grow and thrive together in this home for over 15 years. It's more than just a roof over their heads — it's safety, stability and love.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 days ago
- The Advertiser
'Least curious and least informed': what is AUKUS and why does it matter?
A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden. A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden. A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden. A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden.
Perth Now
5 days ago
- Perth Now
Shock Greens claims, fiery resignation letter
Defecting Greens senator Dorinda Cox has launched an extraordinary broadside at her ex-party, accusing it of racism on her way out the door. In a formal resignation letter, reported by the ABC, Ms Cox said the Greens had failed her as the Party's 'last' First Nations MP. 'In my experience, the Greens tolerate a culture that permits violence against First Nations women within its structures,' she wrote in the letter. 'In this respect, the party is deeply racist.' Ms Cox left the Party last week after a failed bid to become its deputy leader, instead defecting to join the Australian Labor Party. In her letter Ms Cox specifically mentioned a 2023 incident at Perth Airport, which reportedly turned into a physical confrontation between Ms Cox and the former leader of the Blak Greens Tjanara Goreng Goreng. At the time both women made reports to police about the incident. Former Green's senator Dorinda Cox has joined the Labor Party. NewsWire / Philip Gostelow Credit: News Corp Australia 'My reports to the party and parliamentary workplace services range from being assaulted at Perth Airport by a party member, which was ignored (indeed, I was advised not to report it to police), to incidents involving my staff who were isolated by the state and other MPs offices,' Ms Cox's letter reads. She continued to make broad claims about the Party failing in its 'duty of care' to her and her staff, accusing the Greens of being 'solely' focused on winning seats. Tensions have been high since Ms Cox left the party, with South Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young insisting that the 'honourable' move would be for Ms Cox to hand back her seat. At the time of her resignation newly-minted Greens Leader Larissa Waters expressed disappointment in Ms Cox's decision. 'Senator Cox would have had more chance of effecting change by continuing to work with the Greens in the sole balance of power,' Ms Waters said at the time. 'We wish her well.' Ms Cox has faced allegation of bullying. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia The Greens have since revoked Ms Cox's party membership. The letter also addressed bullying allegations against Ms Cox, after it was revealed last year that a reported 20 staff had left her office over a three-year period – some over bullying complaints. 'I have faced an unremitting campaign of bullying and dishonest claims over the last 18 months,' Ms Cox wrote. 'I am not, and have never been, a bully. I do not perpetrate it.' Ms Cox and the Australian Greens have been approached for comment.
Perth Now
5 days ago
- Perth Now
State's massive crackdown on street gangs
The South Australian government has vowed to crack down on street gangs by introducing 'tough new measures' that give police greater powers and prevent further recruits to the crime rings. The proposed new laws will expand current police powers, giving them the authority to treat street gangs in a similar way to outlaw motorcycle gangs. The SA government is vowing to expand police powers. NewsWire / Emma Brasier. Credit: News Corp Australia Further changes would include creating a new offence making it illegal for people to recruit members to a street gang, as well as ensuring courts can impose conditions on street gang participants, such as preventing them from possessing certain weapons and associating with certain individuals and attending certain locations. Other changes would allow the police commissioner to apply to the court for control orders to restrict certain activities for street gang members and participants, and allow for identified criminal groups to be declared as street gangs by regulation. The laws would see street gangs treated the same as motorcycle gangs. NewsWire / Emma Brasier. Credit: News Corp Australia 'These reforms are all about cracking down on street gangs by giving police greater powers, similar to what they have for outlaw motorcycle gangs, to keep the South Australian community safe,' South Australia Attorney-General Kyam Maher said. 'These proposed new laws have been developed in close consultation with SAPOL and are designed to give them appropriate legislative tools to tackle these criminal groups.' 'This government is continuing to deliver on policies that are tough on crime, protect the community and support our law enforcement agencies,' he said. 'This comes on the back of this year's state budget investment that will help our law enforcement agencies in bringing offenders to account, and securing justice for victims of crime.'
