Indians eye other visa routes amid H-1B uncertainty, layoffs
Amid tightened scrutiny of H-1B work visa applications and ongoing tech layoffs in the US, Indian professionals and their employers are increasingly looking at other non-immigrant visas such as L-1 and O-1, immigration experts said.There is also a spike in demand for EB-5 immigrant investor visas.While these developments are not new, there has been an increase in the number of people seeking help in the past few months, US immigration attorney Gnanamookan Senthurjothi told ET.The new Donald Trump administration has tightened scrutiny of H-1B visas since taking office early this year. According to the data from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the number of H-1B visa applications shortlisted this year has declined 27% on year—the lowest since the pandemic-impacted FY21.Every year, the US has been approving 85,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers, with Indians securing close to 70% of these visas.
Layoffs by tech majors including Microsoft, Google and Intel have added to the anxiety of Indians working in the US.
'Our clients have become more fearful and anxious, particularly regarding international travel and visa 'stamping' at consular posts abroad,' said Joel Yanovich, attorney at immigration firm Murthy Law Firm. 'I don't think a day goes by where I don't have a client or two asking me whether it's safe to travel.'All this has led to an uptick in demand for L-1 and O-1 visa categories, which do not have annual limits like H-1B.
While L-1 visa is for intracompany transfer, O-1 is for those possessing extraordinary ability in the areas including science, arts or business.
Visa alternatives 'Part of this (spike in L-1 and O-1 demand) is seasonal, based on people not being selected for the H-1B lottery,' Yanovich said. 'But part of this appears to stem from employers and individuals hoping to avoid the heightened scrutiny they fear the H-1B program may face.'Sukanya Raman, country head - India & GCC practice team at Davies & Associates LLC, said, 'What we are also seeing is that some companies are transferring their employees to other countries such as Canada or somewhere outside of the US for a brief time so that they will qualify for L-visa.'This applies to those in the managerial position and can eventually transition to EB-1C to get the US green card, she said.Some are also considering EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver), which is for individuals possessing advanced degrees that are working for national interest in the US, Raman said.The demand for EB-5 investor visas has also increased 50% since January 2025. 'These are in current status for Indian nationals, which means that visas are available and can get their authorisation and travel documents in 3-6 months,' Raman said. 'This will allow them to legally stay in the US.'The EB-5 is particularly in demand from Indian families who are currently in H-1B and their children are aging out, which refers to children who are turning 21 before parents get their green card, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
H&M quietly moving brand toward private ownership
Hennes & Mauritz AB, the fast-fashion retailer that's been listed on the Swedish stock market since 1974, is steadily moving back toward private ownership . The founding family has stepped up purchases of H&M shares, spending more than 63 billion kronor ($6.6 billion) since 2016 to amass nearly two-thirds control and fueling speculation it could take the Stockholm-based company back into private hands - despite denials from family members. The Perssons, one of Sweden's wealthiest families, have built up a growing stake through holding company Ramsbury Invest , saying little about their intentions other than that they "believe" in H&M, which was founded in 1947 by Erling Persson. The media-shy clan is now getting within striking distance of full control of the retailer, which in recent years has been losing ground among shoppers to its main rival Zara and "ultra-fast fashion" upstarts like Shein . "This is something we've been talking about for years, and few would doubt that's the direction things are headed," said Sverre Linton, chief legal officer and spokesperson for the Swedish Shareholders' Association, which represents small stock investors. If the family doesn't plan to take H&M private, it should communicate that more clearly and stop buying shares, he added. The family has ramped up insider buying by reinvesting dividends, boosting its H&M stake to almost 64% from 35.5% over the past nine years via Ramsbury, a vehicle named after billionaire Stefan Persson's sprawling estate, one of the largest private landholdings in southern England. Including extended family holdings, the Perssons now control roughly 70% of the capital and some 85% of voting rights, according to H&M's website. Live Events In an interview last year with Bloomberg, H&M Chairman Karl-Johan Persson - grandson of the founder - dismissed talk that the family intended to take the company private. "There are no plans," he said. "We just buy because we believe in the company." Representatives at Ramsbury Invest and H&M declined to comment. Analysts including Niklas Ekman at DNB Carnegie say the regular purchases could be more than a show of confidence in the retailer. In a note to clients last month, he estimated that if the family keeps acquiring shares at the same pace a buyout could come as early as two years from now. If the family's holding reached 90%, it could request a de-listing of the shares. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
The Wire
5 minutes ago
- The Wire
Nijjar & After: Facing Flak, Canadian PM says Progress in ‘Accountability' Paved Way for Modi G7 Invite
New Delhi: Faced with questions over the invitation to Indian prime minister Narendra Modi for G7 summit, Canadian prime minister Mark Carney defended his decision, saying New Delhi had agreed to resume law enforcement dialogue in a way that 'recognises issues of accountability,' even as high-profile criminal investigations remains underway. On the evening of June 6 in Delhi, Modi posted on X about a phone call with Carney, noting that he had accepted the invitation to attend the G7 summit in the course of the call. The invitation came just over a week before the summit is scheduled to begin on June 15. Other non-G7 invitees, such as South Africa, Brazil, and Mexico, were invited at least a month in advance. Carney's office issued a readout, saying there 'was agreement to continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns.' Following Modi's post, in Ottawa, Carney was pressed by reporters about the optics of inviting Modi, given that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has previously alleged the involvement of Indian government agents in a campaign of ' violent criminal activity ' in Canada and also accused them of orchestrating the June 2023 killing of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. India and Canada currently have vacant high commissioner posts in each other's capitals, after the top envoys were forced out last year. 'Won't disrupt process' Carney acknowledged the sensitivity of the issue but maintained that his government would not interfere in the legal process. 'We have now agreed, importantly, to continued law enforcement dialogue. So there's been some progress on that, which recognises issues of accountability,' he said, when asked directly why the Indian leader was being invited despite the allegations . He reiterated that the ongoing investigation would remain fully independent. 'We are a country of the rule of law. The rule of law is proceeding as it should in Canada, and I am not going to disrupt that process,' he said. India, for its part, has firmly rejected the allegations levelled by Canadian security agencies, including broader claims of foreign interference in electoral affairs. Canada had last year even accused Indian home minister Amit Shah of being involved in the alleged plot to target Canadian nationals. New Delhi has insisted that Canada has ' not shared with us any shred of evidence ' regarding the involvement of Indian agents in the Nijjar case so far. However, Indian authorities have cooperated with the United States , which has connected its own attempted assassination case involving a US-based Khalistani separatist to Nijjar's murder. Carney refused to say whether he believed Modi was involved in Nijjar's killing. 'First off, there is a legal process that is literally underway and quite advanced in Canada. It's never appropriate to make comments in any respect with regard to those legal processes,' he said. Carney also laid out the broader rationale for the invitation, pointing to Canada's role as this year's G7 chair and the need to engage India on global strategic and economic issues. 'First, we are in the role, Canada is in the role, of the G7 chair, and in those discussions, as agreed with our G7 colleagues, we're addressing important issues like energy security, the digital future, and critical minerals, among others,' he said. 'Partnerships in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world are also part of the agenda. There are certain countries that should be at the table for those discussions,' Carney stated. 'In my capacity as G7 chair, and in consultation with others, some of whom also make these determinations, it makes sense to include India, the fifth-largest economy in the world, effectively the most populous country, and central to a number of those supply chains.' 'Won't even get a slap on the wrist' According to Globe and Mail , the decision to invite Modi drew criticism from within Carney's party as well. Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal, whose constituency in British Columbia includes the temple where Nijjar was killed, said he did not agree with the government's decision to invite Modi. 'My constituents are telling me the message that we are sending is they can come and kill Canadians on Canadian soil and they won't even get a slap on the wrist,' he said. Opposition leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Poilievre, said that the invitation was 'necessary', but that conversations on security issues should remain on the table along with economic matters. 'We need to sell our natural gas, our civilian nuclear power technology and other resource projects to India,' he said Friday, as quoted by CBC news , adding, 'We want to see the government work on addressing security issues at the same time when the prime minister has those conversations'. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
'Criminal betrayal of our soldiers': Congress slams Modi Govt over 'failing' to isolate Pakistan
The Congress on Saturday (June 7, 2025) alleged that the Modi government has failed to isolate Pakistan on the global stage after the Pahalgam terror attack, calling it a "criminal betrayal" of Indian soldiers and citizens. Congress' head of media and publicity department, Pawan Khera, said instead of strong action against Pakistan, China armed it with fifth-generation jets and missiles and the World Bank and the ADB gave more aid to the neighbouring country. He claimed that the UN Security Council also named Pakistan Vice-Chair of the Anti-Terrorism Committee, just days after the terror attack on Indian soil. "After the brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, we expected strong actions and global isolation of Pakistan, but what has actually happened? "China is arming Pakistan with 40 fifth-generation stealth J-35A fighter jets armed with cutting-edge PL-17 missiles. Azerbaijan is investing $2 billion in purchasing 40 Pakistani JF-17 fighter jets," Mr. Khera said. "The World Bank has pledged USD 40 billion for Pakistan's development. The IMF approved USD 1 billion bailout to Pakistan. Russia has signed a USD 2.6 billion agreement to rebuild a steel plant in Karachi," he said in a post on X. Khera also claimed that Kuwait and the UAE have relaxed visa rules and offered 10 billion-dollar investment deals and Pakistan has joined the China International Mediation Organization, gaining greater influence in Asian diplomacy. "The UN Security Council has named Pakistan Vice-Chair of the Anti-Terrorism Committee, just days after a terror attack on Indian soil! "This is not just a diplomatic failure. It is a criminal betrayal of our soldiers and citizens," Mr. Khera said. Another Congress leader Renuka Chowdhury said in a post that IMF gave $1 billion to Pakistan on May 9, the World Bank decided to give $40 billion to Pakistan soon after Operation Sindoor and ADB gave $800 million to Pakistan on June 3, even though the ADB president met PM Modi on June 1. "Have we failed in our Foreign Policy?" she asked. "Why are the 4 terrorists who indulged in Pahalgam carnage still alive and going around?" she said. "You are able to eliminate Naxals, but not able to eliminate these 4 terrorists, even after a month? Who is responsible for the intelligence failure? "151 tours, 72 countries, many hugs, kisses and gifts. Still no results. India needs answers," Chowdhury said. The Congress leader also said that a special session of Parliament was required to ask questions on US President Donald Trump's claims, more than 11 times, of "brokering a ceasefire" between India and Pakistan. "Why is PM Modi not denying his claim?" she asked.
