logo
Students, faculty are asking Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine to veto massive higher ed overhaul bill

Students, faculty are asking Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine to veto massive higher ed overhaul bill

Yahoo27-03-2025

Hundreds of students protested against Senate Bill 1 on Ohio State's campus on March 4, 2025. (Photo by Megan Henry, Ohio Capital Journal).
Ohio college students, faculty and staff are calling on Gov. Mike DeWine to veto a massive higher education bill that would ban diversity and inclusion on campus and prevent faculty from striking.
Lawmakers concurred with tweaks made to Senate Bill 1 during Wednesday's Senate session, sending the bill to DeWine's desk for his signature. DeWine received the bill Wednesday and has 10 days to sign the bill into law or veto it. If DeWine vetoes the bill, lawmakers would need a 3/5 vote from each chamber to override it.
DeWine, however, has previously said he would sign the bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
S.B. 1 would set rules around classroom discussion, create post-tenure reviews, put diversity scholarships at risk, create a retrenchment provision that blocks unions from negotiating on tenure, shorten university board of trustees terms from nine years down to six years, and require students take an American history course, among other things.
For classroom discussion, the bill would set rules around topics involving 'controversial beliefs' such as climate policies, electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity and inclusion programs, immigration policy, marriage, or abortion, and forbid 'indoctrination,' though that remains undefined. S.B. 1 would only affect Ohio's public universities.
'Republicans showed us they'd rather gamble with our economic future than solve real problems in our state,' Ohio Democratic Party Chair Elizabeth Walters said in a statement. 'Instead of growing our state, Republicans are driving students, young adults, and business away from Ohio. We're urging Governor DeWine to do the right thing and veto this legislation.'
Students say they will leave Ohio if lawmakers go forward with massive higher education overhaul
The Ohio Senate Democratic Caucus sent a letter to DeWine urging him to veto S.B. 1.
'This legislation is a misguided attempt by overreaching legislators to impose their ideological beliefs on our public universities,' the letter said. 'The bill undermines academic freedom, attacks collective bargaining rights, and jeopardizes the future of higher education in our state.'
The Ohio House Minority Caucus also sent a letter to DeWine asking him to veto the bill.
'You have an opportunity to protect the future of Ohio's institutions of higher education, and your legacy as Ohio's governor, by vetoing this bill and requiring the legislature to negate terms that are more amenable to the will of Ohioans,' the letter read.
The ACLU of Ohio wants DeWine to veto S.B. 1 and protect free speech on campus.
'By dismantling DEI structures, Senate Bill 1 sends a clear, harmful message to students that their unique backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives are not welcome in Ohio,' ACLU of Ohio Policy Director Jocelyn Rosnick said in a statement.
Anticipating S.B. 1 would pass during Wednesday's Senate session, members of the Ohio Legislative Black Caucus urged DeWine to veto S.B. 1 during a press conference earlier that day.
'This is one of the worst government overhauls that I've seen to date,' said state Rep. Terrence Upchurch, D-Cleveland. 'It will not only limit our First Amendment right to free speech, ban strikes and collective bargaining rights for professors, it threatens opportunities for our students, undermines workforce development and disproportionately harms black and minority communities.'
State Rep. Desiree Tims, D-Dayton, said S.B. 1 is toxic, racist and a threat to free speech and academic freedom.
'Since when is diversity, equity and inclusion a bad thing?' she asked. 'Why is this necessary? The only answer is, so that we can move backwards, pre-civil rights … progress that this country and this nation has stood for. … Senate Bill 1 turns the ugly page back in history, somewhere we do not want to go, where we should not go.'
Ohio University Journalism School Director Eddith Dashiell talked about how the university's journalism school did not give out 12 race-based scholarships totaling $46,000 last year after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against race-conscious admissions in 2023.
More than 800 people submit testimony against Ohio's massive higher education overhaul bill
'The diversity scholarships weren't designed to discriminate against white students,' she said. 'The diversity scholarships were designed to encourage more students of color to come to little old, white Athens, Ohio and get a quality education.'
S.B. 1 will be detrimental to Ohio's higher education, Dashiell said.
'If it hadn't been for an extra effort at Ohio University to diversify the faculty, I would still be in Tennessee,' she said. 'We also urge that Governor DeWine veto this bill because it's going to hurt our students. It's going to hurt those who will benefit from diversity programs and benefit from these diversity scholarships.'
Ohio State University's Chair of the Undergraduate Black Caucus Jessica Asante-Tutu said this bill runs the risk of forcing Ohioans to move out of state.
'Students learn best in environments that encourage exchanges, where ideas flow freely and where differences are respected,' she said. 'This bill stifles all of that.'
As an Olentangy Liberty High School student in Delaware County, Michelle Huang said S.B. 1 hangs over her head as she thinks about applying for colleges this fall.
'The threat of this bill passing is a deterrent from us attending Ohio State in the first place,' she said. 'What DEI is actually doing is actually promoting more discourse and promoting more intellectual diversity.'
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be 'very damaging'
'60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be 'very damaging'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be 'very damaging'

"60 Minutes" correspondent Scott Pelley spoke out about President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS and its parent company on Saturday, arguing that a settlement would be "very damaging." "Well, it'd be very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies," Pelley said during a conversation with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Saturday, who asked how harmful a settlement and potential apology would be to the network. Trump filed a lawsuit against Paramount Global, CBS News' parent company, over a "60 Minutes" interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris in October 2024. Fox News Digital confirmed that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the president's legal team is also demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Cooper, who is also a correspondent on "60 Minutes," also asked Pelley about former show producer Bill Owens resigning from the program in April. Cbs News Ceo Wendy Mcmahon Abruptly Resigns, Cites Disagreement With Company Amid 'Challenging' Period "Bill's decision to resign may not have been much of a decision for him because he was always the first person to defend the independence of '60 minutes.' Bill didn't work for Paramount. Bill worked for our viewers, and he felt very keenly about that. And so I'm not sure Bill had any choice, once the corporation began to meddle in Bill's decisions about the editorial content, or just place pressure in that area, Bill felt that he didn't have the independence that honest journalism requires," Pelley said. Read On The Fox News App Pelley also said he wished he had the public backing of CBS News, but added that his work was still making it onto the program. "You really wish the company was behind you 100%, right? You really wish the top echelons of the company would come out publicly and say '60 Minutes', for example, is a crown jewel of American journalism, and we stand behind it 100%. I haven't heard that. On the other hand, my work is getting on the air, and I have not had anyone outside '60 Minutes' put their thumb on the scale and say, 'you can't say that. You should say this. You have to edit the story in this way. You should interview this person.' None of that has happened. So while I would like to have that public backing, maybe the more important thing is the work is still getting on the air," Pelley said. The "60 Minutes" correspondent recently went viral for calling out Trump during a commencement address. '60 Minutes' Producer Defiant As Cbs Parent Company Mulls Settling Trump Lawsuit: 'I Will Not Apologize' "In this moment, this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack," Pelley said during his commencement speech at Wake Forest University. "And insidious fear is reaching through our schools, our businesses, our homes and into our private thoughts, the fear to speak in America. If our government is, in Lincoln's phrase, 'Of the people, by the people, for the people,' then why are we afraid to speak?" Pelley addressed the remarks during the CNN interview and told Cooper that he felt "strongly" it needed to be said. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "I don't refer to him or the president or the White House or the administration. But I was talking about actions that have been taken by the government over these last many months. But, there was a little bit of hysteria among some about this speech, and I simply ask you, what does it say about our country when there's hysteria about a speech that's about freedom of speech?" the CBS correspondent added. Fox News' Joseph Wulfsohn contributed to this article source: '60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be 'very damaging'

Trump Calls on Qatar to Fund Kennedy Center's MAGA Makeover
Trump Calls on Qatar to Fund Kennedy Center's MAGA Makeover

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Calls on Qatar to Fund Kennedy Center's MAGA Makeover

President Donald Trump is aiming to give the Kennedy Center a MAGA makeover, and he has reportedly called on the country that gifted him his 'palace in the sky' to do it. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Republican president's dramatic takeover of the longtime performing arts institution has led to plummeting ticket sales. Last month, Trump set the tone of his hostile takeover by dissing the institution's history of programming and its physical space during a dinner with the center's board members. 'The building is falling apart,' Trump said as his dinner guests let out uneasy laughter. 'I don't want to scare people. It's in fine shape, but it's falling apart.' To fix this, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has put out calls to the Middle East to bankroll a renovation or two—which could include rehabbing its VIP suites and even building a marina next to the venue so the nautical elite can pull up and enjoy the center's programming from the water. Reportedly on the call list was Qatar, which gifted Trump his $400 million 'palace in sky' Boeing jet, which he plans to use as his Air Force One until he pockets the aircraft for personal use at the end of his presidential term. 'The back of the house and the front of the house have been left in an embarrassing state. I am proud to be a small part of a team where the boss eschews partisan politics in favor of putting American culture, heritage, and excellence first,' Richard Grenell said in a statement. He was named executive director of the Kennedy Center in February. Les Misérables, the president's favorite musical, will open the center's programming this week, and some of MAGA's most faithful followers have shilled out $2 million to join the president at the performance.

China exports growth misses expectations despite tariff truce; imports plunge amid weak consumption
China exports growth misses expectations despite tariff truce; imports plunge amid weak consumption

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

China exports growth misses expectations despite tariff truce; imports plunge amid weak consumption

China's exports growth missed expectations in May, despite a temporary trade truce with the U.S. that prompted businesses to frontload shipments and capitalize on the 90-day pause on steep duties. Exports rose 4.8% last month in U.S. dollar terms from a year earlier, customs data showed Monday, shy of Reuters' poll estimates of a 5% jump. Imports plunged 3.4% in May from a year earlier, a drastic drop compared to economists' expectations of a 0.9% fall. Imports had been declining this year, largely owed to sluggish domestic demand. Exports had surged 8.1% in April as a jump in shipment to Southeast Asian countries offset a sharp drop in outbound goods to the U.S. Chinese shipment to the U.S. plunged over 21% in April, as prohibitive tariffs kicked in. U.S. President Donald Trump's prohibitive 145% tariffs on Chinese goods took effect in April, with Beijing retaliating with triple-digit duties and other restrictive measures, such as export controls on critical minerals. U.S. and China struck a preliminary deal in Geneva, Switzerland, last month that led both sides to drop a majority of tariffs. Washington's levies on Chinese goods now stand at 51.1% while Beijing's duties on American imports are at 32.6%, according to think tank Peterson Institute for International Economics. The temporary tariff ceasefire is expected to have triggered a renewed surge in trade as exporters and importers alike in China and the U.S. seek to frontload shipments, sending shipping costs soaring. Chinese Vice Premier and lead trade representative He Lifeng is expected to meet with the U.S. trade negotiation team led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in London later in the day for renewed trade talks. The second-round of meetings come after tensions flared up again between the two sides, as they accused each other of violating the Geneva trade agreement. Washington had blamed Beijing for slow-walking its pledge to approve the export of additional critical minerals to the U.S., while China criticized the U.S. decision to impose new restrictions on Chinese student visas and additional export restrictions on chips. China's Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it would continue to review and approve applications for export of rare earths, citing growing demand for the minerals in robotics and new energy vehicle sectors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store