Who's Really In Charge—You Or Your AI Assistant?
You glance at your phone to check a message, but before you can tap anything, your AI assistant proactively opens a financial app, recommending an investment you never requested. You vaguely recall consenting to a 'screen-reading' feature weeks ago without thoroughly reading the agreement. What seemed like convenience now feels like something far darker: control.
Welcome to the age of screen-reading AI, where digital tools transition from passive helpers into proactive decision-makers, increasingly taking the wheel of our digital lives—often without our clear understanding or consent.
Seductive Simplicity
The appeal of smart assistants like Google Assistant, Siri, China's YOYO, and Zhipu's AutoGLM is clear: seamless multitasking. Saying 'order my usual coffee' and watching your AI effortlessly navigate apps, apply discounts, and complete payments is undeniably impressive.
But this magic relies entirely on the AI's ability to read your screen. Originally designed as accessibility tools for users with disabilities, these APIs grant deep access, allowing AI to view and interact with any visible content. From Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses using live facial recognition to workplace monitoring software, AI has evolved beyond mere assistance into proactive—and intrusive—decision-making.
Global Alarm Bells: Exploiting Accessibility
The technical gateway for this intrusion is the Accessibility API. Initially created for users with vision or motor impairments, it's now routinely exploited by AI, granting apps extensive screen access and allowing them to simulate user interactions.
This isn't just a China issue—it's a worldwide phenomenon. Meta's Pixel tracking code is embedded on 5.8 million websites globally, bypassing Android's privacy protections. Similarly, Russia's Yandex deploys its Metrica trackers on approximately 3 million sites, breaking through security sandboxes to monitor users comprehensively.
In South Korea, the chatbot "Lee Luda," created by Scatter Lab, drew public outrage after it was revealed to have used personal conversations from its dating app "Science of Love" for AI training, despite users supposedly consenting through vague privacy terms. The South Korean Personal Information Protection Commission ruled that such blanket consent could be unlawful.
More troubling yet is Spain's deepfake platform, ClothOff, already shut down, with the disturbing slogan: 'Remove anyone's clothing, remove girls' clothing for free.' Users upload fully-clothed photos and receive realistic nude images, often without explicit consent from the subject. Though its terms of service claim users must be over 18 or have parental consent and assert that the platform stores no data, at least 11 local teens were recently identified sharing these generated nude photos via social platforms, devastating the lives of their young victims.
All these cases reveal a common structural vulnerability: screen-reading AI overrides user intentions, seizing control under the facade of assistance, and hiding behind ambiguous user agreements to evade accountability.
Decision-Making by Proxy
The real danger isn't simply AI observing what we do; it's AI inferring and acting on our behalf. Previously, data collection was straightforward—surveillance you could control by deciding what to share. Now, through screen-reading coupled with AI-driven decision-making, users no longer merely share data—they delegate decisions irreversibly.
Consider Doubao, a widely popular AI assistant developed by ByteDance, renowned in China for its emotional responsiveness, especially among minors. Recently, Doubao's PC version integrated a screen-reading feature. A user, forgetting to close a chat application displaying private information, asked Doubao to edit an elementary-school essay. Shockingly, the AI included the user's detailed home address in the edited text. The assistant hadn't breached security—it simply read what was openly displayed on his screen.
Such capabilities allow AI to recommend content or services with hidden motivations. For example, if your AI assistant suggests one food delivery app over another, it's not just a convenience—it could be monetized preference placement, subtly steering user decisions for profit.
AI no longer needs your explicit personal data to influence you—it just needs your behavioral patterns, preferences, and impulses. You become the product.
The End of 'Nothing to Hide'
For decades, people dismissed privacy concerns with the adage, "I have nothing to hide." This viewpoint is now dangerously outdated. Today's AI infers moods, habits, and vulnerabilities from mere screen activity. It doesn't need explicit data; it only needs enough insight to gently steer decisions, feeling helpful rather than intrusive. Users rarely resist because the interaction feels intuitive and beneficial.
The AI-driven world makes surrendering control comfortable and effortless, leading to a deceptive illusion of free will.
Reclaiming Control
The central question is no longer, "Is AI spying on me?" It's become, "Is AI deciding for me?"
And if AI is making decisions, who programmed those choices, who benefits, and who holds real accountability?
Consent must be genuinely informed, not just buried in user agreements. Regulators must demand transparency about AI inference processes, not merely data collection. Accessibility APIs need stricter oversight to prevent exploitation. Users, too, must understand that clicking 'Agree' may now mean surrendering more than mere convenience—it could be delegating fundamental judgment.
AI isn't the enemy. The challenge is preserving our agency within an AI-driven world. As AI increasingly nudges us towards choices we assume are freely made, we risk losing control entirely.
This isn't an abstract threat—it's unfolding now. AI systems continue to advance in sophistication, amplifying their subtle influences. As this happens, vigilance must grow proportionately.
If your assistant begins making choices for you—and you believe it was always your decision—the battle for control might already be lost.
The solution isn't rejecting AI, but ensuring transparency, accountability, and genuine informed consent. Technology is most valuable when empowering rather than manipulating. The line between assistance and dominance must remain clearly drawn, or we risk a quiet surrender to invisible powers guiding our digital lives.
Ultimately, the responsibility lies with all of us—tech creators, regulators, and everyday users—to ensure AI remains a tool we control, rather than allowing ourselves to become tools of AI.
Because when technology subtly takes the wheel, convincing you that you're still driving, you've already lost control of the destination.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A look back: Mayor Patrick Cannon's path from scandal to second chances
Stories by Charlotte Observer journalists, with AI summarization Patrick Cannon's journey from disgrace to redemption stands out in Charlotte's political history. After his 2014 conviction for taking bribes from undercover FBI agents and serving time in federal prison, Cannon acknowledged his wrongdoing on his radio show, "At the Table with Cannon." He used this platform to publicly apologize and reconnect with the community. Cannon's return to public life included advising aspiring politicians at forums and voicing support for colleagues' campaigns. Ultimately, he filed to run for City Council, telling voters he takes responsibility for his actions and wants a second chance to serve Charlotte. His campaign raises questions about trust, forgiveness, and the challenges of earning redemption in public service. On Wednesday, Patrick Cannon is scheduled to become a free man. | Published January 24, 2017 | Read Full Story Former Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon has a new talk-show job. | Published April 12, 2017 | Read Full Story Former Charlotte mayor Patrick Cannon apologized profusely on his new radio show for taking the bribes that sent him to federal 50, was arrested in March 2014, four months into his term, and later pleaded guilty to taking about $50,000 in bribes from federal undercover officers. | Published April 17, 2017 | Read Full Story Former Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon, in his first public appearance since being released from federal prison on corruption charges, said Saturday he is focused on being the 'best father, husband and son he can be' – but didn't rule out running for office again.'Anything else is God's will,' Cannon a Democrat, was part of a forum held by the Black Political Caucus for people considering running for public office. | Published May 13, 2017 | Read Full Story Needing a voice over for a campaign radio ad, at-large City Council member Claire Fallon turned to an old colleague: | Published September 14, 2017 | Read Full Story by Steve Harrison When he was convicted, a judge foretold Patrick Cannon's name ought to 'fade into our distant memories' — but this election season may change that. | Published March 4, 2022 | Read Full Story by Will Wright The former mayor is returning to Charlotte politics with a bid for City Council. | Published March 4, 2022 | Read Full Story by Anna Douglas The disgraced former mayor is hoping to make a political comeback. | Editorial | Published March 14, 2022 | Read Full Story by the Editorial Board Patrick Cannon's comments came during a forum with other candidates running for City Council. | Published April 2, 2022 | Read Full Story by Will Wright Find out who's on the ballot and what they stand for. This Q&A is one in a series for The Charlotte Observer's voter guide to 2022 local, county and state elections. | Published April 22, 2022 | Read Full Story The summary above was drafted with the help of AI tools and edited by journalists in our News division. All stories listed were reported, written and edited by McClatchy journalists.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scammers targeting NYC parking meters: How to protect your money
The Brief Scammers are placing fraudulent QR code stickers on NYC parking meters, leading drivers to phishing websites to steal payment information. The Department of Transportation acted swiftly by notifying users, inspecting meters, and working with Microsoft to remove the phishing site. Cybersecurity expert Robert Siciliano advises using official apps for parking payments and monitoring credit card statements, while reporting any suspicious QR codes. NEW YORK - Drivers beware! Scammers are targeting New York City parking meters by placing fraudulent QR code stickers on machines, directing drivers to third-party websites to steal payment information. What we know The Department of Transportation warns that scanning these QR codes leads to a phishing site where users are asked for payment details, which are then stolen by scammers. At least one fake sticker was found on a meter, prompting immediate action from the agency, including notifications to users, inspections of all meters, and collaboration with Microsoft to remove the phishing site. What they're saying Cybersecurity expert Robert Siciliano advises vigilance, noting that lone QR codes are often fraudulent. "A lone QR code that is plastered on is usually going to be fraud," he said. "Most municipalities and cities know at this point that there are three to five different apps that consumers might use to log in to pay for their parking, and as long as you have that app on your phone, generally you should be good." He also emphasizes monitoring credit card statements for unauthorized charges. "The problem with this particular crime is if you are not paying attention to your credit card statements in real time and pay the bill, you are responsible for that fraud," he said. What you can do The official way to pay for metered parking in the city is through the ParkNYC app or by inserting a credit card directly into the meter. Reporting any suspicious QR codes is crucial. The Source This article uses information from the New York City DOT and cybersecurity expert Robert Siciliano.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Uber vs. Carvana
The world's mobility landscape is changing in several different ways. There may be room and reason to own both of these companies right now. One of these stocks, however, is experiencing oversized growth for reasons that aren't apt to persist. 10 stocks we like better than Uber Technologies › Uber Technologies (NYSE: UBER) and Carvana (NYSE: CVNA) aren't just two different companies. They're seemingly polar opposites. Ride-hailing giant Uber is thriving largely because owning and driving a car is an increasingly expensive hassle. Used car dealer Carvana, conversely, makes it easy and affordable to own your own automobile. One could reasonably argue there's solid -- even growing -- demand for both businesses. But it's difficult to deny the contrasted underpinnings of what make these two companies tick. Investors could understandably be confused. The good news is, one of these names is a clearly better bet than the other -- now and for the foreseeable future. You almost certainly know the companies. Uber Technologies isn't just a major personal mobility name, after all. It largely brought the domestic ride-hailing industry into existence, and now controls three-fourths of the U.S. market, according to data from Bloomberg. It's developing an international presence as well, even if it's not quite as dominant overseas. As for its fiscals, the $175 billion company's drivers provided over 11 billion rides last year, up 18% year over year, turning that into nearly $44 billion in revenue and almost $3 billion worth of operating net income. Nearly half of its revenue, however, came from deliveries and freight services rather than passenger trips. Carvana isn't quite as big, although its growth is just as impressive. The used car dealer reported $13.7 billion worth of revenue for 2024, up 27% year over year, generating a record-breaking $404 million in net income. Most of that profit came from sales of used vehicles to retail consumers, although wholesaling accounts for the bulk of its total unit transactions. A rebound from a inflation-crimped slide in demand after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic helped drive these top and bottom lines higher. Last year's forward progress, however, also extends a choppy trend that's been in place for some time thanks to Carvana's clever marketing, and brilliant use of technology to establish scale. And yet, these two seemingly growing companies' stocks aren't exactly performing in tandem. Carvana shares are up by more than 200% for the past year, and testing their peak reached in 2021. Uber shares haven't made any real net progress since March of last year, upended multiple times by earnings reports marred by one modest shortfall or another. The market has largely lost its bigger-picture perspective on both companies, however. Take Uber Technologies' recent quarterly results as an example. Yes, since early 2024 either sales or earnings or guidance haven't always lived up to expectations. The company's never failed to make actual forward progress at any point during this stretch, however. Again, last year's revenue improved 18%, and is expected to repeat the feat this year. Although its sales growth rate is slowing, that's a purely mathematical matter. On an absolute basis, it's chugging along as well as it ever has. It's apt to continue doing so well into the foreseeable future, too. Uber is plugged into a serious secular trend. That is, although plenty of people still own and drive cars, there's a growing segment of the domestic and foreign population that doesn't want to do either anymore. A recent survey performed by Deloitte indicates that only 11% of people living in the United States over the age of 55 would consider giving up their vehicle, whereas 44% of people living in the U.S. under the age of 35 would consider doing so. And the disinterest is greater the younger the crowd. Thirty years ago roughly two-thirds of eligible teenagers held a driver's license. Today that figure's about one-third. The advent of a viable alternative like Uber is a key reason for this paradigm shift that's likely to remain in motion for years, as younger non-drivers grow up and pass along these new norms to their children. To this end, Straits Research believes the global ride-hailing market is set to grow at an average annual pace of more than 11% through 2033. Uber is well positioned to win more than its fair share of this growth. The food delivery industry is also set to grow at an annualized pace of 17%, by the way, according to an outlook from Precedence Research. This is another big growth opportunity for Uber, which already enjoys a strong presence within the market. But is Carvana just too promising to pass up? The bullish arguments hold water, to be sure. Chief among them is the sheer cost of a new car. Data from Kelley Blue Book indicates that as of April the average new automobile in the United States was being sold for a hefty $48,699. That puts the monthly payment well over $700, and subsequently, out of reach for most would-be buyers. Used cars are considerably more affordable though. Kelley Blue Book reports April's used car sales rolled in at an average price of $25,547 apiece, roughly halving the monthly payment as well. There's an important footnote to add to this dynamic, however. That is, the car business is incredibly cyclical. Once the current wave of updates and replacements has run its course, don't be surprised to start seeing Carvana underperform. Making matters even more challenging is the lack of new cars manufactured and sold in the U.S. between 2020 and 2022. As Edmunds points out, a three-year-old car (plus or minus a year) is Carvana's sweet spot, so to speak, where affordability and value intersect. Available inventory of these vehicles now stands at more than a decade low though, making it difficult for Carvana to offer what most consumers want. Never say never, of course. It's possible Carvana will continue to consolidate the country's highly fragmented and largely inefficient used car business, achieving growth through greater scale. There's certainly plenty of room for it. As it stands right now, Carvana estimates it only accounts for about 1% of the used car business. It's also possible Uber will run into an unexpected headwind sooner rather than later, even if it's not clear what that headwind might be. Be realistic though. Increasingly crowded urban and metropolitan streets and parking lots paired with car prices that aren't apt to abate anytime soon works in Uber Technologies' favor. Meanwhile, Carvana's recent sales strength doesn't reflect a new long-lived norm as much as it reflects the fact that the average vehicle being driven on U.S. roads is now 12.6 years, according to S&P Global Mobility, an age at which replacing it makes more sense than repairing it. The resulting demand for quality used cars isn't apt to last forever though. Now throw in the fact that Carvana's shares are currently trading 14% above analysts' consensus price while Uber's stock is 16% below analysts' (most of whom rate Uber as a strong buy at this time) average price target of $97.39, and there's little doubt that the ride-hailing powerhouse is a better stock to buy right now than the used car dealership chain's. Before you buy stock in Uber Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Uber Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Uber vs. Carvana was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
