logo
Some Americans fear violence on home front amid conflict with Iran

Some Americans fear violence on home front amid conflict with Iran

USA Todaya day ago

"There could be retaliation here. I feel like it's on everybody's mind," said one man who was visiting Washington D.C. with his son.
NEW YORK – As tensions flared in the Middle East after the U.S. directly entered the conflict between Israel and Iran, some residents and tourists in major American cities say they feel uneasy about the possibility of violence breaking out at home.
At Penn Station, Catherine Wagoner, a kindergarten teacher from Boston waiting for her train home after visiting friends, told USA TODAY she felt less safe traveling since the attacks in Iran.
'Being in New York feels more of a threat – more of a target,' she said, adding, 'I definitely have a lot of privilege, and I don't feel like I'm necessarily the target, so I can recognize that. But I just have a constant state of anxiety about the state of the world.'
Wagoner's feelings were echoed in a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll that surveyed 1,139 U.S. adults nationwide and found that some 79% of respondents said they worried "that Iran may target U.S. civilians in response to the U.S. airstrikes."
Since the United States bombed three nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend, Iran responded by attacking a U.S. military base in Qatar, causing little damage and no casualties. On Tuesday, President Donald Trump said a ceasefire was in effect between Israel and Iran after he accused both countries of violating an initial agreement. It's unclear whether the current ceasefire will hold.
After the U.S. directly entered the conflict, law enforcement agencies across the country warned of increased threats to public safety and police departments increased their presence at religious centers and large-crowd events.
"The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States," a Department of Homeland Security bulletin said, warning of an increasing risk of "violent extremists" plotting cyber or terrorist attacks. The warning extends through September.
In New York City, Mayor Eric Adams said additional police units were ordered to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites in coordination with federal agencies. In Washington, D.C., the city's police force said it's maintaining an increased presence at religious institutions. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass made a similar announcement in the wake of the U.S. bombing in Iran.
'I don't know what's going to happen'
At Penn Station, there were no visible signs of increased police security on June 23, just the usual crowd of luggage-toting travelers standing in lines inside the large train hall or sitting on the floor as they waited for their train.
Dolores Broward, 29, who was heading to a family reunion in Texas, said she was nervous about making the trip, her first on a train. She purchased her ticket several weeks ago, before the tensions with Iran escalated.
'I don't know what's going to happen, let alone what it's going to be like on a train,' she said. 'I've never been on a train. But I'll be damned if I go on an airplane. That's scary.'
In the nation's capital, near the Washington Monument, Cindy Pramann, 59, said possible retaliation from Iran has been at the back of her mind since she arrived in the district for a conference.
"D.C. would be a target so that definitely crossed my mind," she said, noting that she lives near New York City and felt a similar anxiety in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks that the U.S. would be drawn into a full-scale, prolonged war. "We have a 20-year-old so we're worried for him."
Some who spoke to USA TODAY also mentioned recent politically-motivated and hate-fueled attacks and said the frequency of such incidents is cause for concern.
Earlier this month, a man disguised as a police officer shot two Minnesota lawmakers in their homes, killing Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. In Colorado, police say a man with a makeshift flamethrower and Molotov cocktails attacked a group raising attention for Israeli hostages in Gaza, injuring over a dozen people. In May, a gunman shot and killed two Israeli embassy staff members outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington.
'I feel like it's on everybody's mind'
Ron Mahoney and his son, Brenden, who visited Washington from Albany, New York, said the tinderbox situation in Iran seemed ripe for escalation.
"There could be retaliation here," Mahoney said. "I feel like it's on everybody's mind. How could you not have a little bit of thought asking yourself, 'Is my safety protected?'"
Mahoney said the scenario he's considered most is an Iranian sympathizer plotting an attack against U.S. citizens. He cited recent remarks from Trump administration officials about the presence of possible sympathizers in the country illegally, including some who were allegedly on terrorism watch lists, Vice President JD Vance said in a recent interview on NBC News.
Aboard Air Force One on Tuesday, Trump said sleeper cells – including "many from Iran" – entered the country illegally under the previous administration. Their comments came after a Department of Homeland Security bulletin highlighted the risk of extremists "independently mobilizing to violence" if Iran's leadership called on them to do so.
While federal, state and local law enforcement agencies nationwide have warned of the heightened threat environment, they said there were no specific credible threats of violence or terrorism related to the Mideast conflict.
'There's always a risk'
Not everyone felt a sense of unease.
Gabriella Stevens, whose train to Washington from New York was delayed by nearly an hour, said she has no concerns about traveling.
'I feel like constantly in the world, there's a lot that is going on,' she said. 'If you travel internationally, there's always a risk. I personally don't feel concerned about traveling from New York to Washington.'
Stevens, 23, who works in environmental consulting, said she doesn't feel there is an Iranian threat to Americans on U.S. soil. 'I feel like a lot of what may be retaliation will occur at bases that are abroad and not necessarily at home, at least in the short term,' she said.
Erin Palmer, who has lived in Washington D.C. for six years, said while the risk of an attack may have been a momentary thought, she has not altered her routines or been plagued with worry.
She said she feels more unsafe because of the frequency of gun violence, crime and mass shootings in the U.S. than an act of politically-motivated terrorism.
"I think more about shootings here in the city than Iran," Palmer said. "If it happens it happens but it's unlikely."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump doesn't rule out sending Ukraine more Patriot missiles after Zelenskyy meeting

time7 minutes ago

Trump doesn't rule out sending Ukraine more Patriot missiles after Zelenskyy meeting

Following his closed-door meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the NATO Summit on Wednesday, President Donald Trump didn't rule out sending Ukraine monetary and defense aid as he voiced frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. During his press conference at the conclusion of his trip to The Hague, Netherlands, Trump signaled a willingness to provide Ukraine with additional aid and sell or send Patriot air-defense missiles to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia. "They do want to have the anti-missile, missiles," Trump said of Ukraine. "As they call them the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available." Trump's openness comes as Zelenskyy told ABC News earlier this month the United States diverted anti-drone weapons, previously promised to Ukraine under a Biden administration agreement, to the Middle East. "You know, they're very hard to get. We need them to. We were supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective," Trump said. "As far as money going, we'll see what happens. There's a lot of spirit," Trump added. Trump also appeared to shift his tone when describing his conversation with Zelenskyy, a relationship marked by many pivots. "He was very nice, actually. You know, we had little rough times sometimes. He was uh - couldn't have been nicer. I think he'd like to see an end to this. I do," he said of Zelenskyy. Zelenskyy offered similar praise of Trump, calling their meeting "long and substantive" while affirming he told him Ukraine is ready to buy more U.S. weapons. "With the President, we discussed the protection of our people — first and foremost, the purchase of American air defense systems to cover our cities, our people, churches, and infrastructure," Zelenskyy said in a statement on Wednesday. "Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American arms manufacturers. Europe can help as well," Zelenskyy said. "We also talked about possible joint drone production. We can strengthen each other." During his press conference, Trump added Zelenskyy was fighting a "brave" and "tough" battle while putting pressure on Putin to show more willingness to end the conflict. "Look. Vladimir Putin really has to end that war. People are dying at levels that people haven't seen for a long time." Then, when pressed on why he wasn't able to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine quickly as he adamantly claimed while on the campaign trail, Trump again pointed the blame towards Putin. "It's more difficult than people wouldn't have any idea," Trump said. "Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I had some problems with Zelenskyy. You may have read about him, and it's been more difficult than other wars." Trump's public praise of Zelenskyy marks a shift in tone for the President, who has had public battles with the leader of Ukraine. Most notably in February, a public Oval Office spat between the two officials led to a scrapped bilateral mineral deal, which wasn't finalized for two months until the pair sat down together on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral. Then, in recent weeks, as Trump focused on negotiating an agreement between Iran and Israel, he left last week's G7 Summit in Canada early, skipping out on a bilateral with Ukraine. However, after their meeting on Wednesday, Trump displayed more compassion for the situation in Ukraine in a moment highlighted by his exchange with a Ukrainian reporter who said her husband was a Ukrainian soldier while she and her children fled to Warsaw for safety. "Wow, that's rough stuff, right? That's tough," Trump said, asking the reporter many personal questions before answering her policy question. "That's very good question. And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband. Okay?" Trump said.

War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers
War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers

The Intercept

time9 minutes ago

  • The Intercept

War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers

As Democrats try to push forward legislation that would block further strikes on Iran, one measure advanced by House leadership could actually strengthen the Trump administration's justification for subsequent attacks, anti-war advocates warn. House progressives on Wednesday were trying to reach a compromise with Democratic leaders that would curb further U.S. military involvement in Iran while satisfying concerns from pro-Israel members about American support for Israel's missile defense. There are three different war powers resolutions in play in Washington. In the Senate, a resolution from Tim Kaine, D-Va., appears to be on track for a vote on Friday. In the House, however, Democrats remain sharply divided between two resolutions. 'There's no upside to advancing a competing War Powers Resolution. It's not just unnecessary — it's actively counterproductive,' Cavan Kharrazian, a senior policy adviser at Demand Progress, said in a statement. 'There's still time to reconcile this on the House side, and we hope an agreement can be reached to enable a strong vote with the best possible language.' The resolutions in both chambers face long odds, thanks to near-unanimous support from the majority Republicans for President Donald Trump's strikes. Congressional Democrats are responding to Trump's strikes by pursuing a vote under the War Powers Act, the Vietnam War-era law designed to limit presidents' ability to launch military action abroad without congressional approval. Kaine's initial resolution introduced last week directs Trump to halt hostilities against Iran, while making clear that the president can still defend the U.S. from imminent attack. Kaine's resolution has drawn support from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. It is expected to come to a voter later this week. Amid concerns from pro-Israel Democrats, Kaine said Tuesday that he was co-sponsoring an amendment to his resolution with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Andy Kim, D-N.J. The amendment is intended to continue to allow the U.S. to participate in Israeli missile defense. Pentagon officials said last April that the U.S. — not Israel — shot down most Iranian drones and missiles during an Iranian attack. 'This amendment would leave no doubt that Senator Kaine's resolution would ensure that President Trump has to make the case to the American people for further action against Iran without constraining our ability to help defend the Israeli people from Iranian attacks,' Kim said in a statement. While most Senate Democrats appeared to have coalesced around Kaine's resolution, House Democrats remained split on Wednesday over how to respond to Trump's strikes. Advocates last week said they were frustrated that Democratic leaders were not moving forward with a resolution as Trump publicly mulled attacking Iran. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., teamed up with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to introduce a resolution. After the strikes were launched, three House Democratic committee ranking members introduced an alternative resolution that its authors claim would also force Trump to cease hostilities with Iran. The sponsors are Reps. Jim Himes of Connecticut, Adam Smith of Washington, and Gregory Meeks of New York. Anti-war advocates worry that the House leadership measure could actually wind up strengthening Trump's justification for launching further strikes on Iran. In an apparent nod to Israel, the leaders' resolution would give the president the power to 'defend the United States or an ally or partner of the United States from imminent attack.' Trump has already justified his strike on Iran as an act of 'collective self-defense of our ally, Israel,' according to a letter he sent Congress, despite the assessment of U.S intelligence agencies that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. Critics say the House Democratic leadership resolution mirrors the language of Trump's justification far too closely. 'We think if it passes, it would be worse than not having a war powers resolution.' 'We think if it passes, it would be worse than not having a war powers resolution,' said Yasmine Taeb, the legislative and political director for the Muslim advocacy group MPower Change. 'This war powers resolution gives the impression that the president has broad authority to be able to engage in military offensive action with respect to Iran — if Israel is asking us to.' Spokespersons for Himes, Meeks, and Smith's offices did not immediately comment. Khanna has said that his resolution is intended to preserve the U.S. military's ability to participate in Israeli missile defense. Advocates said they understood there were ongoing discussions about a compromise. The two sides have ample time: A vote on the measure is not expected to come to the floor before mid- to late-July. Whether or not the two sides come to an accord, however, the push to respond to Trump's strikes could face serious pushback from Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson. Johnson said Tuesday that he thought the War Powers Act itself was unconstitutional and signaled that he may use a procedural move to prevent it from coming to the floor. The War Powers Act states that resolutions brought under its auspices must be fast-tracked to the House floor within 15 working days. Johnson, however, could try to block the resolution from receiving such a 'privileged' status — although that would likely force a vote on the procedural maneuver itself. Massie's co-sponsorship of the resolution gave it bipartisan support, but it's unclear whether he will continue to push its passage in the face of intense pressure from the White House and the ceasefire announced by Trump on Monday. Massie has said he is taking a 'wait and see' approach. As a shaky ceasefire between Israel and Iran continued to hold Wednesday morning, progressives in the House said they were pursuing a vote on their preferred resolution despite the opposition from Johnson. Khanna said at a Capitol press conference that blocking the vote with a procedural maneuver would be an 'unprecedented abrogation of congressional power.' 'The fundamental point here is that we don't know what the strikes accomplished, but we do know a lot of the harm,' Khanna said. 'It has hardened the resolve in Iran to now race towards a nuclear weapon.'

A battered Iran faces an uncertain future after its grinding war with Israel
A battered Iran faces an uncertain future after its grinding war with Israel

San Francisco Chronicle​

time16 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

A battered Iran faces an uncertain future after its grinding war with Israel

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The bombing has quieted in Iran's 12-day conflict with Israel. Now its battered theocracy and 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei must regroup and rebuild in a changed landscape. Israeli airstrikes decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and depleted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. Israeli missiles and American bunker buster bombs damaged the nuclear program — though how much remains disputed. Khamenei went into deep isolation in an undisclosed location, appearing only twice in videos as the Israelis had free rein over the country's skies. Iran's self-described 'Axis of Resistance,' a group of allied countries and militias in the Mideast, has been mauled by the Israelis since Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack. Foreign support Tehran may have expected from China and Russia never materialized. At home, old problems remain, particularly an economy wrecked by international sanctions, corruption and mismanagement. 'Iran's leadership has been dealt a heavy blow and will be conscious of preserving the ceasefire, which gives the regime breathing room and allows space to focus on internal security and reconstruction,' the Eurasia Group said in an analysis Wednesday. Shoring up loyalty One thing Israel's campaign showed was how much its intelligence agencies have infiltrated Iran — particularly its swift pinpointing of military and Guard commanders and top nuclear scientists for strikes. The No. 1 task for Khamenei may be to root out any suspected disloyalty in the ranks. 'There must be some sort of purge. But who will implement it? That is the question,' said Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. 'This level of distrust that apparently exists now is going to paralyze any effective planning or security overhaul,' he said. In that atmosphere, rebuilding Iran's military, particularly its Revolutionary Guard, will be a challenge. But the forces have a deep bench of officers. One top survivor of the war, Gen. Esmail Qaani, in charge of the Guard's expeditionary Quds Force, was seen in videos of a pro-government demonstration in Tehran on Tuesday. On the civilian side, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi found himself empowered to the level of almost a de facto prime minister, publishing announcements on even the ceasefire while others in Tehran remained silent. Khamenei also has to rethink the security policy he wove together over the past two decades. The 'Axis of Resistance" alliances allowed Iran to project its power across the Mideast but also was seen as a defensive buffer, intended to keep conflict away from Iranian borders. That buffer has now been shown to be a failure. Race for a bomb? After Israel's campaign exposed Iran's vulnerabilities, Khamenei might conclude that his country can only protect itself by turning its nuclear capability into an actual bomb, as North Korea did. Iran has always said its nuclear program is peaceful. But it is the only non-nuclear armed state to have enriched uranium to 60%, a short step from weapons-grade. Many observers believe Khamenei opposed taking that step to a weapon to avoid a war, Azizi said. But now voices within the system demanding a bomb are likely growing, he said. 'We might have already passed that threshold for Khamenei's viewpoint to change.' Still, any drive for a nuclear weapon would be a major gamble. The extent of damage from the U.S. and Israeli barrages remains unclear, but Iran certainly needs to rebuild its nuclear facilities and centrifuge infrastructure, whether that takes months or years. And it would have to do all that in extreme secrecy, concealed from Israeli and U.S. intelligence. Were Israel to catch wind, it could resume strikes. Khamenei could also take the opposite path, resuming talks with the United States in hopes of winning sanctions relief. U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff, appearing Tuesday night on Fox News, called the chance for future negotiations 'promising.' 'We're already talking to each other,' he said. 'We are hopeful we can have a long-term peace agreement that resurrects Iran.' Challenges at home Many also fear an intensified crackdown on dissent, as a leadership battered by war regroups amid mounting problems at home. Iran's frail economy has been wrecked by international sanctions, corruption and years of mismanagement. For months, the ailing power grid has been plagued by hourslong, rolling blackouts. The flight of much of Tehran's population during the war temporarily eased the strain. But as they return, even longer blackouts are likely to come roaring back during the worst of the summer months, disrupting everything from bakeries to factories. The war also shut down Tehran's stock market and currency exchange shops, pausing a collapse of Iran's riyal currency. Back in 2015 when Iran reached its nuclear deal with world powers, the rial traded at 32,000 to $1. Today, it is near 1 million rials to the dollar. Once businesses reopen in force, the plunge could resume. The economy has sparked unrest in the past. After state-set gasoline prices rose in 2019, protests spread across some 100 cities and towns, with gas stations and banks burned down. In the ensuing crackdown, at least 321 people were killed and thousands detained, according to Amnesty International. Then there's the 2022 protests over the death of Mahsa Amini, a young woman who had been detained by security forces allegedly over not wearing her headscarf, or hijab, to their liking. A monthslong crackdown killed more than 500 people and saw over 22,000 detained. Many women in Tehran still refuse to wear the hijab. But activists worry the war will trigger new restrictions. In an open letter last weekend, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi wrote that 'the Islamic Republic is a religious, authoritarian, and misogynistic regime — incapable of reform and systematically violating the fundamental rights of the Iranian people.' But she called for a ceasefire in the war 'because I firmly believe that democracy and peace will not emerge from the dark and terrifying corridors of war and violence.' Questions persist over Khamenei's successor Despite Israel's talk of eliminating him, Khamenei survived this confrontation. What comes after him remains unknown. The war could fuel a change in the Islamic Republic itself, pushing more towards a military-style rule. Under the Islamic Republic, leading Shiite clerics stand at the top of the hierarchy, drawing the lines to which the civilian government, the military and intelligence and security establishment must submit. As supreme leader, Khamenei symbolizes that clerical power. A panel of Shiite clerics is tasked with choosing one of their own as his successor. Several names have been touted, including Khamenei's son and the grandson of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the father of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Some candidates are seen as more hard-line, some more open to reform. Whoever is chosen, military and Guard commanders may more than ever be the power behind the robes. 'People have been talking of a transition from clergy-dominated Islamic Republic to a military-dominated Islamic Republic,' Azizi said. 'This war has made that scenario more plausible. … The next government will be more military-security oriented.' Keath reported from Cairo. ___ EDITOR'S NOTE — Jon Gambrell, the news director for the Gulf and Iran for The Associated Press, has reported from each of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Iran and other locations across the Mideast and wider world since joining the AP in 2006. Lee Keath, the chief editor for feature stories in the Middle East for the AP, has reported from Cairo since 2005.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store