Pathway for vehicles included in Dilli Haat revamp
Nearly a month after a major fire gutted 24 shops in south Delhi's Dilli Haat, the pedestrian-only market is facilitating the entry of vehicles like fire engines as part of its reconstruction.
This comes after the fire brigade team had reportedly faced difficulties entering the market to douse the fire on April 30.
At the northern end, a narrow but non-functional gate opening towards the Maharaja Agrasen Marg is being widened and the pathway is being cleared of stalls and shops to make space for vehicular movements for future emergencies.
'We plan to open this gate for a complete and seamless entry of emergency vehicles in case we need to penetrate to the core inside,' said Neharika Rai, CEO of Delhi Tourism, which is responsible for the market's maintenance.
Meanwhile, those whose shops were gutted continue to wait for compensation. 'We are under pressure to clear the pending wages of artisans. They too are helpless and depend on us for their livelihood,' one shopkeeper said.
'The compensation is being processed by the New Delhi administration,' said a senior official.
Tourism Minister Kapil Mishra had assured shopkeepers of every help needed to restart their businesses.
On Wednesday, Mr. Mishra inaugurated an installation on Operation Sindoor dedicated to the Indian Army in Dilli Haat.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Indian Oil quadrupled fuel supply for armed forces during Operation Sindoor: Senior official
By Shafali Nigam Port Blair (Andaman and Nicobar) [India], June 12 (ANI): Indian Oil ensured seamless fuel supply to the Indian armed forces during Operation Sindoor from Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which went up at least four times, said Rakesh Kumar, Chief Terminal Manager (CTM) of Indian Oil Corporation (IOC). 'During Operation Sindoor, the demand from defence has gone up at least four times, and we were there to supply the product just as I told you earlier. We positioned our vessels from Paradip and Haldia refineries and met their demands just in time,' Indian Oil Corporation CTM said. Mentioning the demand during Operation Sindoor, he said, 'In case of need, just like a few months back, at the demand of the Indian Navy, we positioned our vessels from Paradip refinery and Haldia refinery at a notice of just three days.' Indian Oil demonstrated its strategic preparedness and operational efficiency and played a pivotal role in ensuring uninterrupted fuel supply during Operation Sindoor, the official said, adding that despite a fourfold increase in fuel demand from defence establishments, the state-owned oil PSU successfully met requirements by mobilising vessels from its mainland refineries within days. 'We have a very high level of good coordination with defence, almost on a daily basis. Since they are taking products from us, they have requirements. We interact with them on a weekly basis, and we hold meetings with their supply department as well,' he said about coordination with defence and security agencies in fuel supply or infrastructure planning. During a field visit to the Indian Oil POL Terminal in Port Blair, organised by the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas for the press, when asked if there are any protocols in case of an emergency situation, Kumar said, 'In case of need, just like a few months back, at the demand of the Indian Navy, we positioned our vessels from Paradip refinery and Haldia refinery at a notice of just three days.' 'We are at the smart terminal of Indian Oil. Here, we have a tanking of 27,000 KL. We are dealing with four products over here, which are petrol, diesel, low-sulphur HFHSD and HSD,' he added. In response to the questions on emergency protocols in place for fuel shortages or natural disasters like cyclones or tsunamis, he said, 'We have emergency protocols. Sufficient tankage is there. On average, we have 25 days of coverage for all the products.' He said the state-run oil major is planning to expand services or upgrade existing infrastructure in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. 'We have plans. This terminal is a 27 TKL terminal and a POL terminal. We have requested one more station and we are in an advanced stage of getting new land in Hope Town, where our bottling plant is situated,' he added. Speaking with ANI, V. Ranganathan, Chief General Manager from West Bengal State Office and Port Blair said, 'Port Blair is one of the unique locations where a lot of challenges are there with respect to logistics, as well as product availability.' (ANI)
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
India Won Operation Sindoor – But What Does The Army Want Next, And Who Poses The Greatest Threat?
New Delhi: India crushed Pakistan's assault during Operation Sindoor. But after the dust settled, something more alarming came into view. China was not sitting on the sidelines. It was pulling strings from behind the curtain. Indian radars picked up Chinese-made jets in Pakistani skies. Chinese missiles were used to target Indian bases. Beijing was deeply involved. That means India was not fighting just Pakistan. India was up against two enemies at once. Military officers have sounded the alarm. They want India's defence budget raised to 2.5% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Right now, the defence allocation stands at just 1.9%. A huge portion of that money goes into salaries and pensions. Only a quarter of it helps modernise the military. This cannot continue. Not when two hostile neighbours are preparing for something bigger. China has been pumping weapons into Pakistan. In the May 7-10 clashes, Pakistan deployed Chinese J-10 jets and HQ-9 missile systems. Beijing has promised to send more – stealth fighters, long-range air defence weapons and new-generation drones. China is flooding Pakistan with cutting-edge military tools. Pakistan's economy is in crisis. But even then, Islamabad raised its defence budget by 20%. It cut development. It ignored debt. It focused on weapons. India must respond, believe experts, arguing that it is time for total self-reliance in defence production. India must build fighter jets, drones, loitering munitions and missiles on its own. The private sector must step in. Half-measures will not do. Half-prepared armies lose wars. India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project has started moving. But it must move faster. Tejas took decades. The same mistake cannot happen again. The Indian Air Force is short on fighter squadrons. It has just 30. The target is 42.5. Drones are the new face of war. Swarm drones. FPV kamikaze drones. Loitering drones. India needs all of these, and it needs them in bulk. No country will come to India's rescue in a full-scale war. India must stand on its own. During Operation Sindoor, India used Russian S-400s, Israeli Barak-8s and its own Akash missiles. These systems intercepted and neautralised many Pakistani drone and missile attacks. But more layers are needed. DRDO must now accelerate two things – short-range air defence systems and long-range strike missiles like Project Kusha. Military reform is also crucial. India has a huge army. It must cut unnecessary spending. It must remove red tape from weapons procurement. And it must create joint theatre commands that allow the Army, Navy and Air Force to fight as one. A senior military commander put it bluntly. India is now staring at a superpower that is feeding a hostile neighbour. Pakistan may fire the bullets. But China is loading the gun. India cannot look away anymore. The next battle may not wait for long.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
Multi-partisanship for reforms can help India unlock stalled growth
Following the global multi-party outreach to articulate India's response to Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism, the Prime Minister spoke of institutionalising the idea. The idea of multi-partisanship is undoubtedly inspired. It is a pity no one has thought of applying the concept in other critical areas of governance. For instance, a multi-party consensus on economic policy would be splendid, especially since much of stalled next-gen reform requires buy-in from state governments ruled by parties in opposition to the ruling coalition at the Centre. Right now, a majority in Parliament thanks to its allies means that the ruling dispensation does not need to take anyone in the Opposition on board to fulfil its political agenda. With Operation Sindoor, Narendra Modi was pushing at an open door when it came to multi-partisanship. Getting a consensus on economic reform is a different matter. It requires negotiating contradictory political calculations. It may not always work but the consequences of a lack of political consensus has proven a significant hurdle for private investment in the kind of job-creating greenfield manufacturing projects that India urgently seeks. Consider land acquisition. All private companies struggle to acquire land at scale because of the stiff stipulation in the Land Acquisition Act requiring 80 per cent prior consent from affected families (70 per cent in the case of private-public partnership projects) plus a social impact study. As a workaround, corporations employ land aggregators as intermediaries to pool in parcels of land, but the process is cumbersome, expensive, and ultimately self-defeating. Yet, difficulties in acquiring land have been a key reason India has struggled to make a success of its nearly two-decade-old Special Economic Zones policy, which was supposed to provide the rocket fuel for India's economic growth a la China. Instead, the government has successively scaled down rules governing minimum SEZ size, a change that has not made an appreciable difference to investor interest. When the Modi government first came to power, it briskly sought to underline its pro-business credentials by passing an ordinance easing the land acquisition pre-conditions in some cases and doing away with the social impact study. The amendments were passed in the Lok Sabha but stalled in the Rajya Sabha, where the ruling party did not have a majority. Though the ordinance was re-promulgated three times, it was allowed to lapse. The political furore that chipped away at the Bharatiya Janata Party's 'common man' positioning has not encouraged the party to reintroduce it in its second or third terms. Ructions over land acquisition for private investment burst into contemporary political consciousness in the 2000s in West Bengal and reflects how competing political interests can stall progress. An attempt at consensus between the belatedly reforming Left Front government in West Bengal and Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress over the Tata Nano plant in Singur would have been a sensible route. Had the plant come up, it would have been a game changer for a declining state. But Ms Banerjee's decision to co-opt a traditional Left Front bastion — peasants and cultivators, land losers in the Singur project — weakened the prospect of negotiating with a regime backing big business. The same impulse encouraged her to back land-losing protesters opposing a chemical hub proposed by the Left Front government in Nandigram and Nayachar. Land loser championship brought Ms Banerjee to power in the state but this recent history has not inspired business and industry. The thing is, this situation need not be zero-sum. Politicians have to legitimately consider the welfare of land losers in large projects even if the compensation is generous. What will they do with the money? Where will they go? At the same time, discouraging investment for lack of land is hardly helpful to a state where quality jobs are scarce. And yet we have the experience in China of balancing land-loser apprehensions with the famed Township and Village Enterprises that came up alongside mammoth factories. Instead of the confrontational approach of ordinances, a multi-party consensus exploring such a solution on a national scale could well have positioned India as the first choice for global investors' China Plus One strategies — ahead of Vietnam, Mexico or Indonesia. Labour reforms, another obstacle for large investors, has had a marginally better fate. In 2019-20, Parliament enacted four labour codes to streamline and consolidate labour laws to improve its 'ease of doing business' ranking. Though the World Bank discontinued the ranking in 2021, the government persisted with its efforts to persuade states to enact the laws. The fact that the BJP or its allies are in power in 21 of the country's states and Union Territories has played a role in expanding the adoption of these codes but the results are variable. For instance, according to research by Business Standard, 20 states/Union Territories have adopted the higher thresholds for hiring and firing and 25 have committed to fixed term employment and 31 will relax laws to permit women to work at night. So land and labour, the two key factors of production, remain sticking points in the reforms portfolio as do power pricing and the bewildering variety of local approvals that investors need before setting up a unit. Picking the brains of the best political leaders in the business across party lines in unravelling these Gordian knots in the ease of doing business would be better than packing them off on taxpayer-funded foreign trips where the outcomes are yet unclear.
