What challenges could Trump's Golden Dome face to make it operational by end of his term?
Golden Dome missile defence plan: As the US President Donald Trump on Tuesday selected a design for the $175-billion project and identified a Space Force general to lead the programme, experts suggest it could confront major technical and political hurdles, and the actual cost to achieve its objectives could be much higher than he has projected.
While the US president pushes for a defence system capable of countering a broad range of enemy weapons, comprising intercontinental ballistic missiles, hypersonic and cruise missiles, and drones, he also wants it operational by the end of his second term.
A nonresident senior associate in the Missile Defense Project at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, Melanie Marlowe, said, 'The main challenges will be cost, the defense industrial base, and political will. They can all be overcome, but it will take focus and prioritization.'
She added, "The White House and Congress are going to have to agree on how much to spend and where the money will come from. Our defense industrial base has atrophied," though 'we have begun to revive it'.
Marlowe also emphasised the need for further advancements in sensors, interceptors, and other key elements of the project.
Assistant professor of international affairs and aerospace engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Thomas Roberts, said the price estimated was 'not realistic', adding, 'The challenge with the statements from yesterday is that they lack the details needed to develop a model of what this constellation would really look like."
A senior engineer at the RAND Corporation, Chad Ohlandt, stated "the threat is clearly getting worse," but the "key question is how to most cost effectively counter" it, further continuing, "Any questions of realism or feasibility" for Golden Dome 'depend on where we set the bar. Defend against how many threats? Threats of what capability? What is to be defended? As you raise the bar, it becomes more expensive.'
Associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, Thomas Withington, said, "there are a number of bureaucratic, political, science and technological milestones that will need to be achieved if Golden Dome is ever going to enter service in any meaningful capacity. It is an incredibly expensive undertaking, even for the US defense budget. This is serious, serious money. I'm not holding my breath as to whether we will actually ever see this capability."
Inspired by Israel's Iron Dome, the Golden Dome is designed to defend the United States against advanced missile threats, including hypersonic and space-launched missiles. The Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said the system aims to protect 'the homeland from cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, hypersonic missiles, drones, whether they're conventional or nuclear'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
New normal amid a new cold war
The effect of Donald Trump's return to the White House is being felt in capitals all over the world. At the recently-concluded Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the spectre of a new cold war rose once again to dominate discussions. In his ASEAN chairman's statement, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim categorically asserted the return of a cold war to systemic interstate relations. The reference does not augur well for the ASEAN, which has been trying to build resilience within while maintaining a degree of balance between the US and China. The second important aspect of this year's dialogue has been the tough stand India has placed on its recent military stand-off with Pakistan following the devastating terror attack at Pahalgam. The subsequent Indian political and military action against Pakistan has highlighted what the political leadership is calling the 'new normal', signalling that tolerance has its limits. Both these indicated a changed environment at the Shangri-La Dialogue, especially as they implied certain defining shifts. First, the very definition of the term 'cold war' and how this period will be different from the earlier cold war. Second, the Trump administration's impact on the wider Indo-Pacific and what it expects from the region vis-á-vis the US-China rivalry. Third, the choices for ASEAN states, particularly in light of the extending US-China rivalry. And finally, how this affects the role India plays within multilateral forums and how India's definition of the new normal affects the region. First, the reference to a new cold war is not new. Even during the first Trump term, a National Security Strategy paper released by the administration in November 2017 clearly reiterated that the foremost threats to American interests and leadership in the global order were from China and Russia, articulating the tensions at systemic levels.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump breaks silence on Putin after biggest Ukraine attack with 'he is hit...'
U.S. President Donald Trump broke his silence following the largest Ukrainian attack on Russian forces to date, declaring, 'Putin got hit hard, I don't think he is playing games.' Trump's remarks come after Ukraine's unprecedented drone and missile strikes devastated multiple Russian airbases. Speaking to reporters, Trump suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered a major setback and warned that the Russian leader is likely to respond seriously rather than escalate with mere posturing. Watch for more
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
The free filing IRS software TurboTax wanted to kill is now open source for all Americans
Why is Direct File under threat from Intuit and Donald Trump's new bill? What does it mean that the IRS open sourced Direct File's code? Live Events Who are the former IRS developers now shaping the future of tax filing? Why is the fight over free tax software such a big deal for Americans? What happens next for Direct File and taxpayers? FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The IRS just made a major move to protect its free tax filing software—Direct File—by releasing most of its code publicly on GitHub. This decision comes at a crucial moment. As pressure mounts from Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, and political threats from Donald Trump's budget bill, the future of free, government-backed tax filing could be in real move to open source the code not only gives developers a peek into how the IRS built a modern, user-friendly filing tool—it's also a clear message: the work will live on, even if Washington politics try to shut it Direct File program, developed by teams from the US Digital Service (USDS) and 18F, was part of a pilot launched by the IRS in 2024. About 300,000 Americans used the tool, and according to Federal News Network, users gave it rave reviews for being free, fast, and simple. The idea was straightforward—make tax filing easy and accessible, directly through the not everyone is happy about this. Companies like Intuit, whose TurboTax software dominates the paid tax prep market, have lobbied heavily against Direct File. Now, Trump's budget reconciliation bill includes language that could shut down Direct File entirely. According to policy experts, ending the program 'is a gift to the tax-prep industry that will cost taxpayers time and money.'On GitHub, the IRS released much of the source code that powers Direct File. This is a big deal for transparency, accountability, and future development. It means anyone—from independent developers to watchdog groups—can now examine, improve, or even build upon the free move is especially significant because many believe the program is at risk of being dismantled for political reasons. By putting the code in the public domain, the IRS is essentially giving the project a second life—even if the federal government walks core developers of Direct File—Chris Given, Jen Thomas, and Merici Vinton—have left their government roles. They've now joined the Economic Security Project's 'Future of Tax Filing Fellowship,' an initiative dedicated to exploring better ways for Americans to file taxes without paying high not alone. Gabriel Zucker, who helped build Direct File while working at Code for America, is also joining the fellowship. Their goal? Find new, more efficient, and less expensive models of tax filing—keeping the spirit of Direct File alive in the private years, the IRS Free File program—offering no-cost filing options for low- and moderate-income Americans—has been plagued by private sector interference. Intuit and other companies have pushed hard to keep the government from creating a fully free and easy system, because it would directly threaten their like Direct File show that a simple, free tax filing solution can work. And not only that—it's popular. With over 300,000 users in its pilot year and overwhelmingly positive feedback, the public appetite for such a service is as corporate lobbying ramps up and Trump's bill threatens its existence, it's a reminder of how political power can override public benefit—unless the public speaks now, the fate of Direct File rests in the hands of Congress and policymakers. If the Trump-backed bill passes as written, the program could be killed despite its success. However, by releasing the code to the public and rallying around the cause of free tax tools, developers and citizens are making it harder to erase the program the fellowship led by Given, Thomas, Vinton, and Zucker is pushing forward. They're building something new—maybe even better—by applying the lessons learned from Direct short, this isn't just a tech story—it's a fight over who controls tax filing in America: the people or the a free IRS tax filing tool that helps Americans file their taxes easily without using paid services like it threatens their profits by offering a government-backed free tax filing option for the public.
