logo
Bukele's El Salvador: Popularity, power, and the price of security

Bukele's El Salvador: Popularity, power, and the price of security

France 242 days ago

Nayib Bukele came to power in El Salvador in 2019, winning outright in the first round of presidential elections. Since then, he has steadily consolidated his control. Bukele's party has dominated the National Assembly since 2021. In 2022, he declared a state of emergency, which remains in effect to this day. He also pressured the Supreme Court to allow him to run for a second term – previously prohibited by the Constitution. Despite concerns over his human rights record, Bukele enjoys overwhelming popularity, with polls showing over 80 percent approval. Since the start of the state of emergency, more than 400 inmates have died in jail. This year, he began constructing a new mega-prison to house hundreds of illegal migrants deported by the United States and labelled terrorists. Six years into his presidency, FRANCE 24 takes a look at the Bukele phenomenon. Laurence Cuvillier and Matthieu Comin report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court lets Trump resume controversial deportations to third countries
US Supreme Court lets Trump resume controversial deportations to third countries

France 24

time3 hours ago

  • France 24

US Supreme Court lets Trump resume controversial deportations to third countries

A divided US Supreme Court paved the way on Monday for the Trump administration to resume deportations of undocumented migrants to countries that are not their own. The unsigned order from the conservative-dominated top court came in response to an emergency appeal by the Justice Department to lift a stay imposed by a lower court on so-called third country deportations. The Supreme Court did not provide an explanation for the decision and the three liberal justices dissented. The original case challenging the third country deportations will now be heard by an appeals court but the Supreme Court's move allows the removals to proceed for now. District Judge Brian Murphy had ordered a halt to third country deportations in April, saying migrants were not being given a "meaningful opportunity" to contest their expulsions. Murphy said they should get at least 15 days to challenge their deportation and provide evidence of whether they may be at risk of torture or death if expelled. The original case involves the deportation of eight men -- two from Myanmar, two from Cuba, a Vietnamese man, a Laotian, a Mexican and one from South Sudan -- who the US authorities said were convicted violent criminals. They were being flown to impoverished war-torn South Sudan when Murphy's order came down and have been held since at a US military base in Djibouti. The Trump administration has defended the third country deportations as necessary since the home nations of some of those who are targeted for removal often refuse to accept them. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, author of the dissent, accused the administration of "flagrantly unlawful conduct" that is "exposing thousands to the risk of torture or death." "The government has made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law, free to deport anyone anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be heard," Sotomayor said. - 'Fire up the deportation planes' - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) welcomed the Supreme Court move as a "victory for the safety and security of the American people." "If these activists judges had their way, aliens who are so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won't take them back, including convicted murderers, child rapists and drug traffickers, would walk free on American streets," DHS said in a post on X. "DHS can now execute its lawful authority and remove illegal aliens to a country willing to accept them," it said. "Fire up the deportation planes." Donald Trump campaigned for president promising to expel millions of undocumented migrants from the US, and he has taken a number of actions aimed at speeding up deportations since returning to the White House in January. But his mass deportation efforts have been thwarted or stalled by numerous courts, including the Supreme Court, over concerns that migrant rights to due process are being ignored. Murphy, an appointee of Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, also temporarily blocked the government from expelling Asian migrants to Libya.

Fabricated Trump Truth Social post seized upon by ousted S. Korean president's supporters
Fabricated Trump Truth Social post seized upon by ousted S. Korean president's supporters

AFP

time5 hours ago

  • AFP

Fabricated Trump Truth Social post seized upon by ousted S. Korean president's supporters

"Martial law is a rebellion? A comedy sound. Martial law and rebellion mean the opposite," reads the purported Truth Social post by US President Donald Trump, which was shared as a screenshot on Facebook on June 22, 2025. The Korean-language Facebook post says this was the first time the US leader had mentioned ousted South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol's imposition of martial law on December link). Then-US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell said at the time -- weeks before Trump was sworn in for a second term in office -- that Washington was "deeply surprised" and Yoon had "badly misjudged" the decision (archived link). Yoon's suspension of civilian rule, which was lifted hours later after a unanimous vote in the National Assembly, saw him impeached and then removed from office by the Constitutional Court on April 3. "Indeed Yoon Suk Yeol was right and Yoon Again continues!" adds the Facebook post, which appears to reflect the views of the former president's supporters and uses a slogan adopted by those who believe his removal was illegitimate (archived link). Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on June 23, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same purported Truth Social post was shared in similar Korean-language Facebook, Threads and X posts as well as on South Korean forum Ilbe. Yoon's supporters have sought Trump's support in hopes that he would legitimise Yoon's martial law declaration, as both leaders have employed similar rhetoric about election fraud and alleged communist infiltration (archived here and here). "Finally President Trump is coming to the rescue of President Yoon! We always knew he would," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "Trump understands that the martial law declaration was a necessity." The Truth Social post, however, is fabricated. There have also been no official reports about Trump commenting on South Korea's domestic political situation or the December 3 declaration of martial law. Fabricated post A search for the purported post on Trump's Truth Social feed and archives of his account, captured regularly by the Internet Archive, returns no matching results. Moreover, a visual analysis of the purported post reveals inconsistencies with genuine posts on the Truth Social platform. The fabricated post lacks a timestamp and date, which normally appear in the bottom right corner of Truth Social posts. The text in the purported post also fails to align with the figure for "ReTruths" as it should in genuine posts on the platform. Image Comparison between the falsely shared image (left) and a Truth Social post from Trump's account on June 22 (right), with its alignment and timestamp highlighted in blue by AFP A visual comparison of used in the false post is also different from the font "Inter", which is used on the platform and can be previewed on Google (here and here). Image Screenshot showing differences between the text used in the fabricated post and the "Inter" font used on Truth Social The US in the days before and after June 22 -- when the fabricated post started to circulate in Korean-language social media posts -- are about the Iran-Israel conflict and US domestic politics (archived here, here and here). AFP previously debunked multiple doctored images suggesting Trump had extended support to Yoon following his botched declaration of martial law.

Pro-Palestinian protest leader details 104 days spent in US custody
Pro-Palestinian protest leader details 104 days spent in US custody

France 24

time5 hours ago

  • France 24

Pro-Palestinian protest leader details 104 days spent in US custody

"I shared a dorm with over 70 men, absolutely no privacy, lights on all the time," the 30-year-old said Sunday on the steps of Columbia University, where he was a graduate student. Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to an American citizen and has a US-born son, had been in custody since March facing potential removal proceedings. He was freed from a federal immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana on Friday, hours after a judge ordered his release on bail. The activist was a figurehead of student protests at Columbia University against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, and the administration of Donald Trump labeled him a national security threat. "It's so normal in detention to see men cry," Khalil recalled, deeming the situation "horrendous" and "a stain on the US Constitution." "I spent my days listening to one tragic story after another: listening to a father of four whose wife is battling cancer, and he's in detention," Khalil detailed in his first protest appearance since regaining his freedom. "I listened to a story of an individual who has been in the United States for over 20 years, all his children are American, yet he's deported." The circumstances of the detention were tough, Khalil described, and he took solace where he could find it to gain the strength to carry on. 'We will win' "It is often hard to find patience in ICE detention," Khalil said. "The center is crowded with hundreds of people who are told that their existence is illegal, and not one of us knows when we can go free. "At those moments, it was remembering a specific chant that gave me strength : 'I believe that we will win,'" he continued, to cheers from the audience. Khalil said he even scratched the phrase into his detention center bunk bed as a reminder, being the last thing he saw when he went to sleep and the first thing he read waking up in the morning. He repeats it even now, "knowing that I have won in a small way by being free today." Khalil took specific aim at the site of his speech, Columbia University, chastising the institution for saying "that they want to protect their international students, while over 100 (days) later, I haven't received a single call from this university." Khalil's wife Noor Abdalla, who gave birth to their son while her husband was held by ICE, said his "voice is stronger now than it has ever been." "One day our son will know that his father did not bow to fear. He will know that his father stood up when it was hardest, and that the world stood with him," Abdalla said. © 2025 AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store