Prince William pictured in Challenger 2 tank on visit to British troops in Estonia
The Prince of Wales has joined troops in a Challenger 2 tank as he visited UK soldiers on a NATO base less than 100 miles from the Russian border.
Prince William travelled in the commander's turret of the tank as it sped across muddy terrain at Tapa army camp in Estonia.
He watched on as soldiers from the Mercian Regiment took part in training exercises.
The Mercians, of which he is colonel-in-chief, have just started their six-month deployment in Estonia as the lead battlegroup working alongside NATO partners. With 900 British service personnel in Estonia, it is the UK's largest permanent overseas deployment.
The prince witnessed how soldiers worked to clear trenches, as smoke grenades were set off and blank rounds of gunfire rang out.
Earlier, as he oversaw the operational handover between the Royal Dragoon Guards and the Mercians, he was shown a selection of military vehicles including the Warrior, an infantry fighting vehicle, the Challenger 2 main battle tank, and the multiple launch rocket systems on the parade ground.
Later he was allowed to get behind the wheel of an Archer, a mobile artillery vehicle with a weapon range of 50km (31 miles).
Speaking to soldiers about his visit, he said: "Hopefully this provides a bit of interest for you all and what you're doing and keeps everyone on their toes."
His trip to Tapa Camp was part of a two-day visit on behalf of the UK government, with the prince deployed to show his support to Estonia, to Ukraine and the UK's commitment to NATO.
The visit has been in the planning for six months, but its timing couldn't feel more significant amid the ongoing threats from Russia, discussions of a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia, and Trump's criticisms of NATO.
0:37
Lt Col Grant Brown from 1st Battalion The Mercian Regiment, who was accompanying the prince during the field training exercise, said: "Every week there is something new going on. Our job is to reassure our allies that we are absolutely committed to freedom. And to ensure we are ready to face any threat no matter where that might come from... We are constantly out here training to ensure that we are ready."
But aside from his high-level diplomatic role, Prince William wanted to draw attention to the reality of life for those troops expected to be ready to fight at any time.
Talking to Estonian troops, one of them told him how they daily think about the close proximity of Russia, with the prince saying: "Yes it must focus the mind".
He also spent time talking to British troops about their experiences of deployment and the impact it can have on their mental health. Breaking down the stigma around mental health is a cornerstone of the Prince's official work.
British forces are deployed to Estonia and Poland under Operation Cabrit, the UK's contribution to NATO's Forward Land Forces in the two countries, providing a deterrent to Russian aggression.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
14 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
BBC will not appeal against Adams' defamation case victory
Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Fein, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Fein press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'
NBC News
30 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's balancing act on the Israel-Iran conflict: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we examine how the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran are splitting President Donald Trump's base. Plus, Kristen Welker writes that Trump's showdown with California is testing his political strength on a core issue. And Gordon Lubold answers a reader question on Trump's military parade this weekend. — Adam Wollner Israel-Iran conflict splits Trump's MAGA backers By Jonathan Allen and Henry J. Gomez As the percussion of Israeli munitions rattled Tehran on Thursday night, President Donald Trump's MAGA movement observed a rare silence — a sign, influential Republicans say, of the divide within their own party when it comes to the prospect of a war between Israel and Iran. It took Trump, who comments publicly more often than any president in recent memory, about 10 hours to put out a statement on his Truth Social platform, in which he urged Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program. The first official U.S. assessment had been issued by the White House under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name, and it emphasized that America was 'not involved' in the strikes. In the meantime, Charlie Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, polled his 5 million X followers on the question of whether America should 'get involved in Israel's war against Iran.' By Friday afternoon, the poll showed more than 350,000 votes, with an overwhelming proportion in the 'No' column. When Kirk read Rubio's statement on the strikes during a podcast Thursday night, Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist popular with the MAGA audience, interjected that it was 'not a supportive statement at all.' Earlier Thursday, before the strikes, Posobiec had warned on X that a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' And Steve Bannon, host of the 'War Room' podcast, which is influential with MAGA adherents within the administration and outside of it, steered clear of public commentary Thursday night. It all adds up to a demonstration of the quandary facing Trump as he and other elected Republicans seek safe political turf. Trump's electoral success owes in no small part to his isolationist-leaning 'America First' platform and his fierce criticism of drawn-out U.S. engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan. But Israel's latest action pits traditional Republican support for the Jewish state — and antipathy toward Iran — against the MAGA base's fear that the U.S. will be drawn into a new foreign war. And even within Trump's MAGA wing, there's a long-running split over American backing of Israel. Trump has always been on the pro-Israel side of the divide. California standoffs provide pressure test for one of Trump's top issues By Kristen Welker The ongoing protests in Los Angeles and legal standoff over President Donald Trump's decision to federalize California National Guard troops dominated the headlines this week, providing a pressure test for the president on one of his signature issues. Immigration has consistently been one of the bright spots for Trump when it comes to his poll numbers. Even as Americans soured on his handling of the economy and inflation throughout the course of his first 100 days in office, they tended to be split over his handling of immigration. It may still be too soon to gauge how Americans feel about the ramped-up immigration raids and the decision to deploy National Guard troops over Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections, since events are still unfolding. But a new Reuters-Ipsos poll released suggests some cracks may be emerging. Half of Americans surveyed said they do not approve of the president's response to protests in Los Angeles, with 35% approving and 15% saying they were unsure or did not answer. A similar share of Americans (49%) said Trump has gone too far with arrests of immigrants, while 40% did not believe he has gone too far, and 11% unsure or not answering. (The poll was conducted from June 11-12 and has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.) Around half of Americans (48%) said that the president should deploy the military 'to bring order to violent protests,' while 41% say he should not do so, and 11% were unsure or did not answer. California leaders have disputed Trump's claims that the L.A. protests were violent, saying the 'majority' have been peaceful. Surveys conducted as the Los Angeles protests were unfolding had mixed more results. A Quinnipiac University poll, which was in the field June 5-9, found majorities of registered voters disapproving of Trump's handling of deportations (56% disapprove and 40% approve) and immigration broadly (43% approve and 54% disapprove), though immigration was still one of Trump's better-testing issues. (The poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.8 points). An Economist/YouGov survey conducted June 6-9 found Americans gave Trump a net-positive rating on his handling of immigration, with 49% approving and 45% disapproving. That survey, which had a margin of error of +/- 3.5 points, also found varying levels of support for deportations, with less support for deporting those who have not committed violent crimes. And on Sunday, we'll have our own set of numbers. Steve Kornacki will join 'Meet the Press' to unpack our latest NBC News Decision Desk poll, powered by SurveyMonkey, which will look at Americans' views of the Trump presidency, including his handling of immigration and other issues. We'll also discuss the latest in Los Angeles and the future of Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. ✉️ Mailbag: How much will Trump's parade cost? Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's reader question is about this weekend's military parade in Washington, D.C. 'How much is it going to cost? Who approved spending it?' To answer that, we turned to national security reporter Gordon Lubold. Here's his response: The estimated cost for the parade was put at about $45 million by the U.S. Army, which pays for the range of things required to put it on, like transporting the slew of tanks, helicopters and vehicles as well as the roughly 7,000 soldiers brought from around the country to participate and provide support for the big event. The parade is celebrating the Army's 250th birthday, which happens to fall on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. While the parade is the centerpiece event, the Army is planning several other events, including static stations for Americans to see its many vehicles, drones and other things, areas for group workouts, a flyover and even a jump by the Army's Golden Knights demonstration parachute team, weather permitting. The estimated cost includes the $3 million it cost to install large metal plates onto some of the streets in the nation's capital to mitigate damage that the tracks of the tanks was expected to cause. The $45 million also includes a $16 million estimate to repair the streets and other damage to the city following the event, which is expected to draw as many as 200,000 or more people. In an interview with NBC News' 'Meet the Press' last month, Trump said the cost of the parade was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.'
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
ICE preparing $45bn expansion of immigration detention facilities to meet arrest quota
Immigration and Customs Enforcement is preparing for a $45 billion expansion of detention facilities to meet high arrest quotas, according to a new report. The Trump administration recently ramped up ICE quotas to 3,000 arrests per day, from 1,000. The increase in ICE raids across the country and the new places agents are targeting to find and detain immigrants in the country illegally have sparked mass protests in Los Angeles and other major cities. With the increase in arrests comes the issue of housing immigrants and, according to a Bloomberg report published Friday, Trump officials are looking to tent companies, private prison operators and disaster-relief providers for a 'massive expansion' of immigration detention facilities. Last month, ICE found 41 firms to bid for business under its planned expansion, Bloomberg reports. Of those firms, at least nine have advertised 'soft-sided' facilities, which are temporary structures previously used to help ICE process immigrants along the southern border. The $45 billion ICE would use to fund the facilities is included in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which has passed the House but still needs to be approved by the Senate and signed by the president. It's been a week since anti-ICE protests erupted in LA following immigration raids at multiple locations. At the heart of the raids is White House aide and anti-immigration hardliner Stephen Miller, according to multiple reports. In late May, Bloomberg reported, citing a person familiar with the matter, that the ICE arrest quota increase was delivered at a meeting led by Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Miller reportedly told federal agents to 'just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,' according to people familiar with the meeting who spoke to The Wall Street Journal. Instead of creating a list of immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally, Miller said agents would target Home Depots and 7-Eleven convenience stores, the Journal reported in an article published Monday. LA has been a flashpoint in the fight between the Trump administration and Americans against his mass deportation efforts. In response to the growing protests, which have mostly been peaceful, the president deployed thousands of National Guard troops and 700 Marines in the city. The move was unprecedented and sparked backlash from California officials. California Governor Gavin Newsom sued the Trump administration to stop the military deployment, and a judge ordered Trump to return control of the National Guard to Newsom. But Trump officials appealed, leading an appeals court to pause the order and set a hearing on the matter for Tuesday.
