Foreign prisoners should be deported
Once more unto the breach, dear friends: foreign criminals will be deported 'as soon as operationally possible' after their conviction. A review led by David Gauke, the former Conservative justice secretary, recommends that the law should be changed to allow ministers to speedily deport 'Foreign National Offenders' (FNOs) serving up to three years, rather than waiting until they have served half of their custodial sentences.
This sounds like an improvement on this especially egregious aspect of our broken criminal-justice system. At present, FNOs represent 12 per cent of all inmates in British prisons: a total of 10,800 prisoners, at an annual cost of £580 million. Any measure that brings down these alarming numbers is welcome. However, the review proposes that foreign criminals with longer sentences would still serve a third of their terms before deportation, while the most dangerous FNOs would only be deported after approval from the parole board.
A reason for mild scepticism about such proposals is that the human rights lawyers who dominate the legal system are disinclined to follow public opinion. Polls have long indicated that the vast majority of people want FNOs kicked out of the country as soon as possible. Yet successive governments have failed to solve the problem and the numbers keep rising.
Admittedly, the Prime Minister has lately undergone something of a Damascene conversion over immigration. It may be that the former DPP is about to reinvent himself as a hardliner on law and order. Miracles will never cease.But even if a new, draconian Sir Keir does indeed promise a crackdown on foreign criminals, the devil will be in the detail. The Gauke review suggests that deported FNOs who sneak back into the UK would be 'immediately jailed'. How easy would such a cat-and-mouse game be in practice?
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Heathrow issues fresh expansion plea after record-breaking month
Heathrow Airport is advocating for an 'open conversation' regarding expansion plans following a record-breaking month for passenger traffic. In May, the airport saw over 7.2 million passengers pass through its terminals. That was a 0.4 per cent increase from the previous year and the highest number ever recorded for the month. A Heathrow spokesperson highlighted the need for proactive planning. 'As these record numbers become the norm, it's time to start an honest conversation about the challenges this presents for an already space-constrained yet highly efficient hub,' they said. "Heathrow continues to deliver excellent service, but to sustain this performance and meet future demand, expanding capacity will be essential." The airport has previously said it will submit detailed plans for building a third runway to the Government in the summer. Chancellor Rachel Reeves used a speech on growth in January to give her support to the project, which has been repeatedly delayed over several decades because of environmental concerns. Ms Reeves said it would potentially create 100,000 jobs. However, Labour transport committee chair Ruth Cadbury, London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan and party donor Dale Vince have all criticised her decision. Sir Sadiq said he remains opposed to the plan because of the 'severe impact it will have on noise, air pollution and meeting our climate change targets'. In February, Heathrow's chief executive Thomas Woldbye announced a multi-billion pound investment to expand terminals 2 and 5, reconfigure the layout of the airfield, and improve bus and coach connections. He said the UK 'risks losing its status as a global trading hub' if the airport does not grow. The third runway is 'critical for the country's future economic success', Mr Woldbye said. 'Heathrow is proud to answer the chancellor's call to get Britain building. 'This is vital investment and will ensure Heathrow remains globally competitive and a jewel in the country's crown.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Richard Desmond attacks £70m Lottery handout to Czech billionaire
Richard Desmond has launched a fresh legal claim against the Gambling Commission over a £70m handout granted to the National Lottery. The media mogul alleges that funds set aside for charitable donations under Camelot, the lottery's previous operator, constitute a 'subsidy' and should therefore be recovered from Allwyn, the current operator. The claim, lodged at the Competition Appeal Tribunal, represents an escalation of an increasingly bitter battle between Mr Desmond and the gambling regulator since he lost out to Allwyn in his bid to secure the fourth National Lottery licence. Allwyn, controlled by Czech billionaire Karel Komarek, subsequently acquired Camelot after it gained control of the lottery. However, Allwyn's ownership has so far been beset by problems owing to a botched IT upgrade. Mr Desmond's Northern and Shell group, which owns the Health Lottery, claims that the Gambling Commission allowed Camelot, once it was under Allwyn's control, to take £70.21m from the National Lottery Distribution Fund to help bankroll marketing activities. 'The decision had the effect of granting to Camelot financial assistance which conferred an economic advantage, on the grounds that the subsidy provided Camelot with resources to market and promote the National Lottery,' court papers filed by Northern and Shell said. This, in turn, bolstered 'the National Lottery's competitive position in the relevant markets, to the ultimate benefit of Camelot and Allwyn'. The National Lottery Distribution Fund is a pot that essentially collects the proceeds of the National Lottery not paid out as prizes and hands them out to so-called 'good causes'. A source close to Mr Desmond described the £70m payment as money that could have helped fund British Olympic athletes or other major UK charities. Northern and Shell's latest lawsuit comes amid an acrimonious fallout set to be settled in the High Court later this year. Mr Desmond has launched a separate £1.3bn claim against the regulator for failing to award him the fourth National Lottery licence, as he claims the bidding process for the 10-year contract was unfair. The dispute was thrown into chaos earlier this year after the Gambling Commission's lawyers accidentally sent thousands of confidential documents to Mr Desmond's legal team. A judge recently ruled that Northern and Shell could rely on the majority of the material in court. Mr Desmond has since been forced to deny accusations that he cannot afford to fight the case. Earlier this month, the Gambling Commission and Allwyn told a judge that his companies cannot afford the legal costs associated with the case, a claim that Northern and Shell has vigorously denied. Sa'ad Hossain KC, representing Northern and Shell, stressed that the company had 'sufficient funds'. Lawyers acting for Allwyn told the court that Northern and Shell would be liable for at least £55m in legal costs if it lost the case. The Gambling Commission was contacted for comment. An Allwyn spokesman said: 'This is a legal dispute brought by Richard Desmond's Northern and Shell group against the Gambling Commission only. No proceedings have been brought by the Northern and Shell group against Allwyn or Camelot.' Mr Desmond declined to comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Spending review - live: Rachel Reeves expected to unveil more funding for schools, NHS and defence
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is set to unveil the UK government's spending review today, which sets the budgets for all government departments over the next few years. The review will confirm how much of taxpayers' money will be spent on the NHS and other public services used by millions. It will also set out how much cash the government plans to invest in projects like new public transport schemes. She is expected to: Place a £39bn affordable homes plan at the centre of the review Give the NHS a 2.8% real-terms rise in annual day-to-day spending over three years Announce increases in spending on defence and schools Pledge £11.5bn of new state funding for the Sizewell C nuclear project in Suffolk, taking the total taxpayer investment in the site to £17.8bn Reinstate winter fuel payments for pensioners, in a major policy U-turn by the UK treasury Extend the £3 bus fare cap until March 2027 Give £15.6bn for public transport projects in England's city regions and £445m for upgrades to Welsh railways The spending review will be delivered by Reeves later today. She will make the announcement at around 12h30 BST, after prime minister's questions. Follow along for live updates throughout the day: The Chancellor has already announced some £15.6bn of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7bn for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education. Although Reeves is reported to have agreed to an above-inflation increase in the policing budget, this is thought to have come at the expense of cuts in other parts of Home Office spending. And sources close to London Mayor Sadiq Khan have expressed concern that the spending review will have nothing for the capital. Ahead of the spending review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. The chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' Rachel Reeves will vow to 'invest in Britain's renewal' as she reveals her spending plans for the coming years on Wednesday. The chancellor is expected to announce big increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools as part of a spending review set to include £113bn of investment thanks to looser borrowing rules. She will also reveal changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern which projects receive investment in an effort to boost spending outside London and the South East. Arguing that this investment is 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' after the October budget, Reeves is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'. She will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' Among the other announcements expected at the spending review is £39bn for affordable homes over the next 10 years as the government seeks to meet its promise of building 1.5 million homes by the next Chancellor has already announced some £15.6bn of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7bn for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education. Although Reeves is reported to have agreed to an above-inflation increase in the policing budget, this is thought to have come at the expense of cuts in other parts of Home Office spending. And sources close to London Mayor Sadiq Khan have expressed concern that the spending review will have nothing for the capital. Ahead of the spending review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. The chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' Rachel Reeves will vow to 'invest in Britain's renewal' as she reveals her spending plans for the coming years on Wednesday. The chancellor is expected to announce big increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools as part of a spending review set to include £113bn of investment thanks to looser borrowing rules. She will also reveal changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern which projects receive investment in an effort to boost spending outside London and the South East. Arguing that this investment is 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' after the October budget, Reeves is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'. She will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' Among the other announcements expected at the spending review is £39bn for affordable homes over the next 10 years as the government seeks to meet its promise of building 1.5 million homes by the next election. Sign in to access your portfolio
