logo
Jetstar Asia flights between Singapore and Broome to end on July 29 to make way for Qantas airbus

Jetstar Asia flights between Singapore and Broome to end on July 29 to make way for Qantas airbus

The burgeoning Kimberley tourism industry is set to be collateral damage in Qantas' scrapping of its Singapore-based offshoot Jetstar Asia.
Jetstar Asia flights between Singapore and Broome will end on July 29 as Qantas brings 13 Airbus A320 aircraft jets back to Australia to use on its highly profitable domestic and trans-Tasman operations.
Tourism Council WA chief executive said Evan Hall, said the closure of the twice-weekly Singapore to Broome return service in the middle of the peak season would hit Kimberley providers hard.
'The tour operators now have major holes in their bookings,' Mr Hall said.
He said the flights between Singapore and Broome were no different to other WA services in mostly carrying locals.
But on Wednesday, Premier Roger Cook held out the prospect of the State Government helping revive the dry season Broome to Singapore service, which started last year.
Mr Cook said the State Government would work with Broome Airport and Qantas to 'see how we can restore those direct aviation links'.
It is understood options for the Broome to Singapore are being considered by the aviation division at Tourism WA, which oversees funding for routes and services that can build high-value tourist traffic in the State.
Qantas and Jetstar Australian management have so far rejected taking over the Broome to Singapore flights, which they claimed had been barely half-full since commencing last year.
Unveiling the Jetstar Asia closure on Wednesday morning, Qantas claimed in public statements it only impacted intra-Asia routes operated by the airline.
But Qantas had privately warned State officials that the twice-weekly flights between Broome and Singapore would be caught up in the closure of Jetstar Asia, which is 51 per cent owned by Singapore businessman Dennis Choo.
It also tried to play down the potential impact on the Kimberley industry by reporting that most passengers on the Broome to Singapore flight were from the WA local area.
Mr Hall said the flights between Singapore and Broome were regularly used by WA residents, and they also carried the 'jewel' of international visitors.
Mr Hall said the route was attractive to high-value, respectful Singaporean and European tourists.
'They're the ones that want to do an Aboriginal tourism experience,' he said.
'They will tour the Kimberley and they will buy pearls.'
He said the route needed more than the one full tourism season and a half season provided by Jetstar Asia to develop.
Mr Cook said service was not 'hugely patronised' by international passengers but had provided economic activity to assist the Broome economy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence experts warn Australia's armed forces 'languishing', short on firepower due to 'deeply inadequate' military spending
Defence experts warn Australia's armed forces 'languishing', short on firepower due to 'deeply inadequate' military spending

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Defence experts warn Australia's armed forces 'languishing', short on firepower due to 'deeply inadequate' military spending

Australia's defence force is weaker than it was before East Timor, is under armoured and short of firepower according to stinging analysis by two of the nation's leading defence experts. With the Prime Minister heading to the G7 in Canada, defence analyst Peter Jennings and Retired Chief of Army, Peter Leahy have both given their thoughts on the AFD and how it stacks up. A break down by Sky News of regional power players also lays out Australia's fragile capabilities despite numerous governments talking up potency, reliability and acquisitions. 'We are in a very dangerous strategic situation now,' said Peter Jennings, from Strategic Analysis Australia. It's a sentiment shared by Retired Lieutenant General, Peter Leahy. 'In the case of the Australian Army I was the Chief from 2002 to 2008. If I look at the army now it is smaller than what it was then. It's not as capable. It has less armoured protection and recruiting is really quite difficult,' said the former Chief. A former senior naval officer who wished to remain anonymous affirmed the Royal Australian Navy was down on the missile firepower it had 30 years ago – leaving it short of ships and under-gunned. With Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Europe rearming and the Chinese Communist Party intent on achieving hegemony in the region, armouries are growing, and defence budgets are being stretched. This year the United States intends to spend (in Australian dollars) $1.56 trillion on defence. China stated spend is $375-billion although its estimated to more accurately be around $620 billion. It's acquired three aircraft carriers and the world's second largest air force in a little over decade. It's also expanding its nuclear arsenal and is amassing a bespoke fleet to potentially take the democratically governed islands of Taiwan. Japan continues to ramp up its own defence spending, reportedly up nearly ten per-cent year on year to $105-billion. The sum is equal to one-point-eight percent of its GDP. Australia will spend $59 billion. It's roughly two per-cent of GDP with an intention to reach two-point-four per cent by 2034. 'We are facing some difficult times,' said Peter Jennings. 'Up against that level of risk, our defence spending is deeply inadequate… We are just a tiny shade over two per-cent of GDP and you know, that I think was a peace time level spend.' When it comes to combat airpower – fighters, bombers and long-range armed drones, America's force numbers around 3,276. China's air fleet is estimated to be around 2750. It remains highly secretive around the number of long-range drones capable of inflicting damage. Japan's defence force numbers 258. Indonesia's strike force is 116. Australia's modest but capable strike force numbers 108. The Department of Defence was specifically asked how many long-range armed drones Australia has acquired, but in its answer, didn't identify any. It's concerning considering the state of the Royal Australian Navy, which critics believe lags a decade behind in acquisition. Australia operates on a 'three to one' rotation policy meaning its force needs to be divided by three. Consequently, it aims to have two submarines, one destroyer and two frigates available for deployment. Although Australia's two resupply ships are both currently out of action tethering the navy even closer to shore. When it comes to soldiers and marines, China's fighting force numbers more than a million. Indonesia stands around 300,000. Australia's active duty force has shrunken to 28,500. 'The ADF is a professional organisation, sadly I think it's languishing,' said Peter Leahy. 'There's a really solid debate that says we need to spend more money on defence and I agree entirely. But I agree with the Prime Minister and others that it's not just a sum we need to spend, we need to be careful about what we want. How we acquire and how we introduce it into services. 'Everybody is saying it's the most catastrophic circumstances since before the second world war (and) we need to do something …. Action is required.' The former Army Chief dismissed the notion Australians should be scared. 'I don't think there's any reason to be scared …. (but) the public need to be concerned that people are thinking about this.' Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese has publicly sidestepped – if not rebuffed - America's request for Australia to urgently increase the nation's defence spending to three-point-five per cent of GDP, saying 'I think that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence. As simple as that.' 'It's very clear that the Americans think our defence spend is deeply inadequate,' said Peter Jennings. '(US Defense Secretary) Pete Hegseth in Singapore said we should lift it from two per- cent to three-and-a-half per cent. That's a massive increase … So, I think the signal, not particularly coded from the United States is we need to do a lot better.' Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison recently told this reporter, 'We've got to be looking at three per cent. We should be at two-and-a-half per cent as quickly as possible. You know, I'd be saying three-per cent by 2030 … and it's not like we haven't been there before.' Though, it's always easier to talk about where defence spending should be than decide where taxes should increase or what must be cut. In the Second World War Australia's defence spend climbed towards 35 per cent of GDP. It's nothing if not an indication of the financial cost of conflict when diplomacy fails. When it came to opposition, Peter Jennings rebuffed suggestion the outcry amounted to warmongering. 'With the biggest war in Europe since the Second World War, with the Middle East in flame, with China not hiding the fact that it's becoming increasingly aggressive to all of its neighbours, circumnavigating Australia with some of its best military equipment. How could anyone think we are in a benign period and we don't have to worry about these developments,' he said. 'Il's plain for all to see, it's not like you need to have some special security clearance to understand what's going on. We can't afford to be in denial about it,' he said.

Why James Cummings picked Hong Kong over ‘bricks and mortar' of Leilani Lodge
Why James Cummings picked Hong Kong over ‘bricks and mortar' of Leilani Lodge

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Why James Cummings picked Hong Kong over ‘bricks and mortar' of Leilani Lodge

James Cummings said people and his passion for training, not the 'bricks and mortar' of his family's Randwick stables at Leilani Lodge, were key factors in his decision to accept a contract with the Hong Kong Jockey Club from September next year. Cummings' deal to join the famed racing district was announced on Wednesday, ending speculation about the 52-time group 1-winning trainer's future. The 37-year-old, the grandson of Melbourne Cup king Bart Cummings, was due to finish as Godolphin's head trainer on July 31 after the racing powerhouse's decision to move away from a private training model. Returning to the public ranks, Cummings was then set to face a battle with Ciaron Maher and the Gai Waterhouse-Adrian Bott team to take over the 55-box stables of Leilani Lodge. Cummings' father, Anthony, was forced out of the stables in February after having his trainer's licence revoked because of his financial troubles. The Cummings family has occupied the stables since Bart established them in the early 1980s. The Australian Turf club has not announced a new tenant, but Maher, the nation's leading trainer, looks certain to get the nod after Cummings' withdrawal. Cummings said his decision to move to Hong Kong came without knowledge about who was getting Leilani Lodge. 'The ATC were very patient, and I respect the position they were in, and the decision hadn't been made at all. I never got that sense,' Cummings said. 'I wanted to know all the information that was on the table there, and I got to that position.' He said the potential to train out of Leilani Lodge again had been tempting but the need to provide clarity for staff and clients, given his chance in Hong Kong, was more important.

The country with the world's most confusing currency
The country with the world's most confusing currency

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The country with the world's most confusing currency

Let's talk exchange rates. First, there's an official exchange rate in Argentina, the sort of exchange rate you're used to. If you use Google as your currency converter – searching, say, '1 AUD in Argentinian pesos' – you will get this official exchange rate, which is the one quoted above, $1 to 768 pesos. If you withdraw cash from an ATM in Argentina, that withdrawal will be calculated using this official exchange rate. So far, so normal. Then, however, there's the credit card exchange rate. If you pay electronically in Argentina, using your credit or debit card, that payment will be calculated at a different exchange rate to the official rate, one that's advantageous to foreign visitors, who are being discouraged from using cash (which is in short supply in Argentina). For example, I ate a meal at a Buenos Aires parrilla recently, and the bill came to 73,500 pesos. If I had paid that in cash that I had withdrawn from an ATM, the meal, at the time, would have cost me about $A122. Instead, I used a Visa debit card, and the meal came to about $A101. So, you use your cards as much as possible, right? Yes, except there's a third exchange rate, known as the 'Blue Dollar'. Argentinians, understandably, are keen to convert their pesos into stable American dollars, which means those hard-currency American bucks are highly sought after. Loading So, if you exchange American dollars in cash for Argentinian pesos, you will get the Blue Dollar rate, which is much better than the official exchange rate, and slightly better than the credit card rate. (You'll also get a better rate for exchanging $US100 bills than you will smaller notes.) That meal of mine at the Buenos Aires parrilla, spending pesos exchanged for American dollars, would have cost me about $A96. Blue Dollar exchanges can be done at unofficial exchange 'cambio' shops often found in tourist-heavy areas of Buenos Aires and other major cities. This Blue Dollar market is tolerated, if not exactly legal. The question then is, what should visitors to Argentina do for money? Loading First piece of advice: don't rely on local ATMs to withdraw cash. That's not just because you will get the worst exchange rate, but because Argentinian ATMs have very low withdrawal limits, and high fees, making this way of sourcing cash highly unattractive. There's a problem with the Blue Dollar rate too, for Australians at least, and that's that you will need to buy those US dollars in the first place. Plenty of Australian exchange outlets, particularly at airports, offer terrible exchange rates on top of charging commissions, which means you're not going to be saving much, if anything, by getting the Blue Dollar rate in Argentina. The sweet spot for Australian travellers is to rely mostly on credit and debit card payments, which are widely accepted in Argentina, and to take a small amount of US dollars – say, $US100 per person per week – to exchange on the Blue Dollar market and use for cash-only payments such as tips in restaurants and taxis (though Uber is also available in large cities). Bear in mind, too, that any pesos you have leftover at the end of your trip will be worthless outside Argentina, and impossible to exchange, so don't change large amounts of money you can't spend. It almost makes you long for travellers' cheques.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store