logo
MPs demand Government not to weaken ‘Hillsborough Law' when bill is passed

MPs demand Government not to weaken ‘Hillsborough Law' when bill is passed

ITV News21 hours ago

MPs have urged the Government not to weaken a law designed to prevent cover-ups in the wake of major disasters, as they call for the "Hillsborough Law" to be passed as soon as possible.
Labour MP Clive Efford warned Commons Leader and Manchester Central MP Lucy Powell that the Public Authorities Accountability Bill, which will include the 'Hillsborough Law', should not be changed under pressure from Whitehall.
Mr Efford asked for it to be passed before the end of July.
Meanwhile his party colleague Liverpool and West Derby MP Ian Byrne asked for the Bill to be 'worthy of the name'.
The proposed law would require public bodies to have a duty of candour, meaning they would need to co-operate with official inquiries and tell the truth in the aftermath of major disasters – or face criminal sanctions.
A previous deadline set by Labour, that the Bill would be passed before the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster in April, has been missed.
The Government had said it needed more time to finalise the Bill.
A draft Bill has been criticised by campaigners, including the Hillsborough Law Now group, for not containing pledges previously made – including the duty of candour.
In March it was reported that a meeting between Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and campaigners had been cancelled, with claims officials were attempting to have the contents of the Bill watered down.
Mr Byrne told the Commons: 'The Prime Minister promised my city and all those affected by state cover-ups that the Hillsborough Law would be introduced before April 15 of this year – the 36th anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster.
'Almost two months have passed since the Prime Minister missed that deadline.
'This is particularly disappointing, since there is a draft Hillsborough Law ready to go, written by legal experts, endorsed by survivors, families, campaigners and proposed in Parliament by Andy Burnham.'
The Liverpool West Derby MP added that 'a failure to introduce a Hillsborough Law worthy of the name will be seen as a continuation of the betrayal of families and survivors of Hillsborough and all those affected by state cover-ups'.
Lucy Powell said the Government was 'working at pace' and was co-operating with families and their representatives.
She said: 'At these times, we always remember those affected by the Hillsborough disaster but particularly the plight that they have faced ever since to fight for justice and fight for accountability.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Couple backed lose legal fight over winter fuel payment
Couple backed lose legal fight over winter fuel payment

The Herald Scotland

time32 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Couple backed lose legal fight over winter fuel payment

They also claim the decision to end the benefit for thousands of pensioners across the country last year was "irrational", breached their human rights and wanted the Court of Session in Edinburgh to set aside the policy and restore the payment as part of a judicial review. However, in a ruling published today Lady Hood refused their petition for a judicial review on all grounds. READ MORE: Health secretary Neil Gray faces fresh questions over 'limogate' controversy Police Scotland send 80 officers to Northern Ireland as riots spread SNP ministers reject proposal for major tax rise on second homes in tourist hotspots She found that neither of the UK or Scottish Governments had failed to exercise their duties under the Equality Act 2010 and that also that neither was under a duty to consult. The judge also held that the decisions were neither irrational nor unreasonable and did not breach the Human Rights Act 1998. She concluded: 'I shall therefore repel the petitioners' first to eighth pleas‑in‑law, and refuse the petition. The question of the appropriate remedies, had I found in the petitioners' favour therefore does not arise. I shall reserve all questions of expenses.' She also stated: 'This case is not a verdict, nor even an expression of opinion, on the merits or demerits of government policy as debated in the public arena. "Instead, the current proceedings were brought by the petitioners to test a much narrower question: namely, whether the policy decisions of each of the respondents (and the legislation which brought those policies into effect) are unlawful, and so liable to be struck down by the courts.' Earlier this week, the UK government abandoned plans to withdraw the payments from all but the poorest pensioners after the scheme drew widespread criticism. It was announced that all pensioners on annual incomes under £35,000 would receive £200 a year with over 80s receiving £300. The Scottish Government had already launched its own winter fuel benefit in response to the original cuts which included extra support for those less well-off, but also a universal payment which is unaffected by income. The couple's lawyers the Govan Law Centre said they have no doubt the Fanning's litigation had been influential in securing U-turns by both governments. A spokesperson from the Govan Law Centre told BBC Scotland News: "While our clients have lost their case at first instance, we have no doubt that this litigation has been influential in securing the partial U-turn made by the Scottish government last November and the major policy U-turn confirmed by the UK government earlier this week. "We hope that the Scottish Government will now follow suit and restore the winter fuel payment in full for people such as our clients." The Govan Law Centre added the legal challenge "was always one of process" and the fact the UK Government has already reconsidered the cuts "vindicates" their clients. It said that an appeal would have "reasonable prospects of success" but added it is unlikely that legal aid would be provided for this. About 10 million pensioners in England and Wales lost their allowance under new measures announced by chancellor Rachel Reeves in July last year. Those on pension credit or certain other means-tested benefits retained the annual payments, worth between £100 and £300. In Scotland, the payment was devolved to Holyrood in April 2024, but the Scottish Government followed the actions of their counterparts in Westminster in terminating it in August 2024, arguing £160m had been taken from its budget. A new alternative, called the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment (PAWHP), was due to be introduced the following month, but that has since been pushed back to winter 2025. The current plan is for all pensioner households in Scotland to receive at least £100 regardless of income, while those on pension credit will receive up to £305 depending on age. Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said the universal approach of the devolved Scottish scheme was important - but that wealthier pensioners would be made aware that they could opt out.

Badenoch says Tories will 'offer a new way of doing things at Holyrood election'
Badenoch says Tories will 'offer a new way of doing things at Holyrood election'

STV News

time33 minutes ago

  • STV News

Badenoch says Tories will 'offer a new way of doing things at Holyrood election'

Kemi Badenoch says her party will put forward a 'different way of doing things' at next year's Holyrood election. Speaking at her first Scottish conference as Conservative party leader, Badenoch also warned Scots that Nigel Farage's Reform will 'let the SNP in'. 'The Conservative party is under new leadership and we'll once again represent everyone across Scotland and the UK who believe the same things we do,' Badenoch said. 'Only our party will bring down bills and give people control of their hard-earned money. 'At next year's [Holyrood] election, Russell Findlay will put forward a different way of doing things.' Findlay said both he and Badenoch were 'realistic' about the challenges they face, but also 'optimistic' that the Tories can win back public trust. Getty Images Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch is congratulated by Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay after delivering a speech to the Scottish Conservative Party Conference at Murrayfield Stadium. Getty Images Badenoch also told the conference she would be 'standing up for our oil and gas'. Although the UK windfall tax was originally introduced by the previous Conservative government, Badenoch said it was a 'good example of what we got wrong' – then added the current Labour administration at Westminster has 'doubled down' on the mistake. She said Labour has extended the tax, claiming it is 'killing the oil and gas industry'. If the measure remains in place until 2030 as intended, Badenoch said 'there will be no industry left to tax'. She promised that a Conservative government under her leadership would end the UK windfall tax and lift the ban on new oil licences. She said: 'The strikes overnight in the Middle East remind us of how vital it is that we can rely on our own energy security, our own natural resources.' Under her leadership, Badenoch said a Conservative government would also scrap the family farms tax to 'ensure we keep British food on British plates'. Hitting out at Reform – which claimed on Friday to now have 11,000 members in Scotland – Badenoch said for Farage's party, the union between Scotland and England is 'just not that important'. In contrast, Badenoch stressed the Conservatives will 'always be proud' of the union. 'Reform will vote to let the SNP in, Conservatives will only ever vote to get the nationalists out,' she said. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

'Rachel Reeves needs to go back to school - her spending review doesn't add up'
'Rachel Reeves needs to go back to school - her spending review doesn't add up'

Daily Mirror

time33 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Rachel Reeves needs to go back to school - her spending review doesn't add up'

There are two things I learned in maths at school: the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the square on the other two sides, and how to write my name in numerals on a calculator. You may think that's not much to show for 11 years of effort in trying to put numbers into a brain that only ate words. But knowing how triangles work is a damned useful thing when looking at the world and working out where it's gone wrong. And the more I see of her, the more it looks like Rachel Reeves' triangle expertise starts and ends with knowing it'll go 'ting' if you hit it with a teaspoon. For those who read only headlines, the first Chancellor to not have the same colour hair from one day to the next has announced £113bn of investment, building back what's been destroyed, restoring people's faith in Labour, and blah de blah blah. Few headlines have reported the Tory view, but that's understandable: it's hard to hear what they say when people have their head that far up their own rancid fundament. At this point a columnist might attempt to pick apart a Chancellor's sums, perhaps quote a great economist. But to me Keynes is what you call interns from Buckinghamshire, and my calculator always seems to spell 315005. The brutal truth is she hasn't bothered with any sums. She's just drawn a lovely picture of an inexplicable future, and she might as well have told us there'd be marmalade custard and sausage ice cream too. A chancellor's spending review doesn't have the same restraints as a Budget, so she's managed to get away with the fiscal equivalent of an architect's drawing of how the town centre will look after it's pedestrianised, all springtime pavement cafes and leafy trees and children playing. But in reality, it's still West Bromwich, the business died for lack of traffic, and everyone grew up living too close to the paint factory. So when Rachel's sunny little plan says HM Revenue and Customs will save 13.1% of its budget through "AI and automation", what will happen is that even less effort will be made to go after tax dodgers, and the process of small business owners and the self-employed getting shafted annually will be commentated by a chatbot. The sort of blithely dysfunctional customer service that will leave you actually pining for a keypad options menu, and a recipe for cock-ups. Rachel said departmental budgets will grow by an average of 2.3%, aside from all those which will be cut. The NHS will get an extra £29billion, and she'll promptly take a chunk back in employer National Insurance contributions for 1.3m staff, which she'll then say she's 'reinvesting' in the NHS. Even spotting some of that cash as it whizzes around in theoretical space and time will be like trying to catch a quark in your hands in the Large Hadron Collider. Then she had the brass neck to call it "a record cash investment in our NHS, increasing real-terms, day-to-day spending by 3%". Except under Tony Blair it increased by £60bn, over the entire lifetime of the NHS it's been 4% a year, and in those days we could actually see it. No mention of dentists, not a sniff of social care. Defence spending has squeaked up merely by changing what you count as 'defence', and is already too low for what the rest of NATO wants. Disabled people rendered more disabled, and less able to work, by a programme of punishing them into work rather than giving bosses an incentive to hire them. A huge £39bn for 'affordable' housing that probably won't be, with a construction industry 250,000 people short of actually being able to build them. A u-turn on winter fuel payments because of a changed economic outlook when the economic outlook has actually got worse. And hooray, a triumph for the Mirror's campaign to extend free school meals to every family on Universal Credit. Except - have you seen a school meal recently? We're talking damp pizza, cold gravy, the cheapest of miserable chickens that even Donald Trump would feel guilty about selling to us. All this hoo-hah about how a hot meal improves learning and life chances, and nary a thought about how reheated, reformed offcuts from the cheapest bidder for the off-site catering contract can possibly qualify as food. You'd get more nutrition from licking the playground. If it weren't so far beneath her, school catering could be Michelle Mone's next big wheeze. And the asylum seekers. The ones who can't work, because that right was taken away last time Labour were in power and saw votes in naked racism. The homeless who can't have social housing, because the Tories sold it all and Angela Rayner bought as much as she could. The people who get £49 a week to feed, heat, and clothe themselves, while living in 'hotels' six to a room or detention centres crawling with cockroaches, while the owners bill the taxpayer five star rates. Well, no more hotels for them! Can it be coincidence, I wonder, that on the same day it was announced rough sleeping would be decriminalised? No need to house them, and no need to sweep them up and put them in the jails we don't have. Heaven forfend anyone'd have a good idea, like allowing them to work and pay taxes, so they could house themselves, integrate, and everyone benefits. In Rachelworld, all the asylum seekers are going to just disappear - pouf - as the world plummets headfirst into climate crisis and authoritarianism. I can't even bear to discuss the environmental unfriendliness of nuclear waste, or the carbon footprint of a modular reactor and everything that goes into it. Suffice it to say, even Swampy might be converted to burn coal instead, and by the time that idea's toxic half-life has decayed to a bearable level we won't have those pavement cafes. The one good bit of news in the spending review is that we can all rejoice, for the only way Rachel could square all this is by locating and stripping the fabled magic money tree. But all she has to show for it is promises that don't add up, and won't be enough to save her from being a convenient firee for a Prime Minister who, not long from now, will want to blame someone else for the economy that tanked for two reasons he wouldn't admit. Now class, what do you get if you triangulate all the above, and add up the squares of Brexit and employers National Insurance contributions? 707. Put that upside down in your calculator and smoke it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store