German data protection official wants Apple, Google to remove DeepSeek from the country's app stores
A German data protection official has reported Chinese AI app DeepSeek to Apple and Google, saying the app transfers users' information to China illegally.
Meike Kamp, Berlin's Commissioner for data protection and freedom of information, told the companies that DeepSeek did not provide 'convincing evidence' that users' data was protected as required by EU laws.
'Chinese authorities have far-reaching access rights to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies,' Kamp said, adding that the two tech firms must now review the report and decide whether to remove the app.
Kamp said that her office had asked DeepSeek to comply with EU laws for transferring data outside the bloc or pull its app from the country, but the Chinese company did not do so.
Italy earlier this year banned DeepSeek from app stores in the country, citing similar data protection concerns.
Notably, two key details about DeepSeek that consumer privacy advocate groups in the EU highlighted are that the service is made in and operates out of China. Per its privacy policy, this includes the information and data that DeepSeek collects and stores, which is also housed in its home country.
Apple and Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
This story was corrected to clarify that Berlin's data protection commissioner reported DeepSeek to the companies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
Germany asks Apple, Google to block Chinese AI firm DeepSeek from app stores over ‘unlawful' data transfer
A top regulator in Germany asked Google and Apple on Friday to remove Chinese AI startup DeepSeek from their app stores in their country due to data privacy concerns. Meike Kamp, Germany's data protection commissioner, said in a statement that DeepSeek's transfer of German user data to servers based in China was 'unlawful.' 'DeepSeek has not been able to provide my agency with convincing evidence that German users' data is protected in China to a level equivalent to that in the European Union,' Kamp said in a statement. DeepSeek stores data on China-based servers. AP 'Chinese authorities have far-reaching access rights to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies,' she added. Kamp advised the two Big Tech giants to review her request promptly and decide whether to ban the DeepSeek app, though her office did not set a deadline. She noted that DeepSeek had not complied with requests to meet the European Union's data privacy standards. Representatives for Apple and Google did not immediately return a request for comment. DeepSeek exploded onto the scene in January and briefly caused a major tech stock selloff after it released an AI model that it claimed to have trained at a fraction of the cost of rivals like OpenAI's ChatGPT – and without access to the most advanced computer chips. As The Post has reported, DeepSeek's own terms of service disclose that user data is stored 'in secure servers located in the People's Republic of China' – posing the same national security risk that led Congress to crack down on ByteDance-owned TikTok. The company also says it automatically collects data on personal information such as 'device model, operating system, keystroke patterns or rhythms, IP address, and system language.' DeepSeek has already faced a crackdown in both the US and Europe. REUTERS In March, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration was 'likely' to ban the DeepSeek app from government devices. Elsewhere, New York state has already instituted a ban from government devices and networks due to 'serious concerns' over data privacy and censorship risks. In Europe, Italy has blocked DeepSeek from its app stores. The Netherlands nixed it from government devices. With Post wires
The Verge
44 minutes ago
- The Verge
Google quietly introduced precise Bluetooth tracking on the Pixel Watch 3
With the Wear OS 5.1 update that was released last March, Google quietly introduced a new feature called Channel Sounding for the Pixel Watch 3 that could improve the accuracy of pinpointing the location of other devices using its existing Bluetooth hardware. But while Channel Sounding is now supported by the smartwatch, it's not yet in use because the wearable is one of the first Android devices to implement it, according to Android Authority, and you need multiple devices supporting the feature for it to work. The Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) announced the latest iteration of its wireless communication protocol in September 2024, and one of Bluetooth 6.0's most interesting upgrades has nothing to do with wireless headphones. Most Bluetooth-based trackers rely on the signal strength between two connected devices to estimate their distance, but it's frequently unreliable due to obstacles or interference. Channel Sounding instead measures the time it takes to send multiple radio signals at different frequencies between two connected devices. According to Bluetooth SIG, that approach allows for 'centimeter-level accuracy,' as well as directional awareness. Pinpointing the exact location of a tracking device like an Apple AirTag using an iPhone is easy thanks to their use of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) hardware. The wireless UWB protocol provides more accurate spatial awareness between devices, allowing apps like Apple's Find My to determine the exact distance to a tracker like an AirTag and provide directional arrows guiding you to its location. But UWB requires its own radio and antenna, which increases the hardware costs of a device. The advantage of Channel Sounding is that it uses the Bluetooth hardware that's now common in nearly every smartphone, smartwatch, and set of wireless headphones. Devices will need Bluetooth hardware that supports the new 6.0 protocol, but given the Pixel Watch 3 is nearly 10 months old at this point, there are plenty of devices available that are already compatible. We just need more companies to release software updates that add support for Bluetooth 6.0 so we can actually start taking advantage of these new features.
TechCrunch
44 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Big Tech lands an early win in legal battles against publishers
This week, two major AI companies scored early wins in court, with federal judges siding with Meta and Anthropic in separate lawsuits over how their models were trained on copyrighted material. The decisions represent the first real legal validation of AI companies' argument that training models on books, images, and other creative works can be considered 'fair use' — even if those materials weren't obtained with permission. It's a big deal for companies building generative AI, and a potential turning point for the many lawsuits still in motion. Today, on TechCrunch's Equity podcast, hosts Max Zeff and Anthony Ha were joined by Sean O'Kane (who graciously stepped in while Kirsten headed off to the Nevada desert to see the next big act of Redwood Materials, the startup founded by former Tesla CTO JB Straubel) to dive deeper into the rulings. While neither case sets a precedent yet, Anthony noted that appeals are likely, and broader challenges could ultimately shape how AI companies interact with entire industries going forward. Listen to the full episode to hear more highlights from the week, including: Kalshi's $185M round, and what it says about the rising (and legally murky) world of prediction markets The startup betting on reusable satellites, and why the Department of Defense is paying attention Tesla's robotaxi rollout in Austin, and how it stacks up against Waymo and other AV companies' approaches Equity will be back next week, so stay tuned! Equity is TechCrunch's flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and posts every Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod.
