logo
Transgender woman arrested after using bathroom at Florida state Capitol

Transgender woman arrested after using bathroom at Florida state Capitol

Boston Globe07-04-2025

Advertisement
Rheintgen said that she sent 160 letters to state representatives, the attorney general and governor to tell them when she would use the bathroom and asked that she not be arrested.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
She arrived at the bathroom on the second floor of the House office building of the Capitol in Tallahassee on March 19.
Two police officers spoke to Rheintgen outside the bathroom and told her that she would be given a trespass warning if she entered, according to an arrest report from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
The police had seen a copy of Rheintgen's letter, said the report, which used male pronouns to refer to her.
According to the report, Rheintgen told the officers, 'I am here to break the law,' and entered the bathroom. She said in an interview with The New York Times that she spent probably 30 seconds to a minute inside.
Advertisement
'I was originally intending to pray the rosary, but I didn't have enough time,' she said. 'I was just washing my hands, and they told me to leave.'
An officer followed inside and said that Rheintgen would be subject to arrest if she did not leave, and Rheintgen said, 'OK,' according to the report.
She said she spent about 24 hours in jail. If convicted, she faces up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine. Her arraignment is scheduled for May, according to court records.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement said in an email Monday that Rheintgen was arrested for 'trespass on property after warning,' not specifically for violating the state's bathroom law, the 'Safety in Private Spaces Act.'
The law, which went into effect July 1, 2023, applies to bathrooms and changing facilities in government buildings, including schools, prisons and libraries.
Representatives for Gov. Ron DeSantis, who signed the bathroom law, and the state attorney general, James Uthmeier, did not respond to requests for comment Monday.
Since 2022, five states have passed a transgender bathroom law for all government buildings, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.
In two of those states, Florida and Utah, violations can result in criminal penalties. In the three other states, Montana, South Dakota and Wyoming, the laws have civil penalties.
A district court judge in Montana blocked the state's law April 2 after a legal challenge by the ACLU.
Gillian Branstetter, a communications strategist with the ACLU, said that, to the best of the organization's knowledge, Rheintgen's arrest was the first on record under those five state laws.
Advertisement
There are 14 other states that ban transgender people from choosing their own bathroom, but those apply only to some -- not all -- government buildings and schools.
Nadine Smith, the executive director of Equality Florida, a LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, said in a statement that Rheintgen's arrest was a 'deliberate erosion of human dignity.'
'Transgender people have been using restrooms aligned with their gender for generations without incident,' Smith said. 'What's changed is not their presence -- it's a wave of laws designed to intimidate them out of public life.'
Rheintgen is from Illinois but she said she visits Florida every year to see family and was on such a trip when she engaged in her protest. She said that she did not see herself as an activist before, but she felt like she had to be one now.
In her letter to Florida representatives, she included a photo of herself because, without it, she did not think officials would be able to tell that she was the person breaking the law.
'I know that you know in your heart that transgender people are human too, and that you can't arrest us away,' Rheintgen wrote.
This article originally appeared in

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schumer says 16 Republicans have ‘discomfort' with green tax credit rollbacks
Schumer says 16 Republicans have ‘discomfort' with green tax credit rollbacks

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Schumer says 16 Republicans have ‘discomfort' with green tax credit rollbacks

Democrats are working to convince some 16 of their Republican colleagues to oppose the GOP's policy bill because of its rollbacks to climate-friendly tax credits, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday. 'We have a group…of seven or eight Democrats who are talking to their Republican colleagues…and we're getting some vibes that people realize this bill went too far and we're hoping they can all go together to [Majority Leader] John Thune and to [Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike] Crapo and say 'change it. We can't be for it the way it is,' Schumer told reporters Wednesday. 'We have a list of 16 Republican senators who have shown some discomfort with this and that's the main group we're focused on,' he added. The version of the 'big, beautiful bill' passed by Republicans makes major cuts to tax credits for climate-friendly energy sources, making it so that any project that is not already under construction within 60 days of the law's enactment is ineligible for the tax credits. This provision, among others, is expected to bar many projects from eligibility and could ultimately lead to less low-carbon energy development. At least some Republicans have publicly expressed skepticism of a rapid end to the credits with Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Curtis (R-Utah) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) warning against a 'full scale' repeal. However, House Republicans who have championed the cuts are pushing for them to stay in their current form, with members of the Freedom Caucus board recently saying it will 'not accept' changes that water down the cuts.

Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms

Associated Press

time29 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. 'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. 'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children,' Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues. ___ Associated Press Writer Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana contributed to this report

Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law
Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law

Boston Globe

time37 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law

Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement that the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion,' Hare said. 'Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports.' Advertisement The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. Advertisement 'This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes,' Hare said. 'Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case.' The appeal was filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, and was first reported by Front Office Sports. It would be heard by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store