
Californians see undocumented immigrants as essential to economy, poll finds
As President Trump launches a crackdown on unauthorized immigrants in the U.S., a new survey finds that a majority of California voters support providing social services for all low-income residents in the state, regardless of immigration status.
In contrast to the anti-immigrant rhetoric emanating from the White House, the survey of 800 California voters portrays a populace that values the contributions of immigrants, regardless of legal status, and believes their well-being is intertwined with a well-functioning state.
Californians 'understand what a vital role immigrants play in ensuring that we all have a quality of life, and they want to make sure the basic fundamental services like access to healthcare get maintained for everyone,' said Miguel Santana, president and executive officer of the California Community Foundation, which commissioned the survey in partnership with other foundations across the state.
The poll found that more than two-thirds of respondents support allowing all state residents to purchase health insurance through Covered California, regardless of immigration status. Currently, unauthorized immigrants are not eligible to buy a plan through the state's health insurance marketplace.
Nearly two-thirds of respondents, 64%, support offering food assistance to all eligible low-income families, regardless of the parents' immigration status. Currently, undocumented immigrants are not eligible for California's food stamp program, but they can apply for assistance on behalf of their U.S.-born children.
The survey also found that 57% of respondents support continuing to allow all eligible low-income residents to access medical care through Medi-Cal, the state's public health insurance program for the poor, regardless of their immigration status.
Last year, California became the first state in the nation to offer health insurance to all low-income undocumented immigrants. That expansion is being blamed, in part, for Medi-Cal costs ballooning well above the original budget estimate.
As part of the nonpartisan survey, San Francisco-based David Binder Research interviewed voters by cellphone, landline and online, in English and Spanish, between March 19 and 24. Of the respondents, 47% identified as Democrats and 28% identified as Republicans, generally reflecting the California electorate.
The research revealed that even moderate and swing voters in California see undocumented immigrants as essential to the economy, and are worried about the economic fallout from Trump's pledge to carry out mass deportations, said pollster David Binder. Participants expressed concerns that raids targeting farmworkers will drive up grocery prices and that wide-scale deportations will decimate small businesses and make it more expensive to build houses.
'They're worried that mass deportations are going to cause disruptions in their daily routine,' said Binder, whose research firm also does polling for Democratic candidates. 'They'll say, 'I'm really nervous about this, because it may end up costing me and my family.''
That sentiment underscores a broader truth in the Golden State: Immigrants are critical to the economy in California, where about 10.6 million people — or 27% of all residents — were foreign-born as of 2023. That's the highest share of any state and more than double the share in the rest of the country, according to the Public Policy Institute of California. About 1.8 million immigrants living in California — roughly 17% — were undocumented in 2022, according to the Pew Research Center.
Unauthorized immigrants accounted for an estimated 7% of the state's workforce in 2022, according to the Pew Research Center, with some sectors deeply reliant on this workforce. At least half of the estimated 255,700 farmworkers in California are undocumented, according to UC Merced Research.
The California survey struck a different tone than several national polls that have found the American public is generally supportive of the Trump administration's get-tough immigration policies. A March CBS News/YouGov poll, for example, found 58% of Americans approve of the administration's program to deport immigrants who are in the country without authorization.
The California survey, in contrast, found that about 6 in 10 voters support ensuring all Californians have access to due process, regardless of whether that person is undocumented or has criminal convictions. This could indicate that the Trump administration's efforts to frame its deportation strategy as a public safety initiative are 'falling flat' with California voters, according to the research summary.
'Instead of mass deportations, Californians want to further integrate immigrants, regardless of their legal status, into the fabric of our state,' said Tom Wong, director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Center at UC San Diego, who was not involved in the survey.
Masih Fouladi, executive director of the immigrant rights group California Immigrant Policy Center, said the survey affirms efforts that advocates are pushing in Sacramento, including increased funding for immigrant legal services and protecting access to healthcare.
'It shows that the people in California still believe in a California for all,' said Fouladi, who wasn't involved in the polling.
This article is part of The Times' equity reporting initiative, funded by the James Irvine Foundation, exploring the challenges facing low-income workers and the efforts being made to address California's economic divide.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Markets sink amid Trump and Musk tension
Markets sink amid Trump and Musk tension originally appeared on TheStreet. On June 6, the overall cryptocurrency market cap decreased by 3.42% to $3.36 trillion, with losses concentrated in large-cap cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum (-5.4%), Solana (-8.7%), and Dogecoin (-13.3%), as per Kraken. Bitcoin remained stable, down only 1.8% to $104,002, with 24-hour trading volume at more than $41.8 billion. Altcoins across the board saw weekly losses exceeding 2%, with Cardano, XRP, and BNB all suffering notable declines. However, Bitcoin had a small gain of 0.3% over the last hour. BNB saw a 0.4% gain, while Solana had a similar hourly gain of 0.7%. Cardano saw the most significant hourly gain of 1.3% on the hourly bounce. Other cryptocurrencies, such as Dogecoin and XRP, experienced hourly bounces of 0.6% and 0.1%, respectively. The overall decline is occurring alongside broader macro and political tensions, while we observe an escalating war of words between U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. After Musk condemned Trump's $1.5 trillion "Liberation Day" spending bill for a "disgusting abomination", the former allies had a bitter exchange across social media. Musk, who has recently resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency, accused Trump of being ungrateful and claimed credit for helping the GOP win the 2024 elections. Trump dismissed the drama, telling Politico, "It's going very well, never done better", although aides set up a call to reconcile. Speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, he suggested that Musk's anger stemmed from losing electric vehicle (EV) subsidies, which he believes will negatively impact Tesla. The feud has already sown uncertainty in the already jittery markets over debt risks and policy uncertainty. With crypto sentiment already teetering, analysts warn that U.S. political instability could encourage further outflows from tokens such as DOGE and ADA, which are more retail-heavy. Markets sink amid Trump and Musk tension first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Falls Amid Musk Vs Trump Feud
Tesla TSLA shares had their worst day since March, falling 14% on Thursday as the feud between Elon Musk and President Trump continues to heat up, and is making international headlines. In the aftermath of his 130-day term ending as a special government employee, Musk has publicly criticized the Trump administration's budget reconciliation bill after previously heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Despite losing favoritism in the White House, Tesla shareholders have previously called on Musk to focus his attention back on the leading EV maker amid declining sales. Underlying this is that having a CEO push a political agenda had disrupted public sentiment, with Tesla facing significant losses of more than $100 million this year regarding vandalism at its dealerships and EV charging stations, which spilled over from nationwide protests targeting Elon Musk. This also created a somewhat unnecessary way for General Motors GM and Ford F to potentially take more share of the domestic EV market, with the public outcry of the 'Tesla Takedown' movement coming as the DOGE cut thousands of federal jobs at the discretion of the world's wealthiest person. Adding fury to Musk's frustration with President Trump's budget reconciliation bill is that it will eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles that have benefited Tesla and other EV manufacturers, while undermining his cost-cutting efforts as head of the DOGE. However, harsh criticism and a personal vendetta against the Trump administration could, of course, make Tesla the target of harsher EV regulations in the U.S., with the President threatening to take away the company's government contracts. Furthermore, this comes on the heels of recent reports that Tesla's sales have continued to decline in Europe, as sales in May fell 45% year over year in the U.K. and 36% in Germany amid rising competition from Chinese EV brands such as BYD and XPeng XPEV. Notably, BYD has surpassed Tesla as the top-selling EV brand in Europe. Most concerning to technical traders is that TSLA has fallen below its 50-day simple moving average (Green Line) of $292 a share, which is lower than its 200-day SMA (Red Line) of $310 due to the recent volatility in the stock. Generally, the 200-day SMA is lower than the 50-day SMA when a stock is in an uptrend and higher than the 50-day SMA when a stock is in a downtrend, as in Tesla's case. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Also suggesting more risk ahead for Tesla stock, and correlating with news of declining sales in Europe, is that fiscal 2025 and FY26 EPS estimates are noticeably lower in the last month and have now dropped 25% and 18% over the last 60 days, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Considering the short-selling strategy has paid off with TSLA of late, with it noteworthy that Tesla has led the Zacks Short Sale List with +20% gains after borrowing shares at $358.91 on Tuesday, May 27. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The back-and-forth spat between Elon Musk and President Trump won't do any favors for Tesla's outlook. Unfortunately, TSLA lands a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) at the moment in correlation with the trend of declining earnings estimate revisions. Eventually, this could end up being a lucrative buying opportunity for TSLA down the road, but a dispute between the world's most powerful and wealthiest person could drag down the broader market as well, with Tesla dragging the Nasdaq down roughly 1% on Thursday. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Ford Motor Company (F) : Free Stock Analysis Report General Motors Company (GM) : Free Stock Analysis Report XPeng Inc. Sponsored ADR (XPEV) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla loses $150bn in market value amid Trump-Musk feud
Tesla experienced a market value loss on Thursday, with shares plunging 14%, translating to a staggering $150bn wiped from the company's valuation. This sharp decline followed a public row between US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a situation that has alarmed investors and traders alike. The feud, which played out over social media, centred on criticisms of the president's tax bill and its impact on electric vehicle (EV) tax benefits. The conflict between Trump and Musk escalated quickly, with Musk's social media posts criticising the president's policies, prompting a sharp response from Trump. Trump alleged that Musk was disgruntled due to the tax bill's removal of EV purchase incentives. This public disagreement has raised concerns about potential regulatory and operational challenges for Tesla, especially as the US Transportation Department has considerable influence over vehicle design standards and is currently investigating Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" software. Tesla's strategy has shifted towards self-driving robotaxis, with Musk emphasising their importance to the company's future. Analysts from Wedbush have suggested that the AI and autonomous driving sector could add up to $1tn in market value for Tesla. However, the company's reliance on camera-based detection, as opposed to the industry-standard radar and lidar sensors, could become a regulatory sticking point. The stock has seen volatile movements since Musk's endorsement of Trump's re-election campaign in mid-2024, including a significant rally followed by a sharp downturn as a "Tesla Takedown" protest gained momentum. Sales have dipped in major markets, including Europe, China, and California, partly due to Musk's political alignments. The House of Representatives' version of Trump's budget bill could further impact Tesla by proposing an end to the $7,500 EV subsidy by the end of 2025. "Tesla loses $150bn in market value amid Trump-Musk feud" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.