Trump tariffs could cost Sona Comstar 3% of annual revenue, company says
Auto components maker Sona Comstar said on Wednesday that it can lose about 3% of its annual revenue due to business loss from the impact of Trump tariffs, becoming perhaps the first Indian company to quantify the loss from the sweeping import taxes levied by the US president.
Vivek Vikram Singh, managing director and group chief executive officer of the Gurugram-based company, revealed the estimated loss from Trump tariffs in the January-March earnings call.
'There is risk of losing some business from tariffs, as customers might look to localise some parts. There is going to be impact on the overall demand as well, but there will be clarity on it in the coming months," Singh said during the call.
Also read:
Volkswagen layoffs: Europe's largest carmaker slashes headcount by 7,000; Net profit drops 40% in Q1 on US tariff
s
In the financial year ended 31 March, the company's revenue rose 12% to
₹
3,555 crore. Of this, about two-fifths, or
₹
1,422 crore, came from United States market. New profit grew 16% to
₹
601 crore.
Going by the company's estimate, the annual revenue loss would be about
₹
106 crore.
In January-March, revenue from operations declined 2% year-on-year to
₹
868 crore, while net profit rose 10% to
₹
164 crore.
However, the company got an interim relief after president Donald Trump's administration said that American auto companies will get some credits to import parts for domestically-made vehicles. This interim measure was intended to give automakers a two-year timeframe to fully localize their value chain.
'Post the announcement, our position is pretty comfortable," Singh said during the call.
Also read:
US GDP drops to 0.3% in Q1; Donald Trump says 'NOTHING TO DO WITH TARIFFS. Be Patient'
On 26 March, the US had announced that all automobile imports into country, including auto parts, will face a 25% tariff to encourage local production of vehicles. As a company with a high exposure to the US, Sona Comstar's business faced severe uncertainties from Trump tariffs.
However, the company continues to put up a brave face.
'Our customers are not too worried about the impact. We will have to wait and see how the situation evolves," Singh said. 'In our business, the relative pricing is important. With China facing higher tariffs, it is a great opportunity for us to gain market share in the United States."
Since the start of the year, Sona Comstar's share price has fallen by about 20% as against a 3.6% fall in Nifty Auto.
On plans for a new facility in the US, the company said that it will wait for the dust to settle on the whole tariff issue before thinking of setting up a new plant there.
Also read:
Wall Street today: Nasdaq slumps 1.9%, S&P 500 tumbles 1.4% on recession fears after weak GDP data
In April 2024, the company opened a new plant in Mexico to cater to demand in the North America region. To be sure, Mexico is so far is exempted from any additional tariffs from the United States.
The North American market is an important destination for Indian component makers, who exported about one third of their total shipments of $21.2 billion in FY24 to the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Karine Jean-Pierre no longer a Democrat? Ex-WH press secy writes tell-all book on ‘broken' Biden administration
Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has run her race in the Democratic Party after serving former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The 50-year-old shared the news in a statement released Wednesday, revealing that she is writing a tell-all book on the 'broken' administration she served. Titled Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines, the memoir is set to hit the bookshelves on October 21, per Associated Press. The upcoming memoir promises a closer look at Biden's decision to exit the 2024 presidential race against Donald Trump and Jean Pierre's decision to become an Independent. 'Jean-Pierre didn't come to her decision to be an Independent lightly,' Hachette Book Group says in a promotional release. 'She has served two American presidents, Obama and Biden… She takes us through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision.' Meanwhile, Jean-Pierre said in a statement, 'Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States.' 'At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically.' The 50-year-old succeeded Jen Psaki as press secretary in 2022. She previously served as deputy press secretary and a senior advisor to Biden's 2020 campaign. Before that, she was a regional political director during Obama's first term. Throughout the November race, Jean-Pierre faced criticism, especially for being evasive about the former president's health. Legacy Lit's announcement on Wednesday further states that Jean-Pierre 'presents clear arguments and provocative evidence as an insider about the importance of dismantling the torrent of disinformation and misinformation that has been rampant in recent elections and provides passionate insight for moving forward,' per the outlet.
United News of India
34 minutes ago
- United News of India
BCCI floats RFP for IPL and WPL digital services
Mumbai, June 4 (UNI) The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Wednesday invited proposals from reputed entities to provide digital services for the Indian Premier League (IPL) and Women's Premier League (WPL), aiming to further enhance the digital presence and fan engagement of both premier T20 competitions. Issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP), the cricket board said, 'The BCCI invites proposals from reputed entities to acquire the rights and obligations to provide services relating to IPL and WPL Digital Properties.' The RFP document outlines the terms, conditions, and technical specifications governing the submission and evaluation of bids. It can be purchased upon payment of a non-refundable fee of Rs 2.50 lakh plus applicable GST for Indian entities, and USD 2,925 for foreign entities. The RFP will be available from June four. The last date to seek clarifications is June 20, the deadline to purchase the RFP is June 25, and completed proposals must be submitted by July seven. Only those meeting the eligibility criteria will be eligible to bid. Indian applicants must have a minimum annual turnover of Rs 15 crore, while foreign applicants must show equivalent turnover. Applicants must also have at least eight years of relevant digital service experience, with preference given to those with a track record in sports, particularly cricket, and expertise in broadcast-integrated digital solutions. 'It is clarified that merely purchasing the RFP does not entitle any person to bid,' the BCCI stated, adding that only those who meet the eligibility conditions and submit complete documentation will be allowed to participate in the bidding process. Interested parties must email payment confirmation to [rfp@ as per the procedure laid out in the RFP's Annexure A. The RFP documents will be shared only after verification of payment and relevant details. The BCCI further clarified that it 'reserves the right to cancel or amend the RFP process at any stage in any manner without providing any reason.' UNI BDN SS
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Elon Musk turned against Donald Trump and his ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' - Here are the 5 reasons
Once close allies, now at odds: Elon Musk's once-robust relationship with Donald Trump appears to be crumbling amid growing policy clashes, public criticism, and mounting fallout for Musk's companies. The turning point seems to be Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping Republican legislative package that Musk claims undermines innovation and economic discipline. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons behind the falling out: Elon Musk's sharp break from Donald Trump finds its most immediate pain point in Tesla's bottom line: the proposed elimination of federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credits. Under current policy, buyers of new EVs are eligible for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits, with an additional $4,000 available for used EVs. These credits, part of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, have been a critical incentive driving EV adoption—and by extension, Tesla's sales. But Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' backed by GOP lawmakers, aims to gut those incentives entirely for manufacturers that have already sold over 200,000 qualifying vehicles between 2009 and 2025. Tesla, by far the EV market leader, is directly in the firing line: the company sold over 336,000 vehicles in just Q1 of 2025 alone. According to JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman, the removal of these credits could represent a $1.2 billion headwind for Tesla—a significant blow as the company battles slumping demand, falling profits, and political backlash from Musk's government role. So, Musk became increasingly vocal in criticising Trump's massive federal spending bill—nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk called the bill 'a disgusting abomination' and accused GOP lawmakers of abandoning fiscal responsibility. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly… which increases the budget deficit… I don't know if a bill can be big and beautiful,' Musk told CBS previously. Musk's discontent escalated after Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of private astronuat and his ally Jared Isaacman—as NASA Administrator. Trump cited 'prior associations' in his decision, which Musk might have seen as a betrayal. Isaacman had broad support in the space community and was seen as Musk's pick to align NASA policy with SpaceX's interests. His removal coincided with Musk's own exit as a 'special government employee' running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk said in support of Isaacman, signaling the depth of his frustration. Elon Musk's foray into federal governance as a 'special government employee' under the Trump administration has left a lasting dent in his personal and public image. What began as a high-profile effort to 'streamline government efficiency' quickly turned into a political and reputational minefield for the billionaire CEO. As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk was tasked with cutting what the Trump administration called 'wasteful spending.' But the resulting actions—including mass layoffs in federal departments, rumored threats to Social Security and Medicare programs, and abrupt budget slashes—sparked widespread backlash. Despite Musk's repeated clarifications that DOGE had no authority over entitlement programs, public anger snowballed. 'It's a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk told CBS. 'I've had people think DOGE is going to stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue.' The political blowback triggered a sharp decline in Musk's public approval. Protests, online campaigns, and lawsuits followed, along with a string of death threats and acts of violence targeting both Musk and Tesla facilities. As public anger grew, Tesla became a target: Showrooms were vandalised Tesla vehicle sales plummeted Shares fell 50% from record highs Net worth dropped by $100 billion Musk lamented being made the scapegoat: 'DOGE became the whipping boy for everything... People thought it would stop their Social Security checks.' His candid remarks reflect a man caught between two identities—visionary entrepreneur and political appointee. 'I don't want to speak up against the administration,' he said, 'but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration is doing.' Musk recently escalated pressure on the FAA to drop Verizon's $2.4 billion contract for air traffic control upgrades, claiming the system is failing. He offered Starlink as an emergency solution, suggesting the FAA should shift the contract to SpaceX. But critics flagged this as a possible conflict of interest—especially since Musk had been advising on federal spending.
