What changes are being made to the EU Settlement Scheme?
Campaigners have welcomed new changes to the EU Settlement Scheme that would make it easier for people to obtain settled status to live in the UK.
The new system will see those with "pre-settled status" automatically granted settled status if eligible, rather than having to go through the application process all over again.
It follows a High Court judgement that ruled it was unlawful to take away the rights of people with pre-settled status just because they hadn't made a second application before the expiry of their status.
While some 1.7 million EU citizens with pre-settled status stand to benefit from this change, campaigners warn some of those with "complex life circumstances" will "fall through the net of this policy" and risk losing their right to live in the UK, or being "pushed into exploitation".
Here, Yahoo News explains the changes and why campaign groups still have concerns.
Settled status is an immigration status given to people under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) introduced in 2019 after Brexit.
It allows citizens from the European Union, European Economic Area (EEA) and Switzerland who were living continuously in the UK for at least five years before 31 December 2020 to live and work in the UK permanently.
Those who didn't meet these criteria could apply for pre-settled status, a temporary immigration status, granted for a period of five years, initially requiring people to then apply for settled status once eligible.
The deadline for most people to apply for the EU Settlement Scheme was 30 June 2021, but the Home Office did make exceptions for those with "reasonable grounds" for a late application.
The EU Settlement Scheme has provided 5.7 million EEA and Swiss citizens and their family members with the status they need to continue living and working in the UK since Brexit, according to the Home Office.
In a bid to make things more straightforward, the Home Office is introducing a new process to automatically convert eligible pre-settled status holders to settled status.
Pre-settled status holders approaching the expiry of their status will receive an email telling them they "may soon be considered" for an automated conversion.
The Home Office says it expects to issue the first grants of settled status under this new process from late January, before expanding the process to benefit more people later this year.
It says it will automatically check pre-settled status holder records against government-held records, for example, for evidence of criminal conduct and to ensure they have been living in the UK – the same checks used when people first applied for the EUSS.
"We are also considering the appropriate next steps for cases where a pre-settled status holder no longer meets the conditions," the Home Office adds.
Pre-settled status holders won't need to do anything and will be informed if they cannot be granted settled status, although people are still free to apply online themselves if they prefer.
The changes follow a ruling by the High Court in 2022 that certain aspects of the EUSS were unlawful.
Judge Mr Justice Lane concluded that the Home Office had wrongfully interpreted the withdrawal agreement between the UK and EU by allowing people with pre-settled status to lose their rights purely because they had failed to make a second application.
The legal challenge was brought by the Independent Monitoring Authority (IMA) – the watchdog set up by the government to look after EU citizens' rights in Britain after its exit from the union.
At the time, more than two-and-a-half million people faced having their residency rights taken away for failing to make a second application.
The Home Office initially indicated it intended to challenge the ruling, but confirmed in February 2023 that it would not do so.
It is now extending pre-settled status by five years for people approaching the expiry of their status to ensure nobody loses their residency rights because they didn't make a further application.
While EU citizen campaign groups have welcomed the Home Office's changes, they still warn that some people could still face a bureaucratic maze in trying to prove how long they have been living in the UK.
Grassroots movement the 3 Million suggested the way the government has chosen to implement the High Court's judgement "still puts at risk people whose residence history is not straightforward".
"If someone hasn't either had a continuous job or claimed welfare benefits during their five years of continuously living in the UK, then they are not likely to benefit from this automatic grant of settled status," a spokesperson said.
"Instead, the Home Office will put the burden of proof on EU citizens - to show they've lived here continuously and they qualify for settled status.
"We've seen many people who are unable to meet the high threshold of bureaucratic evidence the Home Office requires: from stay-at-home mums being refused settled status because their names are not on any household bills, to people who lost their job and lived with friends for a while, and the most vulnerable of whom were pushed into destitution and homelessness.
"We are concerned that EU citizens and family members with complex life circumstances will fall through the net of this policy, have their immigration status curtailed and be pushed into exploitation."
Many of you have reported receiving an email about #eVisas from the Home Office which is very confusing.People granted status under the EU Settlement Scheme should already have a UKVI account and be able to see their digital status - which is now referred to as an eVisa. pic.twitter.com/2XOlYaLtXx
— the3million (@the3million) December 11, 2024
As an alternative, the 3 Million proposes granting indefinite leave to remain to all EU citizens with pre-settled status after five years of being granted that status, provided there are no other suitability issues.
Kate Smart, CEO of Settled, a charity set up in 2019 to help EU citizens living in the UK after Brexit, acknowledged that the automated process "will give a lot of people peace of mind about their future".
However, she said the charity already has concerns that "Home Office letters being sent to EU citizens about such changes are too long and complex and causing unnecessary confusion and anxiety".
"In some cases, EU citizens who want to comply with the rules are taking the wrong steps because they don't understand," Smart added.
"Secondly we have concerns for those people whose cases are not automatically updated and will still need to present evidence, perhaps going back years, to prove their right to remain.
"Finally, even with Settled Status, we know many people find the digital system hard to use and believe a paper document is needed."
In guidance published earlier this month, the Home Office said there is "no change to our digital approach", adding that "physical documents can be lost, stolen, damaged or tampered with".
The department says evidence of residence "can be as little as a utility bill, bank statements or a letter from a GP or charity".
What are the ETIAS travel rules for Brits travelling to Europe? (Yahoo News)
EU should send troops to Trump-target Greenland, says military chief (The Telegraph)
What we know as Spain plans 100% tax on property bought by Britons (Yahoo News)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Government struggles to slash foreign aid spent on asylum hotels
The government is struggling to cut the billions of pounds of foreign aid partly used to house asylum seekers in hotels, according to new figures. The £2.2bn Home Office estimate to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) in this financial year is only slightly less than the £2.3bn spent in 2024/25. The vast majority is used for the accommodation for asylum seekers who have arrived in the UK, with recent figures showing more than 32,000 were being housed in hotels at the end of March. Labour has pledged "to end the use of asylum hotels" and the government says it has reduced the overall asylum support costs by half a billion pounds, including £200m in ODA savings, which had been passed back to the Treasury. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he will cut the overall ODA from its current level of 0.5% of gross national income (GNI) to 0.3% in 2027. Foreign aid is supposed to be spent on providing humanitarian and development assistance in other countries, but the UK is allowed to count refugee-hosting costs as ODA under internationally agreed rules. Labour MP Sarah Champion previously said a "scandalously large amount" of ODA has been diverted to the Home Office and has called for a cap on how much can be spent supporting asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. A Home Office spokesperson said: "We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure, and are urgently taking action to restore order, and reduce costs. "This will ultimately reduce the amount of Official Development Assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. "We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4bn by 2026."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Government struggles to cut foreign aid spent on asylum hotels
The government is struggling to cut the amount of foreign aid it spends on hotel bills for asylum seekers in the UK, the BBC has learnt. New figures released quietly by ministers in recent days show the Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year - that is only marginally less than the £2.3bn it spent in 2024/25. The money is largely used to cover the accommodation costs of thousands of asylum seekers who have recently arrived in the UK. The Home Office said it was committed to ending asylum hotels and was speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The figures were published on the Home Office website with no accompanying notification to media. Foreign aid is supposed to be spent alleviating poverty by providing humanitarian and development assistance overseas. But under international rules, governments can spend some of their foreign aid budgets at home to support asylum seekers during the first year after their arrival. According to the most recent Home Office figures, there are about 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels in the UK. Labour promised in its manifesto to "end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds". Contracts signed by the Conservative government in 2019 were expected to see £4.5bn of public cash paid to three companies to accommodate asylum seekers over a 10-year period. But a report by spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) in May said that number was expected to be £15.3bn. Asylum accommodation costs set to triple, says watchdog Asylum hotel companies vow to hand back some profits On June 3, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told the Home Affairs Committee she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation and added: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether." The Home Office said it was trying to bear down on the numbers by reducing the time asylum seekers can appeal against decisions. It is also planning to introduce tighter financial eligibility checks to ensure only those without means are housed. But Whitehall officials and international charities have said the Home Office has no incentive to reduce ODA spending because the money does not come out of its budgets. The scale of government aid spending on asylum hotels has meant huge cuts in UK support for humanitarian and development priorities across the world. Those cuts have been exacerbated by the government's reductions to the overall ODA budget. In February, Sir Keir Starmer said he would cut aid spending from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% by 2027 - a fall in absolute terms of about £14bn to some £9bn. Such was the scale of aid spending on asylum hotels in recent years that the previous Conservative government gave the Foreign Office an extra £2bn to shore up its humanitarian commitments overseas. But Labour has refused to match that commitment. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, said: "Cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government. "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul." Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said the government was introducing "savage cuts" to its ODA spending, risking the UK's development priorities and international reputation, while "Home Office raids on the aid budget" had barely reduced. "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict," she said. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK," she said. "The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "Labour promised in their manifesto to end the use of asylum hotels for illegal immigrants. But the truth is there are now thousands more illegal migrants being housed in hotels under Labour. "Now these documents reveal that Labour are using foreign aid to pay for asylum hotel accommodation – yet another promise broken." A Home Office spokesperson said: "We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure, and continue to take action, restoring order, and reduce costs. This will ultimately reduce the amount of Official Development Assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. "We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4bn by 2026." Is the government meeting its pledges on illegal immigration and asylum?
