
Young Ukrainian women see reporting from frontline as a duty
WHEN Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022, Olha Kyrylenko was at home watching images from her colleagues risking their lives to cover the siege of the port city of Mariupol.
"I asked myself whether I could work in such conditions at all," said Kyrylenko, now a 26-year-old reporter for the leading media outlet Ukrainska Pravda.
"And I was like, well, I have to at least try," she said during a rare break in war-torn eastern Ukraine.
She went to cover the front lines for the first time shortly after Russia invaded, and noticed that she was far from the only woman.
"All my friends, journalists working in the war, are women," Kyrylenko said.
While women journalists had already been covering fighting between Ukraine and Kremlin-backed separatists since 2014, a new generation emerged in 2022.
Mobilisation in Ukraine's army is obligatory only for men, but the country has seen more and more women joining its ranks.
Two Ukrainska Pravda journalists have been drafted into the army, including the photographer Kyrylenko worked with on her first reporting trip to the front in 2022.
Since then, she has been working on her own.
That was also the case for Viktoria Roshchyna, whose death in Russian detention last year highlighted the risks taken by Ukrainian journalists covering the war.
The 27-year-old went missing in 2023 during a high-risk trip to territory occupied by Russian forces.
Her body was sent back only in February and bearing signs of torture, according to a media investigation.
Kyrylenko worked with Roshchyna and remembers her as "tenacious" and ready to work where no one else would.
But Kyrylenko said her death had forced her to think hard about whether journalism "is worth risking your life".
In April, Kyrylenko was reporting in Pokrovsk, a vital frontline logistics hub where fighting is fierce, on her mother's birthday.
She promised her mother that nothing would happen to her.
But, she said, "my life right now is not the highest value in my life".
The main thing is "that my country as a country should survive and that the truth about this war, whatever it is, should be present in the information space".
Keeping a professional distance as a Ukrainian journalist covering the war can be difficult.
Alina Yevych, a 25-year-old reporter, said she had managed — for a while.
Then she met a woman who said she had been kidnapped and raped for a week by Russian soldiers in Mariupol.
After hearing her words, "I don't know how to be objective", said Yevych, who works along with her boss Maria Davydenko for Vchasno, an independent news outlet.
Yevych said soldiers they interview sometimes found it hard to believe that women could understand how tanks work or listen to their stories without flinching.
Mentalities are changing, Yevych said, but "for some people, you really remain a girl in this war".
Vyacheslav Maryshev, editor in chief of the visuals department at Suspilne, a state-funded news organisation, in Kharkiv in northeast Ukraine, said his female employees tended to take fewer unnecessary risks.
The men sometimes want to act like "Rambo" to prove their bravery, he said, but in his team of war reporters there are more women than men.
One of them, Oleksandra Novosel, said she had just convinced her bosses to invest in bulletproof jackets more suited to women's body shapes.
At the start of the invasion, one of the vests available at Suspilne weighed 12kg — around a quarter of her weight.
"I walked around in it and wobbled," Novosel recalled.
The 30-year-old said she would prefer not to need a bulletproof vest, and had not imagined working in a warzone until her country became one.
She would rather be covering courts or investigating corruption, she said, but for the moment, reporting on the war is "my duty".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
42 minutes ago
- The Star
Anthropic CEO says proposed 10-year ban on state AI regulation 'too blunt' in NYT op-ed
Dario Amodei, CEO and Co-Founder of Anthropic attends the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo (Reuters) -A Republican proposal to block states from regulating artificial intelligence for 10 years is "too blunt," Anthropic Chief Executive Officer Dario Amodei wrote in a New York Times' opinion piece. Amodei instead called for the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies at a federal level, so that emerging risks are made clear to the people. "A 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument. AI is advancing too head-spinningly fast," Amodei said. "Without a clear plan for a federal response, a moratorium would give us the worst of both worlds - no ability for states to act, and no national policy as a backstop." The proposal, included in President Donald Trump's tax cut bill, aims to preempt AI laws and regulations passed recently in dozens of states, but has drawn opposition from a bipartisan group of attorneys general that have regulated high-risk uses of the technology. Instead, a national standard would require developers working on powerful models to adopt policies for testing and evaluating their models and to publicly disclose how they plan to test for and mitigate national security and other risks, according to Amodei's opinion piece. Such a policy, if adopted, would also mean developers would have to be upfront about the steps they took to make sure their models were safe before releasing them to the public, he said. Amodei said Anthropic already releases such information and competitors OpenAI and Google DeepMind have adopted similar policies. Legislative incentives to ensure that these companies keep disclosing such details could become necessary as corporate incentive to provide this level of transparency might change in light of models becoming more powerful, he argued. (Reporting by Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru; Editing by Anil D'Silva)


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Putin ready to ‘help resolve' Iran nuclear stand-off: Kremlin
MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to 'help resolve' the standoff between Iran and the United States over Tehran's nuclear programme, the Kremlin said Thursday. 'We have a close partnership with Tehran. And President Putin said that he was ready to use this partnership to help resolve the Iranian nuclear issue,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. After a call between the leaders on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump said Putin had offered to 'participate' in talks on Tehran's nuclear programme, as Trump accused Iran of 'slow-walking' its response to Washington's offer of a deal. Washington and Tehran have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new accord to replace the nuclear deal that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. Trump said Monday that his administration would not allow 'any' enrichment of uranium, despite Tehran's insistence that it has the right under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said earlier Wednesday that Washington's proposal was against Tehran's national interest. Russia and Iran have deepened their military ties amid Moscow's military offensive on Ukraine. The Kremlin said earlier this week that Tehran had the 'right' to a run a peaceful nuclear energy programme.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Russia says it will repair warplanes damaged by Ukraine's drones
MOSCOW: Russian warplanes were damaged but not destroyed in a June 1 attack by Ukraine, and they will be restored, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said. Ukrainian strikes targeted airfields in Siberia and the far north where Russia houses heavy bombers that form part of its strategic nuclear forces. The United States assesses that up to 20 warplanes were hit and around 10 were destroyed, two U.S. officials told Reuters, a figure that is about half the number estimated by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. But Ryabkov, who oversees arms control diplomacy, told state news agency TASS: 'The equipment in question, as was also stated by representatives of the Ministry of Defence, was not destroyed but damaged. It will be restored.' It was not immediately clear how swiftly Russia could repair or replace the damaged aircraft - if at all - given the complexity of the technology, the age of some of the Soviet-era planes, and Western sanctions that restrict Russian imports of sensitive components. Commercial satellite imagery taken after the Ukrainian drone attack shows what experts told Reuters appear to be damaged Russian Tu-95 strategic bombers and Tu-22 Backfire long-range bombers that Russia has used to launch missile strikes against Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin told U.S. President Donald Trump in a telephone conversation on Wednesday that Moscow would have to respond to the attacks, Trump said. Russia has an estimated fleet of 67 strategic bombers, including 52 Tu-95s, known as Bear-H by NATO, and 15 Tu-160s, known as Blackjacks, of which about 58 are thought to be deployed, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. In addition, it has 289 non-strategic fighters and bombers, including Tu-22s, Su-24s, Su-34s and MiG-31s, according to the Bulletin. Russia has given no detail about which aircraft were damaged but said that Ukraine targeted five airbases.