logo
Exclusive: Mars' $36 billion Kellanova deal faces EU antitrust investigation, sources say

Exclusive: Mars' $36 billion Kellanova deal faces EU antitrust investigation, sources say

Reuters7 hours ago

BRUSSELS, June 18 (Reuters) - Mars' $36 billion bid for Pringles maker Kellanova (K.N), opens new tab is set to face a full-scale EU antitrust investigation, people close to the matter said on Wednesday, a move that could require the candy giant to divest assets to address competition concerns.
The European Commission, which acts as the antitrust watchdog in the 27-country bloc, is concerned about Mars' high market share in some products in some European Union countries, the sources said.
Family-owned Mars is unlikely to offer remedies to assuage such concerns during the EU competition enforcer's preliminary review of the deal, which ends on June 25, the sources said.
The Commission declined to comment. Mars and Kellanova did not respond to repeated emails for comment.
Mars announced the deal in August last year that will bring together brands from M&M's and Snickers to Pringles and Pop-Tarts under one roof.
There has been a wave of consolidation in the U.S. packaged food sector as companies seek scale to weather the impact of inflation-weary consumers cutting back on spending and shifting to private label brands.
European retailers have voiced concerns about the deal, citing the power of large international suppliers of branded packaged goods and the high concentration levels in products such as breakfast cereals, carbonated drinks, confectionery and frozen desserts.
They say such high market shares give large suppliers the power to impose restrictions and practices to retailers' detriment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple eyes using AI to design its chips, technology executive says
Apple eyes using AI to design its chips, technology executive says

Reuters

time44 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Apple eyes using AI to design its chips, technology executive says

SAN FRANCISCO, June 18 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab is interested in tapping generative artificial intelligence to help speed up the design of the custom chips at the heart of its devices, its top hardware technology executive said in private remarks last month. Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, made the remarks in a speech in Belgium, where he was receiving an award from Imec, an independent semiconductor research and development group that works closely with most of the world's biggest chipmakers. In the speech, a recording of which was reviewed by Reuters, Srouji outlined Apple's development of custom chips from the first A4 chip in an iPhone in 2010 to the most recent chips that power Mac desktop computers and the Vision Pro headset. He said one of the key lessons Apple learned was that it needed to use the most cutting-edge tools available to design its chips, including the latest chip design software from electronic design automation (EDA) firms. The two biggest players in that industry - Cadence Design Systems (CDNS.O), opens new tab and Synopsys (SNPS.O), opens new tab - have been racing to add artificial intelligence to their offerings. "EDA companies are super critical in supporting our chip design complexities," Srouji said in his remarks. "Generative AI techniques have a high potential in getting more design work in less time, and it can be a huge productivity boost." Srouji said another key lesson Apple learned in designing its own chips was to make big bets and not look back. When Apple transitioned its Mac computers - its oldest active product line - from Intel's chips to its own chips in 2020, it made no contingency plans in case the switch did not work. "Moving the Mac to Apple Silicon was a huge bet for us. There was no backup plan, no split-the lineup plan, so we went all in, including a monumental software effort," Srouji said.

110,000 extra households in Wales will see energy bills cut by £150
110,000 extra households in Wales will see energy bills cut by £150

Wales Online

time3 hours ago

  • Wales Online

110,000 extra households in Wales will see energy bills cut by £150

110,000 extra households in Wales will see energy bills cut by £150 The warm home discount is being extended, which means thousands of more households in Wales will see their energy bills slashed by £150 this winter An additional 110,000 households in Wales are set to receive a £150 reduction on their energy bills this winter as the warm home discount scheme is extended, the UK Government has confirmed. The latest measure comes after a series of cost of living support initiatives were made through the government's Plan for Change. As a result approximately 110,000 extra households in Wales will get a £150 decrease in their energy bills this winter. For money-saving tips sign up to our Money newsletter here. ‌ In the UK more than six million households will receive the discount, which will see 2.7m more households receive support including 900,000 families with children and a total of 1.8m households in fuel poverty. ‌ According to the UK Government every billpayer on means-tested benefits will be eligible, eliminating previous restrictions that excluded those in need in the past. On the UK Government's website they say their Plan for Change initiative aims to stabilise the economy, adding: "Our missions – growing the economy, an NHS fit for the future, safer streets, opportunity for all, and making Britain a clean energy superpower – are part of a decade of national renewal built on the foundations of a stable economy, secure borders, and national security." It comes after First Minister of Wales Eluned Morgan said she would hold the UK Government's 'feet to the fire' after receiving what she said were categorical assurances that Prime Minister Keir Starmer would follow through on a manifesto pledge of returning the running of post-EU structural funding to the Welsh Government. You can read more about this here. Article continues below In regards to the £150 reduction to thousands of households in Wales Mr Starmer said: " I know families across Wales are still struggling with the cost of living and I know the fear that comes with not being able to afford your next bill. "Providing security and peace of mind for working people is deeply personal to me as Prime Minister and foundational for the Plan for Change." Secretary of State for Wales Jo Stevens added: "This big increase in the number of households receiving money off their energy bills will make a real difference to working people and families right across Wales. ‌ "Our key objective is putting more money in people's pockets, firstly by growing the economy but also by increasing the minimum wage, making increases to universal credit and the state pension, and providing support with energy bills." The energy price cap is set to reduce this July with the additional £150, which was announced on Wednesday, June 18, aiming to further help households. Households can find out if they are eligible with the UK Gov website here. Article continues below

Litigation funder fires back at Tyson Foods over settlement interference claims
Litigation funder fires back at Tyson Foods over settlement interference claims

Reuters

time6 hours ago

  • Reuters

Litigation funder fires back at Tyson Foods over settlement interference claims

June 18 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to opens new tab) A fight over the power of outside funders to influence lawsuits is unfolding in Chicago federal court, where leading litigation financier Burford Capital fired back this week against allegations that it illegally interfered with efforts to settle chicken price-fixing claims against meat processing giant Tyson Foods. Tyson sued, opens new tab Burford in April, alleging it sought to "co-opt the legal system" by blocking a potential settlement between Tyson and Burford's funding client Sysco in the chicken case in order to press for a larger recovery. Burford asked a court this week to dismiss Tyson's lawsuit, accusing, opens new tab the company of trying to divert attention away from the underlying price-fixing claims. Litigation funders provide financial support to clients in exchange for a part of any settlement or other judgment. Burford is the world's largest litigation finance provider. The clash is part of a broader, long-running litigation accusing Tyson and other meat processors of price-fixing in a variety of meat industries. Some of the cases have generated tens of millions of dollars or more in settlements. Tyson has denied any wrongdoing. Burford has spent $140 million since 2019 backing antitrust claims by food distributor Sysco against Tyson and other meat processors, court documents show. Sysco's contract with Burford allowed the funder to participate in some of Sysco's settlement discussions, Burford said in court papers. In 2023, Burford successfully blocked Sysco from settling with a different defendant in the price-fixing litigation for an amount that the funder thought was too low. Sysco is no longer a party in the case, after transferring its litigation rights to a Burford affiliate called Carina Ventures. Burford and Sysco declined to comment, and Tyson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Burford in its filing this week denied it had interfered with Sysco's settlement plans and called Tyson's claims 'threadbare' and 'rank speculation.' Burford said it was Tyson that declined Sysco's last settlement offer in late 2021. – U.S. Senate Republicans on Monday included a provision in proposed changes to President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill that would raise the tax third-party litigation funders pay on litigation proceeds to nearly 41%. Republican Senator Thom Tillis in a May statement introducing the bill said the legislation would curb "abusive practices" and promote transparency in the industry. Paul Kong, executive director of the International Legal Finance Association, a trade group for commercial litigation funders, in a statement said the tax would undermine access to justice by placing "significant barriers in front of small businesses, inventors, startups, and other less well-resourced claimants seeking redress." – Houston-based law firm Jackson Walker has been hit with another civil lawsuit, opens new tab over its failure to disclose a romantic relationship between one of its partners and former U.S. Bankruptcy Judge David Jones. Bondholders of financial services company GWG filed the lawsuit in Houston federal court last week, accusing Jackson Walker, former firm partner Elizabeth Freeman, and Jones of deceiving them and the public by keeping the romance hidden "and taking millions from distressed entities for their own benefit." The bondholders' lawyers at the Bandas Law Firm have brought two previous cases against Jackson Walker on behalf of shareholders who said their investments in certain companies were wiped out in bankruptcy cases where Jones was involved before he resigned from the bench in October 2023. One lawsuit, filed by Morton Bouchard, is still pending. A federal judge last year dismissed a similar lawsuit brought by Michael Van Deelen, who first brought Jones' relationship with Freeman to light. Mikell West, a lawyer at the Bandas Law Firm, did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for Jackson Walker and a lawyer for Freeman both declined to comment. Attorneys for Jones and a spokesperson for Porter Hedges, a Houston-based law firm that was also named in the GWG investors' complaint, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. – U.S. District Judge John Tunheim in Minnesota has awarded $23 million in legal fees to plaintiffs firm Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight for its work on a $69 million class action settlement involving the UnitedHealth Group. Lawyers for the plaintiffs in a court filing, opens new tab this month called the $69 million deal the "largest-ever ERISA settlement alleging breach of fiduciary duty for failure to remove underperforming investment options." The plaintiffs' teams said they dedicated more than 12,800 hours on the litigation, which focused on participants who were invested in a certain Wells Fargo fund. UnitedHealth denied any wrongdoing in agreeing to settle the litigation, which began in 2021. Kirkland represented UnitedHealth. Read more: Oregon contract shows law firms' stake in Coinbase securities fight Madison Square Garden wants sanctions, lawyers' fees in ex-NBA player's case Wegovy maker Novo faces fee demand after losing copycat drug lawsuit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store