logo
Shocking! We share DNA with our closest friends, reveals study-- More details here

Shocking! We share DNA with our closest friends, reveals study-- More details here

Time of India5 hours ago

Your best friend might share your DNA, new study finds
The next time you tell your besties, 'I feel like we're related,' or "You're family" science might back you up! A groundbreaking
study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(PNAS) in 2018 finds that our friends are genetically more similar to us than strangers— even if they're unrelated-- and this could play a surprising role in how we choose our friends.
While it's long been known that people tend to marry or befriend others with similar interests, values, or lifestyles, researchers are now digging deeper into how much of that connection might be because of similar genetics. The study, conducted by researchers from Stanford University, Duke University, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison, looked at over 5,000 pairs of adolescent friends using data from Add Health— this is a long-term U.S.
study that has tracked students from grades 7 to 12 since the 1994–1995 school year.
What researchers found
Interestingly, researchers found that friends were more genetically similar to each other than to random individuals in the same population. In fact, the genetic similarity between friends was about two-thirds as strong as that between the average married couple. According to study author Benjamin Domingue, an assistant professor at Stanford Graduate School of Education, this genetic similarity is not as strong as that seen in siblings, but it is still statistically significant as compared to strangers.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cardiologists: Losing a Hanging Tummy Comes Down To This 1 Thing
Health Wellness Journal
Watch More
Undo
Why do we befriend people who have DNAs similar to ours?
One possible reason is a concept called social homophily. This theory suggests that people naturally form connections with others who are like them— including traits that may be influenced by genetics. For example, personality traits, energy levels, and even tendencies toward certain habits could be inherited, and that could subtly draw similar people together making them friends.
But there's another angle too— social structuring.
This is the idea that people form relationships within the environments they inhabit, which themselves may be influenced by genetics. For instance, traits like educational achievement or body mass index (BMI) have both social and genetic reasons. The study found that friends often shared these traits. On the other hand, characteristics like height— which is also genetic— didn't show strong similarities among friends, likely because height doesn't influence our social choices in the same way as education or lifestyle might do.
When studying schoolmates, the researchers also discovered something interesting: Even among students who weren't friends, genetic similarities were present— but it was to a lesser degree. Schoolmates were about half as genetically similar as friends, but still more similar than strangers. This indicates that just being part of the same school environment creates genetic clustering. According to Domingue, this finding reinforces how deeply intertwined our genes and our social environments really are, reported the TIME.
'Are individuals actively selecting to be around people who are like them, or is it due to impersonal forces, such as social structures, that we all are affected by?,' Domingue asked. His team believes the answer lies more in the structure— the schools we attend, the neighbourhoods we live in, and the families we grow up in.
Kathleen Mullan Harris, co-author and professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, adds that the genetic similarity among schoolmates could be driven by a lot of factors-- from geographic location to parental choices about education.
'It's a complicated equation, and one that researchers need to pay more attention to,' she said.
In fact, the researchers believe this study should serve as a wake-up call for geneticists. When studying the influence of genes on traits like educational attainment, it's crucial to consider the social environment. What may appear as a purely genetic effect might actually reflect the shared environment of a school or community.
In a nutshell, your friendships may be about more than shared interests— they could be written in your genes, shaped by your surroundings, and driven by the invisible forces of both biology and social structure.
Intriguing, right? Tell us your views on this in the comments section below.
Prince Harry's 'Peace' Talk Masks Royal War | SHOCKING Move Sparks Secret Clash With King Charles
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Want to lose weight faster at the gym? Science reveals the most-effective workout order
Want to lose weight faster at the gym? Science reveals the most-effective workout order

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Want to lose weight faster at the gym? Science reveals the most-effective workout order

If you've ever stood in the gym debating whether to hop on the treadmill or hit the dumbbells first, science now has a definitive answer—and it might help you burn fat more efficiently than ever before. A groundbreaking new study by researchers in China, published in the Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness , reveals that the sequence in which you perform your workouts could significantly influence how much fat you lose—especially the dangerous kind. The Study That Could Change Your Gym Routine Dr. Zhixiong Zhou of the Capital University of Physical Education and Sports in Beijing led a 12-week study involving 45 overweight men aged 18 to 30. These men were split into three groups: one did cardio first followed by resistance training; the second lifted weights first and then did cardio; and the third group served as a control, continuing their daily habits without structured workouts. The exercise routines for both workout groups were identical—30 minutes of indoor cycling paired with classic strength moves like bench presses, deadlifts, curls, and squats. The only variable? The order of execution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Start with Weights for Maximum Fat Loss After three months, both active groups showed improvements: weight loss, lean muscle gain, and better overall fitness. But when it came to pure fat loss—especially visceral fat, the dangerous fat that surrounds internal organs—those who lifted weights before cardio came out on top. 'Our findings suggest that resistance training optimizes fat loss when conducted prior to aerobic exercise,' Dr. Zhou explained. 'The sequence of exercise is therefore a pivotal factor in the process of fat loss.' You Might Also Like: How an extremely busy man lost nearly half his body fat in 3 months without strict diet or long gym sessions Visceral fat is particularly dangerous and has been strongly linked to serious conditions such as heart disease, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. According to the study, weight-first exercisers saw a sharper reduction in this type of fat, making the order of workouts not just a question of fitness—but of long-term health. The Science Behind the Burn The key lies in how your body uses energy. Resistance training depletes your muscle's glycogen stores, forcing your body to burn fat during the cardio session that follows. 'When you do cardio first, your muscles will be less depleted of glycogen unless it is a very intense session,' said Jack McNamara, senior lecturer in clinical exercise physiology at the University of East London. 'But the cardio first will also induce a level of fatigue that means you are probably not able to impart maximal effort when it comes to resistance training later on.' In essence, cardio-on-fatigue delivers less bang for your buck—especially when it comes to burning fat. You Might Also Like: Always hungry while dieting? Weight loss expert reveals everyday mistakes that could be to ruining your efforts A Small Change, Big Impact So, the next time you're planning your gym session, consider switching up the order. Start with weights to prime your body for maximum fat burn during cardio. It's a subtle shift that, over time, might help you unlock better results—not just on the scale, but in overall health. As Dr. Zhou puts it, 'The reduction in visceral fat was more pronounced in the resistance training-first group, implying that resistance training first may effectively reduce visceral fat.' Because sometimes, the best way forward is simply to reverse the order.

Bengaluru space startup GalaxEye to build 2nd EO satellite with 0.5 metres resolution
Bengaluru space startup GalaxEye to build 2nd EO satellite with 0.5 metres resolution

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Bengaluru space startup GalaxEye to build 2nd EO satellite with 0.5 metres resolution

BENGALURU: Bengaluru-based spacetech startup GalaxEye Thursday announced plans to build its second Earth observation satellite , targeting a sharp resolution of 0.5 metres and a revisit time of under three days. The launch is tentatively scheduled for late 2026 or early 2027, with the company also preparing to expand into high-priority international defence markets including the US, West Asia, and Europe. 'The second satellite will mark a significant leap in performance over our first satellite, Mission Drishti, which is expected to launch later this year with a resolution of 1.25 metres. Unlike the first mission, the new satellite will be entirely built in-house — showcasing the company's growing systems integration and manufacturing capabilities,' the firm said. The satellite will deploy GalaxEye's proprietary SyncFusion technology, which combines Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Optical data acquisition to deliver persistent, all-weather, day-and-night imagery. The improved resolution and rapid revisit capability are aimed squarely at mission-critical sectors such as defence, disaster response, maritime surveillance, and urban security. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Scam Exposed: What They Won't Tell You about zero trust! Expertinspector Click Here Undo 'Building on the experience from Drishti and evolving needs of defence customers, we're thrilled to take the next big step in scaling our constellation and deepening our mission impact. With over 500 aerial test flights, the success of the POEM payload, and our proprietary software stack, we're confident in our ability to deliver sharper, faster, and more reliable Earth observation data,' said Suyash Singh, founder & CEO of GalaxEye. The company is currently undergoing concept and preliminary design reviews for the second mission. It has also indicated that it will scale its production facilities to support full in-house assembly, testing, and deployment — a move that signals deeper vertical integration and autonomy in future missions. Drishti is expected to validate its core technology stack. It builds on a proven sensor suite and a proprietary data processing pipeline, both of which have been extensively tested on drones, aerial platforms, and in space, including during Isro's POEM mission. Their satellites are expected to serve both defence and civilian sectors with real-time, all-weather capabilities. Applications include risk intelligence, border surveillance, urban safety, and disaster response.

Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind
Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind

It's quick, it's clever, and it answers almost everything—no wonder millions around the world rely on ChatGPT. But could this digital genie be dulling our minds with every wish we make? According to a startling new study by scientists at MIT's Media Lab, the answer may be yes. Researchers have now found that excessive use of AI tools like ChatGPT could be quietly eroding your memory, critical thinking, and even your brain activity. Published on arXiv, the study titled 'The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs' explores how language models—especially ChatGPT—affect the brain's ability to think, learn, and retain information. Brain vs Bot: How the Study Was Done To examine what they call the 'cognitive cost' of using large language models (LLMs), MIT researchers tracked 54 students over a four-month period using electroencephalography (EEG) devices to monitor brain activity. The participants were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another relied on Google, and the last used no external help at all—dubbed the 'Brain-only' group. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World by Taboola by Taboola While the AI-powered group initially showed faster results, the long-term findings were more sobering. Students who depended on ChatGPT for essay writing exhibited poorer memory retention, reduced brain engagement, and lower scoring compared to their peers. As the researchers noted, 'The LLM group's participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.' — rohanpaul_ai (@rohanpaul_ai) Google Wasn't Great, But Still Better Than ChatGPT Interestingly, students who used Google showed moderate brain activity and generated more thoughtful content than those who leaned on ChatGPT. Meanwhile, those in the Brain-only group had the highest levels of cognitive engagement, producing original ideas and deeper insights. In fact, even when ChatGPT users later attempted to write without assistance, their brain activity remained subdued—unlike the other groups who showed increased engagement while adapting to new tools. You Might Also Like: Narayana Murthy says AI was five times faster at what took him hours; shares how techies should use it This suggests that habitual ChatGPT usage might not just affect how we think, but whether we think at all. A Shortcut with a Hidden Toll The study also points to how this over-reliance on AI encourages mental passivity. While ChatGPT users reported reduced friction in accessing information, this convenience came at a cost. As the researchers explained, 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions'.' The team also raised red flags about algorithmic bias : what appears as top-ranked content from an AI is often a result of shareholder-driven training data, not necessarily truth or value. This creates a more sophisticated version of the 'echo chamber,' where your thoughts are subtly shaped—not by your own reasoning, but by an AI's probabilistic guesses. What This Means for the AI Generation As AI tools become more embedded in our everyday tasks—from writing emails to crafting essays—this study is a wake-up call for students, educators, and professionals. While tools like ChatGPT are powerful assistants, they should not become cognitive crutches. You Might Also Like: 'Neuralink babies'? Scale AI's Alexandr Wang says he is waiting for Elon Musk's brain chips before having kids The researchers caution that as language models continue to evolve, users must remain alert to their potential mental side effects. In a world where convenience is king, critical thinking might just be the first casualty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store