Carney says Canada is looking to join major European military buildup by July 1
Power & Politics: Exclusive interview with Prime Minister Mark Carney
Live in
12 minutes
Social Sharing
Prime Minister Mark Carney signalled he hopes Canada will be able to sign on to a major European defence rearmament plan by July 1, a step toward reducing the country's dependency on the United States for weapons and munitions.
He made the remarks on CBC's Power & Politics following the speech from the throne, which committed his government to joining ReArm Europe.
The speech did not set you a timeline, but Carney said he wants to move aggressively
"Seventy-five cents of every dollar of capital spending for defence goes to the United States. That's not smart," Carney told host David Cochrane.
Canada has been engaged in talks with the European Union since Carney took office — before the spring federal election — about joining the plan which foresees the nations on the continent spending $1.25 trillion on defence over the next five years.
"We're making great progress on that, and by Canada Day we'd like to see something concrete there," Carney said.
The comments and the throne speech pledge come one day after NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told an alliance parliamentary conference in Dayton, Ohio, that he expects the 32-member Western military alliance will approve a new defence spending threshold of five per cent of the gross domestic product at the upcoming leaders' summit.
"We are finalizing a plan to dramatically increase defence spending across the alliance," said Rutte, which suggested the NATO target for direct spending on the military could be set at 3.5 per cent of GDP with an additional 1.5 per cent GDP tacked on for defence-related items.
U.S. President Donald Trump has been advocating for the five per cent of GDP spending figure for months. In his Power & Politics interview, Carney said Canada will spend what makes sense and wouldn't commit to a specific figure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
15 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Create a Portfolio of Passive Income: 3 High-Yielding Dividend Stocks That Pay More Than 5%
Dividend income offers a great way to strengthen your overall financial position. It can potentially make you less dependent on the income you earn from a job, maybe even allowing you to work less or retire earlier than planned. Money doesn't buy happiness, but being less dependent on work to fund your lifestyle could be a contributor to a happier, less stressful life. A great way to build up dividend income is to invest in high-yielding dividend stocks that also happen to be lower-risk investments. Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), Realty Income (NYSE: O), and Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE: BNS) are three attractive investments that you'll want to consider if you want to create a strong portfolio of income-generating stocks. Pfizer If you're looking for a high-yielding stock to hold for the long term, Pfizer is one you'll want to strongly consider. At 7.4%, its yield right now is more than five times what you'd get with the average stock on the S&P 500, which pays about 1.3%. Pfizer's stock is trading down more than 10% this year (as of the end of last week), as it can't seem to catch a break. While its valuation is modest -- it trades at 17 times its trailing earnings -- concerns about healthcare reform and the company's future growth prospects have made investors uneasy about the business and investing in it. But the healthcare company is still doing well and is on track to hit its guidance, which calls for revenue between $61 billion and $64 billion this year (comparable to how it did last year). It is also slashing costs to improve its bottom line. And it has been less than two years since it acquired oncology company Seagen, which may unlock more long-term growth for Pfizer in the future. Last year, the company also obtained approval from regulators for its first gene therapy in the U.S. -- Beqvez, a treatment for a genetic bleeding disorder. There's some uncertainty and risk with Pfizer, but there are opportunities as well. And at such a modest valuation, now can be an excellent time to add it to your portfolio. Pfizer has been a big name in healthcare for decades, and I don't think that's likely to change anytime soon. Realty Income One dividend stock I think all income investors should consider owning is Realty Income. This is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that not only offers a high yield of 5.8%, but it also pays a dividend every month. There's no need to wait around for multiple months, as is the case with other dividend stocks; with Realty Income, you're getting a much more regular stream of cash flow. The REIT has a diverse mix of tenants, which makes it an ideal option for long-term investors. It's diversified across industries and geographies, with more than 1,500 clients across 91 industries. The dividend remains well supported -- the REIT reported funds from operations (FFO) per share of $1.05 during the first three months of the year (versus $0.94 a year ago). That averages out to $0.35 per share per month, which is higher than the rate of its monthly dividend of $0.2685. REITs use FFO to assess how much they can afford to pay in dividends, and with Realty Income's financials looking solid, there aren't any significant risks with its payout. Share prices of Realty Income are up 5% this year, and this can be a great income-generating investment to add to your portfolio for the long haul. Bank of Nova Scotia Rounding out this list of high-yielding dividend stocks is Canada-based Bank of Nova Scotia, also known as Scotiabank. At around 6%, that's a high payout for a top bank stock that is known for long-term stability. It declared its first dividend back in 1833 and has continued making regular payments since then. The bank increased its provision for credit losses in its most recent quarter, in a sign of growing concern about macroeconomic conditions. Scotiabank's net income totaled over $2 billion Canadian dollars for the period ending April 30, which was nearly identical to its bottom line in the prior-year period. There are concerns about how the Canadian economy may perform in the near future due to tariffs, but in the grand scheme of things, that may prove to be a short-term concern for investors who are willing to hang on for years. Scotiabank's impressive track record and resilience over the years should inspire some confidence in the business. The bank stock has increased its dividend by more than 22% in four years and can be an excellent option to hang on to for the long term. Not only can you collect a high yield today, but the dividend income you get from this investment can rise over the years. Should you invest $1,000 in Pfizer right now? Before you buy stock in Pfizer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Pfizer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,102!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $882,344!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is996% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
Protests at G7 summit in Alberta set to be largely peaceful, targeting Trump policies
Demonstrators hold a banner reading: "No war, No G7 " during a protest against the G7 summit in Fasano, southern Italy, Saturday, June 15, 2024. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia) EDMONTON — Protests during the upcoming G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis, Alta., may be starkly different than demonstrations happening this week against immigration crackdowns in the United States. A University of Toronto research group that has been monitoring the meetings of world leaders since 1998 says its analysis shows Canadian protests are more peaceful and smaller. But similar to the recent demonstrations in Los Angeles, they're likely to be against the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump. 'The Los Angeles protests will add another (issue) the protesters going there already care about, but it won't do anything much more than that,' said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group. 'I don't think it'll bring more protesters, too. Nor will the L.A. protests delay Trump from coming here.' Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting Trump and world leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union for the three-day summit starting Sunday in the Rocky Mountains southwest of Calgary. Leaders of several non-member countries, including India, Ukraine and Mexico, are also set to attend. The summit comes as protests in the United States continue against Trump's immigration raids, particularly his government's detainment of migrants. Hundreds of marines have joined about 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles. The protests have seen clashes with police, burned cars, rubber bullets shot at journalists and arrests. In Alberta, Kirton said protests during the G7 are not expected to be the same. '(The G7's) distinctive mission from the very beginning was to promote within its own members the values of open democracy,' he said. 'In democracies, people are supposed to protest. It's an integral part.' It's unlikely Canada's government would respond to any clashes like Trump, by calling in the military, Kirton added. The remote Kananaskis location will be closed off to the public. Visuals and audio of protesters at three demonstration zones designated by the RCMP — two in downtown Calgary and one in Banff — are to be shown to the leaders and other delegates at the summit on TV screens. Another zone at the Calgary airport won't be broadcast. Kirton said the distance between officials and protesters ensures the summit unfolds peacefully. 'Trump has been subjected to two assassination attempts, and one almost killed him. So you can see why (RCMP) have to be hypervigilant,' Kirton said. The Calgary Raging Grannies group plans to be at the protest zone at Calgary City Hall on Sunday afternoon. Mary Oxendale-Spensley, 74, said the grandmothers will be far from raging and clashing with police when they call out Trump's tariffs and his pitch to annex Canada. 'We do intend to sing,' said the retired teacher. One of their songs in the lineup: 'U.S.A., you have got a problem.' The song calls the U.S. president an 'orange blob' because of his tan, says he's 'way out of line,' and declares 'our sovereign nation will never be yours,' said Oxendale-Spensley. Ensuring Trump hears their message is vital, she said, even if it's on a screen. 'I'm a Canadian. I was Canadian when I was born. I intend to be a Canadian when I die.' It's hard to say how many grannies will be at the protest, she added. 'My big complaint about the grannies always is that we're grannies. People get sick, people break their ankle, that kind of thing.' Protests at the last G7 summit in Kananaskis in 2002 were peaceful, Kirton said, as demonstrators were also given designated zones. 'I do remember most vividly it was very hot,' Kirton said, and there were not many protesters. 'There were so few of them and it was so peaceful that we didn't even bother to estimate a number.' Aside from protests against Trump, some are expected to address other issues — like calling for an end to the Israel-Hamas war and Russia's war in Ukraine, Kirton said. Kirton said he also anticipates a presence from Canadians who want Alberta to separate from Canada, as well as those opposed to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Tensions have been high between Canada and India since 2023, when former prime minister Justin Trudeau told the House of Commons that agents of the Indian government were linked to the killing of a Canadian activist for Sikh separatism outside a gurdwara in Surrey, B.C. The World Sikh Organization of Canada said inviting Modi to the G7 is unacceptable. The International League of Peoples' Struggles, an international alliance of grassroots organizations, is expecting about 200 people for a protest also at Calgary City Hall. Yasmeen Khan, vice-chair of the group's North America chapter, said protesters want to raise awareness about various issues, including Indigenous struggles, housing and climate change. 'We'll have banners. We'll be chanting,' she said. 'We will also have some cultural performances from some Indigenous artists and migrant youth.' Mounties said first responders are prepared for protests. 'While the number of participants may vary, we have strong situational awareness of anticipated demonstrations and are well positioned to respond accordingly,' said RCMP spokesman Fraser Logan. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Fakiha Baig, The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail
27 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
As gas cars began to hit the streets of Toronto, the city was already an EV manufacturing hub
Dumaresq de Pencier is the exhibit and project coordinator for the Canadian Automotive Museum in Oshawa, Ont. While Tesla may be credited with popularizing modern electric vehicles, they are far from being the first to develop an EV. And I'm not talking about General Motors's EV1 from 1996. EVs appeared decades before the first gas-powered car, going back nearly 200 years. And around the time gas cars began hitting the streets of Toronto the city was already an EV manufacturing hub. From 1893 to 1913, four Canadian companies and one American company built or tried to build electric vehicles in the Greater Toronto Area. Two of these companies still exist, though most people likely wouldn't recognize them today. In an era when gasoline engines were a novelty and steam power was inconvenient for automobile use, electrics were the next big thing. British engineer William Joseph Still was an inventor of steam and electrical technologies whose patent batteries sold well on both sides of the Atlantic in the 1890s. In 1893, he approached Toronto patent lawyer Frederick Barnard Fetherstonhaugh with a new lightweight battery design. The two had already worked together for several years and Fetherstonhaugh, a tinkerer and inventor himself, thought the new battery would be perfect for an electric automobile. Fetherstonhaugh worked with Still and the Toronto-based Dixon Carriage Company at the corner of Bay and Temperance Streets to build the car. It was a 320-kilogram technological marvel that could manage an hour of driving at 24 kilometres an hour. This speed was comparable or even slightly faster than most passenger cars being introduced at the time. Fetherstonhaugh used it as his daily driver for 15 years, charging it at his home in southwest Toronto neighbourhood of Mimico and demonstrating it at the Canadian National Exhibition in 1893, 1896 and 1906. The vehicle vanished from the historical record after the 1912 Toronto Auto Show. In 1897, Still established the Canadian Motor Syndicate to build and sell his car designs. The company's first vehicle was an electric delivery tricycle, shown at the 1898 Canadian National Exhibition. By 1899, Still had invented a more efficient electric motor, better suited for large vehicles. His business was reorganized as the Still Motor Company Limited (SMC) and began selling vehicles in earnest. Its factory on Yonge Street was a hive of activity, helped by one of the City of Toronto's first commercial telephone lines. SMC generally didn't build vehicles from scratch; clients brought them commercial carriages, which the factory retrofitted with motors and batteries. Parker's Dye Works (known today as Parker's Dry Cleaning) was an early adopter and, by 1900, many of Toronto's biggest industrial and commercial concerns had at least one or two SMC vehicles in their fleets. SMC electrics were light, reasonably fast and easy to control, but almost all of them were custom jobs, resulting in high costs and low profits for the company. Financial support came in the form of a buyout from a group of British investors who renamed the company Canadian Motors Limited (CML). In late 1899, Still had developed a moderately successful line of two- and four-seater passenger electrics: the Ivanhoes and the Oxfords. The new owners wanted to sell them in England and CML became the first British-owned car company in Canada and Canada's first car exporter. The company sent dozens of vehicles to England in late 1900 and early 1901, but CML's success in British road trials didn't equate to sales. By 1904, the organization was shuttered on both sides of the Atlantic and Still had moved on to other more lucrative projects. The CML factory in Toronto didn't remain closed for long. In 1903, it was bought by bicycle manufacturing conglomerate Canadian Cycle & Motor Company, which turned it over to the manufacturer of an American electric car, also named the Ivanhoe. These vehicles never sold well and in 1905 the company dropped the brand to focus primarily on gasoline cars. A small side business making hockey equipment under the brand 'CCM' would prosper and still exists today. These Canadian manufacturers had competition. The Fischer Equipment Company of Chicago demonstrated its twin-engine Woods Electric cars and trucks in Toronto in 1898, gaining so much interest that by 1899 the whole enterprise had reorganized as the Woods Motor Vehicle Company. This company had a mostly Canadian board of directors that included representatives from Canadian General Electric, the Dominion Bank and Canadian Pacific Railways. Woods cars were planned to be built at the General Electric plant in Hamilton, which would provide Toronto with an electric taxi network. Woods shifted its focus south of the border in 1901 and kept producing electrics in the U.S. until 1918. Canadian demand for electric cars continued. In 1911, the wealthy McLaughlin Motorcar Company of Oshawa began marketing luxury electric cars on the American Rauch & Lang chassis across southern Ontario. There were plans to build the cars in 1912, but it is unclear if those plans materialized. Within a few years, McLaughlin would become General Motors Canada, though the company has yet to attempt EV production in Oshawa a second time. A smaller-scale local contender was the Peck electric, built on Jarvis Street and marketed at the 1912 Auto Show as the car that 'Keeps Pecking.' Despite cushy interiors, easy-to-use controls and lavish colour ads in the pages of Motoring Magazine, the car's whopping $4,000 sale price – more than $109,000 in today's dollars – was a deterrent, and the company folded in 1913. It would take around a century, and dramatic improvements in technology, for EVs to return to Toronto. Still, every electric car driven on our streets today forms the latest link in a chain that extends back in time more than a century to the era of steam and brass.
