Police admit failures in Harry Dunn case after report finds officers prioritised suspect's welfare
Northamptonshire Police has admitted it failed Harry Dunn and his family after a report found officers prioritised the welfare of the suspect in the case over the investigation.
The 19-year-old died in 2019 after US state department employee Anne Sacoolas – who was driving a car on the wrong side of the road – hit his motorbike near RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire.
However, Sacoolas was not immediately arrested following the crash and was able to flee the country, claiming diplomatic immunity, because police did not believe a "necessity test" had been met.
An independent report, published on Wednesday, has now criticised the force's senior leadership for their handling of the case – including describing its former chief constable as having a "detrimental" impact.
Harry Dunn's mother Charlotte Charles said she welcomed the findings.
She told Sky News: "Unfortunately, we were treated extremely poorly. All the authorities wanted to shut us down...
"This report does validate everything, of the way we felt and everything that we've been put through. To be treated as we were, as the victims of a serious crime, we were let down really, really badly."
Following a long fight for justice by Mr Dunn's family, Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey in December 2022.
She later received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months.
1:37
Following the report, Assistant Chief Constable Emma James said in a statement: "On behalf of Northamptonshire Police, I want to apologise to Harry's family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him.
"The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts".
She also added: "It was vitally important that Northamptonshire Police conducted this review into the most high-profile case in the force's history, a case where clear and significant shortcomings have now been properly and independently unearthed."
The report, which has 38 recommendations, found that Nick Adderley, who was sacked as head of the force last year after lying about his military record, had caused a breakdown in relations with Mr Dunn's family.
It also revealed that his "erroneous statements" about Sacoolas's immunity status led the Foreign Office to contact the force asking him not to repeat them.
Danielle Stone, the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire, said Mr Adderley's behaviour was "unfathomable".
She added that the report "makes really clear his culpability."
The report also said Northamptonshire Police potentially had a culture of not arresting suspects "in circumstances such as these, which could lead to evidence not being obtained". It recommended that the force adopt an "investigative mindset" over serious road crashes.
Regarding the decision not to arrest Sacoolas, the report said the decision had not been "explained in enough detail". It added: "The overriding factor in the decision appears to be the welfare of the suspect and her suffering from shock, with little to no consideration around the full necessity test under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act.
"A prompt and effective investigation was not considered or articulated. The view is that in these circumstances the suspect could and should have been arrested to assist the evidence-gathering process."
The report continued: "The duty (police sergeant) made the decision not to arrest.
"The rationale was largely based on a belief that the necessity test was not met, and information received that Anne Sacoolas was in shock.
"Whilst the welfare of any person is a concern for officers, this should not have prevented the arrest of Anne Sacoolas."
Ms Charles, who was recently honoured with an MBE after her campaigning efforts led to road safety improvements near US airbases, said: "I don't think you're ever done grieving. There's never any closure to losing a child. You live with it, it's so profound.
"So the only thing I would ever say to anybody else who feels that they've got a fight ahead of them, dig deep, do your best, because you just never know the resilience that you've got until you absolutely have to find it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Erin Patterson ‘not on trial for being a liar', defence says, as jury asked to consider key questions
Erin Patterson's barrister has asked the jury to consider whether it's more likely 'that she wanted to kill everyone or wanted to reconnect with her family for the sake of her children', as he continues his closing address in her triple-murder trial. Colin Mandy SC also told the jury at the Latrobe Valley law courts in Morwell that Patterson is 'not on trial for being a liar', and warned jurors against using 'dangerous and seductive' hindsight reasoning to find her guilty. Patterson, 50, is charged with three counts of murder and one of attempted murder over the alleged deliberate poisoning of four lunch guests with beef wellingtons served at her house in Leongatha on 29 July 2023. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering the relatives of her estranged husband, Simon Patterson – his parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson – and attempting to murder his uncle, Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband. Mandy said to the jury, in a section of his address where he asked them to consider the evidence about why Patterson's children were not at the lunch: 'what's more likely? That she wanted to kill everyone, or that she wanted to reconnect with her family for the sake of her children'. Mandy twice said that Patterson was not on trial for being a liar, once in reference to her behaviour after the lunch, and another in reference to misleading her lunch guests about having cancer. The earlier reference came as Mandy was expanding on what he considered the fifth overarching theme of his closing address: hindsight reasoning. He had flagged there were only expected to be four such themes on Tuesday: the 'flawed approach' taken by the prosecution to the evidence, the honestly mistaken memory of witnesses, the burden of proof, and the duty of fairness incumbent on the prosecution. 'This is not a court of moral judgment, you can't, you shouldn't, take a leap from this lie about a lump on her elbow to finding her guilty of triple murder,' Mandy said. 'Those two things are a long way apart.' Mandy said the prosecution theory that Patterson lied to her lunch guests about having cancer because she knew the lie would 'die with them', or, as he described it, would take it 'to their graves' was an 'illogical and irrational theory'. 'It's not a good thing, lying about, misleading people about whether you've got cancer, but it's got nothing to do with any intention to kill or to harm them,' Mandy said. Mandy also said the prosecution theory that Patterson wanted Simon at the lunch so that he could be killed was 'absurd'. Hindsight reasoning was dangerous and seductive, Mandy said, as it distorted how people evaluated decisions and actions that occurred in the past. 'Whatever Erin Patterson's intention was when she served the meal, is what it was,' he said. 'It's the prosecution's job to prove what the accused actually did, and not to engage in hypothetical comparisons about what you or someone else might do in the same situation. 'Things seem obvious in retrospect, but that's not the right way of approaching it.' Mandy went on to say that certain evidence can seem sinister in hindsight, and provide a 'false clarity about ambiguous situations'. He described the prosecution's case in relation to Patterson picking death cap mushrooms in Loch after a post was made on iNaturalist, and then using her dehydrator to dry them, as 'speculation upon speculation upon speculation'. The court has been told that Patterson's phone data suggested she may have stopped in Loch after the posts were made, and that photos of mushrooms shown on electronic scales appeared consistent with death caps. The trial continues.
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bradford grooming cover-up left 8,000 children at risk of abuse, say campaigners
A cover-up of grooming gangs put up to 8,000 children at risk in Bradford, campaigners have claimed. Baroness Casey, whose damning audit of grooming cases was published on Monday, said she would be 'surprised' if Bradford was not one of the first areas to be part of a national inquiry into local obstruction and failings that have denied victims justice. A dossier, drawn up by a leading child abuse lawyer and MP, claims that at least 7,975 children in Bradford were at risk of sexual exploitation between 1996 and 2025, putting it on a par with similar scandals in Rochdale, Rotherham and Oldham. It outlines years of alleged systematic failures by Bradford council and partner agencies to protect vulnerable children from Asian grooming gangs operating in the city. It also contains disturbing first-hand accounts from survivors, police records and court proceedings. In the dossier, women who were victims of Asian grooming gangs in the city have named more than 60 other girls who were also abused by them. More than 70 men have been convicted or are being prosecuted for child sexual exploitation, rape or abuse. Bradford council has, until now, resisted demands from victims and campaigners for a full local inquiry into the scandal, arguing that it has already conducted serious case reviews. David Greenwood, the lawyer who compiled the dossier and played a key role in exposing abuse in Rotherham, said: 'I believe Bradford council is obstructing an independent insight into the scale and nature of sexual offending against children in what is termed grooming gang abuse. 'The council repeatedly quotes small-scale isolated case reviews as support for its view that a deeper inquiry is not required. Its arguments are disingenuous and contrary to the evidence.' Robbie Moore, the Tory MP for Bradford and a member of the home affairs select committee, said victims were frustrated that councils like the one in his city were using serious case reviews as an excuse for claiming that there was 'nothing more to see here'. He said: 'There is an overwhelming case for a full inquiry across the Bradford district, yet we have shockingly never had one. 'If Bradford's political leadership will not act, then the Government must.' Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, confirmed on Monday that the Government would back Baroness Casey's proposals for a national inquiry, where an independent commission will identify areas for local investigations with powers to compel witnesses to attend. It will focus on areas where there have been 'failures or obstruction by statutory services' to block inquiries into child sex grooming gangs. Speaking at the home affairs committee, Baroness Casey said: 'I would say if you were Bradford, if you were anywhere, in my report that we published yesterday, if you're any of the areas that are visible and identifiable, just be ready and be open to the fact that you may be the subject of one of the national inquiries. 'I'd be surprised if some of the areas, including Bradford, would not be subject to be part of the national inquiry. And it's absolutely right that I think MPs, victims, other people, are able to say, we want this to happen here.' Among those calling for an inquiry in Bradford is Fiona Goddard who was abused and exploited by an Asian grooming gang when she was living in a children's home in Bradford from the age of 14. Her groomers plied her with drugs and gifts. A court heard that she was 'in effect used as a prostitute' by another of her abusers. She has previously recounted how she was driven to suicidal thoughts and self-harm as a teenager. In February 2019, nine men were convicted of 22 offences against Ms Goddard and jailed. On Tuesday, appearing alongside Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, at a press conference on grooming gangs, she said: 'I fully believe that Bradford needs to be part of that, because the figures that you have seen in places in their previous inquiries are completely outnumbered by the scale of it in Bradford, and it would be so important to look at a place with such levels to be able to gain inside knowledge.' Ms Goddard has provided names of 14 other girls groomed by gang members. Another woman has named 61 girls who were victims. Since 2015, some 37 people have been convicted of child abuse or sexual exploitation, with a similar number on trial or on bail. Baroness Casey urged the Government not to drag its feet. She suggested it was 'not unreasonable' to expect ministers to adopt her 12 key recommendations, which include setting up a national inquiry, within six months.
The Sun
33 minutes ago
- The Sun
Desperate search for missing girl, 15, last seen in school uniform two days ago as cops urge any witnesses to call 999
A 15-YEAR-OLD girl last seen wearing her school uniform has gone missing. West Yorkshire Police have urged anyone who has seen Ingrid Lackova to call 999. The teen was last seen in Bradford on Momday. Ingrid is 5ft 3, with long brown hair, and cops released a photo to help locate her. She was last seen wearing her school uniform, a white shirt, black trousers, a blue and black striped tie and carrying a River Island bag. Police are concerned for the safety of the girl and asked that if anyone knows Ingrid's whereabouts, or has seen anyone matching her description, please call the police on 999 and quote 1976 16/0. 1
